Aged Care Tightens Its Belt, AUKUS Loosens Its Own: An Interview in Satire

BY JENNIFER EVANS

INTERVIEWER: Minister, thank you for joining us.

MINISTER: Always a pleasure.

INTERVIEWER: Minister, people are concerned that aged care funding appears to be… disappearing.

MINISTER: I wouldn’t say disappearing.

INTERVIEWER: Moving?

MINISTER: Reprioritising.

INTERVIEWER: Onto a conveyor belt?

MINISTER: Onto a strategic allocation pathway.

INTERVIEWER: Which seems to lead directly to defence spending.

MINISTER: Only if you follow it with your eyes.

INTERVIEWER: It’s difficult not to. The belt is labelled “Aged Care,” and at the end of it sits AUKUS eating a three-course meal.

MINISTER: That’s a metaphor.

INTERVIEWER: The aged care sector looks rather thin.

MINISTER: We prefer the term efficient.

INTERVIEWER: It’s missing a shoe.

MINISTER: Streamlining.

INTERVIEWER: Minister, is money being taken from aged care to fund submarines?

MINISTER: No. Absolutely not.

INTERVIEWER: So the money was never there?

MINISTER: It was there conceptually.

INTERVIEWER: But no longer materially.

MINISTER: We’ve converted it into capability.

INTERVIEWER: For aged care?

MINISTER: For deterrence.

INTERVIEWER: Why does AUKUS need so much?

MINISTER: National security is very hungry.

INTERVIEWER: Hungrier than older Australians?

MINISTER: National security has a larger appetite.

INTERVIEWER: It’s wearing a larger belt.

MINISTER: We’re looking at expanding that belt.

INTERVIEWER: Minister, aged care assessors say they’re being told the algorithm is right and they’re wrong.

MINISTER: The algorithm is neutral.

INTERVIEWER: But it keeps downgrading people with complex needs.

MINISTER: That’s not downgrading. That’s data-led compassion.

INTERVIEWER: So if someone falls three times…

MINISTER: The algorithm counts falls very carefully.

INTERVIEWER: … carer exhaustion…

MINISTER: Carers are resilient.

INTERVIEWER: … unsafe hygiene…

MINISTER: We encourage independence.

INTERVIEWER: … and the algorithm still says “low need”?

MINISTER: Then the algorithm has spoken.

INTERVIEWER: Assessors say they used to be allowed to override the algorithm.

MINISTER: That was before consistency.

INTERVIEWER: Consistency with what?

MINISTER: With budget discipline.

INTERVIEWER: So aged care tightens its belt.

MINISTER: Yes.

INTERVIEWER: While AUKUS loosens its belt.

MINISTER: Strategically.

INTERVIEWER: And lobbyists applaud.

MINISTER: They’re very supportive of national priorities.

INTERVIEWER: Minister, what would you say to an older person who feels they’re being pushed off the conveyor belt?

MINISTER: I’d say they’re still very much in the system.

INTERVIEWER: Just not the funded part.

MINISTER: Funding is only one form of support.

INTERVIEWER: What are the others?

MINISTER: Hope. Resilience. And an appeals process via registered mail.

INTERVIEWER: Final question, Minister. If the algorithm keeps learning, what is it being trained to do?

MINISTER: To reflect government priorities.

INTERVIEWER: And those priorities are?

MINISTER: Submarines that don’t yet exist.

INTERVIEWER: At the expense of people who already do.

MINISTER: You’re being very emotional.

INTERVIEWER: I’m just watching the conveyor belt.

MINISTER: Exactly.

Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN

Dear Reader,

Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.

Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.

Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.

With gratitude, The AIMN Team