This article examines a developing crisis in Australian public integrity: the systematic use of encrypted and unminuted communications between lobbyists and the highest levels of government to evade transparency laws. Drawing on recent investigative reporting and parliamentary analysis, it argues that this practice, occurring alongside legislative efforts to weaken the Freedom of Information (FOI) framework and a failure to implement robust anti-corruption measures, represents a calculated retreat from ethical transparency. This creates a “dark space” in policymaking, fundamentally at odds with the stated mission of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) and the basic democratic contract of public trust. The article concludes that this constitutes a form of institutionalised obscurity that protects political interests at the expense of democratic accountability.
Introduction: The Promise and the Practice
The election of the Albanese government was heralded with a promise to restore trust and integrity after a decade of scandals. The establishment of the NACC was its cornerstone. However, a parallel track of conduct suggests a different priority: the management of political risk through the control of information. This article synthesises evidence revealing a pattern where commitments to transparency are actively undermined by operational secrecy, creating a profound dissonance between public rhetoric and private practice.
The Architecture of Evasion: “Going Non-Traceable”
At the heart of this issue is a reported, routine practice within the Prime Minister’s office. Lobbyists and stakeholders are advised to use encrypted messaging applications (such as Signal) and direct phone calls for substantive policy discussions, explicitly to avoid creating a discoverable record under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth). This guidance creates a two-tiered communication system: a formal, sanitised record for public consumption, and a shadow, substantive dialogue where real influence and negotiation occur. The justification – protecting “fluid thoughts” – is a stark departure from the principle that the formation of public policy should be a matter of public interest, not private conjecture.
Weakening the Scaffolding: Legislative and Systemic Failures
This operational evasion is not occurring in a vacuum. It is reinforced by systemic and legislative actions that degrade the infrastructure of transparency:
- The FOI Amendment Bill: The government is pursuing amendments that experts from the Australian Law Council and the Grattan Institute describe as “the most significant retrenchment” of transparency in decades. Key changes include a strict 40-hour processing cap – a logistical impossibility for complex requests – and the introduction of new, subjective grounds for refusal. This legally enshrines the difficulty of access.
- Chronic Record-Keeping Failure: A 2023 National Archives of Australia report found systemic failure across the Commonwealth in managing digital records. In 90% of recent audits, agencies received negative comments. Only one agency had a clear policy on capturing ministerial and departmental messaging for the official record. This is not negligence; it is a pervasive institutional disregard for the archival compact.
- Rejecting Anti-Cronyism Reforms: The government sat for two years on a review into “jobs for mates” in public appointments. When released, it rejected core recommendations to depoliticise the process, such as banning last-minute appointments before elections. This demonstrates a preference for preserving patronage networks over implementing substantive integrity reform.
The NACC in the Dark: An Integrity Watchdog Without a Trail
The establishment of the NACC was meant to be a circuit-breaker. However, its efficacy is premised on the existence of evidence – a paper trail, a digital record, a minute of a meeting. The practices detailed above are designed to eliminate that trail. The NACC’s own definition of “serious or systemic corrupt conduct” includes breaches of public trust and any conduct perverting the impartial exercise of official functions. Influencing policy through hidden channels, deliberately shielded from public and archival scrutiny, aligns precisely with this definition. The NACC’s first major survey, finding 15% of public officials were aware of corrupt conduct in their area, hints at the scale of the challenge it faces in a culture of obscurity.
Analysis: The “Trust Gap” and the Corruption of Process
The outcome is a critical “trust gap.” The public is asked to trust in institutions that are architecturally designed to avoid being held to account. This goes beyond traditional corruption (bribes for favours). It represents a corruption of process, where the very mechanisms for democratic oversight – FOI, archives, parliamentary scrutiny – are rendered inert. The government controls not only policy but the narrative of how that policy was formed, presenting a fait accompli to the public while hiding the machinery of influence. This creates a space where the lines between lobbying, policy development, and undisclosed conflicts of interest dangerously blur.
Conclusion: Gestures Versus Substance in the Democratic Contract
Australia is at an integrity crossroads. It has the gesture – the NACC – but is dismantling the substance required for that gesture to be meaningful. A democracy cannot function on a “need-to-know” basis where the government decides the public does not need to know how it is governed. The use of encrypted lobbying and the erosion of record-keeping are not administrative quirks; they are political strategies that sacrifice long-term public trust for short-term political convenience. Rebuilding trust requires not just new institutions, but a radical recommitment to transparency as the default, not the exception. Until the “dark space” of policymaking is illuminated, the promise of integrity will remain, like the lost records themselves, unfulfilled.
References
Reported guidance to lobbyists on encrypted communications (Source: The Australian, 2024).
Freedom of Information Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) and associated critiques from the Law Council of Australia.
National Archives of Australia, Digital Continuity 2020 Policy: Audit Report (2023). Review of the Public Interest and Governance of Government Appointments (2023) and government response.
National Anti-Corruption Commission, Framework for Identifying Corrupt Conduct and initial survey data (2024).
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.
Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.
Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.
With gratitude, The AIMN Team

The artful dodger is occupying the PM’s suite.Albo be thy name.
Albo, you’re actively putting the wants of lobbyists before the needs of your voters. Disgraceful. You should be shown the door.
Jen, you’ve hit the nail on the head, Anthony Albanese using disappearing messaging apps to communicate with lobbyists is putting the interests of corporates before the interests of Australians.
The mainstream media are giving him cover by claiming he doesn’t like transparency, but his use of dissapearing messaging apps, abuse of the FOI system, his abuse of cabinet in confidentiality, his naked attempt to cloak everything in secrecy by altering FOI laws, and his nobbling of the NACC that everyone wanted to see clean up politics show that Albanese wants to hide what he and his party are doing from the people with utter impunity – a good government wouldn’t need to do that, a good government wouldn’t even think of doing that.
Is it new? On recalls ‘post it’ notes and pencil being used often in the PS, and still to this day too many Australian professionals, politicians and business people prefer verbal over written records, preferably at an event, leaving the door open to interpretation……
“The article concludes that this constitutes a form of institutionalised obscurity that protects political interests at the expense of democratic accountability.”
Politics is power, end of story, and that’s all that Albo understands, nothing more, nothing less and justifies it with his ‘shtick’ so he hasn’t learnt anything.
“Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it”.
We have our right to vote to install a representative of our own choosing. Then they do all our bidding subject to the majority in both houses of the parliaments and the Constitution(s).
There will always be consultations with business & other groups, and it could be said that lobbying is a convenience to our representatives.
And none of that precludes our ability to talk to or write to (lobby) our representative. Or for that matter raise a petition.
Then of course if one still feels so inclined one can vote for a different rep next time.
And all that goes on amidst the noise of the mainstream media which has for a long to gone from the Fourth Estate to a misinformation / disinformation opinion rabble.
What a Fascinating and alarming comment from Gonggongche!