Bryan Dawe speaks to a senior figure from the Australian Labor Party
DAWE: Thanks for joining me.
CLARKE: Good to be here, Bryan. Comrade. Great conference. Great, great conference.
DAWE: You’re pleased with it.
CLARKE: Enormously. Smoothest we’ve run in decades.
DAWE: It ran smoothly because nobody was allowed to speak.
CLARKE: Well, that’s one interpretation.
DAWE: Is there another one?
CLARKE: Yes. Everyone was allowed to speak. Nobody needed to.
DAWE: Why didn’t they need to?
CLARKE: Because we were all in agreement, Bryan.
DAWE: How do you know you were all in agreement?
CLARKE: Because nobody spoke.
DAWE: That’s the evidence?
CLARKE: Qui tacet consentire videtur, Bryan. He who is silent is taken to consent. Even the ancient Romans knew it. Very clean. There’s no ambiguity in silence.
DAWE: Three days. One open debate.
CLARKE: One robust, healthy debate, yes.
DAWE: On extending voluntary assisted dying to telehealth.
CLARKE: Very important reform.
DAWE: Of all the things a Labor conference could argue about — AUKUS, Palestine, a gas tax — the one subject you opened the floor to was dying.
CLARKE: We like to lead with our strengths, Bryan.
DAWE: There was a motion on AUKUS.
CLARKE: Was there?
DAWE: Labor Against War. Five hundred members. Shut down before it reached the floor.
CLARKE: It didn’t reach the floor, so I couldn’t tell you what was in it.
DAWE: You shut it down to avoid knowing what was in it.
CLARKE: I shut it down because I respect the process, Bryan. And the process is that some things don’t reach the floor.
DAWE: Who decides what reaches the floor?
CLARKE: The floor decides.
DAWE: The floor never saw it.
CLARKE: And it decided not to. Instantly. That’s a very efficient floor.
DAWE: Ed Husic had a motion on Palestine.
CLARKE: Ed’s a passionate fella.
DAWE: He was going to speak. Then the union that promised to second him pulled out.
CLARKE: People change their minds, Bryan.
DAWE: Under pressure from factional heavyweights.
CLARKE: People change their minds quickly, sometimes. There’s nothing sinister in a fast decision.
DAWE: Husic says he was attacked by faceless men.
CLARKE: I don’t know who he means.
DAWE: You wouldn’t.
CLARKE: No. That’s rather the point of them.
DAWE: So the whole thing was choreographed.
CLARKE: It was unified, Bryan. Unity is a great asset. Have you seen the Liberals? Have you seen One Nation? Chaos. Faces everywhere. You can’t move for faces.
DAWE: Three hundred delegates and not one dissenting vote.
CLARKE: Well, they were very well looked after, Bryan. You don’t vote against a room that’s just given you the alfalfa pasta and a flight of boutique reds.
DAWE: That’s not unity. That’s the catering.
CLARKE: Unity, catering — I’m not sure I see the daylight, Bryan. There were artisanal chaff-bags. Locally sourced. You don’t get that at a Liberal do.
DAWE: The press compared your conference to North Korea.
CLARKE: I thought that was very unfair to us.
DAWE: Unfair to you.
CLARKE: Kim gets five thousand delegates and a standing ovation that runs for eleven minutes. We wrapped in three days. We’re far more efficient. If anything, Bryan, he should be studying us.
DAWE: The Prime Minister stood up at this conference and attacked One Nation for — his words — “raging against a system that you’re a part of.”
CLARKE: And he’s absolutely right. You can’t rage against a system from the inside. It’s not credible.
DAWE: He runs the most tightly controlled conference in the party’s history and lectures other people about rigged systems.
CLARKE: He’s earned the authority to do that, Bryan. You don’t get to warn people about a stitch-up unless you know exactly how one’s done.
DAWE: Doug Cameron says you’ll pay a price for burying debate. That you’ve hollowed the party out. Thirty percent of the country still with you and falling.
CLARKE: Doug’s from the old school.
DAWE: The school where the party stood for things.
CLARKE: The school where it took three days to work out what we now agree on before morning tea. He calls that conviction. I call it a scheduling problem.
DAWE: Doesn’t it frighten you? A party built on argument, that’s forgotten how to argue. What’s left when the members walk out?
CLARKE: They won’t all walk out, Bryan.
DAWE: How do you know?
CLARKE: Because one of them never does.
DAWE: One of them.
CLARKE: There’s always one, Bryan. Back of the room. Forty years, never spoken. His hand goes up, and the room reads the hand. You don’t need the other three hundred to say anything. You’ve got the hand.
DAWE: And who is he?
CLARKE: I couldn’t tell you.
DAWE: You don’t know?
CLARKE: I know exactly who he is. I couldn’t tell you. That’s a different thing entirely.
DAWE: And if he stopped coming?
CLARKE: Then we’d have to have a debate. And nobody wants that.
DAWE: Senior Labor figure, thank you.
CLARKE: A pleasure, Bryan. Great conference. We’ll do it all again in three years — Reiki massage on Medicare’s a dead cert to get a run in 2029.
A tribute, offered in the spirit of the late John Clarke and Bryan Dawe, whose weekly interviews taught a generation of Australians that the surest way to expose a euphemism is to take it perfectly seriously. Ben Trovato* presides. Nothing here was said; all of it is what would have been said, given half a chance and no shame. The interviewee is a fiction. The conference was real.
* From the Italian se non è vero, è ben trovato — “if it isn’t true, it deserves to be.”
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless independent voice – holding power to account and delivering journalism that matters.
Running this site isn’t cheap. Rising costs mean we need your support now more than ever. Every donation, big or small, keeps our servers running, our writers working, and our stories free for everyone.
Donate here:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund for hosting and future improvements.
Thank you for standing with us. We couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude,
The AIMN Team
Who spoke? What? NO! Next topic…
As always a great read David, thank you for bringing humour to this farce.
As an institution within Labor to add a democratic layer and representation of the rank and file, the National Conference is emblamatic of Labor as a party of the workers, or any average Australian for that matter – farcical.
In late May, the Victorian branch of Labor held its State Conference.
“In a mostly stage-managed conference, ALP delegates still managed to debate the Iran war and voted to oppose the Albanese government’s support for Trump’s war, reports Hamish McPherson…………
The Iran war motion was then carried by a clear majority of conference, including delegates of the left, independents and key left aligned trade unions. This decision will give Victorian delegates to the upcoming National Conference a clear mandate to raise the issue and demand a break from the dangerous drive to militarism and war that is represented by AUKUS.
Conference also passed the report of the Commonwealth and Federal Relations policy committee, which reiterated Victoria Labor’s call for an independent inquiry into AUKUS and for the federal government to suspend support for the program.”
So, the Victorian state delegates were to take both opposition to Trump’s war and a call for an independent inquiry into AUKUS, to the National Conference. How did that work out?
It is delusion, pure and simple. Federal Labor is systemically broken. These poor souls think they can fix Labor from within – absolutely delusional.
Incidentally, for me, the only State Labor branch worth a pinch of salt is the Victorian branch, but even they go all far right too often, such as with jailing children, attempting to rig elections through funding, suppression of any speech Zionists don’t like, and bringing Israeli weapons manufacturers to a weapons expo whilst Israel is committing a genocide, then unleashing the riot squad on protestors.
Whoever came up with the North Korean analogy is spot on. If it comes down to a choice between the lady news presenter on the North Korean state broadcaster and Patricia Karvelas telling us Albo has AI under control, I’m all for the North Korean lady, at least I won’t have a clue what she’s saying, but can revel in her enthusiasm for the message.
@Thommo, exactly!