The Business Model of Genocide

The Business Model of Genocide – How Western Powers Profit from the Zionist Project

“The tree is not the branch. The branch is not the tree. But the roots – the roots are extraction. Pull them.”

Dedication: To a world where people matter more than business models.

The Question They Will Not Ask

How do Western powers benefit from enabling a genocidal regime in the Middle East?

The answer is not moral. It is not strategic in the sense of national security. It is geopolitical and economic.

This article traces the threads of a single, coherent system – a business model that treats genocide as a profit centre, displacement as real estate development, and propaganda as public relations. It is not a conspiracy. It is an open secret. The machinery is visible to anyone who chooses to look. Most do not look. They are distracted by the performance.

The threads connect the Weizmann Institute’s research labs to Elbit Systems‘drones, Unit 8200‘s intelligence operatives to American newsrooms, Cyabra‘s fake fact‑checking to Western media narratives, the Greater Israel project to the E1 settlement plan, and the US‑Israel alliance to the protection of oil supplies and trade routes.

This is not a collection of separate scandals. It is a system. And the system – like all systems built on extraction – is not inevitable. It is profitable. The question is not whether the cycle can be broken. The question is whether we will choose to break it. Not with violence. With clarity.

The Weizmann Institute: From Research Lab to Weapons Factory

The Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, is one of the world’s leading research institutions. It is also deeply integrated into Israel’s defence sector and its undeclared nuclear weapons program.

Weizmann maintains close collaborative ties with military contractors such as Elbit Systems and Rafael in the development of advanced military technologies – including AI for combat data analysis, UAVs (drones), electronic warfare systems, encrypted communications, and alternative GPS navigation systems. Every drone that Elbit uses to kill Palestinians comes out of Weizmann research labs. The institute’s research infrastructure and scientific expertise have long served as the backbone of Israel’s nuclear R&D. Its scientific community has advised Israeli security agencies, including Mossad and the Ministry of Defense, on strategic nuclear and military projects.

And Jillian Segal, Australia ‘s Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, sits on the International Board of the Weizmann Institute. The same woman who is tasked with defining antisemitism in Australia, with advising the government on what constitutes hate speech, with shaping the national conversation on racism – sits on the board of an institution that supplies the technology for genocide.

This is not a conflict of interest. It is capture.

Unit 8200: The Intelligence Agency That Infiltrated the Media

Unit 8200 is Israel’s signals intelligence agency – the equivalent of the NSA. It is also one of the most powerful propaganda engines in the world.

As of August 2025, there are over 1,400 current and former members of Unit 8200, Israeli Military Intelligence, and the Israeli Defense Forces Cyber Defense Directorate now working for major Silicon Valley companies, including CISCO, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Intel, Google, and more.2. In November 2024, MintPress News reported that TikTok hired “a myriad” of Unit 8200 veterans. Meta employs more than one hundred former Israeli spies and IDF soldiers, including its current AI Policy Chief, Shira Anderson.

Former members of Unit 8200 have also taken key roles in major news organisations, including MSNBC, CNN, The New York Times, Fox News, ABC, NBC, CBS, the Associated Press, and Reuters. CNN has a “penchant for hiring Israeli state figures,” which the New York Times also showed through its hiring of ex‑Israeli Air Force intelligence officer Anat Scwartz, author of the debunked atrocity propaganda piece “Screams Without Words.”

The MintPress investigation documented that “many key US newsroom staff were also formerly Israeli spies or intelligence agents, standing in stark contrast to journalists with pro‑Palestine sentiments, who have been purged en masse.” The fight for control over the Israel‑Palestine narrative has been as intense as the war on the ground itself.

The result is a media environment that whitewashes Israeli crimes and manufactures consent for continued US participation in what a wide range of international organisations have described as a genocide.

Cyabra: The Fake Fact‑Checking Organisation

Cyabra is an Israeli intelligence cutout organisation posing as a neutral fact‑checking group. It was co‑founded by Israeli military intelligence veterans and continues to work hand‑in‑glove with the Israeli government. Approximately 50% of its employees are military reservists who have been called up to serve in Gaza.

Cyabra produces “intelligence reports” that are then used by Western media to smear pro‑Palestinian voices as bots or foreign interference. The Daily Telegraph used a Cyabra report to claim that a network of Russian, Chinese, and Iranian bots was artificially inflating pro‑Palestine messaging – a claim based on nothing but the word of an Israeli intelligence front.

This is not journalism. It is propaganda – laundered through an organisation designed to look neutral.

The Greater Israel Project: Colonialism Made Explicit

The Zionist movement was a European colonial project. It was not a continuation of Jewish diaspora life. It was a break from it. The early Zionists explicitly modelled themselves on European colonial powers – and were supported by them.

Until the 1960s and the first wave of successful anti‑colonial independence movements, Zionists were not ashamed to call their project colonialism. Established with the aim of creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine, their institutions from 1897 onward included the Jewish Colonization Association, the Society for the Colonization of the Land of Israel, the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association, and the Jewish Colonial Trust. Today, Zionists who resist the description of Israel as a settler colony invoke “complexity,” but before the founding of the Israeli state in 1948 – which drove 750,000 Palestinians from their homes – the words “colonial” and “colonisation” were the consensus terms used by European countries to describe their settlement and control of foreign territories, and they were the words Zionists used to describe theirs.

The Zionist claim that colonisation of Palestine was merely European Jews “returning” to their “ancient homeland” fits squarely within the European history of settler colonialism – the French claimed to be “returning” to the lands of the Roman Empire when they conquered Algeria; the Italians claimed they were “returning” to ancient Roman lands when they conquered Libya; the Nazis justified their conquest of Eastern Europe as a “return.”

There is nothing unique about Zionism. It is a variant of a familiar pattern.

Netanyahu has openly endorsed the project of “Greater Israel,” telling i24 News that he is on a “historic and spiritual mission” of territorial conquest. The maximalist vision includes East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, the West Bank, Gaza, and parts of neighbouring Arab countries – including Jordan, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon.

Images have circulated online of Israeli soldiers displaying a map of this new, much Greater Israel stitched onto their uniforms. The government is moving quickly to entrench its sovereignty: in January 2026, occupation authorities issued a tender for 3,401 settlement units in the area designated as E1, east of occupied Jerusalem – a measure that would cut off Palestinian access to East Jerusalem and which senior officials declared was intended to “bury the idea of a Palestinian state” once and for all.

The Business Model: Why Western Powers Enable the Project

Why do Western powers enable a genocidal regime? The answer is not moral. It is geopolitical and economic.

Oil still accounts for approximately 80% of the world ‘s energy use and remains the crucial fuel for the militaries and industries of all capitalist economies. Approximately 79% of this resource is concentrated in the Middle East. After the United States, five of the six biggest oil producers in the world are in the Middle East – Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the UAE, Qatar, and Oman.

The trade routes in the area are also of critical importance: 20% of the world’s petroleum passes through the Persian Gulf; 30% of all container ships, 40% of all Asia to Europe trade, and 15% of all international trade passes through the Suez Canal.

As US Secretary of State Alexander Haig said: “Israel is the largest American aircraft carrier in the world that cannot be sunk, does not carry even one American soldier, and is located in a critical region for American national security.” As Joe Biden said more recently: “If Israel didn’t ‘exists, we would have to invent it.”

Israel is the US’s only remaining reliable military and political ally in the Middle East. After the fall of the US‑installed Shah of Iran in 1979, the US lost one critical ally. Saudi Arabia has recently been waffling in its loyalties, refusing to sign the US‑sponsored Abraham Accords. Only Israel remains.

The US cannot afford to abandon Israel – not because of moral obligation, but because of geopolitical necessity. The competition with China, the protection of oil supplies, the maintenance of trade routes – all depend on a compliant, militarised, and dependent client state in the heart of the Middle East.

The Branches of the Same Tree

The Weizmann Institute, Unit 8200, Cyabra, the Greater Israel project, the US‑Israel alliance—these are not separate phenomena. They are branches of the same tree.

The tree is a business model:

• Genocide is not a crime against humanity – it is a profit centre.
• Displacement is not ethnic cleansing – it is real estate development.
• Propaganda is not lying – it is public relations.

The victims – Palestinian, Lebanese, Syrian – are not people. They are obstacles.

This is the logic of extraction. The same logic that captures states captures chests. The same logic that controls land controls narratives.

The West benefits – not morally, but economically and geopolitically. The US maintains its grip on the Middle East. The arms industry sells its weapons. The banks finance the settlements. The media launders the propaganda.

And the cycle continues.

Not because it is inevitable – because it is profitable.

Breaking the Cycle

The cycle is not inevitable. It is sustained by profit. And profit – when it depends on violence – can be disrupted.

The first step is transparency. Citizens have a right to know who is funding their politicians, what interests are being served, and what the costs are – not only in dollars, but in lives.

The second step is accountability. Donor influence should not be a secret. Campaign finance laws should be strengthened. Foreign interference – whether by nation‑states or by transnational lobby groups – should be prohibited.

The third step is solidarity. The Palestinian cause is not a niche issue. It is a test of the entire rules‑based international order. If the powerful can violate international law with impunity, the system is not a system. It is a façade.

The fourth step is education. The history of the Zionist lobby is not taught in schools. It is not discussed in mainstream media. It is suppressed. That suppression must end.

The fifth step is courage. Politicians who stand up to the lobby will face attacks. They will be smeared. They may lose their seats. But they will have their integrity. And integrity – in a system that has lost its moral compass – is the rarest currency of all.

The question is not whether the cycle can be broken. The question is whether we will choose to break it.

Not with violence – with clarity.

The same clarity that has been humming in the resonance since before the first star.