By Denis Hay
Description
Government spending directs billions in public money – could it be used better? See what your government could fund instead of wasteful deals.
Introduction: When Numbers Lose Meaning
Location: A single mum in regional Queensland watches the evening news.
Action: The presenter says the government has committed $368 billion to nuclear submarines.
Thoughts: “I can’t even get my roof fixed. What does $368 billion even mean?”
Emotion: Frustration. Confusion. Helplessness.
In Australia, politicians casually toss around figures like billions and trillions. Yet, for most of us, even $1 million feels abstract, let alone a number with nine or twelve zeroes. But what if we could visualise these amounts, understand what they buy, and imagine how different our country could be if government spending were spent on us?
The Problem: Big Numbers, Bigger Disconnect
A Million vs A Billion vs A Trillion
Let’s break it down:
- 1 million seconds = 12 days
- 1 billion seconds = 31.7 years
- 1 trillion seconds = 31,709 years
That’s the scale we’re dealing with. Now apply that to money.
- $1 million might buy three modest homes.
- $1 billion builds 10,000 public houses.
- $368 billion – the cost of AUKUS subs – could fund universal dental, free uni, AND build 1 million homes.
So why don’t we feel it? Because we’re not supposed to.
Could you spend a trillion dollars in your lifetime?
Where the Government Actually Spends Our Public Money
The 2024–25 federal budget outlines over $730 billion in planned spending:
Defence: $53.4 billion (expected to rise to $100B with AUKUS)
Health ($110 billion):
- This includes public hospital funding (via state/territory block grants), including Medicare, PBS, and aged care services.
- It also includes subsidies for private health insurance (around $6–7 billion annually).
- Some funding goes to private sector providers delivering publicly funded services.
Education ($41 billion):
- This includes Commonwealth funding for public and private schools (the latter receives a significant portion, more than public schools).
- Covers funding to universities and TAFEs, though much of this is skewed toward universities.
- Private school subsidies are estimated to exceed $15 billion over several years.
- Fossil fuel subsidies: Estimated at over $11 billion
- Corporate tax concessions: Tens of billions lost in loopholes
✅ Meanwhile:
- Public housing stock is falling.
- TAFE campuses are closing.
- Regional bank branches are vanishing.
- Out-of-pocket health costs are rising.
Source: Budget.gov.au
Dr. Steven Hail’s extensive work in Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and critiques of neoliberal economic policies consistently highlight how public funds are often directed toward private sector benefits.
What These Billions Could Really Do
Submarines vs Society
If they arrive at all, $368 billion for nuclear submarines won’t arrive until 2040. But the need is now:
- That sum could fund dental care for all Australians, every year for the next 40 years.
- Or build one million public homes – ending homelessness and easing rental stress.
- Or abolish all HECS debt and restore free university education.
Fossil Fuel Subsidies vs a Clean Future
While firestorms and floods devastate communities, fossil fuel giants such as Woodside and Santos receive over $11 billion in annual subsidies.
Imagine instead:
- Solar panels and batteries for 2 million homes
- National job guarantee in renewable industries
- Revived rail infrastructure and rural transit
“It feels like the government is fuelling the fire while we’re burning,” said one bushfire survivor in northern NSW.
Australia’s Dollar Sovereignty: A Hidden Superpower
Unlike households or states, Australia issues its own currency – the Australian dollar.
What This Means
- We can never run out of Australian dollars.
- Our spending limit is not revenue, but inflation and available resources.
- Budget surpluses shrink the economy; deficits grow, especially in downturns.
As an Economist, Professor Bill Mitchell puts it:
“A sovereign currency issuer can afford anything for sale in its own currency. The constraint is political, not financial.”
So why are services underfunded while corporate tax cuts and military expansions thrive?
Because the myth of “fiscal responsibility” is weaponised to serve those already in power.
Government Spending: Investment or Burden?
When people hear the term government spending, they often think of waste or handouts, but it is shaped more by ideology than economics.
Government infrastructure is crucial for health and future prosperity. It’s how nations build roads, fund education, protect the environment, and respond to emergencies like floods or pandemics.
Misunderstanding Government Spending Holds Us Back
Thanks to decades of neoliberal messaging, many Australians believe public spending should be minimised to avoid “burdening taxpayers.” But this framing ignores two key facts:
* Government spending creates jobs, boosts productivity, and strengthens the economy.
* When the federal government spends, it injects money into the economy, not removes it.
As economist Mariana Mazzucato notes, “The state is not just a market fixer. It’s a market shaper.”
Smart Government Spending Builds Nationhood
Think of Medicare, the ABC, the NDIS, public libraries, and clean water systems. These weren’t market creations – they resulted from visionary government spending.
When spending is strategic, transparent, and equitable, it:
* Reduces inequality.
* Fosters innovation.
* Strengthens communities.
* Improves long-term well-being.
Australia’s challenge isn’t too much spending – it’s spending in the wrong places. Government spending can be used for the public good if the government has the will to do so.
What $1 Billion Could Buy Instead?
To make it real, here’s what just $1 billion could fund:
- 10,000 new public housing units
- 50,000 students’ university tuition
- Free dental care for 1 million Australians
- 25,000 full-time public sector jobs
- 500 new bulk-billing GP clinics
- Reopen 100 TAFE campuses across the country
“We’re told we must choose between health, education, and housing – but there’s enough for all three. We need to change the priorities.” – Community advocate, Melbourne.
Why Doesn’t It Happen?
Neoliberalism’s Legacy
- For decades, both major parties have embraced privatisation, deregulation, and surplus fetishism.
- Services are defunded, sold off, or corporatised.
- Profit trumps people, and donations keep politicians quiet.
Media Misinformation
- Dominant media outlets blur the lines between public and private interest.
- Citizens are fed soundbites, not substance.
- The myth: “Australia is broke.”
- The truth: “Australia chooses not to spend on you.”
Reclaiming Public Money for the Public Good
Redirect Resources
Other nations prove what’s possible:
- Norway uses its sovereign wealth to fund universal services, while Australia gives away its gas.
- Germany and Finland offer free higher education
- China, using its currency sovereignty, has lifted 800 million out of poverty while building modern cities and infrastructure
Australia could:
- Cancel HECS debt and make education free again
- Establish a National Housing Authority
- Guarantee jobs through direct public employment
- Fully fund NDIS, Medicare, and dental care under one roof
Invest in the People, Not Corporations
Public money should serve:
• Wellbeing
• Sustainability
• Equity
• Community resilience
It’s time to reverse the flow of government spending – from corporate welfare to citizen care.
It’s Not the Missing Money – It’s the Missing Will
Australia is not short of money. It is short of political courage and media honesty.
For decades, our leaders have chosen defence contractors over hospitals, donors over students, and profits over people. But we are not powerless.
When we understand the truth about government spending and dollar sovereignty, we gain the power to demand a future that serves all of us.
Q&A Section
Q: What is dollar sovereignty, and why does it matter?
A: It means Australia issues its own currency, allowing it to spend to meet public needs, so long as inflation and real resources are managed. It debunks the myth that “we can’t afford” public services.
Q: What’s wrong with billion-dollar defence spending?
A: It’s a long-term, high-risk, low-return investment that benefits private contractors while neglecting urgent public needs like housing, healthcare, and climate resilience.
Q: What can I do as one citizen?
A: Get informed. Share independent media. Support candidates and policies that prioritise public spending for the public good.
Question for You
Have you or someone you know struggled under poor government spending choices? What would you fund with a billion dollars?
Please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Call to Action: Demand Better Use of Our Public Money
If you found this article insightful, explore more about political reform and Australia’s monetary sovereignty at Social Justice Australia.
Share this article with your community to help drive the conversation toward a more just and equal society.
💬 Click on our “Reader Feedback” menu: 🧡 Submit your testimonial and help shape the conversation today!
Support Social Justice Australia – Help Keep The Platform Running
We deliver independent, people-first analysis – free from corporate influence. To keep doing this, we need your help.
💡 Your support helps:
• Keep this site running ad-free
• Fund research that challenges the status quo
• Raise awareness on critical policies
🔗 Donate now – even a small amount makes a big difference.
This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
The biggest no-brainer in Australia is engaging with the USA.
The US claim that China will attack our country is little other than CIA
inventiveness.
Meanwhile, the US is feeding itself from Australia’s spilling bunkers of annual taxpayer revenues, held under their umbrella of false and misleading powers of suggestion.
Better for the people of Australia were to have our nation divest itself through our sovereign independent nation status.
Any reason not to do so is just our government’s cowardly smoke and mirrors mentality,
Reminiscent of the John Howard era, when Howard laid himself prostrate before the feet of whoever was the US President.
John Howard had a huge fear of the Australian people learning of his craven, cowardly self.
Again on MMT, it’s all very well to have academic discussion papers, but bypasses basic issue, there neither models nor working exemplars.
What is ignored is how we like other nations leverage temporary resident churnover as solution to ageing znd tax base decline, as ‘net financial budget contributors’, like short term tourists, via GST, PAYE and privately insured.
The latter applies to the largest cohort, mislabelled as ‘immigrants’, international students and education who are under attack by media channeling white Christian nationalist Tanton Network; US, UK and Oz (coincidence?).
Locally a SusPopAus person, when challenged, claimed no need for temporary resident churn over, and dropped a link from Tanton ‘Overpopulation Project’, promoting MMT as solution.
Me thinks potentially more Trussonomics or Trumponomics to create chaos and crash economy then re-engineer for small government, fewer public services, more privatisation, less regulation and low or no taxes…..then getting older voters to support the same…..
https://overpopulation-project.com/why-modern-monetary-theory-is-good-news-for-population-policy/
Careful what you wish for?
Andrew, while I understand your concern about how economic theories can be misused, I think it’s important to clarify what MMT actually proposes.
MMT doesn’t advocate for chaos or reckless spending—it explains how a currency-issuing government like Australia can responsibly use its monetary sovereignty to meet real-world needs: housing, healthcare, education, infrastructure, and full employment.
The risk you mention—that MMT could be hijacked to justify economic shocks or authoritarian restructuring—isn’t inherent to MMT itself, but to how any policy framework might be manipulated by vested interests.
I believe in applying MMT principles transparently and democratically to improve public wellbeing—not shrink government or privatise services.
If you’re aware of any serious MMT scholars (like Stephanie Kelton, Bill Mitchell, or Steven Hail) who support the kind of agenda you’re describing, I’d be genuinely interested in seeing that evidence. Otherwise, it feels like a mischaracterisation of what MMT actually aims to achieve.