Economic growth doesn’t have to come at a cost to the environment, and the ways in which this is possible will be on display at a global conference being held in Australia for the first time.
This year the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP) is holding its 11th global conference in Darwin and will be the first time the major event has been held in Australia since its inception in 2008.
The conference will focus on nature-based solutions (NbS), or actions and methods that use and protect ecosystems while addressing global challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, human well-being, food and water insecurity and more.
The conference will have a special focus on the insights of local and Indigenous people and what their value systems can offer.
Charles Darwin University (CDU) Associate Professor in Ecological Economics Kamaljit Sangha, who is the chair of the Conference Organizing Committee and a keynote speaker, said nature-based solutions presented an effective and productive solution to human well-being and sustainability.
“Nature-based solutions offer a win-win situation in addressing local, regional, and global environmental issues while also affording transformative economies that can improve people’s well-being,” Associate Professor Sangha said.
“However, to optimize social and ecological gains, NbS need to be carefully developed and implemented in collaboration with local communities.
“We need to implement NbS now. We have no time. We have messed up the entire planetary systems and our survival, including the economy, is totally dependent on the functioning of Earth’s systems. We have no Planet B.
“If we as human society want to survive, we urgently need to do something about it. NbS is one way of doing so, among several other options.”
Associate Professor Sangha will discuss the economics of Indigenous efforts in land management and developing culturally appropriate NbS.
Other keynote speakers include renowned savanna fire ecologist Professor Jeremy Russell-Smith, who is the Research Director of the Darwin Centre for Bushfire Research at CDU.
Professor Russell-Smith will discuss initiatives aimed at supporting and incentivising community-based fire management through market-based approaches.
From the UN-led IPBES (Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services), Co-Chairs Professor Paula Harisson (the UK Center for Ecology and Hydrology) and Pamela McElwee (Rutger University in the United States) will discuss how separately tackling global crises are ineffective and sometimes counterproductive, offering insights on how there can be more nexus approach for just outcomes for people and nature.
Experts from around the world including India, Africa, Germany, Netherlands, South Korea, Indonesia and Czech Republic will attend the event, which was last held in Hanover, Germany in 2019.
“Darwin offers both unique natural systems and people from diverse cultural backgrounds, especially the Indigenous people in the north who have strong, ongoing, imbued connections with their lands over millennia,” Associate Professor Sangha said,
“The global audience will have the opportunity to experience a unique place with a strong culture, people, and nature – all in one place.”
The 11th ESP World Conference, From global to local ecosystem services: pathways to Nature-based Solutions inspired from Down Under, is on June 23 to 27 at the Darwin Convention Centre.
See also:
Low interest loans for low emissions machinery
Time for Labor to rebuild shattered credibility on environment ahead of election, says Greenpeace
Jesting on the Environment: Australian Mining Gets a Present
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
Australia and the United States, both vibrant democracies with shared cultural roots, often invite comparison.…
By Denis Hay Description Explore the truth behind the Tiananmen Square massacre myth. Discover how…
By Dale Webster ONE of the most important Federal Government inquiries into welfare issues…
By Walt Zlotow In life and death the US Navy relished punishing Harvey Milk for…
Sandpit politics is rarely edifying and grown toddlers taking their fists to each other is…
There’s something uniquely entertaining about watching a ‘genius’ billionaire navigate politics like a self-driving Tesla…
View Comments
The laws of physics imply that there will always be a limit to the sustainable scale of global economic activity. You can relax or tighten the limit, but limitless growth indefinitely is not plausible.
Yes there can be economic growth good for both the environment and society, versus the bogus and nativist 'degrowth' movement, linked to fossil fuels.
In the '70s, when global was known, the fossil fuel Club of Rome promoted the debunked 'limits to growth', Daly's steady state economy and Ehrlich's 'Population Bomb'.
The latter are now known in the US as Tanton Network which also promotes degrowth by border security, immigration restrictions and population control; greenwashjng bigotry via 'sustainability' and other eugenics tropes.
There is no evidence for 'degrowth', Vox EU CEPR:
'No solid scientific basis for degrowth (Ivan Savin Jeroen van den Bergh / 11 Sep 2024)
In the last decade, many publications have appeared on degrowth as a strategy to confront environmental and social problems. This column reviews their content, data, and methods.
The authors conclude that a large majority of the studies are opinions rather than analysis, few studies use quantitative or qualitative data, and even fewer use formal modelling.
The first and second type tend to include small samples or focus on non-representative cases; most studies offer ad hoc and subjective policy advice, lacking policy evaluation and integration with insights from the literature on environmental/climate policies; and of the few studies on public support, a majority and the most solid ones conclude that degrowth strategies and policies are socially and politically infeasible.'
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/no-solid-scientific-basis-degrowth