Mr Neal is Entitled to Be an Agitator, directed by Daryl Dellora, is a compelling and thought-provoking documentary that chronicles the tumultuous career of Lionel Murphy, a polarising Australian High Court Justice whose progressive ideals and legal battles left an indelible mark on the nation’s judicial and social landscape. Running at 58 minutes, this docu-drama uses Murphy’s story to explore broader issues of justice, surveillance, and societal reform, making it resonate with contemporary discussions on social cohesion and cultural inclusivity in Australia.
The film’s title stems from Murphy’s 1982 High Court judgment in Neal v. The Queen, where he defended Aboriginal activist Mr. Neal, convicted for spitting at a white store owner and initially sentenced to two months’ hard labour, later increased to six months on appeal. Murphy’s ruling, paraphrasing Oscar Wilde, declared Neal “entitled to be an agitator,” framing activism as essential for societal progress. This case, vividly introduced through a re-enactment featuring Ernie Dingo as Neal, sets the tone for the documentary’s exploration of Murphy as a champion of the marginalised.
Dellora’s approach blends archival footage, interviews with notable figures like Gough Whitlam, Michael Kirby, and Ingrid Murphy, and a reflective narrative to paint Murphy as both a visionary reformer and a controversial figure. The film highlights his radical contributions, including the Family Law Act, Trade Practices Act, and a proposed Bill of Rights, which challenged Australia’s conservative legal establishment. It also delves into the final four years of Murphy’s life, marked by allegations of judicial misconduct and an intense battle to retain his High Court position amid media scrutiny and police surveillance. This framing positions Murphy as a symbol of resistance against systemic forces, encapsulated in his mantra, “Don’t let the bastards win,” as recounted by his wife, Ingrid.
The documentary’s strength lies in its ability to weave Murphy’s personal story with broader societal questions. It critiques the role of media and security surveillance in targeting prominent figures, a topic that feels strikingly relevant in 2025 amid Australia’s debates over misinformation laws and digital privacy. By showcasing Murphy’s advocacy for Indigenous rights and progressive reforms, the film aligns with current parliamentary discussions on social cohesion, particularly the push for inclusivity and addressing historical wrongs, as seen in recent MP speeches and the Welcome to Country debates. Ernie Dingo’s performance and the inclusion of voices like Jenny Hocking and Neville Wran add authenticity and emotional weight, grounding the film in Australia’s cultural and political history.
However, the documentary isn’t without flaws. Critics, as noted in Senses of Cinema, suggest it risks hagiography by presenting Murphy as a near-mythic figure, potentially oversimplifying the complexities of his controversies. The “us vs. them” narrative – pitting Murphy against a vague establishment – may alienate viewers who prefer a more nuanced examination of his alleged misbehavior. The re-enactment of the Neal case, while striking, feels slightly jarring and may not fully integrate with the documentary’s otherwise sober tone. Additionally, at 58 minutes, the film occasionally struggles to balance its ambitious scope, leaving some of Murphy’s reforms underexplored.
In the context of 2025 Australia, where social cohesion is a parliamentary flashpoint, Mr Neal is Entitled to Be an Agitator remains a powerful reminder of the role of dissent in driving progress. Murphy’s defense of Indigenous activism and his fight against surveillance resonate with ongoing debates about cultural acknowledgment and privacy laws. The film’s message – that agitators are necessary for change – echoes the calls from people such as former MP Zoe Daniel for inclusive discourse and reform. Awarded an Australian Human Rights Award, Dellora’s work is both a tribute to Murphy’s legacy and a call to question systemic power, though it could benefit from a less idealised lens.
Rating: 4/5. A poignant, if occasionally one-sided, exploration of a legal maverick whose battles remain relevant to Australia’s cultural and social challenges today.
Agitator’s Spotlight
This award-winning documentary packed out Thornbury Picture House last night, enthralling a sell-out crowd in stunning 4K. Its popularity is no surprise, and you can catch this acclaimed film through the following platforms:
- DocPlay – Available to stream via a subscription.
- Plex – The film is currently available to watch for free (ad-supported).
- Vimeo On Demand – Available to rent or purchase.
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

MICHAEL TAYLOR
A terrific, muscular review that is without fear or favour and makes me hope that the ABC or SBS considers running this reprint. The irony of it all. It might as well speak of today. Indeed, as history often does.
Mr Taylor is entitles to be an agitator. AIMN is entitled to be an agitator. We are all entitled to be an agitator and rage against the madness, protest and march away from the cliff, rather than walk zombie-like towards it.
Ah, for some people like Murphy in today’s bland, careerist,neoliberal- shackled third raters.We well know that there’s none in the opposition, and likely never will be.
As for the government, Ed Husic is a possible contender, speaking out unflinchingly on Palestine, despite the timorous approach of church mouse Abalone.
Nothing like a bit of factional appeasement to get rid of possibly your best ministerial performer,eh Albo?Coming back to bite you on your timid arse.Perhaps you confused Ed with Marles?Another poor decision.
Harry, with “today’s bland, careerist,neoliberal- shackled third raters” you’ve hit the nail right on the head.
I can remember when Labor used to have MPs from a working class background. Ex-shearers and the like.
And most of them were worth their weight in gold.
But it’s not only politics where we see this decline, it’s across the board.
Even professional sport suffers from it.
It’s a symptom of civilisational decline, because in all fields we’ve killed off risk taking, along with idealism and imagination and initiative.
Civilisations in decline get taken over.
Saw the film with David Bradbury. Sorry I missed seeing you, Michael! I was the one on the walker! As to my comments, I canned them after seeing Tess’s. No-one could sum it up better. Murphy was way before his time as a humanitarian, anti-racist, anti-sexist reformer. His party let him down when the going got tough. Sadly, he’d still be a misfit today. Nothing has changed.