Two Fronts and a Third Eye: Trump’s War Party in the Age of the Algorithm

Person viewing futuristic naval command center display.

Trump’s foreign policy now resembles a champagne party staged on the deck of a carrier: chandeliers swinging over grey steel, tuxedos catching the rotor wash, and a band playing fit to drown out the sea.

He wants the world to see grandeur; imperial confidence with a gold-leaf crust. He wants two victories at once, because one victory is never enough to feed the void. So he attempts to run the empire on two fronts: the Caribbean, where Venezuela is done over like a debtor in a back alley; and the Middle East, where Iran is treated as a prop in a morality play written by men who only know one kind of punctuation.

But history doesn’t stay impressed for long. History is a bartender in a doomed coastal town: polite, exhausted, already wiping down the counter because the storm has a name, and it’s coming in fast.

The comedy, dark enough to bruise, lies in the mismatch between the swagger and the arithmetic. War on two fronts isn’t just illegal or immoral or reckless. It is, at base, a logistical problem. Ships can’t be in two places at once. Crews are not infinite. Readiness is not a vibe. Even empires hit the ceiling when they try to do everything, everywhere, all at once. Especially empires.

And that is where the real innovation appears; not in any carrier group’s wake, but in the glow of a screen.

The Caribbean: where “law enforcement” comes with helicopters

The Caracas smash and grab raid is sanitised to make a hit job and kidnap seem a moral responsibility: “interdictions,” “operations,” “counter-narcotics.” Words borrowed from cop shows. But the hardware drifting through tropical waters is not the equipment of a traffic cop. A nuclear-powered carrier is not a polite suggestion. It is a floating steel cathedral built to make other nations feel small.

The spectacle peaks in a scene so surreal it feels like a fever dream: the removal of Venezuela’s president, narrated like a courtroom drama with gunships; an act presented not as war, but as “justice.” In the new imperial dialect, abduction becomes procedure, and procedure becomes righteousness. The helicopters are subpoenas. The raid is paperwork. Reality, as ever, is expected to cooperate.

Congress, meanwhile, performs its familiar role: the worried stagehand who briefly steps forward to warn that the set is on fire, then gets shoved back behind the curtain, so the show can continue. The empire is too invested in the drama to permit anything as boring as restraint. And it’s beyond desperate.

So the Caribbean front remains alive: ships, posture, menace; an oceanic flex meant to be seen from the shore, meant to enter the nervous system of a region and remain as a permanent tremor.

Iran: brinkmanship as performance art

Then there’s Iran, where orchestrated protest and crackdown turn the streets into a pressure chamber. Here, Trump’s foreign policy becomes what it always becomes: a performance in which moral outrage is used as accelerant and “options” are mostly variations of the same blunt instrument.

The rhetoric runs hot; warnings, threats, declarations of strength delivered as if strength is something that exists in words alone. Sound omnipresent, omniscient, inevitable: the empire as a deity with a short fuse.

But omnipresence costs money and metal, and the metal is already booked.

This is the two-front blunder in its purest form: the desire to posture everywhere collides with the fact that resources are finite. The empire, like an ageing magician, discovers it cannot pull endless rabbits from an increasingly threadbare hat. The audience can smell the desperation. The illusion starts to falter.

And when the old methods strain, the new methods rush in.

The third front: the empire becomes an operating system

This is the part that looks like genius if genius is defined as the efficient administration of coercion.

Palantir, the data-fusion behemoth co-founded by Peter Thiel, has been steadily converting governance into a searchable field. Not just abroad, not just in war zones, but at home: systems that treat people as entries, movement as metadata, association as suspicion that can be summoned with a query.

The logic is elegant in the way a guillotine is elegant. Instead of a prison with walls, build a prison made of air: a mesh of databases, sensors, feeds, and interfaces that turns life into a trail. The bars are invisible. The locks are contractual. Freedom becomes conditional; less a right than a setting that can be toggled.

Stephen Miller, Trump’s high priest of coercion, does not need to personally chain anyone to anything. In the modern dispensation, the chain is digital. The chain is the system. The chain is the policy that makes the system necessary, the procurement that makes it permanent, the political theatre that makes it popular with the kinds of voters who like their cruelty neatly packaged as “order.”

And behind it all sits the Thiel doctrine, the billionaire catechism: democracy is messy, regulation is theft, oversight is a nuisance, and “innovation” is what happens when rich men are allowed to build the future without being interrupted by the poor. The state becomes the client. The citizen becomes the dataset. The contract becomes the constitution.

This is how the empire compensates for the limits of ships: when hardware can’t cover every corner, software fills the gaps. When carriers can’t be everywhere, the database can. When the spectacle risks embarrassment, the system ensures continuity.

War gets an interface and conscience gets outsourced

The same logic applies to killing.

Modern war has always been partly a problem of perception: how to keep violence efficient while keeping the moral cost off the books. In earlier eras, this was done with distance; high-altitude bombing, drone strikes, euphemisms. Dresden. Hiroshima. Cambodia. Now it is done with interfaces.

AI-driven targeting and battlefield data platforms compress decision loops. They make the “kill chain” faster, smoother, cleaner. They turn uncertainty into something that can be “managed” by a model, and they turn moral judgment into a checkbox embedded in workflow.

The result is not only speed, but insulation. Death becomes a product of process, stamped and routed and approved. The screen absorbs the horror and returns a recommendation. Power feels less like a decision and more like a system doing what systems do.

The empire doesn’t just want to win. It wants to win without feeling. You hear it every time Stephen Miller is interviewed.

The mercenary halo: privatised coercion waiting in the wings

Around this apparatus drifts a familiar shadow: the privatisation of force, the subcontracting of brutality, the steady conversion of state violence into a market.

In this ecosystem, coercion becomes modular; outsourced, franchised, packaged as “security” or “enforcement support.” The line between government muscle and private muscle blurs, not through ideology but through invoices. The system doesn’t require literal hired killers standing by the door; it requires something more durable: a world in which violence is always available as a service, plausible deniability included.

The genius here is not the gunman. It is the architecture that makes the gunman unnecessary most of the time, and deniable the rest of it.

The real fiasco: Trump is fireworks, the oligarchs are wiring

This is the deeper joke of the Trump era: he is the loud host with the braying laugh at the party, sweating at the entrance, insisting everyone is having a wonderful time. But the party no longer depends on him being competent. It depends on him being useful; an accelerant, a distraction, a permission slip.

He provides the spectacle: the threats, the bravado, the two-front bluster. Behind him, the billionaires and their systems provide the continuity: the databases, the contracts, the enforcement logic, the privatised extensions of state power.

Trump wanted two fronts because one wasn’t dramatic enough. What he’s helping build is something more lasting: a governance model where coercion is automated, privatised, and normalised—where the wealthy rule not only through money but through infrastructure, and the rest are processed as a manageable population.

Coda: the future arrives as a software update

There is a scene that fits this era better than any map room.

A warship offshore, lights humming on the water. A podium somewhere inland, a man making threats into microphones as if microphones were missiles. A contractor in an office park updating a dashboard. A bureaucrat approving a purchase order. A database quietly remembering a face.

No sirens. No dramatic announcement. Just a system tightening.

The brave new world doesn’t arrive with jackboots. It arrives with a software update.

And once it’s installed, it doesn’t need a genius. It only needs a user.

This article was originally published on URBAN WRONSKI WRITES


Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN

Dear Reader,

Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.

Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.

Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.

With gratitude, The AIMN Team

Donate Button

About David Tyler 179 Articles
David Tyler – (AKA Urban Wronski) was born in England, raised in New Zealand and an Australian resident since 1979. Urban Wronski grew up conflicted about his own national identity and continues to be deeply mistrustful of all nationalism, chauvinism, flags, politicians and everything else which divides and obscures our common humanity. He has always been enchanted by nature and by the extraordinary brilliance of ordinary men and women and the genius, the power and the poetry that is their vernacular. Wronski is now a full-time freelance writer who lives with his partner and editor Shay and their chooks, near the Grampians in rural Victoria and he counts himself the luckiest man alive. A former teacher of all ages and stages, from Tertiary to Primary, for nearly forty years, he enjoyed contesting the corporatisation of schooling to follow his own natural instinct for undifferentiated affection, approval and compassion for the young.

25 Comments

  1. Love him or hate him, Trump has done what Hannibal, Alexander, Napoleon and Hitler could never do, he rules the world.

  2. I am amazed at the command of your articles Mr.Tyler,thank you for articulating my jumbled thoughts.
    John the Divine’s Revelations are starting to look eerily accurate.The”number of the beast” anyone? Whether that’s bullshit or not,we are most certainly looking at a very dark time in history.Something’s got to give.
    Is it just my fevered imagination, or has China and Russia gone quiet amid the madman’s ramblings?

  3. In answer to your question; I’d suggest China and Russia are just waiting for America and the Coalition of the Willing to destroy themselves.
    Tne fact is North, South, East and West we have conflict and America and the Coalition of the Willing are involved in most, if not all cases, I wonder why?

  4. Tim Anderson, Director of the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, has posted the following on X, from Prof Seyed Mohammad Marandi, Tehran University.

    THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE PROTESTS IN IRAN
    1.Allegations of “mass casualties” among Iran protesters are not dependable. They come from a group called Center for Human Rights in Iran. The Center for Human Rights in Iran is NOT in Iran. It is in New York.
    2. Is it an Iranian group? No. It is financed by the CIA-adjacent National Endowment for Democracy in Washington DC and related bodies, specializing in disinformation.
    3. Is it led by the people of Iran? No. The chairwoman is Minky Worden, an American who ran anti-China campaigns for many years. She tried to get the Beijing winter Olympics renamed “the genocide Olympics” and cancelled. She failed.
    4. Previously, Ms Worden worked closely with the Hong Kong “pro-democracy” movement (also NED-funded) and her husband was on the board of Apple Daily and had a contract with the Pentagon. Yes, the US regime-change operations around the world are THAT incestuous.
    5. The other main source of unbelievable tales of massive protests and huge numbers of deaths in Iran are coming from the Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA). This is also a NED-funded, US-based disinformation outlet.

  5. With the internet closed in Iran, I am unable to access the website of Seyed Mohammad Marandi.
    But apparently he is described by his website as a “prominent Iranian defender of the Islamic revolution”.
    Sounds entirely impartial and reliable.

  6. A Commentator: This may help
    Seyed Mohammad Marandi holds verified academic credentials as a professor at the University of Tehran.​
    Academic Background

    Marandi earned a BA, MA, and PhD from 1989 to 2003, with his doctorate from the University of Birmingham (UK) on “Lord Byron, his Critics, and Orientalism,” engaging Edward Said’s work on Orientalism. His University of Tehran faculty profile lists him as a Professor in the Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature, with scholarly metrics including 848 citations and an h-index of 15 as of early 2025.​
    Professional Roles

    He formerly headed the North American Studies program and founded the Institute for North American and European Studies at the University of Tehran. Marandi serves as an advisor to Iran’s nuclear negotiation team and frequently comments on international media like CNN, BBC, and RT.​
    Potential Controversies

    While credentials are confirmed, critics label him a regime propagandist due to defences of Iranian policies and ties to figures like his father, former Health Minister Alireza Marandi. He faced removal from a university deputy role amid administrative disputes.

  7. A Commentator: My research confirms much of the following but suggest that the claims align with facts on the organisations’ US bases and NED funding links, but overstate disinformation ties and ignore broader reporting on Iran 2025-2026 protests.

    Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI)

    CHRI is, indeed, based in New York, not Iran, and receives substantial US government-linked funding, including over $18 million by 2023 reportedly from NED and State Department sources. Minky Worden serves as chairwoman; she is American, Director of Global Initiatives at Human Rights Watch, with past roles advising Hong Kong’s Democratic Party and US Justice Department speechwriting. You will not be surprised to learn that no verified evidence confirms direct CIA financing of CHRI,)though NED has historical CIA ties;) Worden’s anti-China advocacy and Beijing Olympics criticism are documented, but her husband’s Apple Daily/Pentagon links lack confirmation in sources.​
    Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA)

    HRANA operates from the US, affiliated with Human Rights Activists in Iran (HRAI), and receives NED donations among other non-political sources. It reports protest casualties, such as 2,615 deaths by mid-January 2026, amid estimates from 2,000-20,000 total protester deaths since late 2025.​
    Protest Casualties Context

    Allegations of mass casualties draw from CHRI, HRANA, Iran Human Rights (Norway-based), and others like Human Rights Watch, with Iranian state media acknowledging thousands dead including security forces. Western outlets cite these groups amid internet blackouts limiting verification, but Iranian state reports confirm funerals for hundreds. Claims of sole reliance on “disinformation” overlook multiple corroborating activist and media estimates.

  8. Fine. Plenty of people look for cognitive reinforcement. Even if it means using the opinion of someone who describes himself as a prominent Iranian defender of the Islamic revolution
    I’ve noted in the past that there is an expert who will write persuasively about every point on the political spectrum
    Some have chosen Seyed Mohammad Marandi to reinforce their views about the economically incompetent religious extremist and misogynistic Iranian regime.

  9. As I noted on another thread, even excellent sites such as this can become home to defenders of the status quo.

    Those who rely on Western propaganda for their news of the world have no concept of the brutality of the regime that the Islamic revolution displaced.
    And many do not wish to have their ignorance disturbed.

    The US has no plan in the event of their destabilisation of Iran being successful.
    If that happens we will see Iran turn into a hell-hole run by competing warlords.
    Or perhaps the US will install as leader a former terrorist, a hardline jihadi extremist as they did in Syria.

    Those who support the protests in Iran are mindless sycophants who worship power and care little for the consequences.

  10. Jonangel, appreciate your reading but suggest that Trump’s rule of the world is more rhetorical than real. If you look at my most recent article, (The Donroe Doctrine …) I point out a few facts that make it impossible for the US to even count on spare parts for its aircraft, let alone find an adequate source of personnel. In brief, beneath the bluster and the swagger, the US is struggling to maintain its war machine. And if they were comfortably top dog, would The Department of War’s hawks be so keen on a “winnable nuclear war” to eliminate its rival and potential military superior China? The other fly in the ointment of the invincibility of the US is the historical fact of defeat in a long list of military encounters. Just about everything, really since World War Two which it entered late and … I’m sure you get my drift. On a side note, my father, a Chief Petty Officer in the Royal Navy at the time was astonished at the hot and cold beverages piped around a fighting US ship, which he was invited to board. As someone who saw active service throughout the war, he was also astonished at how much of US strategy depended on massive aerial bombardment. Nowadays it’s still a lot of that even though Palantir and Pine Gap offer precise guidance. But the fiasco in Iran shows just electronic warfare can be jammed or hi-jacked, hacked and used against you. In Ukraine, now the drones that seemed to promise an asymetrical levelling are becoming very much a two-edged sword.

  11. IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTION
    Perhaps introduce a laughing emoji to deal with ridiculous comments (eg 1.19 PM) that aren’t worth a reply

  12. Steve Davis’s reminder of the long & sorry history of American meddling in the affairs of other countries and the always worse-off outcomes as a consequence of their interference whether overt or covert is timely and a salient opportunity to yet again show why that country cannot, ever, be trusted to do the ‘right thing.’ It’s the scorpion on the frog’s back, begging for a lift across the stream then killing its carrier at the halfway point, because, that’s what it does.

    Whether in Central or South American countries, the Middle East, Southern and Northern Asia, Eastern Europe, Africa, here in Australia, everywhere America has footprinted, its agenda is solely for its own benefit and to hell with the consequences. That sorry history, alone, should be more than enough for the rest of the planet to eschew all contact and relation with that noxious entity, utterly & forever.

  13. Well said Kanga.

    On the bright side, as David Tyler points out, “beneath the bluster and the swagger, the US is struggling to maintain its war machine.”
    Over-extension has been the death of most empires.

  14. David, we all make some good points and I acknowledge yours. But Trump and his administration is way ahead of the pack. Trump has a dream, he knows where he is heading, the rest of our world is just in catchup.
    No one seems prepared to bite the bullet and the longer they hold off, the stronger Trump becomes.
    Hitler marched across half of Europe, before the world took him seriously, by the time the so called Free World wakes up it will be to late.
    I repeat, Trump has done what Hannibal, Alexander, Napoleon and Hitler could never achieve, he controls our world.

  15. “Those who support the protests in Iran are mindless sycophants who worship power and care little for the consequences.
    I’ll simply point out that the above sentence is without rational justification, particularly in the context of economic incompetence, uncompromising religious dogma, misogyny (including the targeted murder of women) and suppression of opposition
    But apparently everyone should just look the other way

  16. Steve, that’s bullshit, no one other than China or Russia, is at this stage prepared to take America on. Given time North Korea might join the fray, but forget the EU, they are done and dusted.
    The America’s are on their own and good luck to them, the question is, will they fight or will they succumb to Trumps fantisis?

  17. jonangel, as always, I hesitate – fools rush in where angels etc. etc. – but I think you’re wildly overestimating this current phase of the American experiment. History, in due course, will record Trump’s serial abysmal failures on many fronts, including his grandiose narcissistic ambition to, as you suggest, rule the world.

    David Tyler’s series of contributions to this and other matters mark him as an astute & perceptive analyst, head & shoulders above most of the rest of us. It’d reward you well to pay close attention to what he has to say.

  18. AC has been reduced to regurgitating Empire propaganda.
    When you cuddle up to curs, you end up with fleas.
    Or in this case, rabies.

    An official Farsi-language social media account associated with Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence agency, published a message declaring direct support for rioters in Iran. The post appeared on December 29, 2025, as major protests spread across Tehran and other Iranian cities due to a worsening economic crisis, fuel price hikes, and the collapse of the rial.
    From the Jerusalem Post — “Go out together into the streets. The time has come,” the Mossad wrote. It continued, “We are with you. Not only from a distance and verbally. We are with you in the field.”
    The statement was a rare open acknowledgment from the Mossad regarding ongoing operations in Iran.
    In June, the Mossad had hundreds of agents involved in Israel’s 12-day war, which set back Iran’s nuclear program, ballistic missiles program, air defense systems, and killed dozens of its top military and intelligence officials. Following the war, Mossad Director David Barnea released a rare statement foreshadowing the spy agency’s activities in Tehran, telling the general public that Israel “will [continue to] be there, like we have been there.”
    https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-881733

    I repeat — Those who support the protests in Iran are mindless sycophants who worship power and care little for the consequences.
    They support a death cult.

  19. Canguro, I am not ignoring Trumps failures and I don’t like the man or his methods. However, the facts speak for themselves. Trump is running wild and no one seems prepared to stop him!!
    In a sick way I admire Trump,, he is highlighting the failure of the democratic system,. The more voices,, the less chance there is of resolution.
    Short of a bolt of lightning or an assassins’ bullet, Trump will win, not because Trump is good, rather, it will be because our leaders are weak.

  20. • Inflation rate of 49%
    • Unemployment rate over 9%
    • Currency collapse
    • Opposition parties banned
    • Run by uncompromising religious zealots
    • Women murdered by the “Morality Police” and other security agencies
    • Institutionalised misogyny and specific suppression of women’s rights in every facet of society
    But according to Steve, we shouldn’t show concern or support for civilians that protests about all this.
    They should just put up with murder by the state, brutality and falling living standards without demure.
    Protest, complaint and opposition is pointless, according to Steve.
    Apparently mass public protests aren’t due to actual disaffection with the religious zealots that (brutally and incompetently) run the country, its because Iranians are easily manipulated by agents of other countries.
    What do Iranians really have to complain about?

  21. Has anyone picked up on the inconsistency in this argument?
    I mean, apart from the views of a distinguished Iranian academic being irrelevant while those of the US gutter press are a beacon of light.

    AC has his knickers in a knot over economic problems caused by illegal US sanctions, and alleged human rights abuses in Iran that he cannot confirm, yet he says not a word about abuses being perpetrated the world over by his favourite superpower.
    Abuses that they boast about.
    Abuses that need no confirmation.
    He does tut-tut about them occasionally, so as to not be ostracized completely, but is his heart in it?
    Check this out.
    On the Palestine genocide — I struggle to identify the “right” side

    And a great deflection from US and Israeli crimes can be seen here — Anyone who considers them (international issues, wars, atrocities) to be “the root cause” of slaughter of Australians peacefully celebrating a cultural event on a Sunday afternoon, has seriously lost the plot.

    We are staring into an abyss.
    A morality-free zone.
    A haven for hypocrisy.
    A den of double standards.

    And that’s just the part of his position that at least has a facade of integrity.
    Now we get to the falsehood.
    “Protest, complaint and opposition is pointless, according to Steve.”
    Nowhere have I suggested that.
    AC lies.
    My position, unlike that of AC who is happy to have genocidal maniacs on his team interfering in a nation’s internal affairs, is the opposite to that.
    Iran’s problems must by solved by by the Iranian people.

    And this is where the love of power that drives the liberal world order emerges from the slime.
    The West does not let people decide their future.
    That is one of the truths behind the Venezuela fiasco.
    The West does all it can to destabilise, manipulate, and if necessary extinguish, independence movements wherever they arise, and independent governments wherever they exist.
    That’s what is happening in Iran.
    That is what AC is supporting.

  22. AC, Much of Iran’s problems today come from Western interference in the 1950’s when the Shah was installed. The Iranians became so sick of the Shah and Us/UK interference and chucked the Shah out for the Ayatolla Khomenie
    brings us to today- poor figures as to econony caused by sanctions from the West. The horrible war with Iraq in the ‘eighties, comes to mind as another (likely Western imposed) issue that further damaged Iran.

    It’s the oil of course and Britain and America don’t like those who question their orders.

    As for the morality police and veils, I doubt whether the old conservatives will realise the damage done to Iran and far worse, their their own reputations

    Last year they beat to death a young woman not wearing her veil the right way. I thought on that day that there there WOULD be hell to pay from a such an extremist move. But the extremism comes from an intense battle to lve with the past, present and future.

    So much pressure, largely caused by western meddling.

  23. Steve says…
    “Iran’s problems must by solved by by the Iranian people”.
    So without protest and some civil disobedience, can you explain how Iranians can effect change?

  24. A Commentator,

    Iran’s problem is the US. Have you read the US policy analysis paper “Which Path To Persia” published in 2009? You should. Just google it and download the freely available PDF. It is a shameful admission of what the US is up to and they make no effort to keep it secret.

    You will find there an analysis of the risks and benefits of backing protesters to achieve regime change in Iran. The risk assessment is that there is not much chance of successfully persuading Iranians to overthrow their government. And it seems they were right about that all those years ago. These papers were published in 2009 and it is now 2026, and yet the agenda is pursued relentlessly.

    Now the US is more concerned about persuading the rest of the world that the Iranians want to turn against their government. They want to manufacture our consent, not the Iranians, for what the US chooses to inflict upon the Iranian people against their will while making it seem to western observers to be the Iranians that want it. Consequently massive pro-government rallies in reaction to the US manufactured protests are portrayed by obedient western media outlets like our own ABC as evidence of anti-government protests. So why have these anti govt protests stopped? No mention is made in western media of the US and Israeli agitators or the US funding mentioned above in this article, though they will eventually be admitted way after the event like all the admissions of US interference that are ultimately exposed and ignored in US press like the NY Times.

    One minute Trump is ready to go to war if the “killing” doesn’t stop. The next minute it is all called off because the “killing” has stopped. Trump has ended yet another war, somebody give him another peace prize.

    Iran has been subjected to sanctions for decades at the behest of the USA that wants revenge for being kicked out by the Revolution that overthrew their murderous puppet, the Shah. The US wants to put another Shah in charge of Iran. That is not what the Iranian people want, and the US knows it, but doesn’t care.

    The US would not fare well in a war against Iran. And Israel, it’s not so eager partner, knows it would likely be destroyed by Iran’s extremely efficient and unbelievably inexpensive missiles and drone weapons which can overwhelm the US’s expensive million dollar counter missile defences, which is what Israel’s Iron Dome depends upon. Iran is ready for the US this time. The US can’t launch another surprise attack whilst lulling the Iranians into a false sense of security with peace talks.

    So by resisting the US’s ambitions the Iranian people can effect change without protest and civil disobedience against their own government, which would only be of benefit to the US and not in their own interests at all.

  25. I have long said trump’s a genius, albeit the dumbest.
    He able to live the ‘now’ and he can manipulate both the past and the future as his now.
    He can say whatever pops into his head with the confidence of not needing to think of consequences first nor remembering after.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*