It has become evident over the years that sports stars, and for that matter anyone in sports venturing an opinion perceived to be remotely controversial, is to be gagged and subject to execration, sustained derision and cyber immolation. They only exist with any legitimacy for the brands who sponsor them, the spectators who supposedly dote on them (till the inevitable accusations of treachery or poor form are made), and the administrators who play their own brand of politics with impunity as hefty salaries are drawn.
While footballers are living proof that regression of the human species, if not stasis, is a plausible fact, it is a bit rich to get riled up over throwaway remarks from such a figure as Kylian Mbappé, a man who is paid too much to kick a ball across grass. Sublime as he is when playing on a football pitch, he should be allowed to make those less than profound observations we come to expect from those who entertain spheres for a living. On the French online talk show The Bridge, the French forward made reference to a meme “that makes me laugh the most, it’s the one where there’s a video of a guy, I think it’s a Chinese dictator.” During the interview, he chuckles as the clip cuts to the said meme, involving his own face superimposed on an image of China’s own Red Emperor Mao Zedong. In Real Madrid, the Spanish club side he plays for, Mbappé is known as the “dictator”, a mirthless comment that barely warrants attention.
Warrant attention, it apparently did. It did not matter that the player never named Mao as a crazed, murderous ideologue who had singularly mangled and mauled a country, or that the superimposed image was one done by the program he was speaking to. Across the social media moronsphere, France’s football captain had apparently erred on cultural and political grounds. China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun warned that words and actions that hurt the feelings of the Chinese people would be repudiated. The China Media Group, parent company of China’s CCTV channel, pulled broadcasts of Spain’s LaLiga matches, along with any fixtures featuring Mbappé. Chinese companies such as Dongpen Beverage (Eastroc), dairy producer Mengniu and cheesemaker Milkground briskly terminated their commercial arrangements with Mbappé, expressing “zero tolerance” for conduct that offended national sentiment.
Instead of offering a modest defence for one of their most notable players against this pettifogging, Spain’s football league body LaLiga offered a grovelling apology while throwing the player to the screeching mob. It “deeply” regretted the “offence” caused by the remarks to “Chinese fans.” Such “comments were made in a personal capacity and do not represent LALIGA. Within the scope of our institutional responsibility, we apologise on behalf of LALIGA and all its clubs.” The President, Javier Tebas, distinguished the affair with some generous crawling: “I wish to personally apologise to Chinese fans for the offence caused. I have deep respect for China, its institutions and its people, and I value the trust which, for so many years, they have supported football.”
The lucre speaks, and on these occasions, it does so in amplified volumes, especially when it comes to the Chinese market. Terrence Burns, CEO of T. Burns Sports Group, captures the amoral sentiment with cold precision: “Mbappé’s team knew, or should have known, what the true cost of Chinese brand endorsements was all about.”
Mbappé was forced, through his digital networks, to gushingly apologise and seize back terrain lost in the faecal miasma fed by social media grievance. His kowtowing took the following, unenviable form: “I apologise to everyone my words have upset.” He had “reacted to an image of himself” during an interview and had no intention causing insult. “I have deep respect for the Chinese people and their history, and I am sincerely sorry.”
Given the butcher’s bill Mao and his sanguinary fantasists left history, the apologies should be coming from elsewhere, not least those toadying courtiers who continue to minimise the significance of the death toll exacted in the name of revolution by terming them “abnorma.l” Be it such sadistic experiments as the “Great Leap Forward” and the “Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution”, the mortality rates will never be entirely known. Works, however, have attempted that herculean task. Yang Jisheng, when a senior editor at Xinhua, conducted research in 12 different provincial archives that lead to Tombstone: The Untold Story of Mao’s Great Famine. It charges that 36 million perished in the 1958-61 famine, which is still treated by a dismissive and paranoid establishment as a natural disaster. R. J. Rummel’s demographic and statistical forays into this field identified almost 7.5 million victims lost in the Great Leap Forward and 7.7 million from the murderous efforts of the Cultural Revolution – and these are but two stretches of lusty bloodletting.
The CCP grandees in Beijing guard against unflattering depictions of their holy leader with foamy dedication, evidenced by the recently imposed three-year prison sentence of the artist Gao Zhen, a US permanent resident who was detained in August 2024 on suspicion of “infringing upon the reputation and honour of heroes and martyrs.” The works in question, many of a satirical nature, date back a decade or more, including Mao’s Guilt.
That brands, fans and governments can come together to abominate and silence even a modest, casual expression that involves a veiled reference to one of history’s grand killers returns us back to the old premise that players must shut up and put up. They are the milch cows of an industrialised base of earnings hostile to the unapproved opinions of any sports figure who dares have them. Money in sports comes with a hefty price tag and seemingly endless lashings of hypocrisy.
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless independent voice – holding power to account and delivering journalism that matters.
Running this site isn’t cheap. Rising costs mean we need your support now more than ever. Every donation, big or small, keeps our servers running, our writers working, and our stories free for everyone.
Donate here:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund for hosting and future improvements.
Thank you for standing with us. We couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude,
The AIMN Team
I’m quite a fan of Dr Kampmark’s work, so it pains me to say that what we see here is simply cheap and nasty.
Were there so few issues of importance in the global arena to write about, that he had to latch onto an issue of no consequence, and use it to unleash on one of the most significant figures of the 20th Century?
I’m not familiar with the conditions in China, the suffering in China that led to the communist revolution, but if they were anything like conditions in Russia under the Czars, then Mao should be a hero to any person with a shred of decency.
The Long March that Mao’s forces undertook to survive and consolidate in the face of attacks by the Kuomintang (that were supported by the US) was simply stunning in its display of physical and mental endurance.
It was a feat that might never be repeated in human history.
Yet here Dr Kampmark is a voice for Western propaganda in his character assassination of Mao.
At the time of the famine, China was still under attack from the West.
Anyone who thinks that Western interference in China ended with the victory of the communists, knows nothing of history.
The CCP has been in a constant battle for survival from day one, and that continues today.
So, under relentless pressure that we simply cannot imagine, did Mao make mistakes in handling the famine, mistakes that led to deaths?
Most likely.
Almost undoubtedly.
He was a human being, after all.
But to demonise him for that is to serve the interests of western imperialism.
We have to ask of this article, why was there no mention of the Indian famine that took place at that time?
The Nobel Prize winning economist Amartya Sen in his study of the East Asian famine in the 1950s and ‘60s notes that the lives lost in India where the government allowed market forces to play out, was 100 million. This exceeded those caused by ALL Communist states after 1917, including the mass famine in China in the late 1950s.
But of course, to include data of that nature puts Mao in quite a different light.
Also left out of this narrative is the respect for Mao that is widespread in China today.
In regard to the constant attacks on China that continue today, it’s worth a quick look at the constant stream of sympathy from the West for the alleged plight of the Uighurs of Xinjiang.
You remember the Uighurs?
They are the persecuted Muslim minority who were victims of a genocide perpetrated by the Chinese government according to the Western media.
A genocide so ruthless, so inhuman, that they were exempted from the one-child policy imposed on the rest of the country.
Yeah, that genocide.
The coverage of that by the West, and it still continues, is exposed by these few words.
The US has little regard for Muslims.
The US has little regard for the Chinese.
But the welfare of Chinese Muslims is a top priority for the US.
That’s how the world works today, and Dr Kampmark should be awake to that.
To endlessly repeat, the pursuit of spondoolicks is the root of all evil, never more so than in the dying days of neoliberal greed, the screams of which, from the worlds most corrupt kakistocracy, can be heard in every corner of the globe.
Sport,to those being shafted, is the most glaring example.
Back home, we remain”deeply concerned”.
Meanwhile, while hundreds of thousands are being starved and murdered, sports “stars’ are paid a kings ransom.