In Australia, the promise of a “fair go” feels like a fading dream. Sydney’s median house price has soared to $1.72 million, while wages creep up just 3.4% a year. Corporate profits boom, yet workers struggle to afford rent. The wealthy glide through elite networks, while regional families face crumbling services. This is Australia’s “rigged game” – an economic and social system tilted toward those already holding wealth and power. From housing to taxes, wages, education, and regional divides, the rules often reward the haves over the have-nots. How did we get here, and can the game be unrigged?
Housing: A Market Locked Against the Young
Australia’s housing crisis is a stark example of a system stacked against newcomers. In 2025, Sydney’s median house price hit $1.72 million, while Melbourne’s reached $1.06 million (Domain). Meanwhile, wages grew just 3.4% annually, leaving first-home buyers – often young or lower-income Australians – stranded. Take Sarah, a 30-year-old teacher earning $85,000. She’s saved for years, but investors leveraging tax breaks such as negative gearing outbid her every time. Negative gearing, used by 1.2 million Australians (mostly high earners), fuel prices surge while offering little to renters – 33% of households pay around $580 weekly in capital cities. The question looms: can young Australians ever own a home when investors hold all the cards?
Taxes: Rewarding Wealth Over Work
Australia’s tax system often favours those with assets, not average wage earners. The top 10% of income earners scoop up 43% of superannuation tax concessions, worth $24.3 billion annually. Capital gains tax discounts – 50% off for assets held over a year – save wealthy investors billions, while a nurse earning $80,000 pays a marginal tax rate of 34.5%. Compare that to a property mogul who halves their tax liability through concessions. Low-income workers face higher effective tax rates relative to their wealth-building capacity, entrenching gaps over time. As Treasurer Jim Chalmers hints at negative gearing reforms in 2025, we must ask: why does the system reward wealth over hard work?
Wages: Stagnation Amid Corporate Booms
Despite Australia’s robust economy, workers are falling behind. Real wage growth has averaged around 1% annually since 2013, barely matching 3.9% inflation in 2024. (Real wage growth, as opposed to wage growth, “measures the change in wages after accounting for inflation”). Meanwhile, corporate profits soar – BHP alone reported $13.7 billion in 2023–24. Low-wage workers, especially the 2.7 million in casual or gig roles (25% of the workforce), see little trickle-down. Consider Jake, a 25-year-old Uber driver, juggling rising costs with no sick leave or job security. The gig economy offers flexibility but tilts power to employers, with CEOs earning bonuses that could fund 500 minimum-wage jobs for a year. As the Fair Work Commission pushes for gig worker protections in 2025, the question remains: why do workers miss out while corporations cash in?
Education: A Pipeline for Privilege
Elite education and networks gatekeep Australia’s best opportunities. Only 15% of students at Group of Eight universities come from low socioeconomic backgrounds, while 70% of “CEOs who ran Australia’s top 100 companies attended private school.” Wealthy families leverage alumni connections and internships to secure high-paying roles in law or finance, while public-school graduates like Emma, a bright 22-year-old from Albury, struggle to break in. HECS-HELP eases access, but average debts of $27,000 in 2025 hit lower-income graduates hardest. With a 2025 federal review of HECS looming, we must ask: is Australia’s education system a meritocracy, or a privilege pipeline?
Regional Disparities: Left Behind in the Bush
Regional Australia, home to 8.8 million people (33% of the population), faces systemic neglect. Unemployment in regional NSW or Queensland averages 6.5%, compared to 4.8% in cities. Access to healthcare and education is 20% lower than in urban hubs. Take the Wilsons, a family in Cootamundra, driving hours for specialist care. Major urban centres generate 80% of Australia’s GDP, hoard wealth and opportunity. Young regional workers often migrate to cities, facing high rents and draining local economies. As 2025 regional development grants roll out, we’re left wondering: why should where you live dictate your future?
A Fairer Game Ahead?
Australia’s “rigged game” isn’t just numbers – it’s Sarah’s dashed homeownership dreams, Jake’s gig-economy grind, Emma’s locked-out ambitions, and the Wilsons’ struggle for basic services. The system rewards wealth, connections, and urban privilege, leaving young, working-class, and regional Australians behind. Yet, change is possible. Fairer tax policies, stronger wage protections, accessible education, and regional investment could level the playing field. The 2025 federal budget offered a chance to rewrite the rules, but it’s up to us – voters, workers, and communities – to demand it. Will Australia unrig the game, or let the gap widen?
See also:
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
Their plan is working.
In Darwin houses are being built at what seems like a gangbusters rate but who is buying them? Investors from south or Maybe Chinese using negative gearing, leaving them empty. The economy is reportedly tanking and a ‘law ‘n order’ government concentrates more on criminalising kids than addressing root causes of the so called Crime epidemic. Changes to the vehicle rego process means effectively no inspections over the
Life of a vehicle except if it is older than 10 years and changes hands. Apart from the potential for more clunkers on our roads my motor mechanic says this change will cost him 10’s of thousands in lost revenue. Admittedly annual inspections of older vehicles are a pain but we’ve accepted them for decades for supposedly safer roads. Of course the cops will still be able to pull vehicles over with obvious defects but they are already overstretched incarcerating the people who haven’t paid their fines or the ten-year-olds on the streets at night for mischief because home, where it exists, is more dangerous. And the Attorney General tells parliament she’s sick to death of hearing the words ‘evidence based’ presumably because not one of the actions of this government is based on expert opinion or even consultation and informed commentary on their decisions is overwhelmingly negative, except for the racist rednecks who put them into power and, sadly, that seems to be the majority of the NT.
Gough did his best to equalise educational opportunity but subsequent governments, Labor included, decided it was better to profit from educational opportunities denied our own young people. Until governments and the wealthy realise the person you want atbthe other end of the scalpel is not the one who bought that position but rather the one who earned the right to wield it, we will go on profiting from what should be a human right for our future generations by selling knowledge to offshore entities.
I find it astounding that the year when Bill Shorten was running as leader and talked about reviewing negative gearing and franking credits yet he was the loser. Seems there are more people in this country who benefit from these schemes and care nothing for those who are left behind because of it. It is time for the government to put up the legislation NOW and see what happens in the Parliament – I suspect that a large number of members and senators are in the group who will lose and would vote against any change. The rich get richer . . . .
This country has several myths that are clung onto despite a significant amount of evidence to the contrary, the ‘fair go’ being one of them alongside being a ‘classless society’.
A comparable myth is the USofA’s notion of equality that is often spoken about alongside ‘the American dream’ and ‘the land of the free’; despite obvious realities of class structures and racism.
Australia and the USofA are both structured around the existence of an upper (or ruling/wealthy) and a lower (or working) class, yet both choose to mostly deny these class structures and entrenched racism exist.
The systems of government, law, education etc have since colonial times rewarded mostly white wealthy people who are often undeserving greedy people lacking in any morals, compassion or kindness. There is very little reward for the rest of us that work hard for the meagre wages doled out. The situation is even more dire for for the disabled, chronically ill, homeless, unemployed, long term unemployed and the majority of Australia’s Indigenous peoples.
A provocative article that deserves a serious response. I will only deal with the residential real estate market that Little Johnnie Howard screwed for the short term benefit of aspiring middle class voters.
.
There will be no respite from the power of Negative Gearing (NG) until a government takes on the major beneficiaries, the highly paid professionals holding more than five (5) residential properties, that research has shown compose about 10% of the landlords.
.
NG should be restricted to one property after the principal residence of the voter, and apply ONLY FOR NEW BUILDS so that the available rental portfolio is increased. NG should be grandfathered in to the economy so that established investments receive some protection from market vagaries of the change.
.
Capital Gains Tax (CGT) should be returned to the pre-Howard interference levels to slow down the rate of investment by multiple home landlords.
.
By restricting NG to New Builds, this will establish a secondary market of ”Used houses” for First Home Buyers that should appreciate at a lower rate than New Builds.
.
Investing in real estate is properly done with part of the profits from other commercial activity, rather than as the first step in wealth creation.
.
But will there be a LABOR GOVERNMENT BRAVE ENOUGH TO LEGISLATE THE SHORTEN HOUSIN REFORMS? Certainly the COALition is unlikely to cut off its personal benefits from investing their enormous undeserved salary packages.
The so-called fair go is increasingly out of reach. With the median house price in Sydney now around $1.72 million—and wages lagging far behind—it’s clear the economic playing field is heavily tilted toward the wealthy, not the many who struggle to get by. This isn’t just numbers—it’s a lived reality for regional families, renters, and workers. We urgently need structural reforms—like fairer taxation of capital gains and wealth—to rebalance the system and restore some genuine equity.
Man, this article hits hard. It’s wild how the ‘fair go’ feels more like a myth these days when home prices, taxes, and opportunities are stacked against so many. You can’t help but wonder—when will the system start working for everyone, not just those who already hold the cards?