By Walt Zlotow
President Trump sure has an aversion to nuclear disarmament treaties with Russia that might just prevent nuclear war.
In his first term he dropped out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a signature Obama agreement including Russia, China, France, Germany and the UK to diffuse Iran’s nuclear program. He also withdrew from the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF). Then he left office without renewing the impending expiration of the New START Treaty. Successor Biden wisely renewed it for 5 years upon replacing Trump in January, 2021.
Here we are with New START set to expire in 12 weeks and guess whose president again? Nuclear agreement adverse Donald J. Trump. And what has Trump done to avoid having the third nuclear treaty go poof on his watch. Nada, zilch, nothing.
New START was and is a sensible nuclear agreement. It limits the number of strategic nuclear warheads that can be deployed by the US and Russia to 1,550 each. It further restricts nuclear capable bombers, submarines and missile launchers to 800. All this to be verified by mutual inspections.
Seven weeks ago Russian President Putin reached out to Trump to get the New START renewal ball rolling. Trump’s response? Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov expressed dismay there has been no reaction to the proposal as of yet. “After all, my colleague in Washington announced that Trump would personally respond to this initiative. But so far, there’s been no response from the American.”
When a reporter recently asked Trump what he thought of Putin’s request to renew New START, Trump meekly replied “Sounds like a good idea to me” before turning away to avoid a follow up question.
When it comes to initiating, staying in, renewing nuclear agreements with Russia that just might prevent nuclear Armageddon, Trump adheres to the NATO formula: No Action, Talk Only.
Walt Zlotow, West Suburban Peace Coalition, Glen Ellyn IL
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.
Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.
Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.
With gratitude, The AIMN Team
Nuclear mutual destruction is a horrific thought. Although Trump doesn’t seem likely to destroy the financial and ego-tripping racket he has set up for himself as President, he also seems so pliable to those pulling strings, who knows.
If a nuclear war does start, where does Australia stand?
Labor has put Australia fair square in the line with the US bases they are allowing on our soil – they’d all be nuclear targets. If a power was going to send nuclear-headed missiles our way, why wouldn’t they then just send another three – at Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne?
trump loves ‘nukes’ and wants to control storms with them.
Thankfully he doesn’t have the ‘button’!!!!!