Why Operation Epic Fury is Burning Down without Burning Out
Thirty-two days into this firestorm, the grim ledger grows heavier by the hour. Thirteen U.S. service members now rest in flag-draped coffins at Dover Air Force Base, their deaths a stark counterpoint to every vow of surgical precision and swift resolution. Brent crude has rocketed past $115 a barrel. Nearly two thousand ships, hulking supertankers among them, skulk on either flank of the Strait of Hormuz, engines humming in futile readiness, permitted only selective passage under the shadow of Iranian mines and missile batteries. Insurance underwriters are scrambling, premiums spiking as the world’s principal energy artery throbs with undisguised peril. Iran, battered yet unbowed, has not merely survived the onslaught. It has struck back with a tenacity and rational calculation that defies every assumption on which this war was built.
From the digital ramparts of Truth Social, President Trump unleashes threats of “Death, Fire, and Fury,” painting Iran as a regime ripe for collapse. Tehran refuses the cue. What was billed as a blitzkrieg, a lightning campaign of overwhelming dominance has morphed into something far more intractable: a protracted contest in which raw firepower meets the unyielding arithmetic of endurance, and endurance, on current evidence, is winning.
The Scoreboard Nobody in Washington Wants to Read
Open-source intelligence lays bare the ferocity on both sides. In the war’s opening salvos, Iran fired approximately 420 missiles across nine countries and maritime targets: 162 aimed at Israel, 167 hammering the UAE, 46 pounding Qatar. Over the first five days alone, more than 90 strikes targeted Israeli soil, with roughly 20 breaching civilian defences to claim at least ten lives; a toll surpassing sixty percent of the entire Iranian barrage from June’s twelve-day war. The horror crystallised in Beit Shemesh, where nine civilians died in a synagogue shelter. In Tel Aviv, a missile tore through a residential block, killing one and wounding dozens after air raid sirens choked into silence.
Iranian missiles landed within twenty kilometres of Dimona, Israel’s nuclear reactor, inflicting over 180 casualties in those strikes alone. Iranian forces crippled the Orot Rabin power station near Hadera, which furnishes between twenty and twenty-five percent of Israel’s national grid. CENTCOM confirms thirteen American deaths and hundreds wounded, the bulk from sustained assaults on Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, satellite imagery quietly dismantles the triumphalist briefings: Kharg Island, declared “totally demolished” by U.S. spokespeople, still hosts tankers moored and loading. Reality has a way of surviving press conferences.
The War That Wouldn’t End on Schedule
Operation Epic Fury launched with the thunder of stealth bombers and precision munitions, promising a decisive blow. Instead it has settled into stalemate, not of Hollywood heroics but of grinding attrition, a domain for which Iran has been preparing for twenty years. Planners anticipated Tehran’s surrender within days. Reality delivered a decentralised command structure that weathers the storm and retaliates against oil infrastructure and American outposts with unnerving coordination.
“We took a little excursion,” Trump reflected on March 9, framing the venture as a brief purge of “evil.” The excursion lingers. Decapitation strikes claimed Ayatollah Khamenei and swathes of the Iranian elite, yet the Islamic Republic’s foundations held. Seven B-2 Spirit bombers made the crossing from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, unleashing GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, thirty-thousand-pound behemoths, against Fordow, entombed eighty to ninety metres beneath unyielding limestone and dolomite, well beyond the bombs’ rated penetration depth. F-22s and F-35Cs swept ahead on suppression missions. Thirty Tomahawks streaked from the USS Georgia in the Gulf of Oman. Israel synchronised strikes on Tehran, Isfahan, Tabriz, Mashhad, Shiraz, Bandar Abbas, and Kermanshah. CENTCOM touted a thousand targets neutralised in the first twenty-four hours. Iran’s answer: strikes on twenty-seven U.S. bases, refineries ablaze from Bahrain to the UAE, and mines choking the Hormuz approaches.
By March 9, Mojtaba Khamenei, harder-edged than his father, had ascended as Supreme Leader, rallying the Revolutionary Guard Corps into a tighter fist. The missiles kept flying.
What Victory Is Supposed to Look Like
To grasp the impasse, define the objectives. Washington’s stated aims focus on obliterating Iran’s missile stockpiles, production facilities, naval assets, and security apparatus; regime change quietly shelved in favour of “targeted degradation,” which is Washington’s way of admitting the original ambition was fantasy. Tehran, by contrast, pursues survival, deterrence through pain, and economic strangulation via Hormuz disruptions and strikes on Gulf partners. Neither objective yields easily to airpower alone. Ground escalation looms as the supposed solution. It demands allies. The allies are not coming.
God’s Own Stalemate
Beneath the tactical ledger simmers a deeper rot: a leadership that has infused this war with apocalyptic zeal and called it strategy. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, tattooed with a Jerusalem cross, forged in Fox News’ green rooms, sponsor of Pentagon prayer services that would embarrass a medieval bishop, has reframed Iran’s defeat as divine mandate. Non-commissioned officers have told their charges that this conflict fulfils “God’s plan,” with Trump cast as Jesus-anointed harbinger of the end times. Over two hundred such complaints have surged across fifty installations, according to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation. Hegseth has prayed aloud for “overwhelming violence” in the name of the Prince of Peace, a fusion of crusade and command in which prophecy eclipses professionalism and operational prudence becomes potential heresy.
The Mutiny That Dare Not Speak Its Name
“We negotiate with bombs,” the Secretary smirks, a declaration that betrays an alarming contempt for the very profession he nominally commands, and for the thirteen flag-draped coffins that have already made the journey home to Dover.
The professional military does not miss the distinction. It has spent two hundred and fifty years building an institution accountable to the Constitution, to the laws of armed conflict, to the hard-won doctrine that separates a disciplined force from a mob with aircraft carriers. Hegseth has spent fourteen months dismantling that accountability with a jackhammer and a prayer book, substituting political fealty for professional judgement, replacing rules of engagement with the Book of Revelation, and inviting a Christian nationalist pastor who believes women should not vote to lead worship services in the Pentagon auditorium.
Within the ranks, unease coalesces into action. Conscientious objector inquiries have erupted; a staggering 1,000% increase per the Center on Conscience and War, overwhelming the GI Rights Hotline with unprecedented volume. These are not faint-hearts but patriots bound by oath to the Constitution, not to revelation’s fevered script. Public sentiment mirrors the fracture: Pew polling registers 59% of Americans now viewing the war as a profound mistake, eroding the domestic reservoir for prolongation. Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine delivers briefings with the steady gravitas of a career soldier. Hegseth postures otherwise.
When the gap between the man at the podium and the men and women in the field becomes that wide, the institution does not break all at once. It bleeds quietly. Careers go unlived. Expertise walks out the door in civilian clothes. And conscientious objector applications pile up on desks across fifty installations; each one a small, formal, legally protected act of institutional self-defence. A soldier’s way of saying: this is not the oath I swore, and you are not the commander I owe it to.
History will recognise what Clausewitz understood and Hegseth cannot: that war prosecuted without rational political purpose, without professional discipline, and without the legitimacy conferred by law and allies is not war at all. It is organised recklessness; expensive, bloody, and in the end its own undoing.
The Mosaic That Won’t Shatter
Iran fights as if war were a marathon of collective will, not a duel of arsenals. No centralised pyramid vulnerable to a single decisive strike, instead a mosaic of distributed leadership: shatter one tile and the image coheres. Four weeks under relentless assault, its navy degraded, commands decimated, infrastructure scarred, and it still mounts synchronised attrition campaigns, severing oil lifelines and igniting logistics nodes across the region. Even the Minab school strike, 165 young lives extinguished, forged not fracture but furious national unity.
There is nothing like being bombed by people who believe God commanded them to do it for cementing resolve.
The Ground Invasion Fantasy
Into this reality strides the Pentagon’s next brainwave: ground operations. Trump muses about seizing Kharg Island as casually as reclaiming a wayward snag at a backyard barbie. Raid plans and coastal incursions leak into the press. Iran’s doctrine awaits them; dug-in defences, terrain turned to kill zones, and a population that has just watched its schoolgirls bombed in the name of Jesus. Who fills the coalition ranks? China demurs. Europe sues for distance. NATO wavers. Gulf states, smarting from direct hits on their own refineries, are quietly recalibrating their enthusiasm. A ground operation demands vast logistics, staging grounds, and the kind of international legitimacy that burns to nothing when your Defence Secretary declares the war a biblical prophecy.
The Arithmetic of Endurance
Airpower alone rarely crowns victors, as Russia’s Ukrainian slog attests, and now reaffirms in Persian. Billions vanish in weeks. Hegseth is eyeing $200 billion more from a Congress with no timeframe offered and no exit visible. Iran cradles capabilities yet unloosed, a veiled arsenal calibrated to prolong the bleed precisely long enough for American political will to crack. Both sides wield a veto over decisive victory. Neither can impose a settlement. This is managed failure dressed in the rhetoric of triumph.
The Peace That Dare Not Speak Its Name
What unravels this knot? Not deeper bombardment. Not invasion’s mirage. Not the fervour of Pentagon prayer. Pakistan is said to be mediating. Turkey and Egypt are working the phones in Islamabad. The diplomatic architecture for an off-ramp exists, fragile, contested, dependent on Trump’s attention span outlasting his ego. But using it requires admitting what is now obvious to everyone outside the Oval Office and the Pentagon chapel: that regime change, nuclear capitulation, and strategic submission are illusions under current means, with current leadership, and without the allies whose assistance was burned to cinders in the bonfire of Trump’s vanity.
Thirty-two days in, Operation Epic Fury has achieved something genuinely historic: it has made the world less safe, energy more expensive, American alliances more threadbare, Iran more unified, and the US military more fractured – all simultaneously, at extraordinary cost, in pursuit of objectives that drift and multiply with each press conference in which a Defence Secretary invokes Jesus Christ to justify the next bombing run.
In the Pentagon chapel, Pete Hegseth is praying for Armageddon. Across fifty military installations, American soldiers are filing conscientious objector applications. In the Strait of Hormuz, the tankers stay put.
The Lord, it turns out, has not yet got back to anyone with a plan of attack.
This article was originally published on URBAN WRONSKI WRITES
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.
Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.
Join our community of truth-seekers. Please consider donating now via:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund to help secure the future of our site.
Your support will go directly toward covering essential costs like web hosting renewals and helping us bring new features to life. Every contribution, no matter the size, helps us keep improving and growing.
Thank you for standing with us – we truly couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude, The AIMN Team

It will be interesting to see if the sustained lack of oil and gas induces the EU to fall in line with Trumps request for support to open the Strait of Hormuz.
Americans now viewing the war as a profound mistake
Sadly, most Americans only see war as a mistake when they’re losing.
As they are here.
*The Lord, it turns out, has not yet got back to anyone with a plan of attack.8
I saw somewhere yesterday that Iran and Oman are planning the future structure of the region.
That’s good to see, and it means that Divine Intervention might not be necessary! 🙂
Hegseth not only abuses the sanctity of his own body by disfiguring it with heavy metal ink images, he abuses the sanctity of the Christian principle by disrespecting and misrepresenting the symbol of Christ’s death.
Trump has pulled the ultimate TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) by saying that it’s not his problem to open up the Strait of Hormuz, leaving this to somebody else.
So typical of Trump, he starts a war and then when the going gets tough, he walks away.
It seems to me that we need to bring the adults in the room back in through the auspices of the UN and have Trump butt out of all international expeditions and leave it to the rest of us to sort out this mess and pull Israel back into line (not only in Iran but also Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza).
The sole reason that oil tankers are not traversing the Strait of Hormuz is because Lloyds of London have declared the Gulf of Hormuz a war zone of high risk and have greatly increased maritime insurance. It’s not mines or drones – it’s all about money.
See the link:
https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=583200&post_id=192658481&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=4an0y2&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoyNTk3MzUxNzgsInBvc3RfaWQiOjE5MjY1ODQ4MSwiaWF0IjoxNzc0OTEzNTQ3LCJleHAiOjE3Nzc1MDU1NDcsImlzcyI6InB1Yi01ODMyMDAiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.OUltPVVzdDs6rZetaBHdUM7-bIp1SPWHhrzudaDgdy4
Mediocrates
It has only ever been about money and insurers (not just Lloyds) will not venture into providing insurance coverage at reasonable rates until there is a not just a possibility but a real actuarial probability of making money.
During March 2026, as noted in your link, President Trump announced that the US will offer government-backed insurance coverage and naval escorts for commercial ships, specifically oil tankers, navigating the Strait of Hormuz to ensure free energy flow amidst the Trump inspired conflict with Iran. He lied…..!
Keep in mind that the Strait is not closed.
It’s open to anyone who is not an ally of Israel or the US, as I understand it.
There is a transit fee, to be paid in yuan, but transit fees are normal for any enclosed waterway.
Just read elsewhere that there’s been a slight change to conditions for using the Strait.
The National Security Affair Committee of the Iranian Parliament, the Majlis, has approved legislation that regulates future passages through the Strait:
– Iran will impose tolls on vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz (it will be in national currency, Rial)
– America & Zionist regimes will be banned from passing through the Strait
– Iran armed forces will guarantee safe passage for vessels
– countries that imposed unilateral sanctions on Iran will be bared from passing through the Strait of Hormuz (now tell Canada, Australia and EU to impose more sanctions!)
– Iran will invite and ask Oman to be part of this new legal regime
The scheme solves several problems:
The toll for future passages will help to repair the damage the USraeli war on Iran has caused to the country.
The payment in Rial will lift the extraordinary diminished currency of Iran. This will allow for more imports, will lower inflation and rise the income of the average people.
The effect of unilateral U.S./EU sanctions will evaporate if other countries decide to no longer follow them.
It is cheaper for Asia and Europe to pay a toll of let’s say 10% on plenty of oil passing through the Strait than to pay 100% on top of the previous price because of supply limits.
It will be more profitable for the Arab Gulf states to see oil flowing, even when the additional toll may cause demand to be slightly lower, than to suffer from no oil sales due to a continued blockade.
Persia had largely been in control of the Strait, including its western coast, until 1763, when the British East-India company established itself in Basra by force. It has now the chance to be back in control.
If it does so in a fair manner that will not unreasonably effect normal trade there is no reason for any neutral country to object to the change.
Good news!! Thank you Steve. Anybody for another TACO??
Good news indeed, Cocky.
If Oman comes on board with this the pair will be unstoppable.
Complete control of the waterway from both sides.
The UAE will be irrelevant.
Like most wars, the aggressive protagonists had some vision of how it will eventuate to their favour, only to find that they’ve been comprehensively f*cked along the way. Despite Americans speaking a hillbilly version of the King’s English, I’m no fan of them and haven’t been for decades. Cheering from the sidelines and rooting for the Iranians.
While Trump’s tesm are thrashing around for a face saving withdrawap, me thinks MBS, Saudi and the Gulf States should go Jared Kushner and divest their funds that are under his management?
None of them can sustain their economies without oil & related income, while some Saudi elites predict Iran can resist till October, and just in time for the mid terms…..
An attack on Kushner is also an attack on his allies Trump, Netanyahu, Putin and Murdoch; the latter was Kushner’s muse, guess around 2016, changed him from being a ‘liberal’ to a follower of Murrays’s The Bell Cuve, or eugenics. .
Great to hear UAE being sidelined. Its despotic leaders have been screeching for the US-Zioista to go further with their obliteration in Iran.
It has developed into a despotic proxy for the hegemonic violence of USA (NATO alliance, EU and South West Asia). A covert conduit for (and now manufacturer under license of) massive arms for shipments into Africa – about 30 countries. Its aim of course is through ‘anti-black’ destabilization to obtain oil, minerals and resource concessions / control.
A typical example being UAE’s ongoing supply to the RSF, initiating and prolonging the deadly civil war in Sudan. Not to mention in the previous civil war in South Sudan where the USA and EU funneled arms through Uganda to both sides.
Clakka, on the UAE situation, this is doing the rounds now —
“To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbor is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power — if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenseless against the angry neighbor, and you are destroyed.” Niccolò Machiaveli (The Prince)
The Arab sheikdoms are in deep trouble.
They are totally dependent on the US, some of them even for domestic security I believe.
If Iran forces all US military to vacate, they collapse.
This has become existential for many players now.