Dedicated to those who have noticed that the performance of principle is not the same as the practice of it.
Abstract
This article examines the foreign policy record of Senator Penny Wong, Australia’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, through the lens of her actions and statements concerning Israel, Palestine, and the Gaza genocide. Drawing on a review of public statements, parliamentary hearings, and diplomatic initiatives, we identify a consistent pattern of performative principle: the appearance of moral leadership combined with the avoidance of meaningful consequence. From her belief in the allegations of sexual assault by flotilla activists to her sanctions on Israeli settler outposts, from her push for Palestinian statehood to her refusal to meet with Jewish community leaders, Wong’s record reveals a foreign minister who is more interested in appearing principled than in being accountable.
Keywords: Penny Wong, Australian foreign policy, Gaza genocide, performative politics, diplomatic contradiction, Labor Party, Israel-Palestine
I. Introduction: The Performance of Principle
There is a particular kind of politician who learns to speak the language of justice without ever practising it. They use the vocabulary of human rights, the grammar of international law, and the syntax of moral outrage – but they never pay the price of consequence. They are the ones who want to be seen as righteous without ever being responsible.
Penny Wong, Australia’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, is a master of this performance. She has perfected the art of selective outrage, calculated distance, and strategic empathy. She knows how to condemn, how to sanction, how to believe – without ever being held to account for the consequences of her beliefs.
This article examines the record of Senator Wong’s foreign policy with respect to Israel, Palestine, and the Gaza genocide. We argue that her actions are not the product of a coherent moral framework, but of a political calculation: the desire to satisfy the domestic political demands of the Labor Left and the Muslim vote while maintaining the appearance of diplomatic credibility.
II. The Flotilla Affair: Believing Without Acting
In June 2026, Senator Wong made headlines when she declared at a Senate Estimates hearing that she believed the allegations of Australian activists who claimed to have been sexually assaulted by Israeli forces while detained during a humanitarian flotilla to Gaza.
“My principled position is to always believe women when allegations of sexual assault are made.”
The allegations were horrific. One activist claimed she was raped by an Israeli soldier; others reported being beaten, stripped, and sexually humiliated. Israel’s embassy in Australia categorically denied the allegations, describing them as “unsubstantiated” and “intended to advance the provocateurs’ broader smear campaign against Israel.”
Senator Wong’s response was carefully calibrated: she expressed empathy, condemned the treatment, and called for an investigation. But when pressed on whether she would seek an independent investigation – rather than one conducted by Israeli authorities – she demurred:
“We want the most thorough investigation possible, but we’re not the ones who are able to determine what that investigation is.”
The activists were left with words but no action. They had been “believed” but not supported. They had been given empathy but not accountability.
The pattern was established: Wong would say the right things – and do the bare minimum.
III. Sanctions on Settlers: The Gesture Without the Grip
In June 2026, Wong announced coordinated sanctions on extremist Israeli settlers in the West Bank, alongside Canada, France, Norway, and the United Kingdom. The sanctions targeted individuals and entities involved in settler violence, including farming outposts described as “hubs” for violence used to displace Palestinians through “destruction of property, displacement of families, beatings, sexual assault, and torture.”
The language was strong. The intent was clear. But the effect was minimal.
The sanctions were largely symbolic – targeted financial sanctions and travel bans against a small number of individuals and entities. They did not change the fundamental reality of the occupation. They did not stop the violence. They were a gesture without a grip.
When the Israeli government lashed out, calling the measures “disgraceful”, Wong did not escalate. She did not threaten further action. She simply… waited.
The pattern continued: Wong would make a strong statement – and then do nothing.
IV. The Conflict at Labor Conference: Playing Both Sides
At Labor’s national conference in July 2026, Wong faced a difficult situation. The Labor Left, represented by figures like Ed Husic, was pushing for stronger criticism of Israel, including:
- Recognition of a United Nations inquiry’s determination that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza.
- Acknowledgement of the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion that Israel was committing apartheid.
- Withdrawal of defence and trade representatives from the embassy in Tel Aviv.
- Sanctions on trade connected to illegal settlements.
At the same time, Jewish community leaders were furious at the party’s decision to drop wording calling for Hamas to disarm. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry accused the party of regurgitating “the same old one-eyed obsession with blaming Israel.”
Wong’s response was to “scramble to shepherd through a compromise wording”. She wanted to appear tough on Israel while keeping the party together. She wanted to satisfy both sides without committing to either.
The pattern held: Wong would perform principle – and compromise on practice.
V. The Visa Denial: Suppressing the Witness
In July 2026, Senator David Shoebridge revealed that Home Affairs had denied a visa to a former ASIO source who had tried to warn about the Bondi gunmen. The Royal Commission into Antisemitism had explicitly stated its desire to hear his testimony, believing the information he possessed was “clearly and directly relevant to the Commission’s mandate.”
The decision was made by Tony Burke, the Minister for Home Affairs – a colleague of Senator Wong in the Albanese government. Burke is also responsible for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s security functions.
This was not a mistake. It was a decision. A decision to suppress evidence. A decision to prioritise political control over truth.
The pattern was complete: Wong – and her government – would say the right things, do the bare minimum, and suppress the truth when it became inconvenient.
VI. The Pattern of Avoidance
In a June 2026 ABC report, Senator Wong described the relationship with Israel as “one of the most challenging times” in its history. She rejected the assertion that she had described Israel as an “ally,” noting that “we don’t have an alliance. We have alliance partners.”
“Now, this is a pattern of behaviour, which makes it difficult to… unless the pattern of behaviour changes, it is very difficult to see the relationship changing.”
She was describing Israel. But she could have been describing her own government.
The pattern is this:
- Believe the victims. Say the right things. Sound principled.
Sanction the perpetrators. Make strong statements. Do the bare minimum.
Compromise. Squeeze the principle out of the policy.
Suppress the truth. Deny visas. Silence witnesses. Control the narrative.
Repeat.
VII. Conclusion: The Senator Who Wanted to Be King
Penny Wong is not a hypocrite. She is a performative politician. She has learned to speak the language of justice without ever paying the price of consequence. She wants to be seen as principled without ever being accountable. She wants to be the King – without ever sitting on the throne.
The problem is not that she is wrong. The problem is that she is empty. She gestures toward justice without ever grasping it. She speaks the words without ever embodying them. She performs principle without ever practising it.
The victims of the flotilla were believed – but not supported. The settlers were sanctioned – but not stopped. The witnesses were silenced – to preserve the narrative.
The Senator who wanted to be King has built a kingdom of appearances. But the foundation is sand. And the tide is rising.
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless independent voice – holding power to account and delivering journalism that matters.
Running this site isn’t cheap. Rising costs mean we need your support now more than ever. Every donation, big or small, keeps our servers running, our writers working, and our stories free for everyone.
Donate here:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund for hosting and future improvements.
Thank you for standing with us. We couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude,
The AIMN Team
I look back at how Australia handled the apartide issue in South Africa that helped bring it to an end. SA’s sporting team the Springbocks were banned. Compare that to labour allowing the criminal murdering IDF to compete in the Sydney Marathon.
We have been seeing for a while now, the takeoever of Australia politics by the Zionist Lobby and eg the blatant pro Israel appointment of Jillian Segal, to the point many of us a wondering who is now running Australia.
The question is how has this happened? That Australian politicions have lost their morals and integrity and only seem interested in protecting Israel?
The only conclusions is it appears that nearly all of our politicions, have somehow clearly been compromised. The question is how and when.
Thank you Andrew.
Penny Wong is even more of a disappointment than Albanese because she seemed to promise so much more.
“The pattern is this:
Point 4. Suppress the truth. Deny visas. Silence witnesses. Control the narrative.”
We see you Penny Wong.
soon after the hamas attack on israel penny wong announced that about 800 humanitarian visas would be offered to gazans to exit the war zone but she also offered 1800 visas to israelies! considering that every israeli has to do at least 2 years of military service where they are trained to kill palestinians! so penny wong was allowing up to 1800 trained killers into australia! some may have killed palestinians during their service but that was ok! the refugee visa should have been restricted only to conscientious objectors with a clean record but that was ignored! of course there is that famous photograph of penny wong jim chalmers steven jones etc in 2014 on their israeli sponsored educational tour in israel is she a foreign agent?
There was an earlier Free Gaza flotilla that tried to bring medicines and food to Gaza, the one containing Greta Thunberg.
An Australian citizen, Suyra McEwen asserted that he was assaulted when in detention in Israel after being kidnapped from that flotilla.
“In a statement to SBS, McEwen claimed that he was physically abused during his detention. He alleges that his arm was dislocated, his head was slammed to the ground, and he suffered sleep deprivation while in custody. McEwen stated he was held in a large cage with 80 other people, and shared a cell at Ketziot Prison in southern Israel with 12 others subjected to intimidation tactics.”
https://tanea.com.au/en/australian-activist-alleges-abuse-in-israeli-detention/
There was no ‘I believe him’, no investigation, no sanctions on Israel, forthcoming from Penny Wong.
Penny Wong is a hypocrite. I heaped plenty of praise on Penny Wong when she immediately visited the Pacific Islands on becoming the minister. Her words to the Islanders struck a chord. Only at the time we didn’t know that Labor fully intended to approve new gas and coal mines that would spell a death knell for the Islands.
Even if she didn’t know either at the time, she has been back since giving the same assurances of respecting the Islander’s interests.
Penny Non-lethal-parts Wong is the worst foreign affairs minister in Australian history.
And another thing about Penny Wong which has caused me, personally, to lose respect for her are some inconvenient facts:
She’s of Malaysian heritage
She’s gay
Her brother Toby died by suicide in 2001.
The only reason I know these details is because at some point in time Penny Wong has shared these things with mainstream media.
I have never sought this information about her intentionally. But it has definitely helped shape my opinion of her.
And her engagement with mainstream media has served its purpose.
Penny Wong has “performed” hypocrisy.
I wonder at the extent to which other nations have got their hooks into this country…
Gutless.
Thank you Andrew Klein, a thought provoking article that makes me think I prefer straight talking people (especially the rare politicians who practice this skill) to the verbose circumlocutions of poli-speak.
It makes me even think (horror!! horror!!) that I prefer the lazy self serving, alcoholic, time wasting millionaire on the public purse who represents his own pecuniary interests rather than the best interests of the voters of New England.
Penny Wong is Foreign Minister. In domestic matters she can SAY what she likes but can’t move from her Ministry.. Tony Burke is Minister for Home Affairs. In domestic matters he can DO what he likes despite whatever Penny Wong thinks.
@ Leona: Being ex Malaysian, lesbian and a sibling suicide DOES NOT define either a character or personality unless you have a prejudice about such matters. A review of Penny Wong’s performance as an elected parliamentary representative is what matters. And yes, like most other humans she has not performed her duties to the expectations of many.
Wong is a “team player” in Albanese’s”solidarity” government, which he demands…”mealy mouthed” is another description.If we wish to change this sorry state of government, we must vote for Greens/Independents, to attain a balance of power in both Houses, and force these bastards to make decisions in the interests of ALL Australians, not just the puppet masters.
Blowing Murdoch’s trash out of the water would be a giant step in the right direction….morning Rupert, you despicable arsehole.
She’s of Malaysian heritage
She’s gay
Her brother Toby died by suicide in 2001.
And? Can you give some relevance to those facts or are you just proudly outing yourself as an illogical bigot?
I’m with Mediocrates on this. Wong has very strict limitations on what she can do; the visa issue, for instance, is totally out of her control.
@ Thommo, Harry Lime: Look out!! The Greens are coming!! Sensible suggestions that neither major party will implement.
Time for more people to vote for a credible Independent in their own electorate. Think Tony Windsor (independent) New England 2000-2013.
@Mediocrates and @leefe,
In no way were my remarks meant to be disparaging.
The fact that she has shared these facts in fact softened by views towards her in the past. I have actually admired her very much.
She’s had many mountains to climb and I think (probably naively) that she could perhaps be more compassionate towards the women who were allegedly sexually abused by IDF members
A most dire political calculation that has taken some time to become evident, which cannot be ignored any longer by the public or the party and the PM.
Both need to go and maybe think about returning Kevin Rudd back the party leadership, that may just give it some semblance of penance.
1) I don’t give a flying f..k if she is of Asian descent or gay.
2) I think she has to some degree probably been silenced by cabinet and/ or the Israel Lobby. Nevertheless the “performative” stuff has been pitiful.
3) Klein is correct that Wong is constrained by ALP factionalist appointments.
Surely, she would have done better as A/G rather than the sinister Dreyfus who has been only a lackey for Israel.
4) Albanese and the other dills who do “social cohesion”-another brick in the wall- rather than “social consciousness”?
5)Mediocrates’ comment about her rank relative to Burke is a symptom of the unholy “Israel right or wrong” approach taken by the government, likely under coercion, that denies Islamophobia.
6) Leona Wallis’ last comment is more nuanced.
7) I think Wong might have been better off resigning, rather than being a mouthpiece for the bunkum offered by the government. Maybe some sort of coercion has been applied. Very cowardly of the right faction of the government to employ her as a stooge while creatures like Burke remain hidden from accountability for their more macabre policy ideas, most accurately represented by people like Minns.
7) Harry Lime is also correct. The government walked away from cooperation with the Greens and Independents as to climate change and environment in the service of vested interests.
8)I digress.
If you have FB, go to Michael Taylor’s page and see his pic of himself and his new pet. Lucky the buggers don’t bite too hard.
Leona:
… caused me, personally, to lose respect for her are some inconvenient facts …
In no way were my remarks meant to be disparaging.
The fact that she has shared these facts in fact softened by (sic) views towards her in the past.
You just broke my brain. In what universe are those two statements consistent?
Leefe, don’t you think Leona’s last comment was a lot more helpful than her first?
I personally didn’t agree with the stuff in the first comment, but she has homed in, correctly, on the responses to mass rape in Gaza.
But it seems a timorous whole of government approach to the cruelty in Palestine involving Israel and the USA in fostering this, are absolutely silenced in favor of lackey-ism, with wider geopolitical issues are also involved that little attention is drawn by MSM.
Believe me I want to like Penny Wong but, I just can’t and never have. It has to do with her insincerity, disingenuousness, hypocrisy and ambition. If her lips are moving in condemnation and indignation, you know that behind the scenes it’s the absolute opposite, One may argue, how is she different from any other career politician? Well, it’s that she’s not and yet she should be.
Paul, I’m going to add it to a post Roswell did some time ago about Americans being scared to come to Aus because of our spiders.
I apologize unreservedly for the comments I made about Penny Wong.
It was never my intention to display rascist, homophobic and unempathetic views, especially about Penny.
I continue to support independent media
It’s all good, Leona.
It takes a strong person to apologise. You have displayed that strength. I respect you for it.
All politicians are “performative”. Haven’t you all noticed how everyone has to be in the media all the time? In fact literally all of Trump’s cabinet are people who have had a media presence. No performance, no votes. Since that is how “voters” behave, can you blame the politicians for chasing the votes? I don’t. We all have ourselves to blame and that means ALL of us. Sigh!
Thanks Michael.
I know what I wrote was wrong, because it was “attacking the man”.
I love AIM. I’ve long given up on social media (“twitter/X”) so it’s one of the few spaces where we can engage with like minded people. I’m amazed that there are only 3319 subscribers!
Paul:
I. Am. Not. A. She.
Or a he, for that matter.
“I know what I wrote was wrong, because it was ‘attacking the man’.”
After apologising for homophobic, racist, and nasty slurs initially framed as “inconvenient facts” (“She’s of Malaysian heritage/She’s gay/Her brother Toby died by suicide in 2001”), the commenter had an epiphany that ‘attacking the man’ (the ‘ad hominum’ fallacy) was the actual offence – and by dint of this wriggle-out managed to restore the homophobia.
While the take-home might be that it’s generally best to leave apologies well alone (if only to preserve the illusion of sincerity), the commenter’s revisionism was of a piece with the performative word-sleights indulged in by Senator Wong and her dangerously incompetent Labor colleagues, as articulated by Andrew Klein.
Certainly when it comes to sophistry Senator Wong is in a class of her own.