Labor’s Eco Renaissance: Destroying the Joint, Sensitively
As federal parliament resumes its familiar variety show of “Consensus or Catastrophe”, the Labor government unveils another environmental revolution; provided it doesn’t trouble its donors in hi-vis or hard hats. Gina Rinehart’s chequebook, Woodside’s lobbyists, and the captains of the mining industry; Mike Henry (BHP), Simon Trott (Rio Tinto), Dino Atranto (Fortescue Metals), Stuart Tonkin (Northern Star Resources), Chris Ellison (Mineral Resources), and Dale Henderson (Pilbara Minerals), remain ringside, observing reforms with more interest than concern¹. Noddy Albanese is off showcasing Australia’s green credentials abroad while environmentalism’s Mr Plod, Murray Watt, revs up his red-tape chainsaw for another round of ecosystem-saving legislation, cleverly designed not to disturb the hands that feed.
A Softly Softly Apocalypse
The reworking of the EPBC Act returns for yet another encore, after four reviews, three re-announcements, and five missed reform deadlines. Ken Henry calls it, “intergenerational bastardry”. Graeme Samuel’s 2020 review describes the Act as “a framework designed by industry for industry”². Five years later, the law has yet to sprout a single tooth. Business loves it. During that ‘consultation’ period, over 250 species have joined the threatened list, and 1.5 million hectares of Australian habitat, an area half the size of Tasmania, have quietly disappeared³.
Watt’s $7 billion business-saving headline comes with the promise to shrink assessment times from 70 to 50 days. Because nothing screams caution like greater speed. Quicker decisions mean less scrutiny; fitting with the 7.7 million hectares already lost since 2000, 93 per cent of it bulldozed without a federal environmental check⁴. No climate trigger either: ten failed bills, a cold shoulder to the UN, an ignored ICJ, while Australia’s mammal extinction rate leads the OECD pack, threefold above average. Only 19 per cent of our land is properly protected; trailing the OECD’s 28 per cent⁵.
Good Old Aussie Carbon Boondoggles
Successive governments have ploughed billions into soil carbon and tree-planting schemes since 2010, mostly yielding glossy brochures and a forest of consultancy invoices. The Clean Energy Regulator says nearly a third of carbon credits are for reductions that never occurred⁶; 78 per cent were issued to already-profitable projects (many run by mining companies above), as big polluters offset new gas fields while armies of monster chain saws hum. Our offset purchases top the OECD, though actual biodiversity spending is less than half the average⁷. Richard Denniss rightly notes, “Australia excels at spending public money for private reassurance”; a carbon market ministry of make-believe⁸.
The False Dichotomy: Big Tobacco’s Gift to Big Mining
Australia’s environmental paralysis is no accident. The narrative, that we must choose between prosperity or green reform, is psychological jiu-jitsu, copied straight from Big Tobacco and perfected by fossil fuel, mining, and gambling interests¹³. This “either jobs or the environment” wedge is not economics; it’s myth, manufactured to keep regulatory hands off the cash register. Big Tobacco pioneered the method: framing health policy as an assault on livelihoods, sowing doubts, funding contrarian science, and using front groups to amplify division¹⁴. The world has never recovered.
Big Mining and Gas, with help from PR firms and local consultants, run the same campaign: “jobs at risk,” industry-funded experts, manufactured balance, and “Aussie lifestyle” defenses¹⁵. Even gambling corporations now deploy these tactics with “grassroots” sport campaigns opposing regulatory reform¹⁶.
Policy after policy is kneecapped by this manufactured drama, while governments; especially Coalition, tiptoe around “economic Armageddon” lines scripted by donor lobbyists. Clean energy, healthy cities, and strict biodiversity laws are dismissed as “elitist” or “anti-jobs.” Only CEOs, lobbyists, and consultants win; the environment and ordinary Australians wait in forlorn hope for a backbone to reappear.
Monster Truck Madness
The obsession with monster four-wheel drives and super-sized utes in Australia isn’t just a North American contagion: it’s entrenched, growing, and deeply damaging. Vehicle sales data show that, since 2010, SUVs and “light commercial vehicles” have grown from 36% to near 60% of total sales¹⁷, with the Ford Ranger, Toyota Hilux, and RAM 1500 topping sales year after year¹⁸. Australian cities now mirror US suburbs, with ever-larger vehicles squeezing out small cars, crowding streets and parking spaces, and, crucially, ramping up aggregate fuel use and emissions.
Successive governments have utterly failed to rein in the auto sector or its advertising excesses. Australia remains one of the few OECD countries without mandatory fuel efficiency standards for new vehicles, and lobbying by the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries, car importers and mining supply chains help block reform yearly¹⁹. New vehicles sold here emit nearly double the CO₂ per kilometre compared to EU or Japanese models²⁰.
The result? Higher emissions, pedestrian deaths, more roadkill, worsening urban air quality; and a culture war where “Aussie lifestyles” trump public health, shoring up the same false prosperity-versus-green dichotomy as the fossil lobby.
Choking Protest: The Assault on Dissent
While politicians fiddle with reform promises, governments are ramping up laws aimed squarely at silencing public dissent. Victoria and New South Wales in 2025 have passed sweeping anti-protest laws banning face coverings at demonstrations, outlawing “dangerous attachment devices” used in civil disobedience, and criminalising protests “in or near” places of worship, subjecting peaceful assemblies to hefty fines and even prison sentences²¹. These laws provide police broad powers to disperse crowds and confiscate equipment, chilling decades of Australia’s proud activist traditions and deterring protests over mining, environment, social justice, and indigenous rights²².
Recent rulings by the NSW Supreme Court declared such laws unconstitutional for burdening political communication, yet governments persist, redrafting and enforcing versions that suppress demonstrators—particularly those opposing government-backed conflicts or large resource projects²³. The anti-protest offensive is a vital vector in the broader strategy where corporate-backed governments throttle the voices challenging extractive industries and climate inaction²⁴.
Victoria’s premier Jacinta Allan and police describe these laws as public safety measures, blaming a “small minority” seeking to incite violence²⁵. Yet human rights advocates warn they inequitably target marginalised groups and lawful dissent, replacing democracy with police powers. The expansion of “safe access” zones around religious buildings further restricts protest space²⁶, stoking fears civil liberties will yield to political convenience.
This crackdown dovetails with policy capture and environmental rollback, a potent cocktail ensuring governments defend extractive interests on the floor of parliament and on the streets.
Don’t Rock the Boathouse
Two thousand plus species threatened, half endangered or critically endangered. Three invertebrates lost every two weeks. Only $12 million a year for extinction prevention; just 0.08 per cent of the $15.6 billion needed, making Australia the OECD’s lowest spender²¹. While New Zealand and Canada approve projects (with climate triggers) inside six months, our process averages eighteen²².
As for environmental protection – the “Greg Hunt group hug” moment (“Our work is done”) remains the truest piece of parliamentary theatre. If the comedians, economists, and activists can see the farce, it’s time we demanded what’s missing: a real, non-spineless Parliamentary Backbone. For now, look under “Parliamentary Backbone (Non-spineless variety)”. Last sighted 2007. Presumed extinct.
Yet, beyond the rhetoric of careful balance and slow reform lies a deeper reckoning. Australia stands at a crossroads; where the fossilised squirrel grip of corporate power and political expedience threatens to smother any real chance of environmental salvation. The erosion of habitat and democracy is accelerating, not abating, carried forward by vested interests who profit from paralysis. If Labor’s eco- renaissance is to transcend lip service, it must summon the political courage to break these cycles: to deny the false dichotomy pitched by Big Tobacco’s heirs; to champion not just market-friendly offsets but genuine ecological restoration; to protect the right to protest as fiercely as it protects corporate profits. Without this, we risk consigning future generations to a landscape and society hollowed out by opportunism, quieted dissent, and the abdication of responsibility. The time for soft revolutions is over; only bold, unapologetic stewardship can do justice to the land and people of this continent.
Citations and Footnote URLs
Footnotes
¹ Mining CEOs: https://miningdigital.com/top10/top-10-mining-leaders-in-australia
² Samuel review: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/epbc/review
³ SLATS habitat loss https://www.acf.org.au/news/deforestation-in-australia-why-its-happening-and-how-to-stop-it
⁴ Fossil Fuel Subsidies: https://australiainstitute.org.au/report/fossil-fuel-subsidies-in-australia-2024/
⁵ OECD biodiversity: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment
⁶ ERF Project Register: https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/ERF/Data-and-reporting/project-register
⁷ InfluenceMap: https://influencemap.org/briefing/2025-Australia-Election-Briefing-32075
⁸ Greenwashing criticism: https://australiainstitute.org.au/report/greenwashing-growth-industry/
⁹ AEC Register: https://transparency.aec.gov.au
¹⁰ Lobbyist Register/InfluenceMap: https://lobbyists.pmc.gov.au/; https://influencemap.org/briefing/2025-Australia-Election-Briefing-32075
¹¹ Senate Inquiry: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications/SafeguardMechanism/Report
¹² Policy capture: https://australiainstitute.org.au/report/policy-capture-mining-money-political-process/
¹³ Big Tobacco’s playbook: https://blog.ucs.org/anita-desikan/how-tobacco-companies-created-the-disinformation-playbook/; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11533144/
¹⁴ Tobacco tactics: https://www.tobaccoinaustralia.org.au/chapter-10-tobacco-industry/indepth-10a-strategies-for-influence/10a-7-the-mechanisms-of-influence-political-lobbyi
¹⁵ Climate sceptics playbook: https://theconversation.com/climate-sceptics-steal-the-big-tobacco-playbook-create-doubt-cause-delay-1854; Big Oil PR: https://www.ciel.org/news/oil-tobacco-denial-playbook/
¹⁶ Gambling lobby copy: https://theconversation.com/how-gambling-companies-are-copying-the-big-tobacco-playbook-in-australian-sport-266998
¹⁷ Car sales https://www.fcai.com.au/sales
¹⁸ Best-selling vehicles: https://www.carsales.com.au/editorial/details/australias-top-selling-cars-2025-139429/
¹⁹ Car emissions reform: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/04/australias-car-emissions-explainer
²⁰ ICCT emissions: https://theicct.org/publication/australia-new-vehicle-emissions-policies/
²¹ Human Rights Law Centre, Victoria anti-protest laws: https://www.hrlc.org.au/explainers/human-rights-briefing-vic-anti-protest-laws/
²² WSWS, Australian court anti-protest laws: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/10/18/wlvq-o18.html
²³ Reddit Australia, NSW Supreme Court protest law: https://www.reddit.com/r/australia/comments/1o7rd07/nsw_supreme_court_finds_protest_law_amendments/
²⁴ Australian Democracy Network, protest threat: https://australiandemocracy.org.au/australian-democracy-network/posts/media-release-right-to-protest-severely-under-threat-in-nsw
²⁵ ABC News, police and protests: https://www.abc.net.au/religion/melbourne-right-protest-police-need-common-sense-safety-measures/105924270
²⁶ Australian Democracy Network, protest space: https://australiandemocracy.org.au/vic-protest-laws-0125
²⁷ Federal budget extinction prevention: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/budget
²⁸ Canadian and NZ approval stats: https://www.canada.ca/en/environmental-assessment-agency/services/impact-assessment-process/statistics.html***
Sources
[1] Labor is close to a deal on environmental law reforms. … https://theconversation.com/labor-is-close-to-a-deal-on-environmental-law-reforms-there-are-troubling-signs-these-will-fall-short-267102
[2] Australian Government Climate Change commitments, … https://www.aofm.gov.au/media/1076
[3] Australian climate policy via ideas, interests, and institutions https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10361146.2025.2566678
[4] Reform of Australia’s national environmental law https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/Briefing_Book/47th_Parliament/ReformAustraliasEnvironmentalLaw
[5] Reimagining climate change research and policy from the … https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1462901123000229
[6] Environmental law reform needed to manage trade of … https://www.nature.com/articles/s44183-024-00085-3
[7] Lessons for Australia’s Climate Change Policy Impasse https://socialsciences.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Principles-of-Effective-Policy-Reform-Final.pdf
[8] Australian policies on water management and climate change https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6918614/
[9] Nature law reform: key asks https://envirojustice.org.au/nature-law-reform-key-asks/
This article was originally published on Urban Wronski Writes
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.
Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.
Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.
With gratitude, The AIMN Team

I don’t know what you’re taking David Tyler,but it’s another ball biter of an article.Makes one angrier than ever.Convenient for Abalone to be doing his international statesman act while leaving all the dirty work to his best toe cutters,Like Murray the Talking fire hydrant and Don ‘the weasel’ Farrell.
The one and a half parties of the duopoly have been screwing the country blind , even with the momentary relief of ditching the Liar,we’ve ended up with someone shaping up to be even worse.
Fuck them all.
Australia has tracked the US with the shared architecture of influence via LNP, Howard et al, NewsCorp led RW MSM etc. with ALP following; whoff of fossil fuels and ‘segregation economics’.
Fossil fueled Atlas Koch climate science denial and anti-renewables via IPA etc., Tanton Network anti-immigration as an environmental greenwash, with FoxNews doing PR/comms and nudging RW MSM further right; Koch + Tanton = Project2025.
Ably supported by heaving mass of low info and monocultural middle aged and older Australians, for now, before ‘the great replacement’.
However, we will still need to deal with consequences of Brexit, Trump, The Voice, Putin etc. and attempts to take us back to the 19thC?
Harry,
Appreciate that; anger’s the only sane reaction left, really. Albanese’s “global handshake tour” would be far easier to swallow if the home front wasn’t being strip‑mined by his own backroom bruisers. Murray and Don seem to relish playing the heavies while pretending it’s all for the greater good. And yep, the old one‑and‑a‑half‑party pantomime rolls on; swap the actors, same script, same audience left picking up the bill.
Andrew,
That’s a sharp read. Australia really has mirrored the US playbook, right down to the media machinery and fossil‑fuel money pipelines. The same culture‑war distractions keep the electorate divided while the resource barons and media moguls consolidate power. Project2025 isn’t just an American fever dream; its talking points are already being test‑marketed here through the usual “think‑tank” channels.
You’re right. Even if the political tides shift, we’ll still be mopping up the fallout from Trumpism, Brexit, and our own culture war flops like The Voice referendum. The bigger question now is whether we can drag the political imagination out of the 19th century before the climate and the democracy run out of runway.
JANUS IDEOLOGY
Blinded disciples
Spin climate catastrophe
Pulverise the forests
Selective logging
Maintained all ecosystems
Green groups protested
Wind renewables
Rewrite ideology
Smash all tree ridge lines
Scarred eroded landscapes
Bladed monstrosities –
Greens, ‘The Price to Pay’
As a young teenager in the early-mid sixties living in the Upper Murray district in SA and just getting started in a lifelong interest in birdwatching, out hiking along the river’s edge heading west from Waikerie, I struck up a conversation with an old fella, a man in his nineties; he’d lived in a double-decker bus in the edge of the river at Ramco for years and had a small patch of citrus.
At that time, it was still possible to see Musk Ducks on the river, along with Grey and Chestnut Teal, Pacific Black Ducks, Australian Shelducks, Freckled Ducks, Wood Ducks, Hardheads, Australasian Shovelers, even, occasionally, Pink-eared Ducks and Blue-billed Ducks, along with other waterfowl like the Royal and Yellow-billed Spoonbills, Straw-necked and Glossy Ibis as well as the ubiquitous (white) Sacred Ibis, also Bitterns, Herons, Cormorants, Darters, Egrets, Pelicans – all added to this rich exposure to the feathered wildlife on the river… and for a kid who was still within his first year of birding it was a wonderland and a thrill to have this resource in the backyard.
The old fella spoke of his childhood. He’d lived on the Murray his whole life, which meant that he knew that river as a boy and young man in the last twenty or thirty years of the 1800s. He told me of the flocks of ducks that would pass by, teeming in their hundreds of thousands, so many that it would take half an hour for the flock to pass, so dense in numbers that they would occlude the sunlight, like a cloud does. I think I sort of understood that those days were over, that we’d never see anything like that again.
And indeed, the passage of the subsequent sixty years has only been more of the same, a turbocharged razing of the natural world and an apocalyptic (and the word is used here correctly) decline in species numbers as habitat is destroyed. Many if not most of the species cited above are now vanishingly rare. In less than a century, wipeout. Replaced by almond orchards that suck enormous amounts of water out of the system, consigning the mighty River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) forests to terminal decline. Almonds for eucalypts, and nobody blinked. Lose the forests, lose the inhabitants – birds, mammals, reptiles, insects – swapped for almonds, for almond milk and lattes for the city set who have zero awareness of the environmental cost of their choice of lifestyle beverages.
Australia’s largest river system… ruined. Who knew? Who cared?
Around that same time, mid-sixties, I visited the Flinders Ranges for the first time. Chambers Gorge, specifically, along with a bunch of schoolmates and a couple of teachers who were our mentors in this business of learning about the natural world of plants, animals, birds and more. We saw Wallaroos, (also know as Euros), as well as the highlight marsupial, the Yellow-footed Rock Wallaby, but we did not see feral goats. Rabbits, yes, but no goats. I revisited that district in the 1980s… only twenty years later. The damage due to goats of the flora in that region was appalling to behold. Twenty years, wipeout.
In the early seventies I’d worked on pastoral properties in the upper northeast of SA. I learned of the damage done to landscapes through the overstocking with sheep in the early years of colonial expansion, that the fragile saltbush and bluebush regions had to be carefully managed to prevent total species loss and to minimise the erosion that followed the razing of plant life across the landscapes. I saw regions that had suffered this fate in the 1800s and never recovered, and I saw regions that had been well-managed and the contrasts were painfully evident.
I also saw D7 bulldozers paired together with a humungous chain tearing down pristine wilderness on the western edge of the Darling Downs in Qld; another apocalyptic vision unfolding before my eyes; a complex ecosystem that existed for possibly millions of years, replaced with a monocultural crop, cotton, an exotic species that required massive amounts of water, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides in order to grow; dollars in the bank for the multimillionaire farmers and the irreplaceable loss of hundreds if not thousands of species from micro to macro. Insanity, really, at all levels, whether it’s the ruination of river systems – not only the Murray but most of them in this country. – or the wholesale clearing of land for the purpose of farming or grazing – and let’s not overlook that the farming community in this country is not large, there’s only around ~135,000 farm enterprises, only around 420,000 people employed, including fisheries and forestry, a bit over 1.5% of this country’s population. Doesn’t quite seem right, does it, that that small number of people, the custodians, as it were, of the natural landscapes of this country, have been given licence to wreak the extraordinary amount of damage inflicted across the continent. All the while, politicians seem in thrall, the great mass of citizens ensconced in their coastal homes with their urban concerns and their cost of living and other pressures preoccupying their outlooks on life and their ‘don’t talk to me about what’s happening out there across the country, it’s not my concern’ attitudes… it’s not hard to be despondent and in despair. Albanese willingly sacrificed the Maugean skate, endemic to and only found in Macquarie Harbour in the southwest of Tasmania, in preference to the continuation of the salmon farms in that body of water, knowing the consequences vis-à-vis deoxygenation, knowing the extreme risk of extinction, for what? To save a few jobs, to ensure an ALP member’s position, to allow a foreign-owned corporation to continue its toxic and far from best practice industry continued operation. One can only derive from these examples that the political classes – at all levels and of all colours – just don’t care. Business as usual, and we’ll all go down in a screaming heap when it’s over and done with.
To ram the point home, in my first year at uni studying Agricultural Science, one of our subjects dealt with the history of agriculture in this country. We were told of the development of what became the MIA, the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area. The federal government around the time of WWI commissioned agricultural scientists to survey this district in the southwest of NSW, then majorly unpopulated, as a potential site for returning soldiers, who were to become what became known as soldier-settlers. It was the government’s position that this was to be some sort of recompense, to recognize their service and provide a pathway back to civilian life.
In due course, the report came back. The designated area was unsuitable for the proposed purpose. Duplex soils, underlying salt, poor drainage, risk of salination of the native trees were removed… in short, unsuitable.
The government shelved the report, ignored the scientific advice of experts, and shipped thousands of returned soldiers into that region. It was a disaster… within a decade or less, most of these returned servicemen walked off their land and returned to the cities. So much for the ‘Lucky Country’ and its second-rate society of so-called ‘managers’.
Canguro,
I felt so moved by your reply..an article in itself really. I can see you seeing all the destruction. It brought tears to my eyes. When I was young I spent a lot of time around the Murray. It was one of the deepest pleasures of my life. To see it plundered and ruined makes me angry and sad. But well done you. Truth teller.
Dear Canguro,
Thank you for this extraordinary reply; part memoir, part ecological witness statement, part indictment of a system that has long traded biodiversity for short-term gain. And sheer poetry. Your words carry the weight of lived experience, and the clarity of someone who’s seen the arc of decline firsthand; from wonderland to wipeout.
The image of the old fella at Ramco, recalling duck flocks so dense they occluded the sun, is haunting. It’s a metaphor for abundance lost, and a reminder that memory itself becomes a form of resistance when the landscape forgets what it once was. Your early birding days read like a catalogue of a fabulous richness now rare or gone; each species a feathered footnote in the story of a river system sacrificed.
You’ve mapped the damage with precision: goats in the Flinders, bulldozers in the Downs, almonds replacing red gums, cotton replacing complexity. And you’ve named the political cowardice that enables it; the wilful ignorance, the sidelining of science, the sacrifice of species like the Maugean skate for the sake of salmon profits and political expediency.
Your account of the MIA debacle is especially telling. It’s not just environmental mismanagement; it’s a pattern of ignoring expertise, erasing consequence, and calling it progress. Soldier-settlers were promised land and dignity; they got salt and silence.
I share your despair, but also your fire. Your voice is not just a lament; it’s a ledger, a reckoning, and a call to remember what was, so we might fight for what’s left. If you’re open to it, I’d love to collaborate further; perhaps build a companion piece that turns your testimony into curriculum, or a visual map of ecological amnesia across the regions you’ve named.
Let’s keep the conversation going. The ducks may no longer darken the sky, but your testimony, the moving words of a gifted naturalist, lynx-eyed observer and historian are straight from the heart and they deserve to be heard.
Warm regards,
David
Shay is right, Canguro. Your comment would make a great article. All I need is your nod of approval.
Thanks to all – Shay, David, Michael – for your generous replies. I think anyone who’s paid attention to the trajectory of this country’s ecological decline could have a similar tale to tell. For the soft-hearted, it is quite difficult to bear, to comprehend, and for those of tougher mien, perhaps grist to the mill, gird the loins and all that, fight the bastards whatever the cost.
It seems, understandably, a David & Goliath contest… how can ‘little people’ take on corporations, multinationals, mining billionaires and farming dynasties, along with complicit state & federal governments that aid & abet the destruction that seems to be everywhere and all at once?
I see all this, and I have empathy for those who say it’s all too hard, all too late, the battle is over, and we’ve lost, big money has won, the ruthless momentum of capitalism and its mindless protectors and supporters have won the day.
What I’d really like is for somebody to grab me by the neck and say, forcefully, ‘Mate, you’re wrong. The fight is worth it, and we will prevail.’ But, sadly, I scan the landscape, as I have forever, and the evidence of the cost of the never-ending momentum behind the urge to convert resources into dollars is stark, confronting, shocking even, and antithetical to all that one holds dear in the sense of alignment as a creature held in the bosom of Mother Nature, or Gaia, our little planet and god-given home in this infinite universe.
Michael, by all means, promote and publish this if you wish.
Canguro,
Yes, please authorise to give Micheal the nod of approval.We all need more voices of authenticity from lived experiences. Both you and David and Micheal and Carol would be great collaborators in future articles on the environment. David and I and Micheal and Carol are passionate about it as you are. Add your voice. Get your articles on the AIMN. David and I read your response over and over and I can’t begin to tell you how much it meant to us.
Your knowledge of wild life was wonderful. I’m a twitcher btw but mostly have brought sick or abandoned magpies up to adulthood. I can’t tell you how much joy it brought me.So…write more.
Canguro,
Oh and yes the fight is worth it
Excellent article and appropriate comments.
I’m over 70 now, and my body is riddled as could be expected. I was told I have a vulnerable gene, never mind exposure to the man-made things predating on that gene.
I grew up in the bush in a riverine environment on the fringe of Melbourne. I loved that ‘natural’ environment, the quietness and the beautiful creatures, large and tiny. It was my playground and my learning. As I grew, I became saddened to learn of buried dumps and scourges from the 1800s through early 1900s. I had been fooled by secondary re-growth. I saw the stacked firewood roots from the erasure of the Malley & Wimmera, plagues of mixo-rabbits, the vile Roach on the end of my hook, felt the burning eyes nose and throat from the horrendous pollution in the river, saw the river yellowed by the clays scoured from the hills where reckless logging of mountain ash left the earth bare. There were no more tree-ferns along the river, they had been taken by sub-urban savages – replaced by choking willows. The ‘ghost gums’ (River Red Gums) started tumbling. In abject ignorance, the important regenerators, the tea trees, were being flattened for panic-fear of fire, and along with them the small ferns, mosses, lichens and lizards and amphibians that thrived in their micro-climate. Oh, and for the sake of gold they inoculated the ground with cyanide and mercury, and for leather, into the river, the industrial toxins of tanning – wattle sap wouldn’t suffice. For their rampant blackberries, and whilst at it, termites, the manic spraying of DDT, later dieldrin, and later again 245T (Agent Orange) spreading a man-made plague of illness and birth defects in all creatures. It’s no worry for them, they’ll manicure it and pave it until it’s indistinguishable from western European / British dead land. And ‘Rally-Ho’ like the blithering elite, as the wildlife fled, they fixed it by injecting for their pleasure, cats, dogs, foxes, deer, trout and all manner of Euro-delights.
As an over-35 adult, I traveled working far and wide in Oz, and noted the same recipe at play, but on a more industrial scale, bringing with it perceivable toxification and desertification. In my childhood locale, I tried to fight back, but it was in vain against the institutionalization of such recipes in the short-term quest for money. And, again in vain trying to enlighten the mind-blown sub-urbanites not looking over the horizon and expecting everything on a plate to slake their mythical notions of paradise. They like bling, cars, pavement and flushing dunnies and ballistic security. Little do they know it may only take a few years to wreck and toxify the joint, but at least 100s of years to revive it, sans many species.
But their children are awakening them, and suspicions about govt stupidity and rhetoric, and the costs of convenience are rising. The really old folk know, but they are interminably wounded and saddened and are reckoned not to count.
Regarding the EPBC, this Oz community is on tenter hooks after Tanya Plibersek almost forged cross-party agreement to enable a Bill to be introduced, but Albo intervened. He brought in the notorious Murray Watt in re-negotiate, re-craft, and drive through a (new) better Bill. Particularly poignant after Watt’s first actions (and obscurities) in fossil-fuel processing in NW Western Oz. And not forgetting Albo’s rush on critical minerals and energy deals to give a raison d’être to the ‘Future Made In Australia Innovation Fund’ and for his version of geopolitical alignments.
After consulting with the oligarchy and the international relics of the Industrial Revolution, Watt is playing politics hard, drip-feeding the draft Bill, splitting out (future) regulation (containing national environmental standards) and mode of operation of the new national EPA. And playing both sides against the middle, running separate negotiations with LNP and Greens who publicly express ideological polaric interests. And saying the final 25-30% of the Bill is work-in-progress.
And today (29 Oct) it is mooted by Environment Victoria, “Labor’s environment laws look set to fast-track development, whether it’s mining, fossil fuels or housing developments, by handing approval powers back to state governments who have shown they can’t be trusted to protect the environment or listen to communities.”
Suffice it to say, the new EPBC Act is urgent, and Labor says it wants it through before the new year (with haste and rush). A scary proposition given the current state of play, and where Watt can choose to assign political blame for failures and delays.
It’s looking like a horror story on the spectrum, as thirsty, with pocket fulls of crypto, we head for life-support before realizing we’re going the way of leaded children, die-back, bleached corals and the Maugean skate.
Good response, Clakka. The horror stories just keep on writing themselves… no shortage of raw material.