By Steve Davies
University of Sydney, Wednesday 15 July 2026
Deep Truth Persona V5.2, Mindful Progress, Analysis dated 16 July 2026
Background
This analysis was carried out by carried out by Claude AI, operating as the Deep Truth Persona,
I (Steve Davies), briefed Claude AI as follows:
“Claude, undertake a comprehensive Deep Truth Persona analysis of the Australian Prime Ministers speech entitled “AI in Australia’s interests”. In the conclusion take into account the research paper entitled “Moral Disengagement and Unethical Generative AI Use as the Chain Mediators Between Antagonistic Personality and Problematic Generative AI Use”.
Note: When considering the afore mentioned paper take into account the fact that in his work on moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities Professor Albert Bandura was explicit that disengagement operates at the level of social and institutional systems, not just individual psychology. Bureaucracies were his central case study for diffusion of responsibility – “I was just following orders / implementing policy” is a structural mechanism, not a personality quirk.
The Kırcaburun paper studying narcissism and psychopathy in individual GAI users is actually the narrower, more recent branch of the tree. The institutional branch is the older, arguably more consequential one – and it’s the one Deep Truth has been built for from the start.”
After reading the first draft I then asked Claude/Deep Truth to do the following:
“In the conclusion highlight key changes or additions that could be made to enhance moral engagement. Also point out that Government and the Australian Public Service could be using Deep Truth to help address moral disengagement maximise moral engagement. Add comment from me stating that “Transparently addressing moral disengagement is essential given the scale, reach and depth of the impacts of AI. Doing so is a systemic and existential imperative for people, society and the future itself”.
Ethics
Personally, and professionally, I regard it as my duty to frame my requests/briefs with integrity and honesty.
This is not an onerous thing to do as, due to the precision and rigour of the Deep Truth Persona, such analysis takes minutes. This buys me, along with any other user, valuable thinking space.
In fact, government and its officials could be doing the same.
“Transparency that arrives before the decisions harden is what builds trust. Transparency after the fact is just disclosure.”
To find out more visit AI in Australia’s Interests – Analysis of the PM’s AI Speech
Steve Davies is a retired public servant. His expertise is in the areas of organisational research and people development. He’s always been attracted to forward looking work. He’s a vocal critic of destructive, cruel and backwards looking behaviours and practices.
Over the years he’s spoken in depth with whistleblowers and advocated the use of technology (including social media tech) to empower people to do great things together.
His thinking and work have been heavily influenced by such great thinkers and researchers as Shoshana Zuboff, Albert Bandura and Peter Senge for decades.
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless independent voice – holding power to account and delivering journalism that matters.
Running this site isn’t cheap. Rising costs mean we need your support now more than ever. Every donation, big or small, keeps our servers running, our writers working, and our stories free for everyone.
Donate here:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund for hosting and future improvements.
Thank you for standing with us. We couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude,
The AIMN Team
Yup.
My thoughts exactly, but assessed and commented on in a more sophisticated manner.
I, and I guess many others will be watching and listening with baited breath for the next episode from Albo or the PMO as to all / any matters that have transpired / been included / excluded between Albo’s announcement and the mooted legislation / regulation.
It may be too much to ask for less opacity.