RMIT University
US President Donald Trump has announced a 500-billion-dollar investment in AI, called the ‘Stargate Project’, which could have far-reaching impacts.
Dr Emmanuelle Walkowiak, Vice Chancellor’s Senior Research Fellow:
“The newly announced ‘Stargate Project’ signals a massive acceleration in AI development that could reshape industries, the labour market, and the Australian regulatory framework.
“This investment is not just about technological AI advancement, but mostly about an acceleration of transformation of our institutions. It envisions a US-centric libertarian approach of the digital economy and raises concerns about who sets the rules for data governance, labour protections, and ethical boundaries.
“Large-scale AI initiatives like this one can rapidly eclipse existing regulations, shaping industries and social structures before the public or policymakers fully understand their implications. In Australia, several inquiries are underway to inform policy, including the Inquiry into the Digital Transformation of Workplaces.
“This announcement could prompt considerations on several issues: Should Australia tighten regulations or create a parallel AI infrastructure push? Might we try to impose more responsible, transparent frameworks on global tech players? Does more need to be done to further protect Australian data sovereignty?
“Calling the project ‘Stargate’ uses a sci-fi label and futuristic narratives to shape public imagination, pushing a faster adoption while sidestepping ethical and societal questions around the design, deployment and governance of AI. It is also showcasing the growing influence of tech entrepreneurs like Elon Musk or Sam Altman, presented as legitimate experts for policymaking with economic and societal impact. From Elon Musk’s Mars vision to OpenAI’s AGI ‘for the benefit of all humanity’, these futuristic imaginaries shape public discourse and policy agendas.
“Trump’s AI priorities for the US contrast with the recommendations provided by scientific experts across the world. Following an extensive consultation with over 200 academic experts from five continents, as well as over 11,500 citizens, key priorities have been identified for the upcoming 2025 AI Action Summit in France.
“Scientific experts across the world call for global AI governance through permanent oversight bodies, broader stakeholder inclusion, and clear red lines for advanced AI development. They emphasise trust in AI via enforceable safeguards, transparent policies, and an international safety network. For the public interest, they propose standardised auditing frameworks, a global charter of AI principles, and channels for citizen engagement. The future of work priorities include upskilling, workforce protection, and AI literacy programs. Finally, innovation and culture initiatives focus on promoting ‘green AI,’ protecting cultural data, and coordinating global research funding with an emphasis on ethics, alignment, and equity.
“As we enter a golden age of AI, it is our collective responsibility to ensure its benefits are shared equitably for a better future.”
Emmanuelle Walkowiak is a Vice-Chancellor’s Senior Research Fellow in RMIT’s School of Economics, Finance and Marketing. She leads the FLOW-GenAI initiative (Future of Labour, Organisation and Work with GenAI).
More reading: Forensic scientists issue call to arms to build forensic intelligence capability
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
I fail to see a golden age this way. More likely a gilded one surpassing that of the 19th century. A huge impoverished mentally ill population ruled by an elite whose work is all done by computers , robots and a few desperately poor humans where essential .Not sustainable and certainly undesirable ethically !
This is just another way to funnel taxpayer funds into the bottomless maws of tech billionaires like Lone Skum and the Zuckster. And to turn the general populace into nothing more than chunks of data and cogs in their insatiable machine.
If owners and controllers, those eternal maggots of millennia past, get close to an ultimate control, then greedy concentrated deficiency and inner emptiness will see the rest of us out thinning cadaverously. The owners and controllers took the podiums, got on the thrones, built the shrines of submission, stole the land with self awarding criminality, and, left most poorly off over all of known time. Under the gloss and makeup of the Trump types, little different from the old Caligula, Attila, Ivan types, is, pure unadulterated faecal foam and fraud, awaiting our crushing subservience or worse, for even today, in the midst of plenty, death comes to the “unlucky”. Could a huge program of elimination, of liquidation, be organised on our behalf? We seem to need a peoples’ Praetorian guard, for some balanced decency.
I see “Stargate” more as being a giant ATM to be emptied (along with thick brown enevelopes and kickbacks to Trump) as fast possible than anything else.
Excellent article,
expresses the appropriate concerns, and processes in train that prevent AI becoming a tool of invasion and subjugation of the ‘public’ and theft from them. Trump et al seem to be ‘jumping the gun’ and ‘the shark’ with the likes of the Techbros who subsequent to their kissing of the ring, are now running amok.
I have already declined the use of AI pushed by Microsoft in its recent ‘365’ subscription – it was hard to find the ‘opt out’.
There are already legal cases afoot against AI’s harvesting of private / proprietary information without appropriate permissions / recompense.
There is nothing ‘cute’ about AI, albeit that’s how it’s being peddled.