Why Australia Shines: Three Ways it Outpaces the USA

Australia and the United States, both vibrant democracies with shared cultural roots, often invite comparison. Yet, in key areas of governance and societal well-being, Australia implements policies that arguably set it apart as a model for progress. From its stringent gun control measures to its accessible healthcare system through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and its unique approach to civic engagement via compulsory voting, Australia demonstrates innovative solutions that prioritise safety, affordability, and participation. This article explores how these three policies not only distinguish Australia from the USA but also contribute to a more equitable and engaged society.

1. Strict Gun Laws

Australia’s gun laws are a global benchmark for firearm control, and they’re a stark contrast to the U.S.’s permissive approach. After the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, where 35 people were killed, Australia implemented the National Firearms Agreement. This banned automatic and semi-automatic rifles, introduced mandatory buybacks (over 650,000 firearms were surrendered), and enforced strict licensing requiring a “genuine reason” for owning a gun, like hunting or sport shooting – self-defense doesn’t count. Background checks, waiting periods, and safe storage rules are non-negotiable.

The impact? Australia’s firearm homicide rate dropped from 0.57 per 100,000 people in 1996 to 0.18 by 2019, and firearm suicides fell by over 50%. Compare that to the U.S., where gun violence kills about 14.7 per 100,000 annually (2021 data), with over 600 mass shootings in 2024 alone. Australia’s not gun-free – rural areas still have plenty of firearms – but the tight regulations mean fewer impulsive shootings and safer streets. The U.S.’s Second Amendment culture and patchwork laws make similar reform a pipe dream, leaving Americans grappling with a gun violence epidemic Australia largely sidestepped.

2. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)

Australia’s PBS is a cornerstone of its healthcare system, making medications affordable for everyone – something the U.S. sorely lacks. Established in 1948, the PBS subsidises prescription drugs, capping costs for patients. In 2025, Aussies pay up to $31.60 per prescription (or $7.70 for concession cardholders like pensioners), with a safety net kicking in after 36 scripts a year, dropping costs to $0 for concessional patients. Over 1,300 drugs are covered, from cancer treatments to antibiotics, saving patients billions annually. For example, take insulin, which can cost Americans $300-$1,000 a month out-of-pocket, is capped at $31.60 per script in Australia.

The U.S., by contrast, has no universal drug subsidy program. About 28 million Americans were uninsured in 2023, and even insured folks face high copays or deductibles. Studies show 1 in 10 Americans skip medications due to cost. The PBS isn’t perfect – new drugs can be slow to get listed – but it ensures no Aussie chooses between medicine and rent. The U.S.’s market-driven system, with its price-gouging pharma giants, leaves millions behind, while Australia’s PBS reflects a commitment to equitable healthcare.

3. Compulsory Voting

Australia’s compulsory voting system, in place since 1924, ensures democracy reflects the whole population, not just the loudest voices – unlike the U.S., where turnout can be abysmal. All citizens over 18 must enrol and vote in federal and state elections, or face a small fine (about $20-$50). It’s not draconian – informal (invalid) votes are allowed if you really want to protest – but turnout hovers around 90%, compared to the U.S.’s 66% in the 2020 presidential election and a dismal 46% in 2022 midterms.

This high participation forces politicians to appeal to a broad spectrum, not just motivated fringes, leading to more centrist policies and less polarisation. In the U.S., low turnout often amplifies extreme voices, as special interest groups dominate. Compulsory voting also fosters civic engagement; Aussies see voting as a duty, not a chore. The U.S.’s voluntary system, combined with voter suppression tactics such as ID laws or felony disenfranchisement, means millions are sidelined, skewing representation. Australia’s system proves mandating participation can strengthen democracy without sacrificing freedom.

Why This Matters

Australia’s not perfect, but these three systems – strict gun laws, the PBS, and compulsory voting – show a society prioritising safety, equity, and civic responsibility. The U.S.’s struggles with gun violence, healthcare costs, and voter apathy highlight what happens without such measures. Australia’s approach isn’t about being “better” in a smug sense; it’s about practical policies that tangibly improve lives.

 

Dear reader, we need your support

Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.

One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.

With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.

Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969