Dr. Steinbock’s TRT World Interview
Recently, TRT World released the analysis of Murat Sofuoglu on “Why did Xi choose to visit Egypt amid the US-Iran tensions?” Dr Steinbock was one of the interviewees. Here are all his comments.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping arrived in Cairo as China and Egypt marked 70 years of diplomatic ties, shortly before a possible meeting with US President Donald Trump in late September.
The visit came amid renewed regional tensions, with US forces attacking IRGC targets and Tehran retaliating by attacking American bases across the Middle East.
Cairo and Beijing have a significant economic relationship, with bilateral trade reaching close to $21 billion, as the two countries have linked Egypt’s Vision 2030 with China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
During the visit, Xi and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi called for a “comprehensive agreement” to end the war with Iran and signed more than 20 agreements. They included a deal allowing Beijing to complete the third phase of a joint industrial zone at the Suez Canal, expanding China’s economic presence along one of the world’s most important trade routes.
Question: Why did Xi Jinping pay a visit to Egypt in the middle of US-Iran tensions?
Dr Steinbock: Xi’s visit was about securing maritime trade and fostering regional stability. It reflects Beijing’s role as the stable alternative to decades of US military entanglements in the region.
Q: Is this visit’s timing anything to do with Iran-US tensions?
DS: The visit took place just weeks before the critical summit with President Trump. The timing leverages the growing sentiment among U.S. allies that Washington’s security umbrella has become a source of dangerous instability. Chinese engagement promises greater stability and development.
Q: Do you see any connection with the Xi-Sisi meeting and a new emerging security cooperation in the Middle East in the wake of the Mecca agreement?
DS: During his visit, Xi explicitly called for Middle Eastern nations to explore a new, independent security architecture and oppose external interference. By echoing the philosophy of the new Mecca alliance, China actively backs indigenous security arrangements run by regional leaders rather than external powers.
Q: Cairo was initially part of the quadrilateral format of Türkiye-Pakistan-Saudi Arabia-Egypt, which aimed to address Middle Eastern tensions, but it did not join the Mecca agreement. Do you think Xi wants to encourage Sisi leadership to join the Mecca alliance backing the emergence of a regional security architecture?
DS: China isn’t forcing Egypt into a rigid defense pact, but rather guiding Cairo to lead from the center. Beijing supports an architecture that develops in concentric circles. Egypt could serve as the maritime anchor of this new architecture, preempting interference in regional choke points.
Q: How do you evaluate overall outcomes of the Xi-Sisi meeting?
DS: Very successful. Building on a long friendship, the summit set a new course for bilateral ties, focusing on infrastructure, currency, and defense. By cementing local currency trade, expanding the Suez Canal zone, and locking in joint military drills, China also contributed to a unified regional front against violent unilateralism.
Dr Dan Steinbock, an expert of the multipolar world, is the founder of Difference Group and has served at the India, China and America Institute (US), Shanghai Institute for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). He is also the author of The Obliteration Doctrine (Sept. 2025) and The Fall of Israel (Oct. 2024). For more, see https://www.differencegroup.net/
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless independent voice – holding power to account and delivering journalism that matters.
Running this site isn’t cheap. Rising costs mean we need your support now more than ever. Every donation, big or small, keeps our servers running, our writers working, and our stories free for everyone.
Donate here:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund for hosting and future improvements.
Thank you for standing with us. We couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude,
The AIMN Team
Dr Steinbeck has reported very sensible political advice for Australia. However, given how the Canberra Bubble is deeply integrated into American imperialist thinking, it is unlikely to either be heard or acted upon.
1) “Xi’s visit was about securing maritime trade and fostering regional stability. It reflects Beijing’s role as the stable alternative to decades of US military entanglements in the region.”
What makes Australian voters think that the US administration would not deploy USAF planes to ”bomb” Canberra …. it is closer than Beijing??
2) ”The timing leverages the growing sentiment among U.S. allies that Washington’s security umbrella has become a source of dangerous instability. Chinese engagement promises greater stability and development.”
Do you remember the ”Flight From Vietnam” by US military personnel in 1975? Who profited financially from the about 20 years of conflict?
3) ”China actively backs indigenous security arrangements run by regional leaders rather than external powers.”
Australia has been kidded since 1975 that US intentions are defence for Australia rather than exploitation as part of the imperialist ambitions that have been exposed by the TACO Trumpery regime.
Time for Australia to stop supplying military armaments to the ZION@ZI Israel genocide of Indigenous Palestinians and start developing our own defence capability and weapons manufacturing systems, especially drone technologies that have rendered Scummo’s COALition USUKA sub debacle redundant already.
4) ”[L]ocal currency trade” means ignoring the US Swift system of international payments for trade, thus removing one of the most profitable income streams for US banks, and trading in local currency, the BRICS+ system alternative that an increasing number of nations, now reported as over 120 countries is preferring.
At a time in history when the TACO Trumpery administration in the USA (Undemocratic Sewer of Apartheid) is throwing away any pretence or desire to remain the ”world police person” it would appear to be in Australia’s best interests to review the opportunities available for High Speed Rail, civil public infrastructure construction and compute technologies, rather than continue to be an exploited third world export economy like the African continent.
Xi 1, Stupid 0.