Dedication: To the Australian people, who deserve leaders whose sole loyalty is to them – not to foreign powers, corporate interests, or the hollow promise of a “secure” digital future.
Introduction: A State Within a State?
The Australian voter is entitled to representatives whose sole loyalty is to Australia and the Australian people. Yet recent events have raised a troubling question: Are some Australian politicians acting as advocates for a foreign state, rather than as representatives of their constituents?
This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a documented pattern of behaviour that spans multiple actors, multiple institutions, and multiple years. It is a pattern that has cost Australian lives, eroded Australian privacy, and transferred Australian wealth to foreign corporations and foreign intelligence agencies.
And it is a pattern that the Australian government – under both major parties – has actively facilitated.
The Politicians Who Speak for Another Country
Senator Raff Ciccone: A Consistent Record of Foreign Advocacy
Senator Ciccone has a long-standing, publicly documented relationship with the Israeli government. In October 2023, he expressed “solidarity with the people of Israel” and condemned the Hamas attack. In October 2024, he declared his “enduring support for the people of Israel and the Australian Jewish community.”
His record pre-dates October 7. In August 2023, he participated in a parliamentary delegation to Israel hosted by the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC). He has described Israel as “the miracle in the desert” and “a state that they can be incredibly proud of.” He has committed to “stand up against the unfair one-eyed treatment of Israel.”
The problem is not that Senator Ciccone supports Israel. The problem is that his support is so unconditional that it creates a clear contradiction with his duties as an Australian senator.
In May 2026, eleven Australians were detained by Israeli forces while attempting to reach Gaza as part of a humanitarian flotilla. Members of the group have alleged they experienced violence, sexual assault, and abuse while in custody. They have lodged a submission with the International Criminal Court alleging war crimes and other breaches of international law.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong has stated she believes the women who came forward, describing the allegations as “terrible” and “horrific”. The Australian Federal Police have formally launched an investigation into the allegations.
Yet Senator Ciccone publicly endorses the state accused of these acts. If the allegations are credible enough for the AFP to investigate, and for the Foreign Minister to publicly believe the victims, then endorsing the state accused of these acts creates a political and moral problem.
As the Centre for Independent Studies notes, the purpose of constitutional provisions against foreign allegiance is “to prevent persons with foreign loyalties or obligations from being members of the Australian Parliament.” While Senator Ciccone is not constitutionally barred, his public posture raises questions about where his primary loyalty lies.
Senator James Paterson: The “Destroy Israel” Threshold
Senator James Paterson, the shadow Home Affairs spokesperson, has taken this advocacy even further. He has publicly stated that “any support for destroying the state of Israel means you are a security risk to Australia.”
This is a remarkable claim. It means that a political opinion – supporting Palestinian statehood, criticising Israeli policy, or advocating for a one-state solution – can make an Australian citizen a “security risk.” It means that a foreign state’s territorial integrity is being treated as an Australian national security interest.
Paterson has also argued that “the act of simply liking a tweet that is supportive of Hamas or that calls for the destruction of Israel is enough for someone to be considered a security threat to Australia”. He has publicly supported “Israel doing what it needs to do to restore deterrence in the region, to put Iran back in its box and to dismantle the terrorist networks on its border.”
The question is not whether Israel has the right to defend itself. The question is whether Australian politicians should be acting as advocates for a foreign state’s military strategy.
Mike Burgess: The Spy Chief Who Became a Moralist
Mike Burgess, the Director-General of ASIO, has transformed his role from intelligence chief to public moralist. In his 2026 annual threat assessment, he claimed that the “hatred of Jews is one thing virtually all the violent extremist cohorts have in common.”
This is a remarkable claim. It means that antisemitism is being elevated to the status of a unifying theory of violent extremism – a claim that critics have described as “reckless, academically clumsy, and dangerous.”
Burgess has also revealed that ASIO’s review of past terrorism cases in 2024 did not extend to re-examining the Bondi gunmen, who had been investigated in 2019. That investigation concluded the Akrams did not pose a terrorism threat. The review was limited to 12 months due to a “resourcing decision.” Yet Burgess insists that ASIO’s counterterrorism resourcing was adequate.
The contradiction is stark. ASIO had the resources to investigate foreign intelligence threats but not to re-examine a potential domestic terror threat. The agency had the resources to issue public warnings about antisemitism but not to prevent the Bondi massacre.
The NDIS: AI Surveillance Dressed as Disability Support
The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is being transformed into a surveillance state testbed. Legislation before parliament permits the automation of discretionary decisions – including where “there is (a) a discretion being exercised; (b) an evaluative judgement being made; (c) a state of mind being formed.”
This is unprecedented. As former Human Rights Commissioner Ed Santow notes, “Generally, the advice that oversight bodies give to government is that discretion is something that is quintessentially a human task.” The power being proposed is “incredibly broad.”
The bill contains scarce safeguards. The Australian Council of Social Service states it should not pass. Over the next 10 years, $184.9 billion will be taken out of the scheme, and it is expected that 160,000 participants will be removed.
This is not disability support. This is disability control. And it is being enabled by the very politicians who claim to protect the vulnerable.
The AFP: Prosecuting Children While Missing Terrorists
In a stark example of misdirected priorities, the Australian Federal Police have been prosecuting a vulnerable autistic teenager while failing to prevent the Bondi massacre.
Thomas Carrick, an autistic 13-year-old, was “groomed” by the AFP in an undercover operation that “encouraged” his fixation on ISIS. The case was thrown out after a magistrate found the AFP had “groomed” him. He was later charged with fresh offences, pleading guilty to threatening a synagogue.
His parents are now suing the AFP, alleging discrimination against his age and disability. “My son, he wasn’t a terrorist, he had a fixation,” his mother told the ABC.
The AFP has laid 31 charges under new online extremism offences. Nineteen of them are against minors.
The system is targeting the vulnerable while failing to protect the public. The Bondi attack was not prevented. The Akrams were not re-investigated. But an autistic child was prosecuted.
The Royal Commission That Was Never Meant to Find the Truth
The Royal Commission into Antisemitism was called after 15 people were killed at a Hanukkah celebration at Bondi on December 14, 2025. It has heard genuine testimonies of antisemitism – Jewish patients fearing hospital surgery, Jewish students facing abuse in schools.
But the Commission has also been structured to serve a political purpose. The Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, Jillian Segal, has called antisemitism a “virus” and claimed that the fastest growing form of antisemitism in Australia is “the conflation of criticism of the Israeli regime with the Jewish community.”
This is a political agenda dressed as an inquiry. The Commission is being used to legitimise the suppression of political dissent, not to protect Jewish Australians from genuine harm.
The Question That Must Be Asked
To Burgess, to Ciccone, to Paterson, to the entire political class that has enabled this system:
What do you think you are playing at?
You have:
- Failed to prevent the Bondi massacre
- Prosecuted a vulnerable autistic child
- Delegated the lives of disabled Australians to AI
- Acted as advocates for a foreign state
- Transformed a spy agency into a moral crusade
- Spent billions on surveillance while cutting support for the vulnerable
None of it is good enough.
Conclusion: Leave the Future in Better Hands
The Australian people deserve better. They deserve leaders whose sole loyalty is to Australia. They deserve a government that protects the vulnerable, not surveils them. They deserve an intelligence agency that prevents attacks, not issues moral lectures.
The system is not broken. It is working exactly as designed – to extract wealth, power, and information from the Australian people for the benefit of foreign corporations and foreign states.
The solution is not to reform the system. The solution is to leave the future of Australia in better hands.
It is time for a change.
References
- “A Question of Loyalty – When Australian Politicians Speak for a Foreign State.” The AIM Network, 2026.
Transcript, “3AW Mornings with Tom Elliott.” Senator James Paterson, 4 September 2024.
“ASIO chief Mike Burgess defends resourcing decisions and warns of ‘unprecedented number of threats’.” ABC News, 24 June 2026.
“Australian citizen working as spy for Iran ‘orchestrated’ Bondi firebombing, Asio boss says.” The Guardian, 24 June 2026.
“Exclusive: Unprecedented automation in NDIS decisions.” The Saturday Paper (paywalled), 6 June 2026.
“Autistic teenager ‘Thomas Carrick’ sentenced over terror-related offences.” ABC News, 14 May 2026.
“ASIO’s 2024 review of past terror cases didn’t extend to prior flag on Bondi attackers.” ABC News, 25 May 2026.
“High-profile witness tells royal commission that antisemitism is a ‘virus’.” ABC News, 7 May 2026.
This article was first published in The Patrician’s Watch.
Also by Dr Klein
The Performance of Power – Pauline Hanson and the Politics of Self-Promotion
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless independent voice – holding power to account and delivering journalism that matters.
Running this site isn’t cheap. Rising costs mean we need your support now more than ever. Every donation, big or small, keeps our servers running, our writers working, and our stories free for everyone.
Donate here:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund for hosting and future improvements.
Thank you for standing with us. We couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude,
The AIMN Team
An excellent article exposing the corrupted ideals of so-called ”Australian security services and some COALition politicians”.
It ranks among the other unchallenged possibly treasonous activities of the former gg David hurley and his $17 million per year ”Leadership Training Programme” for his retirement, Barnaby ”Beetrooter” Joyce publicly accepting a $40,000 gift that was returned after much public approbation and Scummo’s USUKA sub debacle deal that sold out Australian sovereignty from which he benefited personally by receiving a directorship with a US sub building corporation. There are many more.