Farmers speak out on Net Zero – Key facts on climate and pollution reduction goals

Sign on gate: "I'm a Farmer for Climate Action.
Image from Farmers for Climate Action

Farmers for Climate Action Media Release

In light of recent events and on behalf of its 8,400 farmer members, Farmers for Climate Action points out some key facts.

Quotes from farmers:

SA cattle and sheep pastoralist Ellen Litchfield:

“We need politicians to listen to farmers, not fossil fuel billionaires.

“Let’s be clear: coal and gas drive climate change; climate change is smashing farmers and sending farm insurance costs through the roof; ending net zero will not end the rollout of clean energy, and nuclear isn’t viable without net zero commitments.

“We’re being smashed by hotter and longer droughts in my part of the world and we know that burning coal and gas are what drives climate change.

“We sell our beef and lamb all over the world and we need net zero to make sure our trading partners continue to have confidence in Australian produce.”

NSW wheat and sheep farmer Peter Holding:

“Stopping net zero would not stop the rollout of clean energy projects, because investors are building clean energy to replace unreliable old coal stations which are shutting now, and clean energy with storage is the cheapest and fastest form of electricity generation to build.

“At the time of the Nationals press conference in Canberra on Sunday, electricity was free on the wholesale market across Queensland, NSW, Victoria and SA because abundant renewable energy had forced the price so low. We’ll see more of this as we bring on more storage to release that energy at night, and more wind farms, which produce nighttime energy. Further, there is no nuclear without net zero.

“We need politicians to listen to farmers, not fossil fuel billionaires.”

QLD beef grazier Kylie Burton:

“Climate change is here now and it’s hurting our farm and our family. We’ve endured extreme droughts for over a decade in central Queensland. Farmers rely on a stable climate, so protecting farmers and food security means protecting the climate.

“We’ve had to completely change our business because other industries have been polluting the climate – they should have to change their ways.”

TAS dairy and beef farmer and Nuffield Scholar Iain Field:

“Most Australians probably think of Tasmania as a wet place with lots of rainfall, but even in Tasmania we’ve now seen climate change bringing us worse droughts. We need serious pollution reduction this decade to protect our farmers.”

VIC sheep farmer Luella Drinnan:

Climate change costs farming families money. Agriculture is one of Australia’s most valuable sectors and climate change directly compromises farming businesses. On my family farm, looking after the environment is just best practice farming. As a nation, we need to reduce emissions and work towards net zero by 2050 to protect our farming businesses, food supply and agricultural sector.”

WA cropper Kit Leake:

“We as farmers are doing our best to deal with climate change, and so should all other industries have to.”

“Losing a net zero target will affect our export markets, the buyers are so passionate about it they will go elsewhere.”


Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN

Dear Reader,

Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.

Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.

Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.

With gratitude, The AIMN Team

Donate Button

3 Comments

  1. It’s a total irrelevance. Nats aren’t in power and they never will be. Performative bullshit for Gina and co.

  2. Perhaps the most significant point mentioned here and also highlighted on the news today :

    “At the time of the Nationals press conference in Canberra on Sunday, electricity was free on the wholesale market across Queensland, NSW, Victoria and SA because abundant renewable energy had forced the price so low. We’ll see more of this as we bring on more storage to release that energy at night, and more wind farms, which produce nighttime energy.”

    We know that wholesale electricity prices in the daytime are often very cheap or even negative due to solar generation producing more supply than there is demand. These savings will now be passed on to consumers for three hours each day which, in a residential situation, could mean that those with hot-water storage currently charging at overnight off-peak rates could be powered during the three hour daytime supply at no cost: other appliances with timers (washing machines, dishwashers) could also be timed to take advantage of the free power.
    This will start to bring down the overall cost of electricity particularly with battery charging.
    Sadly, our media outlets spend time on the completely irrelevant National Party nonsense instead of a very real breakthrough on power costs.

    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/nov/03/australians-to-get-at-least-three-hours-a-day-of-free-solar-power-even-if-they-dont-have-solar-panels

  3. Re: climate variability: I am entirely sympathetic with the plight of Australian farmers, not only because of the manner in which politicians dance around this subject seeking “gotcha” moments for hungry media but also for the nefarious solutions proposed by egotistic scientists. eg; the Danish government mandate requiring the inclusion of Bovear to stock feed for dairy cows.
    https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/bovaer-backlash-danish-cows-collapsing?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=319741&post_id=177809207&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=4an0y2&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

    Apart from the deleterious effects on cows is there any evidence that humans will not experience adverse effects by consuming Bovear contaminated dairy products? Typical of egotistic scientists and politicians – solve one problem by creating another one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*