Healthcare Beyond Profit: Ending Inequality in Care

Healthcare advocacy beyond profit illustration.

By Denis Hay   

Description

Healthcare beyond profit means fairness, not shareholder gain. Corporate healthcare undermines equality. Here’s how Australia can address this issue.

🎧 Prefer to listen to this article? Press play

Introduction: The Central Question

What should healthcare be, a human right or a commodity? The difference defines whether people receive care because they need it or because they can pay. In Australia and across the world, corporate-driven healthcare has turned treatment into a profit centre. This model undermines equality by rewarding shareholders while leaving citizens struggling with bills, waitlists, or denial of care.

The truth is simple: healthcare beyond profit must be the goal if we want fairness, equality, and dignity. Australia’s system shows both the promise of universal care and the dangers of corporate encroachment.

This article examines why Australia needs healthcare beyond profit and how corporate models undermine equality.

The Problem: How Profit Shapes Healthcare

1. The Rise of Corporate Healthcare

Over the past few decades, the role of corporations in healthcare has expanded. Private hospitals, insurers, and pharmaceutical giants now shape large parts of the system. What was once seen as a public service is increasingly treated as an investment market.

Private hospital networks focus on profitable procedures, insurers dictate what care is “covered,” and global pharmaceutical firms set prices detached from actual costs—the result: a healthcare landscape distorted by profit motives. The shift away from healthcare beyond profit has reshaped the system in favour of corporations.

2. Profit Before Patients

Corporate logic demands cost-cutting and revenue maximisation, not patient well-being.

  • Staffing and safety: Private providers cut staffing levels to reduce expenses, compromising patient safety.
  • Insurance games: Claims are delayed or denied, protecting profits.
  • Drug pricing: While Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) subsidises many essential medicines, serious gaps remain. New cancer treatments often take years to be listed, leaving families to pay tens of thousands out of pocket or delay care. Even with PBS support, ongoing co-payments for chronic conditions like diabetes can add up, while newer technologies, such as insulin pumps or glucose monitors, are only partially covered.

The result is an uneven system where some patients can afford breakthrough treatments while others face financial strain or go without.

3. Inequality in Access

In a profit-driven system, access is rationed by ability to pay.

  • Private premiums and gap fees rise faster than wages, leaving millions uninsured.
  • Rural and Indigenous communities, already underserved, face the most significant barriers.
  • Preventive care, which saves money and lives, is often neglected in favour of lucrative treatments.

Healthcare inequality mirrors and reinforces broader social divides.

The Impact: Real-World Consequences

4. Citizens’ Experiences

Australians feel the impact directly:

  • Families crushed by medical debt.
  • Patients skipping GP visits, tests, or medications because of cost.
  • Long waitlists in the public system, while corporate providers profit from quick elective surgeries.

Healthcare inequality is not abstract; it plays out in daily decisions between paying bills or getting care. For many families, the promise of healthcare beyond profit seems unattainable.

5. Who Benefits from the Status Quo

The corporate model delivers clear winners and losers.

  • Private hospitals profit from easy, high-margin procedures while avoiding severe, costly cases.
  • Public hospitals carry the burden of complex care, effectively subsidising the private system.
  • Pharmaceutical corporations extract maximum profits through inflated drug prices.
  • Politicians reap lobbying dollars and donations, entrenching the system.

The pattern is clear: corporations’ profit while the public shoulders the most complex and most expensive care.

The Australian Context

6. Medicare Under Threat

Medicare is a cornerstone of equity, but it is under constant strain. Bulk-billing rates are falling, gap fees are rising, and corporate providers increasingly control pathology, aged care, and mental health. Every step toward privatisation erodes universality. (Source)

7. Private vs Public Realities

A little-known truth: when Australians face serious or complex illnesses such as advanced cancer, trauma, or organ failure, they always end up in public hospitals.

Why? Private hospitals rarely have the intensive care units, transplant teams, or specialist resources needed for such conditions. They prefer elective surgeries that guarantee profit. Even those with top-tier private insurance often rely on the public system when their lives are at stake.

This creates a double standard: the public carries the risk, while the private sector takes the reward. This divide highlights why healthcare beyond profit is essential to protect Medicare.

8. Global Comparisons

  • United States: A system dominated by corporations produces extreme inequality and widespread medical bankruptcy. (Source)
  • United Kingdom: The NHS, once a beacon of equity, faces creeping privatisation and outsourcing pressures. (Source)
  • Nordic countries: Public-first systems prioritise equity and consistently deliver better outcomes at lower cost. (Source)

Australia sits at a crossroads: whether to follow the US path of corporate dominance or strengthen Medicare as a universal public good.

The Solution: Reclaiming Healthcare for People

9. Healthcare as a Public Good

Healthcare is not just a cost; it is an investment in people, productivity, and community wellbeing. Treating it as a commodity distorts priorities, while treating it as a public good ensures everyone has equal access to care when they need it.

Moving toward healthcare beyond profit ensures equality, prevention, and universal access.

10. Policy Solutions

To move beyond profit, Australia must:

  • Expand Medicare to cover dental, mental health, and pharmaceuticals.
  • End corporate rorts with stronger regulation and transparency.
  • Cap private profits in aged care and health insurance.
  • Rebuild public ownership in essential health services.

These reforms would strengthen equality while eliminating perverse incentives that allow corporations to profit from illness.

11. Australia’s Dollar Sovereignty as a Tool

The biggest myth is that we “cannot afford” universal healthcare. As a nation with dollar sovereignty, Australia issues its own currency. This means public spending is not constrained like a household budget. The actual limits are real resources: trained staff, hospital beds, and equipment.

Investing in healthcare builds national strength, reduces long-term costs, and ensures dignity for all. The barrier is not money, it is a matter of political will.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Is private healthcare needed to ease pressure on public hospitals?

Private providers primarily focus on profitable elective care. Severe conditions are still treated in the public system, so private care does little to relieve pressure.

Q2: How can Australia afford to expand Medicare?

Through monetary sovereignty, the government can fund healthcare beyond profit directly, ensuring resources are allocated where people need them most, without relying on profits.

Q3: Does corporate competition improve quality?

Evidence shows that competition increases inequality. Universal public-first systems consistently deliver better outcomes.

Q4: Why do private hospitals avoid severe cases?

Because they are resource-intensive and unprofitable, high-risk patients are transferred to public hospitals.

Q5: Does the PBS protect Australians from high drug prices?

The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) keeps many medicines affordable, but serious gaps remain. New cancer drugs can take years to be subsidised, forcing families into debt or delay. Even for subsidised treatments, ongoing co-payments, and limited coverage for devices like insulin pumps create financial strain.

Final Thoughts: A Call for Justice

Healthcare beyond profit is not optional; it is the foundation of a fair society. Allowing corporations to dictate who gets care entrenches inequality and undermines dignity. Australia has the tools, through monetary sovereignty and political courage, to guarantee healthcare for all.

The choice is clear: strengthen Medicare and invest in universal care, or slide toward a future where profit decides who lives and who suffers.

Australia has the tools to achieve healthcare beyond profit, but it requires political will.

What’s Your Experience?

Have you or someone you know had to rely on the public healthcare system because private hospitals were unable to treat a serious illness? Share your story below.

Call to Action

We’d Love to Hear from You

Please share your thoughts through our Reader Feedback form, check out what others are saying on our Testimonials page, or scroll down and leave a comment below. Your voice helps shape future content.

Spread the Word

Change starts with conversations. Share this article with friends, family, or your social networks so more Australians can see what’s possible. Every share helps build momentum for a fairer society.

Keep Independent Journalism Alive

We’re 100% reader-supported, no ads, no corporate strings, just honest, truth-driven journalism. If our work has informed or inspired you, please consider contributing. Even $5, or whatever you can spare, helps us keep publishing and reaching more Australians.

Donate Now – one-time or monthly.

Already donated? Share the love by leaving us a quick review on Google to help others find us.

Remember: as a nation with dollar sovereignty, Australia can invest public money to serve public purpose. Tell your MP you support that.

Engaging Question

What’s the first public investment you’d fund with Australia’s dollar sovereignty—housing, health, education, or green energy?

References

World Health Organisation: Universal Health Coverage and Equity.
OECD: Health at a Glance 2023.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Australia’s Health 2024.
Grattan Institute: Strengthening Medicare.
Healthcare beyond profits: Older Australians will pay a lot more.

 

This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia

 


Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN

Dear Reader,

Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.

Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.

Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.

With gratitude,

The AIMN Team

Donate Button

2 Comments

  1. A journalistic exercise in logical steps which leads to this conclusion:

    “Please share your thoughts through our Reader Feedback form, check out what others are saying on our Testimonials page, or scroll down and leave a comment below. Your voice helps shape future content.

    Change starts with conversations. Share this article with friends, family, or your social networks so more Australians can see what’s possible. Every share helps build momentum for a fairer society.”

    Outstanding effort Denis Hay unlike the performance of PPPs in the delivery of health services even from so-called free hospitals in Queensland where some items like podiatry prescriptions are delivered by private firms at great expense to public health.

    One private provider here in Q severed ties with a Chinese provider and the public hospital system. The hospital moved onto a McDonald’s styled provider with an emphasis on marketing hype.

    The cost of the shoes to that hospital from a Dutch firm doubled to $3,200. Despite electronic measuring the shoes were not satisfactory.

    Through internet searches, I tracked down the Chinese provider in Guangzhou where my feet measurements had been kept on file. I received the shoes in a few days by courier service for $800 which was half the cost charged to the Hospital. The former provider has severed ties with the public hospital because too many questions are asked about prices charged. Staying with the private health system meant that the patients simply paid more without question.

    My inquiries were not answered until I mentioned that I write for AIM Network. Instead of ignored emails, I received a reply in 20 minutes threatening me with legal action for my inquiries as the name of the former provider in China was commercial in confidence and for patients to track.

    Now, I have good shoes from China again where the local supplier there operates a podiatry service in Guangzhou. He is an Australian citizen and lively in China to supervise his business.

  2. After getting a herniated disc I my lower back, I was told that I would have to find some $60,000 (then) to have an operation to repair the problem privately, straight away. The same operation was to be available as a Medicare patient in 6 month’s time. I chose to wait, and by the time I reached the top of the list, my back was fine, with rest and some physio.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*