WWTD (“What would Trump do”) is no longer a hypothetical. It is a pattern of behaviour repeated so consistently that its outcomes are now predictable. These moves (30 in total) are not a list of scandals, but a behavioural map showing how power is pursued, accountability is avoided, and chaos is reframed as success.
WWTD is not about personality. It is about reflex
These are not isolated incidents, nor are they random flaws of temperament. They are repeated responses to predictable pressures. The overlap is deliberate. WWTD is not ideology or impulse, but a limited set of behaviours deployed again and again as circumstances change.
WWTD? Predictable Moves
Pattern 1: Reality Management (When facts threaten narrative)
- When challenged by facts: Dismiss them. Repeat the lie. Louder.
- When caught lying: Attack the person who noticed.
- When facts contradict feelings: Choose feelings.
- When truth is inconvenient: Call it fake. Repeat until sticky.
- When history records events: Rewrite it, then accuse others of doing so.
Pattern 2: Institutional Erosion (When systems resist personal power)
- When institutions resist: Call them corrupt. Undermine trust.
- When courts intervene: Impugn the judges.
- When investigations begin: Question legitimacy. Delay relentlessly.
- When laws obstruct ambition: Float ignoring them. Gauge reaction.
- When democracy constrains power: Question the result.
Pattern 3: Responsibility Avoidance (When leadership is required)
- When responsibility appears: Deny involvement. Blame predecessors.
- When advised by experts: Question loyalty, not evidence.
- When advised to de-escalate: Do the opposite. Publicly.
- When chaos follows: Declare it intentional.
- When outcomes are unclear: Announce victory anyway.
Pattern 4: Power Retention (When authority is threatened)
- When consequences arrive: Fundraise off them.
- When accused of corruption: Claim persecution.
- When supporters act violently: Distance rhetorically. Encourage emotionally.
- When rhetoric causes harm: Deny intent. Refuse accountability.
- When power slips: Cling. Litigate. Delay.
Pattern 5: Ego and Performance (When restraint would help)
- When praise is absent: Manufacture it. Quote himself.
- When criticised: Personalise. Nickname. Escalate.
- When allies express concern: Test obedience. Punish hesitation.
- When confronted with complexity: Reduce it to a slogan.
- When leadership requires restraint: Perform dominance instead.
- When norms constrain behaviour: Break them. Call it strength.
- When rules apply equally: Argue they were written for someone else.
- When unity is required: Divide strategically.
- When silence would help: Tweet.
- When all else fails: Flip the board. Claim victory anyway.
You could almost play bingo with this list.
A drinking game, however, would be reckless. The pattern is too dense.
WWTD? Claim victory anyway
It’s like playing chess with a pigeon. The rules never mattered. The pieces end up on the floor. The board is fouled beyond recognition. And somehow, amid the mess, the pigeon struts, chest puffed, declaring itself the winner. This isn’t strategy or strength; it’s disruption followed by self-congratulation. The tragedy wasn’t that the board was knocked over – it was that so many spectators applauded and called it leadership.
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.
Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.
Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.
With gratitude, The AIMN Team

Trumpery Farr-Caduckery..,the USA, untold shittery agony. Voters? Arghh.
“…WWTD (“What would Trump do?”)…
What Trump does is immaterial to me – I’m more concerned with what Australian politicians do. Wait a minute, they are doing exactly what Trump does!! How did that happen?
Denial, addiction, delusion!
Who would have thought you could monetize that.
Thick as two short planks, both the same. Excavated from a dung pile of losers. Says lots about political USA and the GOP.
G’day Dear Lachlan, such a clever article and I also have to say I am transfixed by the Peace Dove with blood spilling from its chest, indeed, the whole illustration is amazing and now I learn you did it !!! Have you got a title for the illustration and did you do it on your computer or paint it ? Please tell us more about it. I think you should sign your work. And I would love to suggest you make it a poster as well,that we could buy. I would love to frame it. Congratulations you multi-talented artiste !
Oops! my eyesight is not the best and I have just realised it’s a red tie not blood, so it’s probably not a Peace Dove. It’s Trump. Is it an Eagle ? It is still brilliant artwork and I’d still love to buy a copy ! Classic example of how we, as individuals, interpret artwork.
Thanks Tess. I wish I had that talent. All my images are free to use. It was a collaborative effort with an AI platform. If I spent a month toiling on such an image with my own meagre artistic talent, it would only have been at best a quarter as good. It did turn out rather well. The image does seem very powerful and says so many more things than my brief description below.
I wanted Trump to collide with the old saying about playing chess with a pigeon. We see Trump as a pigeon. He has befouled the board and wrecked the game with pieces strewn everywhere. His disregard for ethics, rules and logic and complete idiocy on full display. Despite this, he struts proudly as if he’s won the game with loyal adherents cheering on his obscenities.
If any wish to make commercial use of the image and potentially profit, I’d only ask they donate some of their profits to worthy causes such as aid for homeless or those at risk of homelessness, helping women and families affected by family and spousal violence or helping Palestinians affected by atrocities in Gaza. Or subscribe to AIMN and other worthy independent media platforms.