Albo’s Waterloo: The Clayton’s PM and the Farrellisation of Labor

Man in suit speaking at an event.
Image source: Screenshot from YouTube video uploaddd by Sky News Australia

“Leadership’s always been about two main things: imagination and courage.” (Paul Keating).

Bernard Keane is half right. In today’s Crikey, he despairs of our PM as “a political manager, a risk-averse executive who always plays the percentages.” Dead right, as far as it goes. But Keane, for all his nous, undercooks the grill. This isn’t one man’s failure of nerve. It’s a captured party’s moral collapse; decades of corporate capture and right-faction strangulation producing, at the hour of maximum crisis, a Clayton’s Prime Minister with added charisma bypass: the PM you have when you’re not having ScoMo.

Anthony Albanese has his rusted-on fans, to be fair, but Keane sees a manager who won’t lead. Or is it something worse: a party machine that can’t? Hollowed out by factional warlords, but plushly upholstered with lobby money, Labor under Albanese has flubbed the pub test with a ring-in; not some spectacular policy dud, (we’re spoilt for choice there from AUKUS to Caucus) but in outsourcing a nation’s compassion to the figurehead of a disgraced US-proxy state accused of war crimes. Nothing says we feel your grief as well as rolling out the red carpet for Israel’s mostly ceremonial, President, Isaac Herzog, down-under to dispense “great comfort” while pepper-spraying citizens who object to hosting the head of state of a country the UN has accused of genocide.

Albo’s Waterloo has arrived. It smells of horse shit, capsicum spray and moral bankruptcy.

Keane’s Half-Truth

Keane’s been charting Albanese’s shrinkage for over a year. January 2025, he wrote of a PM “managing but not governing, in charge but not in power, deciding but not leading.” The 2025 landslide; 94 seats, the most any party has ever won, changed nothing. If anything, it made things worse. A mandate the size of Uluru, and all Albo will do with it is manage the optics?

From the October 7 horrors through Gaza’s descent into catastrophe, through Trump’s second coming and America’s fascist lurch, Stephen Miller’s ICE goon squads, Albanese has shown all the panache of a Myer account manager.

Mutter “ceasefire” at regular intervals, avoid eye contact with the footage, and pray the polls hold. Paul Keating, who knows a thing or two about burning political capital, is damning: “Never before has a Labor government been so bereft of policy or policy ambition.”

And here’s where Keane is too kind.

“It’s not a lone manager’s failing; it’s the organisational afterlife of Farrellisation: the slow substitution of belief with briefing notes, strategy with message discipline, and politics as reputation management.

Roll Out the Farrell

To understand how Labor arrived at this wretched pass, meet Don Farrell; the Godfather, as Graham Richardson, no shrinking violet himself in the dark arts, once dubbed him. Senator for South Australia. Minister for Trade and Tourism. Special Minister of State. Deputy Leader of the Government in the Senate. And, more to the point, the supreme numbers man of Labor’s right faction.

Farrell’s CV is pure machine politics. SDA state secretary for fifteen years; the shopworkers’ union that has long been the right faction’s infantry division. Powerbroker enough in 2012 to knock Penny Wong, a sitting senior cabinet minister, off the top of the South Australian Senate ticket. (Albanese himself called it “gross self-indulgent rubbish” at the time. That was before Albanese needed Farrell’s numbers.) The Power Index listed him among Australia’s top ten political fixers. As a colleague puts it:

“He controls the pre-selection … of every MP in South Australia. If you want to get on, you get on with Don.”

A vineyard owner in the Clare Valley, against marriage equality until the wind shifted, master of electoral reform who couldn’t quite land it, Farrell is the chap whose factional machinery underwrites the Albo project. “Farrellisation” is not just the dominance of one man. It’s the triumph of a method: loyalty over principle, faction over conscience, the numbers over the narrative.

When Labor swaps spine for spreadsheet, that’s the Farrell factor at work. Not the full Farrell; we’d need a book for that, but enough to understand why this party, confronted with the greatest moral crisis of its generation, reaches not for Chifley’s light on the hill but for the focus group report, the lobbyist’s business card and the bizarrely inept invitation to Isaac Herzog.

“The Labor Party is not going to profit from having these proven unsuccessful people around who are frightened of their own shadow and won’t get out of bed in the morning unless they’ve had a focus group report to tell them which side of bed to get out.”

Keating is right on the money. Again. The Farrellised party doesn’t do vision. It does management.

The Bondi Trap

On December 14, 2025, an IS-inspired father and son open fire on a Hanukkah celebration at Bondi Beach, killing fifteen people, including a ten-year-old girl and an eighty-seven-year-old Holocaust survivor. and wounding more than forty. It is Australia’s worst mass shooting since Port Arthur. A Syrian-Australian shopkeeper, Ahmed al-Ahmed, wrestles a shot-gun from one of the gunmen, an act of immense courage that briefly reminds us what the word “hero” actually means.

The grief was real. The political exploitation was instant. Albo had blood on his hands, they reckoned.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and the Coalition leftovers were in it like a rat up a drainpipe, weaponising fresh graves to paint Labor as soft on terror. The Coalition, itself reduced to 44 seats after the May landslide, its former leader having lost his own electorate, had one card left to play: force Labor to hug the hardest possible pro-Israel line, daring Albanese to refuse.

He didn’t refuse. He walked right in.

Our PM asks his Governor-General to formally invite her counterpart of sorts, another titular head of state, Israeli President Isaac Herzog. Of course, he’ll come with some baggage. The UN’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry found Isaac Herzog to have incited genocide by declaring all Palestinians, “an entire nation,” responsible for the October 7 attacks. The invitation is framed as solidarity with the Jewish community. It is received by much of the country as something else entirely.

The Herzog Debacle

Herzog arrives, February 9, for a four-day visit. Thousands upon thousands around the nation take to the streets in an impressively disciplined and united series of protest demonstrations. But it’s not the type of social cohesion, the federal government favours.

The NSW government, reaches for the Major Events Act – legislation designed for sporting events and cultural festival, declares Herzog’s visit a “major event,” and grants police expanded powers to restrict protest. When the Palestine Action Group challenge this in the Supreme Court, they lose.

Then came the streets. Thousands gather at Sydney’s Town Hall. Police use pepper spray and tear gas. At least 27 people are arrested. Video emerges of officers dispersing Muslims at prayer. Across the country; Melbourne, Brisbane, towns and regional centres, an estimated 50,000 or more turn out. The Palestine Action Group call it “a brutal police attack on a massive peaceful protest.” The progressive Jewish Council of Australia, in a full-page open letter signed by over a thousand Jewish Australians, says Herzog was “not welcome” and warn that hosting him “risks entrenching the dangerous and antisemitic conflation between Jewish identity and the actions of the Israeli state.”

Amnesty International nails it: “Welcoming President Herzog as an official guest undermines Australia’s commitment to accountability and justice.”

Albanese’s response? “Turn the temperature down.” The most vacuous three words in the Australian political lexicon since ScoMo’s “operational matters” or “on water.” Or the fatuous flatulence of the “Two State Solution”.

Clayton’s Labor: The Party You Have When You’re Not Having a Party

The Clayton’s metaphor is more than satirical decoration. It captures something structurally true about this Labor government. The form is there; the rhetoric of social democracy, the talk of fairness, the occasional progressive gesture. The substance is missing. What you’re drinking is corporate-capture cordial with a right-faction chaser.

Corporate capture isn’t abstract. It’s AUKUS zealotry funnelling hundreds of billions to American submarines while nurses can’t afford to live near their hospitals. It’s a party that talks about cost of living while its factional architecture is underwritten by the very corporate interests driving the gouging. It’s Albanese’s 2023 meetings with Arnold Bloch Leibler partners; the power-brokers of prestige and coin whose orbit Labor’s leaders increasingly inhabit.

The right faction seals the deal. Nominal lefties like Albanese and Wong? Sure. But policy bends rightward on security, borders, liberties. Palestine is reframed as a “national security” file. Dissent is recast as “importing foreign conflicts”; an old smear, recycled from the Balkan-brawl era, deployed to delegitimise citizens exercising their democratic right to object to genocide committed with the diplomatic cover of their own government.

This isn’t a vehicle for change. It’s a limousine for lobbyists.

The Wound That Won’t Heal

Keane is right that politics demands leaders who reflect majority values without ostracising dissent. Most Australians are appalled by what is happening in Gaza. The polls say it. The streets scream it. Yet Albo manages away: banalities for the base, banquets for the lobby.

The Bondi trap worked its dark magic; not toppling Labor electorally, not yet, for that you’d need an effective opposition, but exposing its soulless core. Corporate husk, factional right, and now the spectacle of pepper-spraying protesters to protect the visit of a leader accused of inciting genocide. This is Labor unmasked. A Clayton’s outfit unfit for moral crisis.

Albanese’s Waterloo isn’t electoral. It’s existential. Herzog’s visit crystallises the wound: a Prime Minister who’d rather host a figure the UN accuses of inciting genocide than lead his nation’s conscience against one. The real opposition now rises not from what’s left of the right – itself a study in internal bickering, disunity and dissension with the Nationals walking away from the Coalition agreement in January -and back again, but from the citizens, unions, Jewish dissenters, and independents refusing to accept “social cohesion” as code for complicity.

Paul Keating, whatever his own contradictions, understood that leadership means burning political capital for something that matters. “I always believed in burning up the government’s political capital,” he said, “not being Mr Safe Guy.”

Albanese is Mr Safe Guy. And this time, playing safe has cost him everything that matters.

Labor’s light didn’t flicker out in Gaza’s rubble. It was switched off, deliberately, by a machine that long ago replaced conviction with management.

Albo just paid the power bill.

This article was originally published on URBAN WRONSKI WRITES


Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN

Dear Reader,

Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.

Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.

Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.

With gratitude, The AIMN Team

Donate Button

About David Tyler 179 Articles
David Tyler – (AKA Urban Wronski) was born in England, raised in New Zealand and an Australian resident since 1979. Urban Wronski grew up conflicted about his own national identity and continues to be deeply mistrustful of all nationalism, chauvinism, flags, politicians and everything else which divides and obscures our common humanity. He has always been enchanted by nature and by the extraordinary brilliance of ordinary men and women and the genius, the power and the poetry that is their vernacular. Wronski is now a full-time freelance writer who lives with his partner and editor Shay and their chooks, near the Grampians in rural Victoria and he counts himself the luckiest man alive. A former teacher of all ages and stages, from Tertiary to Primary, for nearly forty years, he enjoyed contesting the corporatisation of schooling to follow his own natural instinct for undifferentiated affection, approval and compassion for the young.

15 Comments

  1. This piece captures something many Australians are feeling but struggling to articulate — that this is not just about one decision, but about a deeper shift in what Labor has become.

    When politics becomes risk management rather than moral leadership, the public notices. The frustration we’re seeing in the streets and across communities reflects a broader concern about how power is exercised, who influences it, and whether ordinary citizens still have a meaningful voice.

    I’ve written about similar themes recently, particularly the growing influence of corporate power in shaping political decisions:
    👉 https://socialjusticeaustralia.com.au/democracy-for-sale/

    And also about how factional control and media pressure can narrow political courage:
    👉 https://socialjusticeaustralia.com.au/labor-party-factional-power//

    Whatever our individual views on foreign policy, the bigger issue is democratic accountability. If citizens feel shut out of major moral and strategic decisions, trust erodes.

    Open debate is not division. It is democracy doing what it is supposed to do.

  2. jonangel
    That’s the key question, isn’t it?

    Changing one leader inside the same factional machine may not change much. If the underlying structure stays the same, the outcomes often do too.

    One alternative isn’t simply “replace Albo” but shift the balance of power altogether. A minority government supported by independents and minor parties could force genuine negotiation instead of top-down factional control. It would mean legislation has to earn crossbench support, not just pass through party discipline.

    We’ve already seen how strong independents have reshaped debate on integrity, climate, and political donations. A minority government can dilute factional dominance and reduce corporate capture because power is no longer concentrated in one internal bloc.

    The real question may be less about who leads, and more about how power is structured.

    If voters want different outcomes, they may need to change the parliamentary arithmetic.

  3. Another great article.

    David asks “Or is it something worse…”

    It’s something worse.

    Labor has become a party of liberalism, as shown by at least two features I can think of, off the cuff.

    Labor supports the liberal world order, an order based on enforcing, no matter the cost or the harm, an exploitative economic structure.

    And it has for an unfathomable reason, internalised the liberal fear of democracy — a fear of the masses.
    This is unfathomable because as David Tyler points out, they have a mandate the size of Uluru and public goodwill that money can’t buy.

    The goodwill is evaporating fast.

    If Labor does not return to its roots we will see One Nation as the Federal Opposition after the next election, or even possibly, a One Nation government.

    Prime Minister Pauline Hanson.
    How does that sound?

  4. What a brilliant analysis by David Tyler and Bernard Keane that sums up my feelings so succinctly. Thank you!!

    My over-active imagination is working overtime to digest the political implications exposed in this article; it may take several reads …..

    Uhm ….. just an edit; the invitation to Herzog was issued by the Zionist Federation of Australia President Jeremy Leibler, which is beyond his rights and position as a private citizen to offer a state visit. Albo was tossed the bone of contention and he acted in concert with gg Sham Moyston to process the ZFA demand.

    @ jonangel and Denis Hay: Obviously the chooks have come home to roost for the disinterested Australian voters who might now realise that ”democracy is a participation sport” where the winners (usually over-paying corporate financial ”political donors”) are successful when mediocre, unprincipled persons are pre-selected for Parliament.

    Yes, the LABOR landslide of 2025 is a step in the correct direction, but the dead hand of managerialism reflects the COALition preference for lots of talk and little action.

    Time to elect credible INDEPENDENTS to represent the voters rather than the foreign owned multinational corporations. This is already happening in NSW west of the range where 4/8 state electorates have INDEPENDENT MPs representing the best interests of the voters.

  5. FFS it’s Uluru, or are you one of those curmudgeonly adherents of colonialism?
    I have tried to take Keane’s views into consideration when I think through the issues but his writing always reminds me of the many texts by Mark Latham that I had to study in my undergrad years in the early 2000s. That was a time when Latham tried (mostly successfully) to pass as a left wing Labor stalwart. I didn’t buy it contrary to my lecturers who didn’t know right from left, and as time has shown I was correct.
    Keane reminds me of Latham, trying to convince his readers that he’s on the side of the “ordinary punter”, still relying on the notion that the six o’clock swill holds some vastly relevant opinion rather than groggy reflection of the blokes, and of course the blokes are the ones whose opinion counts, and depending on the imaginary social demographic location of the imaginary pub.
    BTW. Again it’s Uluru unless you are reflected in the angry old colonialist meme.

  6. Well said, and so true. Anthony Albanese has burned whatever capital he had with those labor voters who are not just rusted on but who consider all sides before giving their vote to those who would govern in their name.

    I hark back to when Albanese was selected by the parliamentary Labor Party to lead them, way back in 2019, when he said he was not the opposition leader but the leader of the Labor Party.

    He disappointed then and he has continued to disappoint.

    I don’t often agree with Bernard Keane in his rants about the ALP but in this instance I do agree, Albanese is just a manager, he has no vision, is not willing to take a risk and for any government that has 94 seats out of 150 that says, take a risk, take several risks, take lots of risks, do the stuff that needs to be done for those who you are supposed to represent, not the party donors, not the multi billionaires that you hang out with but the people who pay your salary and perks and pension (when you retire).

    There is little doubt at this juncture that the ALP will win the next election.

    I hope that Albanese is not the leader of the Labor Party when 2028 comes around, he might be a nice guy, but it is time for him to take his $200K+ a year pension, his taxpayer funded office, staff and travel, and his new wife and make a life for them both, outside politics.

  7. Point taken, Lorraine, it is, of course, Uluru. I can’t account for my lapse. Please accept my apologies. I’ll fix it immediately. As for Bernard Keane, I am taking issue solely with his analysis. I fear you may be doing him an injustice. But I hear what you are saying about Mark Latham and I respect your suggestion of a parallel, as one who has never read any prescribed texts by Mark Latham.

  8. I don’t understand the criticism of Bernard Keane. To my mind he has been ahead of much of Australia in his condemnation of Albanese’s timidity. Don Farrell, an ex-Shoppie, nothing more needs to be said, must go. He is a malign influence, likewise Marles witness the Husic and Butler decisions. Of course the entire Labor caucus has to be complicit apart from Husic who has nothing to lose now, there doesn’t seem to be anyone else in the party willing to stand up to Albanese or even voice dissent.i would have said Chalmers but he shows no signs of putting forward the massive economic changes which would benefit the middle and working classes while making the extremely wealthy and the the exploiters pay their way. Now here’s dream: I would like to see David Pocock as PM. An impossible scenario I know so perhaps it’s time for another woman, Tanya Plibersek who, after all, has been dudded over ministries by Albanese.

  9. Wong’s main rival in SA has been Farrell. In fact Farrell lost his Senate seat a while ago and the right-faction had him put right back in for the next election.

    Sen Wrong. David Shoebridge asked Wrong a question in the senate a little while ago concerning, in part, to do with Herzog autographing, and Wong AGAIN failed in response.

  10. Uhm ….. a few points here:

    1) Do you mean the disgraceful political hit on Ed Husic (a Muslim MP)and Mark Dreyfus (former Attorney General)for the benefit of a couple of Victorian nobody’s playing faction politics??

    2) Chalmers obviously is one of the most competent LABOR MPs and will likely be a future leader, but will SLO_MO ALBO allow him to ”do a Keating” and make the changes necessary for the benefit of the Australian voters rather than the corporate ”political donors”?

    3) Tanya Plibersek MP for Sydney declined to run for LABOR Leader in the past due to family problems that she placed ahead of politics. Sadly, it may be too late for Tanya PM.

    4) “David Pocock as PM”!!! YES!! YES!! YES!!

  11. Umm NE Cocky, I did like David Pocock until he made an unfortunate comment about migrants, almost like he forgot that he is an immigrant himself.
    Chalmers may be leader material, but I am cautious of his connection to the knifing of Rudd by Gillard. Still, he was young then and seems to be learning well. He has a good teacher, a key strategist of the ALP who was so often underestimated even though he was instrumental in negotiating the minority govt of Gillard.

    Husic impresses me and I hope he is around for the long haul. Not sure if he will ever make PM or leader because of the inherent bias against his religion.
    Tanya has chosen not to put her hand up, and understandably so as the mere mention of the possibility bought out the daggers and denigration of her family.
    I think there is a new crop of up and coming Labor politicians that we are yet to hear about. Albo knows that the future depends on regenerating the ranks.

  12. David, Latham was prolific in his writing and managed to convince people that he was a new breed of Labor left. Knowing how it ended, it probably isn’t worth reading his work unless you are curious to see how I saw what others didn’t .
    Another misdirection is that people believed Gillard was from the left, and maybe she had affilliations with the left, but her politics were based on personal aspiration and right wing policies. In a small meeting with a few other people when she was shadow minister for immigration and Indigenous affairs, Gillard told me that she agreed with Howard’s move re the Tampa debacle. She also said that she couldn’t see why Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders should be treated any differently to any other ethnic minority.
    I have long sat on the fence in regards to Keane but he is increasingly reminding me more of Latham and his early work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*