Adelaide University Media Release
A threatened South Australian plant has been slowly declining for more than 3000 years, with new genetic research revealing it is now on the brink of extinction and should be recognised as Critically Endangered.
Researchers from Adelaide University and the University of Wollongong have used DNA from living plants to reconstruct the long-term history of the rare Spidery Wattle (Acacia araneosa), uncovering evidence that its population has collapsed by more than 99.9% over the past 3200 years, long before European settlement.
The study, published in Ecology and Evolution, shows the shrub’s effective population size has fallen from around 49,000 to just over 50 over the past three millennia, with climate drying, prolonged drought, and grazing by introduced animals all contributing to its decline.
Lead author Brittany Hogben, a PhD researcher from the School of Biological Sciences at Adelaide University, said the findings provide a rare glimpse into Australia’s ecological past while offering a powerful new tool for protecting threatened species.
“We analysed DNA from living plants and used statistical techniques to reconstruct the species’ history,” Hogben said.
“By looking at patterns in the genetic data, we can work backwards to understand how populations have changed over thousands of years and identify the pressures that have driven those changes.”
The Spidery Wattle is found only in a small area around Arkaroola in South Australia’s Flinders Ranges.
Researchers found its decline began during a period of increasing aridity around 3000 years ago and accelerated during more recent droughts, including the Millennium Drought. Historical grazing by sheep, goats and rabbits has also limited the plant’s ability to recover by preventing young seedlings from surviving.
“It’s not one single factor that’s pushed this species towards extinction,” Hogben said.
“It’s the combination of a drying climate, recurring droughts, habitat fragmentation and grazing pressure that has slowly eroded the population over thousands of years.”
The study also revealed that what was once thought to be a single population is actually two genetically distinct populations with very little exchange between them.
“This separation reduces genetic diversity and makes the species less resilient to future environmental change,” Hogben said.
Although the Spidery Wattle survives only in a small pocket of Arkaroola today, active conservation efforts are already underway. Grazing exclusion fences protect remaining plants, restoration plantings have begun, and approximately 2000 seeds have been preserved by the Botanical Gardens of South Australia and the Millennium Seed Bank at Kew Gardens in the UK to support future recovery efforts.
Co- lead author Dr James Dorey from the University of Wollongong says upgrading the species to Critically Endangered status would help attract funding and international recognition for the conservation work still needed.
“Threatened species listings are one of the main ways conservation funding is allocated,” Dr Dorey said.
“Getting the listing right means we have a much better chance of securing the resources needed to protect this species before it’s too late.”
Beyond the fate of a single wattle species, the researchers say their approach demonstrates how modern genetics can reveal hidden chapters of Australia’s environmental history and help identify species most at risk in a rapidly changing climate.
The research also confirmed that the Spidery Wattle remains a distinct species despite occasionally hybridising with the more common Silver Wattle, strengthening the case for its continued conservation.
‘Population collapse of the Spidery Wattle (Acacia araneosa) during Late Holocene aridification: genomic evidence for Critically Endangered status’ is published in Ecology and Evolution.
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.73959
Also from the Adelaide University
It’s time to rethink how we buy, wear and repair clothes
Australia’s farmland at risk of ‘ecological collapse’
Sweet lifeline for wildlife after bushfires ravage their habitat
Could the world’s smallest possum be living on the Yorke Peninsula?
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless independent voice – holding power to account and delivering journalism that matters.
Running this site isn’t cheap. Rising costs mean we need your support now more than ever. Every donation, big or small, keeps our servers running, our writers working, and our stories free for everyone.
Donate here:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund for hosting and future improvements.
Thank you for standing with us. We couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude,
The AIMN Team
It is hard not to remember Adelaide University’s shameful decision to cancel the planned event with Francesca Albanese, but that was hardly Shannon Evenden’s fault.
Here we have a plant (a couple considering the genetics) that will become extinct if we don’t act differently. Its circumstances are, of course, unique, but consideration of its potential demise surely must be considered in a broader context as well.
Due to the greedy and morally bankrupt behaviour of governments, like the fossil-fuel-captured Labor government, we are either in the midst of a mass extinction event, or about to enter one. So, does the saving of a plant that was dying out matter?
If it doesn’t, then wouldn’t that apply to all life-forms on the entire planet. Wouldn’t we be saying it’s all going to die anyway, take up skateboarding?
What of our stewardship of the planet? what of our responsibility to our grandchildren to leave a planet conducive to life?
If it does matter, then how, why, even where and what do we conserve?
The image above shows a whispy shrub that reminds me of a ‘Silver Princess’ eucalypt – popular in many gardens for its aesthetics. Could it be preserved by commercializing its existance? Should we be trying to save flora and fauna by commercializing them?
We would only be able to save a tiny fraction of biodiversity that is threatened in that manner.
It has been dying out due to localized climate change over the past 3000 years, should we just let it go anyway?
Once it is gone, its genetics and whatever they offer to the planet are lost forever, certainly to the ecology of Arkaroola. But, that ecology will have been altered by the introduction of feral animals anyway.
Presumably, its seeds could be stored in a seed bank?
If it is genetically better suited to a wetter area, should we entertain establishing it elsewhere, presumably one where the pre-settlement ecology has already been degraded?
This article raises a number of questions that we should be addressing. However, the elephant in the room is climate change. In Australia, Labor approving new gas and coal fields willy nilly is going to lead to a mass extinction event.
If we take our stewardship of the planet seriously, then we need to throw Labor out of government.
If you voted Labor ahead of more progressive alternatives in ’25, do you look at your grandchildren and think ‘I’d rather have a Labor government then leave you a planet conducive to life’?
Whilst everyone argues their ‘holy grail’ how about someone collecting some seeds and send to to seed banks?