The People versus Murdoch: the rise of independent media

Elderly man wearing glasses, looking upwards.
Image: Screenshot from CNBC video

Over a decade ago, I wrote about a subject that remains as relevant today as ever. For nearly twenty years, I’ve been hammering away at the keyboard – a space where I could speak freely, defy control, and fight for democracy and truth. It was a place to be heard. But it wasn’t always this way. Before the rise of bloggers and independent media, we were limited to listening to those who controlled the narrative.

Let’s revisit the days when we found our voice, thanks to the emergence of bloggers, citizen journalists and independent media.

Plato (428–348 BC) opposed the written word, arguing it would erode memory. He believed people would stop memorising facts or stories, and that spreading words indiscriminately was wasteful and untrustworthy. How prophetic. Spoken over two millennia ago, his words feel strikingly contemporary. Consider today’s mainstream media (MSM), which claims its journalists are reliable, truthful, and objective. Who do you believe – them or Plato?

In recent decades, the MSM has leaned toward stories that are trivial, narrow, shallow, and sensationalist – often at the expense of truth. As Plato might have lamented, the MSM spreads words indiscriminately, wastefully, and with questionable trustworthiness. Truth, it seems, doesn’t sell newspapers.

Some bloggers echoed Plato’s concerns, prompting a fierce backlash from the MSM. I recall reading articles from the Murdoch press that unleashed a near-xenophobic hatred toward the blogosphere, attacking it with more zeal than they ever directed at incompetent politicians. One such critique described the blogosphere as:

A small, incestuous clique of self-identified lefties, with readerships composed mostly of themselves… Naivety and self-righteousness define the vast majority of the Australian blogosphere, along with whining conspiracy theories. Those who hide under the veil of anonymity, taking cheap shots to satisfy their trendy social agenda.

The MSM claimed, “The great thing about newspapers is that, love us or hate us, we’re the voice of the people. We represent the community, their views, their aspirations, and their hopes.” Represent the community? Don’t they mean control the community?

Independent media has profoundly reshaped modern communication, much to the chagrin of traditional print media. The MSM often dismisses us as falling below their standards, but I disagree. Today’s news stories are frequently little more than opinion pieces, unchallenged and unaccountable. Citizen journalists, however, hold the MSM to account – a role that sits uneasily with the media establishment.

Many citizen journalists possess a natural gift for taking the day’s main story, transforming it into something worth reading, and fostering a range of opinions that the MSM often ignores. In just a few years, blogging – in particular- became a global phenomenon, reshaping journalism and unlocking publishing opportunities previously unimaginable. To me, blogging is journalism. While individual blogs may have limited readership, sites with aligned agendas often link together to amplify their impact. In contrast, MSM blog platforms typically filter out contributions that don’t fit their narrative, rendering them inaccessible to dissenting voices.

So, what impact have independent sites had? Their influence has been most profound in the political sphere.

In a March 2010 essay titled The Influence of Political Blog Sites on Democratic Participation, ShariVari wrote:

A computer-mediated environment makes it easier for citizens to express their feelings about political candidates and speak more candidly than in face-to-face settings. The internet’s diversity provides access to a wide range of opinions and information, potentially shaping or changing individuals’ political views. By disregarding blog sites with corporate or agenda-driven motives, political bloggers can foster peer-to-peer discussions of personal viewpoints.

This perspective was heartening for a then-blogger like me, who had lost faith in the MSM. It affirmed that independent voices could have an impact, however small at the time. If Australia followed the U.S. trend, a thriving blogging industry might one day emerge.

ShariVari concluded:

All research shows that increased opportunities for participation encourage democracy… Citizens are increasingly turning to and trusting the internet for accurate information, using it as a platform for participatory democracy, and becoming more knowledgeable about politics in the process. A Spiral of Silence – where people self-censor due to perceived minority views – is less likely in an online environment where citizens evaluate each other’s opinions without status cues like gender, race, or socioeconomic status. Blog sites are undeniably expanding the ways citizens participate in democracy.

Fifteen years ago, those in democratic societies seeking to share their ideas faced editorial gatekeepers whose policies often reflected their own ideologies or market-driven priorities. Today, this control is crumbling in the face of participatory media. Audiences no longer want to be passive consumers – they want to comment on and even create the news.

Citizen journalists believe they are better equipped to provide the diversity that modern democracies need, a diversity often ignored by traditional media. Independent platforms allow them to expose doctored or omitted facts, highlight biases, and give voice to alternate perspectives. These sites encourage readers to think critically, ask probing questions, and challenge the MSM’s hidden agendas. Independent media is awash with objective, fact-based analysis that counters the narratives of established outlets.

The explosion of independent sites isn’t merely an echo of dissenting voices – it’s a response to the MSM’s failure to provide objective, impartial reporting. If the MSM were truly committed to quality journalism, there might be no need for the millions of blogs and independent platforms that exist today to fill the gaps they’ve left.

In essence, it’s the People versus Murdoch… then and now.


Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN

Dear Reader,

Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.

Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.

Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.

With gratitude,

The AIMN Team

Donate Button

 

About Michael Taylor 179 Articles
Michael is a retired Public Servant. His interests include Australian and US politics, history, travel, and Indigenous Australia. Michael holds a BA in Aboriginal Affairs Administration, a BA (Honours) in Aboriginal Studies, and a Diploma of Government.

8 Comments

  1. re. “The MSM claimed, “The great thing about newspapers is that, love us or hate us, we’re the voice of the people. We represent the community, their views, their aspirations, and their hopes.””… it is, of course, a bald and bare-faced lie.

    A cursory few of the many media barons includes William Randolph Hearst, Rupert Murdoch, Jeff Bezos, Conrad Black, Robert Maxwell, Kerry Packer, Silvio Berlusconi, the Fairfax Family… an extremely truncated few among the many millionaire / billionaire business class who’ve made their fortunes peddling their versions of what ‘the people want to hear’.

    These tycoons are, in essence, puppeteers, manipulating the strings of their minions – editors, journalists, opinion writers – along with applying pressure on the political classes to conform to their wishes or be judged accordingly.

    A great shame, really, that the MSM have successfully contrived over generations to manipulate reality so successfully; hiding truths, promulgating falsehoods, acting as propaganda vehicles, acting as agents for those hidden from public scrutiny, single-minded in pursuit of power and wealth. A pox on the whole rotten corpus!

  2. Murdoch (now the Murdochracy) has become the most destructive destabilizing force in Western communities. Murdoch Snr realised early in his life that that it would be necessary to forgo his native Australian citizenship in favor of “becoming an American”. So that rather than being a big fish in a little pond he could be a shark among the minnows. His style of journalism thrives by trivialising humanity.

  3. I trust those like Michael West, Heather Cox Richardson and AIMN long before I’d trust NewsCorpse.

  4. Murdoch closed 120+ Oz papers, over 80 were restarted by ex journos, there’s some 50 left supported by their regional/local communities. What we lost is ongoing close scrutiny of local pollies, business, shonky tradies,local issue analysis, police/courts, Iding conmen & thieves and lots of local community news. Online blogs only do so much because Journalism is labour intensive but I hope new independents are profitable to generate local coverage and public disgust forces an end to pro business, fossil fuel vested interest bias of current dwindling cartel MSM owners.

  5. In the not-so-recent past I was a staunch supporter of the ABC and argued vehemently that a national broadcaster was essential as an independent, reliable source which could be used as a yardstick to judge the corporate media.

    The Gaza war has exposed the ABC as partisan and unreliable, with the exception of John Lyons.(Disclaimer: I haven’t been able to see anything of it for nearly 6 months, maybe it has changed.) I note that John is no longer the ABC’s Middle East correspondent.

    If the ABC has failed to independently and without fear report on Gaza, that raises the question what else has it been partisan about. It shows a clear leaning towards the duopoly and indeed an outright anti-Greens bias, and what else?

    The Coalition have long whinged about supposed ABC bias against them (strongly disagree, if anything they had cowed the ABC into giving them an easy ride.) One of the things they suggest is removing the news part of the ABC. My first reaction is ‘yeah, they would say that the dishonest fraudsters.’

    Is it necessary anymore? With the rise of independent media. There are loads of good, useful sites. There are sites that do investigative journalism and sites that do political commentary.

    Having lost faith in the reliability of the ABC and having seen biases within the ABC I’m not so sure it is necessary as a news outlet?

    So as to stop its audience shifting to the appalling Ch 9,7 & 10 news broadcasts??

    As an aside, from what I’ve read and watched (Owen Jones is a great source) the BBC is so bad in regard to Gaza that someone or some people should be in the dock facing charges of crimes against humanity.

  6. I have not consumed MSM for ages, switched off 9,7 & 10 years ago in addition to ABC, it used to be a must watch for Q&A, Insiders and when Barry Cassidy left that was it.

    In my humble opinion, this masthead has more value from a journalistic view and far better articles from an erudite readership, more strength to us all.

    Read many others as well Michael West Media, The Saturday Paper, The Australia Institute, Kangaroo Court (Jurisprudence); The Conversation (Academic) Al Jazeera, Counterpunch & PBS.

  7. Heather

    Well said.

    This site is a treasure.

    I intend to watch the ABC again when I can do so, to diversify my newsfeed, to find out what Newscorp are saying without paying to do so, to find out the Zionist perspective on things, to find out the duopoly perspective.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*