By Denis Hay
Description
Australia’s BRICS strategy can boost trade, peace, and sovereignty. Discover how shifting alliances reshape our global role.
🎧 Prefer to listen to this article? Press play
Introduction
Johannesburg, September 2025 – The thunder of applause echoed through the Sandton Convention Centre as the expanded BRICS bloc welcomed Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE. Watching the livestream in his Canberra lounge room, wheat farmer Tom Wallace felt a familiar knot tighten in his stomach. Fertiliser costs were rising, U.S. steel tariffs hit hard, and uncertainty about Australia’s next nuclear-submarine bill kept him up at night.
“If half the world’s population is striking new trade deals, why are we still clinging to Washington’s coat-tails?” he wondered.
Problem → Australia’s alignment with the United States is exposing its economy to volatility and missed opportunity.
Why it hurts → Households, exporters, and public services bear the cost while global influence shifts elsewhere.
Solution → A balanced approach through Australia’s BRICS strategy can expand our trade, boost resilience, and enhance sovereignty.
The Problem: Staying in Washington’s Shadow
1. Tariff Shocks
In July 2025, the U.S. imposed tariffs of up to 50% on Australian aluminium and steel.
2. AUKUS Blowouts
Projected spending on the AUKUS submarine program is expected to reach AU$18 billion by 2029, as part of a long-term total exceeding AU$368 billion over 30 years.
3. Missed Trade Growth
BRICS now accounts for 41% of global GDP (Purchasing Power Parity, PPP) and includes 4 of Australia’s top 10 trading partners.
Case in point: In 2024, an Australian lithium start-up targeting a supply deal with Tata Motors in India encountered a significant hurdle: its finance provider excluded support for deals settled in rupees. This reflects a broader challenge: Australian exporters often struggle to secure finance when trading in non-dollar currencies, which limits diversification opportunities and potentially costs jobs – a clear example of how dollar dependence blocks new trade.
This highlights the urgent need for Australia’s BRICS strategy to include alternative financing arrangements that support multi-currency trade.
Why It Hurts: Deeper Economic & Social Wounds
• Public Money Drain – Billions spent on defence hardware instead of TAFE, housing, or healthcare.
• Commodity Dependence – Heavy reliance on China and the U.S. for exports exposes Australia to price cuts and political retaliation.
• Strategic Insecurity – Increased US base access makes Australia a high-value target in any Indo-Pacific conflict, raising insurance premiums for northern ports. This is not just theoretical – expanded US military infrastructure in Darwin and other northern regions has already drawn concern from defence analysts and insurers. The Port of Darwin is considered to be under heightened risk in global assessments.
• Lost Innovation – U.S. ITAR rules restrict Australian companies from exporting tech with U.S. components.
The Solution: A Three-Tier BRICS Strategy
By pursuing Australia’s BRICS strategy, we can shift from dependence on traditional partners to targeted engagement with emerging economies.
1. Diplomatic Engagement
• Seek observer status at the 2026 BRICS Summit (Kazan)
• Sign an MoU with the New Development Bank for non-dollar trade settlements.
2. Trade & Investment Pivot
The following sectors show where Australia’s BRICS strategy can unlock new value through focused diversification.
3. Peace-Focused Defence & Green Industry
• Cap AUKUS spending and redirect funds to a National Resilience Corps
• Use dollar sovereignty to fund a Green Steel Export Hub in Whyalla
Balancing Sovereign Currency with Real Trade Needs
Critics of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) often argue that Australia’s sovereign ability to issue currency doesn’t translate into power in international trade, since other nations, including BRICS members, won’t accept AUD directly.
This is true: countries want tangible exports, such as lithium, wheat, and iron ore, not fiat currency. But this does not invalidate MMT. It clarifies its boundary: sovereign spending creates capacity internally (for jobs, education, infrastructure), while external trade requires productive capacity in tangible goods and services.
Australia’s monetary sovereignty provides it with the fiscal space to invest in highly tradable sectors, such as green hydrogen and processed critical minerals, that interest BRICS nations. Reality underscores the need to align domestic investment with external trade demand.
This reinforces the need for Australia’s BRICS strategy to align domestic investment with the real-world demands of global trade.
Australia Risks Being on the Wrong Side of History
Australia can no longer afford a single-track alliance. A forward-looking, Australia’s BRICS strategy offers real alternatives. As global power shifts toward multipolar cooperation, led by countries seeking financial independence and inclusive development, Australia risks falling behind.
Clinging to outdated alliances while ignoring emerging global platforms weakens our influence and growth potential. We must recognise this shift and reframe our foreign policy with sovereign foresight.
Key Insights & Next Steps
A forward-thinking BRICS strategy for Australia offers more than just trade. It gives us options: for peace, progress, and prosperity. Diversifying alliances does not mean abandoning values – it means acting with sovereign intent.
Q&A: Reader Concerns
Q1. Will BRICS membership undermine Australia’s human rights record?
No. Australia can set binding labour and climate conditions in all trade deals.
Q2. Can we balance BRICS engagement with US alliances?
Yes. India and Japan already manage a complex overlap between the Quad and BRICS. A well-calibrated Australian BRICS strategy can achieve the same goals without compromising security ties.
Q3. Could BRICS become another dependency?
Only if we let it, strategic caps and strong regional ties will prevent over-reliance.
Question for Readers
Do you believe Australia should remain tied to outdated alliances or take bold steps by advancing Australia’s BRICS strategy to align with a changing global order?
If implemented thoughtfully, Australia’s BRICS strategy could reposition us for success in a rapidly shifting world order.
References
Geopoliticaleconomy.com | BRICS expands with new partner countries
Cockatoo.com.au | BRICS 2025: Impact on Australia…
Carnegieendowment.org | Quiet crisis in the U.S.–Australia alliance
Constructor.net.au | Case for & against Australia joining BRICS
The Diplomat.com | Australia rejects U.S. defence-spending push
Why Australia is falling out with the U.S.
Call to Action
💬 We’d Love to Hear from You!
Inspired by this article?
✅ See what others are saying on our Reader Testimonials page.
✅ Share your thoughts via our Reader Feedback form – your voice helps shape future content.
✅ Scroll down and leave a comment below to join the discussion.
If this article resonated with you, explore more on political reform and Australia’s monetary sovereignty at Social Justice Australia.
📢 Spread the word:
Share this article with friends, family, or your social networks to keep the conversation going and help build a fairer, more just Australia.
⭐ Support Independent Voices That Challenge the Status Quo
Social Justice Australia doesn’t rely on corporate advertisers or donors. We exist because of passionate readers like you.
If you believe in independent media that:
- 🧠 Educates and informs through truth-based analysis
- 🔍 Exposes injustice and failed policies
- 📣 Advocates for real, people-first reform
… then please consider supporting our work.
💸 Click here to donate – one-time or monthly, your contribution keeps our platform alive, ad-free, and uncompromising.
🙏 Thank you for being part of this movement.
Together, we are changing the conversation – and the future.
🌟 Bonus: Help others discover our work – leave us a quick Google review. It only takes a moment and means the world.
Explore how Australia’s BRICS strategy supports our path to peace-first diplomacy and trade resilience.
This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia
Also by Denis Hay:
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
If India and Japan can handle the juggling act, I dont see why we should not try, too.
We know that USA is ripping us off while wee are dependent on their currency basis, so BRICS sounds like the answer to a maids prayer.
Presentation of the Audio leaves alot to be desired. More like listening to a Robot.
It works fine for me.
Disagree, the importance of US (& UK) trade has always been overstated, yet in decline vs Asia and the EU.
Why BRICS? It more a grouping and a talking shop; no nirvana and full of contradictions including like the US now, a tendency towards authoritarianism, corruption and sub optimal human rights.
Australia should refocus on our EU and Asian partners, which still includes BRICS; don’t throw the baby out with the bath water?
BRICS is largely a talkfest ( and mainly for autocratic regimes). It doesn’t even have a trade agreement.
It makes sense for Australia to devote its attention to developing bilateral relations with EU, Japan, India.
A multi polar world with increasing influence of Putin, CCP and assorted religious zealots isn’t something I see as beneficial to Australia’s future
The essay and the debate afterwards, shows we are STILL not a wake up to things like our supposed gas “shortage” when the product proves of use only to TNC’s and sell-outs in politics and media.
People still can’t wake up to what the FTA’s were really about and hence ransacking of this country for the oligarchy and toadies and traitors selling us out.
Vichy-Oz!