
RE-Alliance Media Release
RE-Alliance response to the Coalition’s proposed energy bill
Australians want affordable, reliable power and cleaner energy. Delivering all three requires steady, responsible policy, not stop-start changes based on ideological preference. RE-Alliance says the Coalition’s proposed energy bill threatens to upend work already under way across regional Australia, and doesn’t present a costed alternative showing what it would build, where or when.
RE-Alliance National Director Andrew Bray said:
“For too much of the previous decade, federal governments were caught up with ideological arguments while coal power stations kept getting older and less reliable. Meanwhile, state governments of all political stripes got on with planning and delivering the generation, storage and transmission needed to replace them.
“Regional communities are busy working to deliver new energy projects. Farmers, councils and local businesses need to know what is coming so they can shape projects, prepare for their impacts and secure lasting benefits.
“The Coalition is right that Australians are sick of ideology in energy policy. The last thing we need is another round of chopping and changing on a political whim, just as regional communities are getting on with the work needed to build a modern electricity system.
“This Coalition plan is much clearer about what it would cancel than what it would build. Where is the costed alternative? When would it produce power? Which communities would host alternative technology like nuclear power plants?
“A wrecking ball is easy to swing. Keeping the lights on while coal retires takes planning, investment and people willing to host new infrastructure. If the Coalition wants to undo the work already progressing, it must explain how that delivers lower bills and reliable power.
“The way forward is to keep building the power we need and give host communities more influence over how it is done. Fix the problems people are raising. Don’t make them pay for another round of national energy paralysis.
“Australians want affordable, reliable power and cleaner technology. Polling by 89 Degrees East found 62 per cent of residents surveyed across key renewable energy zones supported Australia’s shift to renewable energy. That does not mean every project gets a tick. It means politicians should listen to community feedback that improves project delivery and the shift to renewables.
“AEMO’s latest system plan finds that renewables, connected by networks and supported by storage and gas backup, offer the least-cost path to reliable supply as coal retires under current policies. The Coalition is entitled to propose another path. However it owes Australians the numbers, the timetable and an honest account of what that path means for regional communities.”
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless independent voice – holding power to account and delivering journalism that matters.
Running this site isn’t cheap. Rising costs mean we need your support now more than ever. Every donation, big or small, keeps our servers running, our writers working, and our stories free for everyone.
Donate here:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund for hosting and future improvements.
Thank you for standing with us. We couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude,
The AIMN Team

Hah! With all due respect, the public deserves more than a few text messages, or a policy proposal scrawled on a sauce stained napkin delivered by creative accounting “consultants”.
I won’t be holding my breath for anything other than more PR spin.
It is the SLUT era when people will grub for imagined career, money, status, prestige, admiration, acceptance from a loose coalition of similar sluts, the IN crowd of getitnowandfuckya irredeemable incurable savages. The brakes are locked on Trumpery type selfish ignorance.
I fail to see renewable energy meeting our current or future power needs without gas or nuclear support. Gas is in fact a fossil fuel, so we’d never meet a zero emissions target.
Fortunately, jonangel, there are, as Shakespeare put it, more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
leefe, I am surprised, you still believe in heaven?
Energy is science, opinion is not. The world is heading fast to fully clean energy grid, household, EVs and now transport, including Australia, but ppl don’t want clean energy to prevail because.. …?
Well, the plan is that money from tobacco excise will be funnelled in to reducing the excise on petroleum products and that will solve the clean-energy problem provided the coalition with One Nation get elected to run the nation is 2028.
At least I think that’s the policy and I have no reason to doubt Barnaby Joyce who tells a muppet at News24 that he is speaking to very, very senior people about all sorts of things but naturally it all remains highly confidential !!
Next Question ?
Never did, jonangel, but Shakespeare did and one does not fuck around when quoting the master.
Neat way to sidestep the point; your opinions are just that – opinions, not backed by science. You being unable to envisage something is of zero relevance as to whether that thing will occur.
Talk to a turnip and get an answer, free of Shakespeare, science, sense.
leefe, I did not realise you were quoting “the master”! I have always thought Shakespeare rode on Francis Bacons back, but each to his/her own.
Their own, jonnyboy, their own. But you know that.
Yeah, you would.