The Weaponisation of Antisemitism – How an Unelected Envoy and a Contested Definition Are Silencing Healthcare Workers
Dedicated to healthcare workers around the world who take a stand against genocide.
I. Introduction: A Dangerous Precedent
On 17 June 2026, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) announced it had adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism to guide its regulatory work. Ahpra CEO Justin Untersteiner stated the agency is “committed to working with the Special Envoy for Antisemitism and partners to eliminate antisemitism from the health system”.
This announcement represents a significant and deeply concerning expansion of regulatory power. The IHRA definition is contested worldwide – seven of its eleven illustrative examples concern Israel, raising legitimate fears that it conflates criticism of Israeli policy with antisemitism. The Australia Palestine Advocacy Network (APAN) has warned that the move could “silence health professionals from criticising Israel’s human rights record.”
This paper examines the influence of the antisemitism envoy, the lack of evidence for antisemitism in the healthcare system, the powers of Ahpra, and the broader pattern of Zionist influence over Australian institutions.
II. The Special Envoy: Power Without Accountability
Jillian Segal AO was appointed as Australia’s first Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism in July 2024. Her role is to assist and advise Government by providing advice to the Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs and promoting public awareness of antisemitism.
She has no legislative power to compel any institution to do anything. Her role is advisory.
Yet Segal has demanded sweeping legal and institutional changes that were never debated in Parliament. As one commentator noted, “This isn’t policy, it’s a Kafkaesque nightmare.” Her recommendations include:
- Stripping funding from universities that fail to act on antisemitism
- New hate speech laws criminalising promotion of racial hatred
- Expanded powers to cancel visas
- New rules to address online hate
The irony is stark: Australians were asked to vote on same-sex marriage and the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, but on the question of whether speech critical of a foreign state should be criminalised, “we are not asked. There is no referendum, no transparency and no democratic process.”
III. The IHRA Definition: A Contested and Weaponised Tool
The IHRA definition states: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.” The controversy lies in its illustrative examples – seven of eleven relate to Israel.
The definition has been condemned by its own author. Kenneth Stern, the lead drafter of the IHRA definition, has become one of its most vocal critics, calling its application “a disaster” for democracy and likening the current climate to McCarthyism. When ABC Radio put this criticism to Segal, she dismissed it: “That train has moved on… and Kenneth Stern has been left behind.”
The Australian Parliament has received numerous submissions highlighting the definition’s dangers. One submission notes that the IHRA definition “dangerously conflates criticism of Israel with antisemitism” and “promotes a dangerous ‘Israel Exceptionalism’, granting the state undue immunity from accountability for heinous crimes.” The submission further notes that the International Court of Justice has found South Africa’s claim that Israel is violating the Genocide Convention “plausible” and declared Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territories “unlawful.”
IV. The Evidence: What Antisemitism in Healthcare?
Ahpra’s adoption of the IHRA definition implies a significant problem with antisemitism in the Australian healthcare system. The evidence suggests otherwise.
According to Ahpra’s own testimony before a Senate committee, of 225 complaints accusing health practitioners of antisemitism or Islamophobia since October 2023, approximately 200 were closed with no regulatory action. Only 13 complaints resulted in regulatory action, including three tribunal referrals.
Most complaints were about health workers posting on social media – not about their practice. This suggests the problem is not widespread antisemitism in healthcare, but rather the weaponisation of the complaints process to silence political expression.
As APAN noted, healthcare workers have reported “fear of professional consequences for speaking publicly about Gaza and Palestine.” The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners has raised concerns about “frivolous or vexatious complaints” to the health regulator about social media posts opposing Israel’s war in Gaza.
V. Ahpra’s Powers: An Odious Overreach?
Ahpra is Australia’s health practitioner regulator, responsible for ensuring practitioners are “qualified, competent, and safe to practice.” It has significant powers, including:
- Issuing public statements about practitioners under investigation
- Imposing sanctions before wrongdoing is confirmed in cases of “serious risk to public safety”
- Issuing interim prohibition orders against unregistered persons
The question is whether Ahpra should be using these powers to police political speech. The answer is clear: no.
Ahpra’s role is to protect public safety – not to enforce political orthodoxy. Using a contested, weaponised definition of antisemitism to investigate healthcare workers for their political views is an odious overreach that threatens:
- Freedom of speech – healthcare workers should be able to speak out against genocide without fear of professional consequences
- Medical ethics – doctors have a duty to speak out against violations of medical neutrality and attacks on healthcare
- The integrity of the complaints process – the weaponisation of complaints undermines trust in the regulator
Untersteiner acknowledged concerns about the “weaponisation of the notifications process” and stated Ahpra is reviewing its vexatious notifications framework. This is insufficient. The adoption of the IHRA definition itself is an act of weaponisation.
VI. The International Context: BMA and the Israeli Medical Association
While Ahpra is adopting the IHRA definition to police political speech, the British Medical Association (BMA) has taken a different path. In July 2025, the BMA voted to suspend engagement with the Israeli Medical Association (IMA) until it “affirms medical neutrality and condemns attacks on healthcare in Gaza.”
The IMA has described attempts to suspend it from the World Medical Association as “setting an extremely dangerous precedent.” The WMA itself has opposed the initiative.
The contrast is instructive. The BMA is taking a stand against the IMA’s failure to uphold medical neutrality. Ahpra, by contrast, is taking a stand against healthcare workers who criticise Israel’s actions. One is a stand for medical ethics. The other is a stand for political conformity.
VII. The Geopolitical Context: Genocide and Complicity
The adoption of the IHRA definition must be understood in the context of Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza and Lebanon. Health officials have reported that Israel’s war on Gaza has killed more than 73,000 Palestinians, including thousands of healthcare workers.
Ahpra’s move comes at a time when the Australian government is investigating the treatment of Australians who were part of a humanitarian flotilla intercepted by the IDF. This appears to be “string pulling and the pre-emptive victim theatrics so beloved of the Zionist political movement” – short on facts, it makes up with noise and threats to personal standing and income streams.
The Australian government has already legislated sweeping hate speech laws following the Bondi terror attack, which killed 15 people at a Hanukkah event. These laws grant powers to list “hate groups” and cancel visas. ASIO chief Mike Burgess conceded the laws would likely see such groups “simply move underground.”
VIII. Conclusion: A Choice Between Democracy and Censorship
The adoption of the IHRA definition by Ahpra represents a dangerous precedent. An unelected envoy, with no legislative power, has pressured a regulatory agency to adopt a contested definition that has been condemned by its own author. The evidence for antisemitism in healthcare is thin, and the definition itself is a weapon to silence political speech.
Healthcare workers should be able to speak out against genocide without fear of professional consequences. Medical ethics demand nothing less. The weaponisation of antisemitism to silence critics of Israel is not just an attack on free speech – it is an attack on the integrity of the medical profession itself.
The Australian government is currently investigating the treatment of Australians who were part of a humanitarian flotilla intercepted by the IDF. This investigation must proceed without prejudice, and the findings must be made public. The adoption of a contested definition of antisemitism by a health regulator should not be used to pre-emptively discredit the findings.
Australia’s healthcare system must be a place of healing, not a place of political policing. The use of a weaponised definition of antisemitism to silence healthcare workers must be rejected.
Dedicated to healthcare workers around the world who take a stand against genocide.
Also by Dr Klein
An Ode for the Unnumbered Dead of Palestine
Beyond the Spectacle – Trump’s UFO Files and the Silence of the Cosmos
Less Than Nothing – What the American Security Guarantee Really Costs Australia
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.
Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.
Join our community of truth-seekers. Please consider donating now via:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund to help secure the future of our site.
Your support will go directly toward covering essential costs like web hosting renewals and helping us bring new features to life. Every contribution, no matter the size, helps us keep improving and growing.
Thank you for standing with us – we truly couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude, The AIMN Team
How has it come to this that antisemitism is now a far more heinously egregious affront to common human decency than the blatantly obvious orchestrated and systemic genocidal apartheid of a disimpowered nation and
the mass slaughter of that nations most innocent, the children.
Equating anti-Zionism with antisemitism and Judaism with Zionism are a ruse and two dangerous misconceptions that are blatant distractions ment to play into the hands of those who are justifying racial and religious apartheid while Zionist Israel conducts its rapacious genocidal war in Gaza, unabated. Their intent is to
deceive and
inhibit us from using our critical thinking abilities so as to apply our findings with consistent clarity and objective forthrightness.
Shamefully and without any regard for principles, values or morality, spineless Western politicians grotesque submissiveness to US hegemony and pro Western sanctimonious scum media propagandists have legitimised Zionist Israel’s barbaric and evil trashing of international laws, Christian values and foundational principles that will culminate in the capitulation of civilised society as decent human beings know it to be.
The anti-semitism campaign is a Zionist lead distraction that is attempting to obscure the penetration of a foreign political movement that distorts Australian National Security and Foreign Relations Policies. The extent to which previous Australian Governments have allowed “co-operative arrangements” with US military agencies without open public debate is clear to see. Pine Gap, Tyndall, Sterling, and constant rotations of US military units on Australian sovereign territory are prime examples. Add AUKUS and you get the picture.
The Iran/Israel/USA debacle that has befallen Trump and his war hawks raises the same question for US citizens to consider. Will the US Congress enable the integration of Israel’s military and security agencies into the US military-security complex without reference to the precepts of the US Constitution?
Former US Presidential candidate and Congressman Dennis Kucinich’s essay signals a warning that equally applies to Australia. Albanese, Marles and Wong take note: you are betraying Australia’s independence and sovereign integrity.
https://substack.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.rR1BYHWYX8BnMaEo511lOs-gAPebuKTyKafT4l_B-F8?
https://substack.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.rR1BYHWYX8BnMaEo511lOs-gAPebuKTyKafT4l_B-F8?
….and this link also supports my comments above: Zionist policies and influences are incompatible with the Australian way of life and should be rejected from our political and governance processes.
https://pearlsandirritations.com/post/2026/06/changing-times-israel-the-united-states-and-australia/?utm_source=pi_news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-2026-06-22
I have to say that VP J D Vance summed up the situation that Israel finds itself in quite appropriately:
“Donald J Trump is the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time,” Vance said on Thursday.
“If I were in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left in the entire world.
“Over the last three months, two thirds of the defensive weapons that have protected your homeland have been built by American hands and paid for by American tax dollars.
If he was being antisemitic then I guess many of us fall within that definition.
ajogrady and Mediocrates..totally agree.Labor are a bunch of two-faced, fork tongued,weak as piss pretenders,capitulating to the first sign of push back.But we already knew that.Vote Greens or Independents. Every. Single.Time.
Jillian Segal, the PM’s Special Envoy for Israel’s Zionist Lobby, has not a shred of credibility. https://maxgrossarchive.com/2025/07/13/thugs-whores/
Excluding Muslim, Arabic and Palestinian voices from testifying at the so-called Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion makes it abundantly clear that it has nothing to do with social cohesion.
Nothing surprises me about AHPRA. They have long used their “powers” arbitrarily and with little accountability. What began as a much needed oversight of rogue practitioners and practices has mushroomed into a massive bureaucracy which seems to have lost sight of any advocacy whatsoever for the healthcare workers it professes to support. Who pay large annual fees to maintain their professional status.
Their interference in the anti-Semitism discussion is an example of their overreach.
I was delighted when I retired from a long career as a registered nurse and no longer had to provide an annual inquisition and a large fee.
Was going to shamelessly steal from ajogrady’s superb post (with passing acknowledgement of course ）and channel some Caitlin Johnstone at the same time, but why be repetitive, so instead:
“If your strongest argument for censoring anti-Israel speech begins with the words “It makes Jewish people feel,” then your argument isn’t strong enough to be taken seriously. We’re talking about genocide, apartheid, ethnic cleansing and nonstop wars here. Feelings take a backseat to these issues — even the feelings of people who strongly believe their feelings matter more than human lives.
Feeling uncomfortable feelings is fine and normal. We’re all supposed to feel uncomfortable feelings from time to time, especially when terrible things are happening. I myself have been feeling many uncomfortable feelings while scrolling my social media feed since October 2023, but I don’t feel entitled enough to believe laws should be passed and the internet should be censored in order to shelter me from experiencing those feelings.
Suck it up, buttercup. These are conversations that need to be had.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2026/04/25/israel-apologists-lie-about-their-feelings-and-beliefs-and-other-notes/
The pro-Israeli Australians are conducting a systematic erasure of Palestine existance, its culture, any presence of Palestinian people and anything to do with Palestine.
Deepcut reports on the persecution of academic Dr. Jumana Bayeh:
A Macquarie University lecturer in Middle East politics who has been the target of a pro-Israel media campaign claims to have been filmed, followed and threatened on campus.
Dr Jumana Bayeh — an associate professor specialising in postcolonial and Middle East studies at Macquarie University — said a man recorded her without her consent in a May lecture, became aggressive toward another student when confronted and followed her when she left the building, forcing her to call campus security and prompting her students to form a protective circle around her.
“At one point, he said, ‘I can find you’,” Bayeh told Deepcut.
“That gave me the chills. I felt sickened by it.”
All of this is happening under Labor.
Imagine if it were reversed and Palestinian Australians were persecuting pro-Israeli Australians, would Labor and the police do nothing?
It’s not the first time Bayeh’s lectures have been targeted by students or members of the public with pro-Israel views.
“In 2024 I had a student in my class. For several lectures, whenever I mentioned the 1948 Nakba or the war on Gaza or any Israeli attack on Lebanon, he would start fist-pumping and cheering and clapping,” Bayeh said.
Like fellow Macquarie academic Dr Randa Abdel-Fattah, Bayeh has been repeatedly targeted by pro-Israel lobby groups and conservative media outlets over her criticism of Israel in the classroom. In April, Sky News ran an ‘exclusive’ revealing that Macquarie was investigating Bayeh regarding a lecture she gave in a Middle East studies class in March.
The complaint cited Bayeh’s referring to Hezbollah as a “resistance group” and describing Israel’s actions in Lebanon as “ethnic cleansing”, audio recordings of which were included in the Sky report.
The complaint was officially lodged by Michael Gencher, a former CEO of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies and the executive director of StandWithUs Australia, an “Israel education organisation” with branches in nine countries.
https://www.deepcutnews.com/p/macquarie-academic-claims-she-was
Deepcut news also reports on comments made and evidence ascertained in the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra vs Gillham case.
There was one written complaint about Jayson Gillham’s introduction given before he debuted the meditative piece ‘Witness’. “In total, there were three complaints about Gillham’s comments and 487 complaints about the cancellation of his performance.”
To quote Caitlin Johnstone:
“This is not a complicated issue. It doesn’t take a tremendous amount of learning, wisdom or morality to wind up on the correct side of this thing. You don’t have to be a buddha, a scholar or a saint to oppose an active genocide. You just have to not be all fucked up inside.
There is only one correct position to have on the Gaza holocaust, and if you still haven’t managed to find your way into that position then I think it’s fair to say you have been wasting your life up until this point.”
Clearly the people on the board of the MSO are ‘all fucked up inside’, some of the statements made by board members are sociopathic.
https://www.deepcutnews.com/p/the-shocking-pro-israel-remarks-heard
@ Thommo: An informative series of posts. Thank you.
POTUS Butcher Bibi is pushing forward with the Greater Israel expansion of Israel with the authorisation of the ZION@ZI Knesset and the tacit support of the PPOTUS (Pederast Protector of the Undemocratic Sewer). NOw where are those Epstein Files??
Three hundred (300) members of Wollongong Friends of Palestine successfully picketed Bisalloy Steel blocking two shifts, the latest in a series of ten (10) pickets since October 2023.
“Bisalloy Steel sells products to Israeli armoured vehicle manufacturers Rafael Advanced Defense Systems. Rafael is a government-owned corporation, founded by the Israeli Ministry of Defence, which primarily supplies the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF). Bisalloy Steel products are part of the supply chain of IOF Merkava tanks, which are being used to destroy homes and villages in Palestine and Lebanon.”
Related companies are also supplying F-35 components fighters and Merkava tanks.
https://www.greenleft.org.au/2026/1456/analysis/community-shuts-bisalloy-steel-down-over-its-continuing-ties-israel
Physicians for Human Rights Israel and Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya’s lawyer visited the good doctor in prison. You might remember the good doctor as the doctor that left the hospital he worked at a walked alone to a tank that had threatened to shell the hospital.
The director of Kamal Adwan Hospital had fresh, severe injuries to his head, eyes, ears, and neck, they said, leaving him so disfigured his own attorney initially struggled to recognize him.
Attorney Nasser Odeh, who saw Abu Safiya Thursday at the underground Rakefet interrogation facility in Nitzan Prison, said he arrived shackled hand and foot, escorted by masked guards, struggling to breathe and speak, unable to sit upright, and repeatedly on the verge of losing consciousness.
Abu Safiya told him that after his Supreme Court appeal was heard June 10, four or five guards entered his solitary cell at Ganot Prison and beat him with a hammer and batons, and that since his June 24 transfer to Rakefet he has been beaten daily, losing consciousness several times and receiving no medical treatment.
“This is the last time you will see me,” he told his lawyer. “They brought me here to kill me. I don’t see myself surviving. This is the end.” He has been held without charge since December 27, 2024. Dr. Abu Safiya’s son described the visit in an Instagram post, available here.
Following an April petition filed by PHRI and Dr. Abu Safiya’s lawyer, Israel’s Supreme Court on Sunday ordered the state to respond by Tuesday, July 7, to a petition seeking the release of 14 Palestinian doctors detained without charge, and to specifically address the charges made about Dr. Abu Safiya’s condition.
https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/hamas-gaza-government-abu-safiya-israel-venezuela-earthquake
Australian doctors, nurses, medical associations should be screaming from the rooftops over the abduction and torture of Gazan doctors and nurses, but if they have then I haven’t seen it. That’s not to criticize the doctors and nurses though, they have been cowered by AHPRA and who would blame them, they probably can’t afford to lose their jobs anymore than anyone else.
No, the blame lies with Labor, the party that sold out to Zionism long ago.
Lamestream media did an expose on AHPRA’s latest move:
So how has AHPRA responded to the backlash? By posting an Instagram carousel attempting to clarify what is and isn’t allowed under their new policy.
Lamestream goes on to quote what are, in my opinion, so vague and broad as to be a cover all for AHPRA should they wish to ‘investigate’ someone.
The list of things AHPRA says are “unlikely to raise concerns” include “advocating for a peaceful resolution of a conflict or war”, “calling for accurate, true and impartial reporting on a conflict or war”, and “urging for protection of health workers in a conflict or war”.
….. what AHPRA explicitly suggests are things that are “likely to warrant investigation”. They include “calling for inappropriate action against a specific group” and “posting deliberately biased or false political content”.
…………
Will nurses and doctors be struck off the register for calling for a one-state solution and an end to apartheid? For mentioning the word apartheid? For haring their support for a gas tax? It’s an incredibly worrying situation.
https://www.lamestream.com.au/the-press-gallery-strikes-again-the-push-to-silence-doctors-and-nurses-3/
This is life in Australia under the Labor regime.
Did those who voted Labor ahead of other progressive alternatives in ’25, look at their grandchildren and think ‘yeah, nah, why should have freedom of thought and speech, I’d rather vote a Labor government into power?’
Nice work Thommo, keep it up.