The Arson Investigator: How Western sanctions built Iran’s bonfire; and now, the firebugs demand to lead the rescue

Two men speaking at a public event.
Image: Edited screenshot of YouTube video uploaded by DRM News

The placards rise in neat, Instagrammable formation outside the buttery yellow sandstone of Sydney Town Hall in summer sun. A sea of cardboard rectangles held aloft, their edges crisp and unbent. Some are neon-bright; electric pinks and safety oranges,while others are just plain white with bold, serif lettering that was got up in Canva before a painstaking hand-paint-job.

Freedom for Iran. End the Regime. Support the Strikes. The Lion and Sun Pahlavi flag snaps in the brisk harbour breeze beside the Star of David, an ancient emblem of antique ubiquity, only recently appropriated by Judaism. Coffee cups steam on the sandstone steps. The slogans scan well, the crowd photographs better, and the whole scene smells of righteousness, long flat whites and someone else’s country burning.

There is something almost Wagnerian about chanting for the bombing of your birthplace; liberty at Mach 2, democracy with afterburners. Edward Said knew it. Every empire, he writes, tells itself and the world that it is unlike all other empires, that its mission is not to plunder and control but to educate and liberate. And there is always a chorus of willing intellectuals to say calming words. He was moved to write that in 2003, about Iraq. It reads as though written yesterday, about Iran.

Let no one misread what follows as apologetics for the clerical state in Tehran. It is repressive, censorious, vindictive. Its prisons are not figurative. Its morality patrols are not metaphorical. The protests that erupt on December 28 begin with the clatter of metal shutters slamming down at the Alaeddin Shopping Centre; shopkeepers pulling the iron across, padlocking their livelihoods, stepping into streets that reek of tear gas and damp concrete.

Crowds spill along Jomhuri Street and into Lalehzar. “Azadi”, the freedom chant, rises through winter air bitter with burning tyres. By nightfall it carries across the vast Grand Bazaar, a city within a city, a vaulted labyrinth of saffron, rosewater and diesel fumes where, for five centuries, the fortunes of Iranian commerce and Iranian politics have turned in lock-step.

The suffering behind that chant is so real that it defies further comment. Let the hard facts tell the story. Inflation above forty-two per cent. Food prices up more than seventy. Bread, the flat sangak hauled steaming from stone ovens, its blistered crust the taste and smell of every Iranian neighbourhood, up more than one hundred per cent. A rial so gutted that a Tehran bazaari explains the impossible arithmetic to Al Jazeera: you must sell a television, but by next morning you cannot afford to buy another. The Islamic Republic massacres thousands of its own citizens. Anyone who flinches from saying so plainly has no business writing about it.

Suffering makes populations most vulnerable to manipulation by outside powers. But what the Australian media will not say plainly is this: the economic catastrophe driving Iranians into the streets is not simply caused by the regime’s corruption or mismanagement, real as those are. It is engineered, systematically, over decades, by the United States and its allies.

Trace the accelerants. In 2018, Trump withdraws from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action; the nuclear deal painstakingly negotiated under Obama, and reimposes “maximum pressure” sanctions. Iran’s GDP contracts by more than ten per cent. Poverty rises by the same margin. Food prices climb two hundred per cent. Health care costs surge one hundred and twenty-five.

Washington cuts off Iranian banks from SWIFT, the Belgium-based messaging network through which trillions of dollars cross borders daily; our financial system’s central nervous system. Without SWIFT, Iran cannot settle international trades, cannot receive payment for exports, cannot import pharmaceuticals or spare parts or wheat at anything close to market rates.

Nearly all of Iran’s oil revenues are frozen. The rial begins its long death spiral. China, buying more than eighty per cent of Iran’s shipped oil through shadow tankers and settling in yuan via its own CIPS, the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, Beijing’s own alternative to the dollar architecture, keeps Iran from total economic meltdown, but the lifeline is thin, opaque, and priced at dependency.

Then come the June 2025 strikes. Israel, with American support, bombs not only military and nuclear sites but civilian infrastructure; energy facilities, hospitals, residential neighbourhoods in Isfahan and Shiraz, the state broadcasting building in Tehran. Close to five thousand casualties. The air tastes of phosphorus and the grit of pulverised masonry for weeks.

In September, Britain, France and Germany trigger the UN’s snapback mechanism under Resolution 2231, reimposing Security Council sanctions that freeze Iranian assets abroad and halt arms transactions. The rial loses another forty per cent of its value.

By December, purchasing power for ordinary Iranians has fallen by more than ninety per cent over eight years. Cooking oil triples in a single week. Dairy rises sixfold in a year. Majid Ebrahimi, a cab-driver tells Al Jazeera that dairy prices have gone up six times this year. Other goods over ten times. His cab smells of cracked vinyl, stale tobacco and exhaustion.

He counts himself lucky he can drive his taxi. He is not protesting. He is surviving.

Analysts call it the “rebellion of the de-classed”, a middle class pushed below the poverty line, a Generation Z stripped of any future. Doctors drive taxis. Young professionals lie awake in childhood bedrooms they thought they had left behind, staring at ceilings they can taste the plaster dust of, listening to parents argue about the price of eggs. Before the protests, a bone-weary President Pezeshkian, the weakest president in the Republic’s history, a reformist marooned in a system that has discredited reform, addresses a restive crowd and raises his hands in exhausted despair: where do you expect me to get the money from?

This is not background context. This is the cause. And now the same powers that severed Iran from SWIFT, froze its reserves, starved its hospitals, and bombed its power grid present themselves as liberators of the people they have been slowly strangling. Create the crisis. Amplify the anger. Provide the figurehead. Assemble the fleet. It is not a rescue mission. It is the arson investigator who lit the fire.and it has dollar signs in its eyes.

The choreography barely bothers to whisper. On December 29, one day after the first demonstrations, Israel’s Mossad posts a message in Farsi on X, its tone somewhere between triumphant and predatory, instructing Iranians to go out into the streets, declaring it stands with them not only from a distance but “in the field.” Mossad says the quiet part out loud, and nobody at the ABC thinks this is worth interrogating.

Days later, a visibly gleeful Trump is on Truth Social, misspelling his all-caps-threats as usual but making himself clear: locked and loaded and ready to go. Then the carrier fleet. The USS Abraham Lincoln steams into the Arabian Sea trailing a wake that smells of diesel and geopolitics. The USS Gerald R. Ford, the largest warship ever built, swings east from the Caribbean, its flight deck a grey acre of steel reeking of jet fuel and intent. Two carrier strike groups. F-35 stealth fighters. Tomahawk cruise missiles. The full industrial apparatus of American violence arranged in the Persian Gulf like cutlery around a place setting.

Every regime-change operation in living memory begins with real grievances. Iraq’s people genuinely suffer under Saddam. Libya’s under Gaddafi. Syria’s under Assad. And what does “liberation” deliver? Shattered states, millions displaced, power vacuums filled by warlords, and Western oil companies quietly resuming operations in the rubble. The playbook does not change. Only the target.

Yet something is different now. The carriers circle, but they do not strike; because this is not Baghdad in 2003. The UAE refuses to allow military operations from its territory or airspace. Saudi Arabia calls for diplomacy. Turkey offers to mediate. The BRICS alliance, of which Iran is a member, represents a multipolar world in which the old coalition of the willing is simply not willing. Which makes the propaganda effort all the more essential. If you cannot bomb your way to regime change, not yet, not without costs you are not prepared to bear, you must manufacture consent from the inside out. You need the exile figurehead. The sympathetic media coverage. The demonstrations in allied capitals, fragrant with righteousness and someone else’s grief. In short, a rent-a-revolution.

Iran’s own Tudeh Party, the communist party, operating underground, its members imprisoned and executed by the same regime it refuses to stop criticising, holds the intellectually honest ground: it condemns the regime’s brutality without reservation, and condemns with equal force the overt intervention of US imperialism, observing that the policy of regime change has always served the strategic interests of global imperialism and can never lead to freedom.

That is the tragic clarity, and it will not resolve into comfort. The regime is monstrous. The people deserve freedom. The machinery being assembled to “deliver” it will almost certainly make things worse, as it has every single time before. Human rights do not arrive by airstrike. They are built, slowly, from civic courage, generational pressure, and internal legitimacy; the very qualities foreign intervention tends to annihilate. Bombs do not fall with ballots attached.

Anyone who finds that easy has not understood it.

Ṯhis article was originally published on Urban Wronski Writes


Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN

Dear Reader,

Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.

Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.

Join our community of truth-seekers. Please consider donating now via:

PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below

Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund to help secure the future of our site.
Your support will go directly toward covering essential costs like web hosting renewals and helping us bring new features to life. Every contribution, no matter the size, helps us keep improving and growing.

Thank you for standing with us – we truly couldn’t do this without you.

With gratitude, The AIMN Team

About David Tyler 158 Articles
David Tyler – (AKA Urban Wronski) was born in England, raised in New Zealand and an Australian resident since 1979. Urban Wronski grew up conflicted about his own national identity and continues to be deeply mistrustful of all nationalism, chauvinism, flags, politicians and everything else which divides and obscures our common humanity. He has always been enchanted by nature and by the extraordinary brilliance of ordinary men and women and the genius, the power and the poetry that is their vernacular. Wronski is now a full-time freelance writer who lives with his partner and editor Shay and their chooks, near the Grampians in rural Victoria and he counts himself the luckiest man alive. A former teacher of all ages and stages, from Tertiary to Primary, for nearly forty years, he enjoyed contesting the corporatisation of schooling to follow his own natural instinct for undifferentiated affection, approval and compassion for the young.

8 Comments

  1. Iran is a warning lesson to Canberra politicians and desk jockeys that with US bombers and marines stationed in the NT the ACT is a mere four hours flying time from destruction by ”our ally” the USA (United States of Apartheid).

    When TACO Trumpery does his double dealing on the Scummo USUKA sub debacle and still wants access to Australian deposits of rare earth minerals for free, then maybe. just maybe GO-SLO-ALBO will wake up to the fact that the CIA and US State Department have no allies, only assets, which they are prepared to direct against any nation regardless of the political propaganda of ”friendship”.

    Time for Australia to get out of the frustrated USUKA sub contract and join the BRICS trading group of middle nations seeking a prosperous future for their voters rather than repeating 19th century imperialism for the select few BILLIONAIRES.

  2. I don’t see how any of this is going to be settled peacefully.There are too many vested interests that stand to profit from a Full scale attack on Iran, not the least of them the war criminal Netanyahu, the Military Industrial complex, and the other late stage brigands who see a colossal pile of money.
    The only thing that’s changed from the days of the British East India Company and the other colonial powers of that time, is the technology, and the rise of multinational corporations taking their place, not with galleons and canon balls, but control of governments and financial institutions.
    If the murderer Bibi succeeds in goading the bloke with the world’s worst combover, we’re going to get a resolution that no one can forsee, only the certainty that EVERYONE on the planet will pay.
    Your move, stupid
    Cocky, Albo is never going to change, he’ll be sucking beer on the porch, before any responsibility comes calling…on a fat pension.

  3. Excellent analysis. Thanks David.

    Despite the gathering flotilla, both Trump and his Israeli master would be aware that:
    In return for Iranian crude oil sold at a “handsome discount” of $10-$15 per barrel, China has expedited delivery of its HQ-9B, a long-range surface-to-air defense system, and its YLC-8B radar.https://www.juancole.com/2026/02/resistance-technological-enhancement.html

    Apparently the Chinese radar “has a detection range of over 350 kilometers for stealth aircraft,

    This is a real game-changer, along with Iran’s “full-scale adoption of China’s BeiDou satellite navigation system, replacing the US GPS, which has rendered Iranian precision-guided munitions immune to the “GPS Denial” and spoofing tactics employed by the US during the “Twelve-Day War” last June.

    I think David that you are correct to conclude the ‘regime-change’ operation will proceed; but this time the cost will be truly enormous and would affect just about everyone.

  4. Thank you, JulianP,

    You’ve hit on the exact technical shift that is keeping military planners up at night. The link you shared from Juan Cole’s Informed Comment (February 2026) highlights a massive pivot: Iran is no longer just a regional power with a large inventory; they are becoming a technologically buoyant front backed by Chinese “force multipliers.”
    The “Electronic Shield”

    The deployment of the YLC-8B 3D radar is the most significant tactical shift we’ve seen since the “Twelve-Day War” last June.

    Anti-Stealth: By operating on the UHF band, this system bypasses the “stealth” geometry of 5th-generation aircraft like the F-35I Adir.

    The 350km Trap: Detecting a stealth jet at that range doesn’t just give Iran a warning; it “compresses the decision cycle” for attackers, forcing them to commit far more resources to electronic warfare than previously planned.

    The BeiDou Factor

    Your point about BeiDou is the real “silent” game-changer. During the June 2025 conflict, the U.S. and Israel successfully used “GPS Denial” to blind Iranian drones and misguide missiles.

    By switching to China’s satellite constellation, Iran’s precision-guided munitions (PGMs) are now hitting with centimetre-level accuracy, immune to Western spoofing.

    This removes the primary “soft” counter-measure the West relied on to mitigate Iranian strikes without starting a full-scale air war.

    The Cost of “Regime Change”

    You are, above all, correct, regarding the “enormous cost.” We are moving away from a scenario of surgical strikes and toward a high-attrition environment.

    Economic Fallout: With Iranian crude being the “currency” for this tech (at that $10-$15 discount), China is now financially and strategically “locked in” to Iran’s survival.

    Global Shockwaves: If a “regime change” operation is attempted against a nation equipped with anti-stealth integrated defences and satellite-independent precision, the disruption to global energy and shipping would be unlike anything we’ve seen in the modern era.

    It seems the “Axis of Resistance” has upgraded from a militia-based strategy to a high-tech “Denial” strategy, making any future intervention a much more dangerous gamble.No wonder Hegseth appears to be dithering. Then there is the Hegseth factor itself, the former Fox News jockey is not exactly inspiring confidence at what used to be called The Pentagon. Morale is said to be at an all-time low.

  5. NEC, that would require a progressive advisory team to the PM. What we are seeing instead is a myopic, managerial, conservatism which also looks suspiciously like appeasement of US bully-boy tactics. But your proposal makes a lot of sense and with allies like Team Trump, we have never been so vulnerable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*