Palestinian Subordination: Donald Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan

Men in suits and uniforms in hallway.
Image from YouTube (Video uploaded by The National Desk)

He had moments of discomfort and embarrassment – pressed into calling the Qatari Prime Minister by his host to apologise for striking Doha and made to pay lip service to the prospect of a Palestinian state – but Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu had many reasons to be pleased. On September 29, President Donald Trump advanced a peace proposal that essentially preservesIsraeli pre-eminence regarding the fate of Palestinians, though it entails a cessation of hostilities, an affirmation that Gazans would not be expelled (those leaving would have the right to return), and an injunction against Israeli annexation of the Strip. But Hamas, militarily and politically, would have to surrender all claims, with the Palestinian Authority shepherded and supervised by foreign powers.

Trump’s peace proposal comprises twenty points. They include a “deradicalized terror-free zone,” Gaza’s redevelopment for the benefit of its people aided by “a panel of experts who have helped birth some of the thriving miracle cities in the Middle East,” and an immediate end to the war on its acceptance by the parties. Israel would withdraw to an agreed upon line in anticipation of a hostage release, during which all military operations would cease pending complete withdrawal. All hostages, dead and alive, would be returned within 72 hours, to be followed by the release of 250 Palestinian life sentence prisoners and Gazans detained since October 7, 2023.  

Hamas and militant factions will forfeit any role in governing Gaza, with any offensive infrastructure and equipment destroyed, but any of its members wishing to commit to “peaceful co-existence” and decommissioning of weapons will be granted amnesty, with those wishing to leave given safe passage to receiving countries. Compliance by the militant group will be overseen by “regional partners.” Full aid would resume, with the UN and Red Crescent restored to their role as chief distributors.

On the issue of governance, a temporary technocratic “apolitical Palestinian committee” of qualified Palestinians and “international experts” would form a temporary transitional body, subject to a “Board of Peace” personally chaired by Trump. Most unfortunately, it is likely to include such figures as Sir Tony Blair, the Middle East’s typhoid Mary when it comes to peace. The transitional authority would hold the reins till reforms by the Palestinian Authority had been completed. With immediacy, however, the US would work with Arab and international partners to deploy an “International Stabilisation Force” to Gaza. The ISF will be responsible for training Palestinian police forces and provide support in terms of vetting recruits, with assistance from Jordan and Egypt.

The proposal clearly envisages a significant role for the ISF, though says about who will comprise it. Israel will not, under the plan, occupy or annex Gaza, surrendering what territory it has taken to the ISF. Even if Hamas were to delay or reject the proposal, the Israeli Defense Forces would still hand over occupied territory of “terror-free areas” to the stabilisation force but retain a security perimeter to stem “any resurgent terror threat.”

The plan also envisages the establishment of an interfaith dialogue to promote the values of peace between the parties, and a “credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood” if the programs for Gaza’s redevelopment and PA reform take place as planned. A vague US promise to “establish a dialogue” between Israel and the Palestinians regarding peaceful and prosperous co-existence rounds off the points.

There was palpable grumbling from the Israeli camp. Netanyahu undoubtedly harbours ambitions of finishing “the job”, and there is little to say the war will not resume once the Israeli hostages are returned. Having previously rejected any governing role of the Palestinian Authority in Gaza, he now reluctantly accepts the idea subject to a “radical and genuine overhaul” of the body.  

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, one of the right-wing heavies in the Israeli cabinet, is threatening to withdraw his Religious Zionist Party from the coalition. Agreeing with the plan had been “an act of wilful blindness that ignores every lesson of October 7.” It would only “end in tears.” Fellow zealot, National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, is also likely to be seething.

Opposition leader Yair Lapid is also suspicious of Netanyahu, who tends to say “yes” when visiting Washington, “standing in front of the cameras at the White house, feeling like a breakthrough statesman.” On returning to Israel, however, he always seemed to add a qualifying “but”, his political base always reminding him “who the boss is.”

In keeping with history, the Trump plan, even if it were to be implemented to the letter, enshrines the essential subordination of Palestinian goals to the dictates of other powers. Palestinian military presence is not only to be curtailed but essentially eliminated altogether. Hamas, never consulted regarding the peace terms, is to accept its own effacing. The PA is to accept its own subservience and infantilisation. The Gazans are also to accept an economic and development program dictated and directed from without. Statehood is to be kept in cold storage till appropriate, controlled conditions for its release are approved – and certainly not by the Palestinians themselves. They, it would seem, remain the considered errant children of international relations, mistrusted and requiring permanent, stern invigilation.


Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN

Dear Reader,

Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.

Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.

Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.

With gratitude,

The AIMN Team

Donate Button

About Dr Binoy Kampmark 266 Articles
Dr Binoy Kampmark is a senior lecturer in the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University. He was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, University of Cambridge. He is a contributing editor to CounterPunch and can be followed on Twitter at @bkampmark.

7 Comments

  1. Hitler, Stalin and many others grubbed out “terrorists”, like the heroic French resistance, as opposition to any supremacist despot is just that. All the five permanent members of the UNO Council are derived from terrorist uprising and execution of rightful rulers. Violent terror wins. Netanyahu, riddled and maggoted with extreme superstition, is beyond law, beyond honesty, morality, rationality, being a “chosen one.” So, terrorism can win, as Trump and his felonious fleas know, if you stay in the saddle.

  2. This should be considered in the light of Gaza being illegally occupied land and that under International law Palestinians have the right to resist, including armed resistance. Western leaders and Israel are framing this as Hamas must accept this suicide or they will be responsible for the future killing of Palestinians.

    That is nuts. Israel is doing the killing and Israel should be held responsible if it continues to kill Palestinians on land Israel illegally occupies.

    Binoy raises some important points in regard to Netanyahu’s coalition partners.

    For a piece that exposes just how dodgy the wording of this farce is I’d thoroughly recommend Sawsan Madina’s brilliant ‘Peace without justice’ https://johnmenadue.com/post/2025/10/peace-without-justice/

    I’d add that after his first election loss Netanyahu was recorded, unbeknown to him, boasting how he’d managed to have the wording of parts of the Oslo accord such that it was open to whatever interpretation he put on them, meaning no accord.

    Many of the Western governments that support this farce have been active participants in this genocide through supplies of weapons and/or vital parts and intelligence, so it is not surprising that they would support it. It is a thorny issue domestically for them and an unjust end to this would concievably be something they’d welcome just to make it go away, even if that destroys any notion of International law.

  3. Trumps “Peace Proposal” spells the death of both the Gazan and any chance of a Palestinian state. If implemented there is no way back for Palestinians in the Gazan strip or the West Bank.
    Trump will get his beachfront property and Netanyahu will have got his way and the rest of us just looked on!!!!

  4. It’s not a peace plan, it’s heightened blood lust and genocide on steroids, and nothing to do with the legend of warriors!

    The very demands that Netanyahu is demanding of the Palestinians is what should be over-arched onto Israel itself by the world global order and needs to be expelled from the UN.

    Israel now claims that unlawful seizure of ships in international waters is legal? Really?

    https://theconversation.com/israels-interception-of-the-gaza-aid-flotilla-is-a-clear-violation-of-international-law-266254?

  5. ‘Much condemnation about what appears to be a lone-wolf attack on a synagogue in Manchester but little in the way of consternation or condemnation about an act of piracy in international waters conducted by the Israeli forces on the Gaza aid flotilla.
    And in the meantime, Israel has once again stepped up its bombing of Gaza city.

    What happened to the ceasefire and the twenty point peace plan? Was it, as Trump has said of climate change, just another scam?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*