Charles Darwin University Media Release
The age of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed our interactions, but threatens human dignity on a worldwide scale, according to a study led by Charles Darwin University (CDU).
Study lead author Dr Maria Randazzo, an academic from CDU’s School of Law, found the technology was reshaping Western legal and ethical landscapes at unprecedented speed but was undermining democratic values and deepening systemic biases.
Dr Randazzo said current regulation failed to prioritise fundamental human rights and freedoms such as privacy, anti-discrimination, user autonomy, and intellectual property rights – mainly thanks to the untraceable nature of many algorithmic models.
Calling this lack of transparency a “black box problem”, Dr Randazzo said decisions made by deep-learning or machine-learning processes were impossible for humans to trace, making it difficult for users to determine if and why an AI model has violated their rights and dignity and seek justice where necessary.
“This is a very significant issue that is only going to get worse without adequate regulation,” Dr Randazzo said.
“AI is not intelligent in any human sense at all. It is a triumph in engineering, not in cognitive behaviour.
“It has no clue what it’s doing or why – there’s no thought process as a human would understand it, just pattern recognition stripped of embodiment, memory, empathy, or wisdom.”
Currently, the world’s three dominant digital powers – the United States, China, and the European Union – are taking markedly different approaches to AI, leaning on market-centric, state-centric, and human-centric models respectively.
Dr Randazzo said the EU’s human-centric approach is the preferred path to protect human dignity but without a global commitment to this goal, even that approach falls short.
“Globally, if we don’t anchor AI development to what makes us human – our capacity to choose, to feel, to reason with care, to empathy and compassion – we risk creating systems that devalue and flatten humanity into data points, rather than improve the human condition,” she said.
“Humankind must not be treated as a means to an end.”
Human dignity in the age of Artificial Intelligence: an overview of legal issues and regulatory regimes was published in the Australian Journal of Human Rights.
The paper is the first in a trilogy Dr Randazzo will produce on the topic.
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
“AI is not intelligent in any human sense at all. It is a triumph in engineering, not in cognitive behaviour….It has no clue what it’s doing or why – there’s no thought process as a human would understand it, just pattern recognition stripped of embodiment, memory, empathy, or wisdom.”
Spot On. I worked on computerised Voice Recognition back in the 1990’s with a leader in that field. I also later worked on (which was then called) Natural Language, which included the computerised assessment of Processes and Legislation for contradictions and Black Holes.
So I can say with the solid experience of minutely exploring many rabbit holes, that AI as commonly used today is little more than the Advanced Interrogation of massive data (a sort of glorified Data Mining).
To rely solely on the responses of AI is to deny utilising one’s emotional, spiritual, empathetic and moral compass in making decisions. AI does not have these human qualities. AI has no value other than the materialistic data it has absorbed and therefor runs according to the intentions of those who design the algorithms that define its’ performance. AI runs the risk of being a “rubbish in – rubbish out” human construct. Caveat emptor.
You just have to look at the MechaHitler debacle when LoneSkum tried to tweak Grok into being a bit less “left-wing” to know how dangerous reliance on AI can be.
It’s useful for some tasks – such as managing and number-crunching raw data – but needs careful human oversight.
Wow looking forward to the next two articles from Dr Maria.
Nearly 70 years ago, at high school, I read a story and it connect the world computers and asked is there a god. There is now!!! The programmer raced for the plug and was killed.
AI has made that fiction a reality.
ps Randazzo, an italian property development family with power in Darwin..