Why Budget Surpluses Are Harming Everyday Australians

By Denis Hay

Description

Learn how budget surpluses cut services, widen inequality, and ignore Australia’s dollar sovereignty – plus a people-first plan to fix it.

🎧 Listen to this article.

Introduction

Brisbane, 2024.

Nurse Mara finishes a 12-hour shift, only to discover that her rent has increased by $50 a week. On the news: “Record $15.8b budget surplus!”

Instead of relief, Mara feels fury.

Problem: surplus targets have starved public housing, hospitals and wages.

Agitate: inequality rockets as Canberra pats itself on the back.

Solution: Australia’s dollar sovereignty enables us to fund people-first policies – if we dispense with surplus mythology.

PROBLEM: Surplus Mythology in Canberra Is Misleading and Harmful

Australia’s political class – from both Labor and Coalition governments – has long sold the idea that a budget surplus is proof of responsible economic management. But this belief, born out of neoliberal ideology and corporate influence, fundamentally misrepresents how a currency-sovereign government like Australia’s works.

The false household analogy:
Governments aren’t households. They don’t need to “save” before spending. While households use money created by the government, the federal government issues the Australian dollar – it doesn’t need to tax or borrow to spend. Yet, politicians and media pundits frame the budget as if it must be “balanced” like a family’s finances.

Surpluses as political theatre:
Governments crow about surpluses during elections to appear “fiscally responsible.” Surpluses drain money from the economy, removing income that would otherwise circulate among workers, small businesses, and communities.

Real consequences of this myth:

• Underspending on vital services like public housing, Medicare, and education
• Stalled infrastructure projects due to artificial budget constraints
• Missed opportunities to invest in climate resilience, digital infrastructure, and regional development.

Australia’s obsession with budget surpluses leads to underinvestment in the future – not prudence but planned scarcity.

Australians Are Paying the Price for Surplus Obsession

While Canberra celebrates its “black ink,” Australians like Mara – a nurse in Brisbane – are facing crippling rent hikes, understaffed hospitals, and stagnant wages. These aren’t isolated cases – they reflect a national trend.

Surpluses drain household incomes:
When the government runs a surplus, it removes more dollars through taxation than it spends back into the economy. This leaves households and businesses with less income to spend, save, or invest – especially during economic downturns.

People on JobSeeker, Disability Support Pension, or the Aged Pension fall further behind as real payments decline in relation to inflation and living costs.

Young people and renters are priced out of housing as public investment dries up and private developers dominate.

First Nations communities see cuts to essential services under “fiscal discipline” narratives.

Surpluses help private interests, not public needs:

• Massive corporate tax concessions and fossil fuel subsidies are kept.
• Billion-dollar private contractors and consultants are still funded.
• Meanwhile, public hospitals and schools are left to ‘do more with less’.

The most vulnerable suffer first and most:

Result: growing inequality, slower wage growth, unaffordable housing, and the erosion of trust in government. All while politicians claim, “budget responsibility.”

Use Australia’s Dollar Sovereignty to Invest in the People

Australia is a monetary sovereign nation – we issue our own currency, the Australian dollar. This gives us a unique ability to fund what we need, provided real resources (labour, materials, skills) exist. It’s time to shift from austerity to functional finance.

Spend based on capacity, not ideology:
Instead of chasing arbitrary surplus targets, governments should assess:

• Are people unemployed or underemployed?
• Are hospitals under strain?
• Are housing waitlists growing?

If the answer is yes, there’s fiscal space to spend. The government can and should inject money directly into public systems to meet these needs.

Implement a national Job Guarantee:
A Job Guarantee program would:

• Ensure that everyone willing and able to work has access to meaningful, living-wage employment.
• Stabilise inflation by anchoring wages and reducing labour market volatility.
• Rebuild local economies through care work, environmental repair, and public service jobs.

Build essential public infrastructure using sovereign spending capacity:
Accounting tricks should not constrain public spending. It should be guided by what builds a resilient, fair society, such as:

• Fully funded universal healthcare and dental care
• Free public education from early childhood to TAFE/university
• Public housing construction at scale
• Climate-ready transport, water, and energy systems

Reinvest yesterday’s surplus:

Use taxation not to fund spending, but to shape society:

• Close loopholes that help the top 1%
• Introduce taxes that reduce harmful behaviours (e.g., pollution, speculative land-banking)
• Redistribute wealth to reduce inequality and boost aggregate demand.

Outcome: a strong, inclusive economy that supports all Australians. Full employment, stronger public services, and a fairer Australia – achieved without arbitrary surplus targets.

Summary

Budget surpluses are optional and harmful. Embracing dollar sovereignty lets Australia invest in its people, slash inequality and future-proof the economy.

Q & A

Q1. Do big deficits always cause inflation?
Not when spare capacity exists; inflation appears only when spending outruns real resources.

Q2. Won’t global markets punish higher debt?
Our debt is in AUD – repayable on demand by its issuer. Bonds merely store private savings.

Q3. How does a Job Guarantee different from welfare?
It offers paid, socially useful work at a living wage, preserving skills and community value.

Q4. Is taxation still necessary?
Yes – not to fund spending, but to curb excessive demand, discourage harmful behaviour and reduce inequality.

Call to Action

Curious what others think? Read testimonials at https://socialjusticeaustralia.com.au/reader-testimonials/.

If you found this article insightful, explore more at Social Justice Australia and share it with your community.

Click on our Reader Feedback page and leave your story.

Comment below and leave a Google Review: https://g.page/r/Cf72h_5fXcalEBM/review

Support block: Please help keep this platform running.

Donate at https://socialjusticeaustralia.com.au/donation/

Comment below – your voice powers our campaigns.

Quote Cards 

1. “Surpluses drain dollars from your pocket, not Canberra’s.”
2. “A deficit today can be tomorrow’s hospital bed.”
3. “Dollar sovereignty means investing in Aussies, not spreadsheets.”

Social-Media Blurb

“Record surplus? Great – unless you’re on a hospital wait-list or smashed by rent. Our latest guide busts the surplus myth and shows how dollar sovereignty funds a fairer Australia. Read now at Social Justice Australia.”

References

1. theaustralianinstitute.org.au – 5 Key Takeaways From the 2024 Budget
2. acoss.org.au – Inequality in Australia 2024
3. themandarin.com.au – Budget 2025 cuts social services
4. abc.net.au – $15.8 b surplus confirmed.

This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia 

Dear reader, we need your support

Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.

One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.

With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.

Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969