Categories: AIM Extra

Where should Palestinians go to make way for Gaza Trumpworld?

I think it a fair question especially since Egypt and Jordan have said ‘not here’.

The question arose when my nemesis gleefully posted a YouTube video; ‘Trump’s Gaza Plan Unveiled: Is This Biblical Prophesy Unfolding?

As a response I asked the question whether we should welcome Palestinian refugees here in Australia. Just for a change, he responded with his own words; “Somewhere that they feel at home linguistic and cultural, there are about 12 Islamic countries who are wanting a peaceful Middle East. They who want to return are to be welcomed if they are not a threat to peace.”

In other words, “No!”

Since 1948, according to the line of thinking in what he posts, the threat to Israeli peace has been Palestinians upset because their lands were being taken from them. They dare to resist the takeover, the colonisation of their lands.

The region formerly known as British Mandated Territory of Palestine; the British taking over the occupation from the Ottoman Empire which collapsed during WWI.

The British, without letting the Palestinians know what they were doing, wrote the Balfour Declaration which laid the groundwork for creating a Zionist state in Palestine. The UN declared the State of Israel after WWII, one of the first actions the newly formed UN did. Oh, I forgot (and so did the Israelis), that the land was to become a shared space, Israelis and Palestinians living peacefully together. Two states, the Two State Solution as ratified later in the Oslo Accords.

Negotiation of the declaration was essentially that the Palestinians to take it or leave it. They were denied a voice.

In the lead-up to the British leaving the mandated territory in 1948, the Israelis, under the leadership of Israel’s first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, in what we today would call a terrorist attack, bombed the King David Hotel which was the centre of the British administration in 1946. The period leading up to that event had seen the rise of a number of Israeli Zionist militia which sought to quell Palestinian opposition to the growing immigration of Zionist Jews from Europe who were taking over their lands.

The immediate actions of the Israeli forces on the announcement of the UN declaration forming the State of Israel was to destroy Palestinian villages and farms, an action called the Nakba, the catastrophe, which saw hundreds of villages destroyed and displaced about 750,000 Palestinians who sought refuge in Syria, Lebanon and Egypt. Of those Palestinians who remained many found shelter in the Egyptian territory of Gaza, the Gaza Strip, which became contested territory during the growing immigration of Jews settling from war torn Europe, but it became a virtual prison with the passage of time. Israeli control included the construction of secure fencing, the limiting of fishing rights to a narrow stretch of coast line and a naval blockade limiting the ability to bring freight in or out of the enclave. All supplies including essential services such as food, medical supplies, building materials, power, water, sewage was controlled from Israel.

Palestinian movement in and out of Gaza was strictly controlled with check points manned by armed guards. Some Palestinians worked in Israel and had to queue daily to leave for work and to return after work, and passage through depended on the mood of those manning the entry and exit points. Exit or entry could take hours of frustrating hold ups, waiting for permission to be granted… or denied, according the whim of the gate keeper.

Gaza was a virtual prison, the crime of the inhabitants: being Palestinian. And we wonder why there has been the occasional flair up, culminating in the attack of October 2023.

The words of my nemesis are interesting; ”They who want to return are to be welcomed if they are not a threat to peace.”

Looking at the history of Palestine/Israel, I do suggest that the greatest threat to peace, pretty much since the Balfour Declaration has been the Palestinian resistance to having their lands taken from them, having their villages destroyed, being expelled from their homeland, and that is an ongoing threat when we look at the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.

The greatest threat to peace has been the settlers, the Israelis making their ‘Biblical promised land’ their home.

So what to do with those who do not feel safe returning to the wasteland that is Gaza?

President Trump is probably quite happy to send them to any of those 12 countries my nemesis refers to, without naming them. But Jordan and Egypt have said they cannot take them.

Jordan currently has over 2.3 million refugees, most, but not all enjoying full citizenship which affords them the right to work and passports to enable travel. A most unusual benefit afforded those refugees.

Egypt has not welcomed refugees yet many came from the 1948 Nakba, mostly Christians, but they and their descendants have never been naturalised, never granted citizenship. The numbers are guessed to be between 50,000 and 110,000 but since the Hamas/Israeli war it is estimated that about another 115,000 Palestinians have crossed into Egypt.

Lebanon already is home to about 250,000 refugees from the various conflicts; 1967, 1972, and some intifadas around the turn of the century, not to mention those being displace from the West Bank and Golan Heights, an ongoing territorial grab by the Israelis.

Syria is host to about 450,000 refugees from those conflicts and has just a few issues to deal with, like reconstruction after 13 years of civil war.

Other nations in the region include Saudi Arabia. No, not interested, they have poo-hoo-ed the Trump suggestion.

Iraq? Mmmmm, still reeling after the invasion in search of non existent weapons of mass destruction, still reconstructing with the help of the multi-national oil corporations who are stealing their natural resources.

Kuwait? In the same boat really, besides it is barely larger than a postage stamp, and a sand dune covering oil reserves.

Qatar? Bahrain? United Arab Emirates? Could probably use some labour for the ongoing development of the city states. Their track record in ensuring safe working conditions is a bit on the nose though. It seems the preferred may be slave labour.

Yemen? Iran? Probably not all that welcoming.

Turkey? Currently hosts the largest refugee population in the world, about 4 million, so they would more than likely not welcome another influx.

It just so happened that I needed to visit some-one near where I used to live. I hadn’t been there for about fifteen years and so was interested to see what changes had occurred. I passed by a church I used to be a member of and next to it, on the next block was an Islamic Mosque. I did some quick research and found that in the Perth region there are now 10 Mosques spread throughout the region and about the same number of Synagogues, although they are mainly in the northern suburbs.

I have not heard of any troubles between the churches, the mosques and the synagogues, yet there is a sizeable population of adherents to each faith in the Perth region. We have not had synagogue or mosque burnings, not even graffitied.

Where I live, in the northern suburbs, we have a very mixed population with immigrants from Africa, the Middle East, South America, Europe, Asia and we seem to have very little conflict. No gun fights, not nasty signage on the homes of ‘strange’ people, coloured ones, turbaned ones. Much the same in the southern suburbs.

I really do get the impression that people who come here are looking for somewhere peaceful to live, somewhere that is safe, especially those who come from war zones, from the Sudan, Somalia, The Middle East, from religious discrimination in India.

An African woman I net several weeks ago told of the brutality she escaped from. She told of a group of young men being tied, a pit dug for them, they were marched into the pit and it was filled in. As she told the story she held her 10-year-old son to her. She lives with the trauma of that time, she revels in the peace and acceptance she finds here.

Australia has been a safe haven for people from all over the world, from strife torn regions, from wars, from oppression, from religious conflict.

So would we, could we, should we make a few Palestinian refugees welcome here?

 

Dear reader, we need your support

Independent sites like The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.

One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.

With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.

Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

 

 

Bert Hetebry

Bert is a retired teacher in society and environment, and history, holds a BA and Grad Dip Ed. Since retiring Bert has become an active member of his local ALP chapter, joined a local writer’s group, and started a philosophy discussion group. Bert is also part of a community art group – and does a bit of art himself – and has joined a Ukulele choir. “Life is to be lived, says Bert, “and I can honestly say that I have never experienced the contentment I feel now.”

View Comments

  • The solution is easy. If Trump is transactional (he is not), he would offer the Palestinians a part of Florida. There is a nice house in Mar-a-Lago that could become the presidential palace of New Palestine.

  • I have heard it said that Trump is transactional in his negotiations. That started me thinking about what do people mean by transactional and what do they mean as it pertains to Trump?

    Firstly, transactional in general seems to refer to transactional relationships. These are based on an understanding of “I do something for you, you do something for me” (or vice versa). It is a relationship between equals. This is a contract, written or unwritten. Contracts are usually written, so transactional is a bit wider also covering unwritten and implicitly agreed arrangements. Contracts and transactions must be based on trust.

    Stop me if I’m wrong, I’m just exploring this stuff.

    My interpretation of transactional could be wrong, or maybe transactional is being applied to Trump without much thought, or maybe some are making an excuse for the way Trump works as if it is some legitimate business tactic that we can accept.

    Trump’s modus operandi is to get others to do things for him. He might promise big things, seemingly his end of the contract, but he has shown in his business and political life to continually renege on his bargains once he has what he wanted. There were many contractors in business, who having fulfilled their part of a contract, Trump then refused to pay. And yet his businesses still failed, even the Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City (how does a casino even fail?).

    Trump has promised to make America (does that include Canada and Mexico also as part of North America, and South America?) great again. Well, what does that mean? No details on how he will do it. Little in policy. In just two weeks he has wreaked more havoc and destruction than ever before — and this is against the very people he fooled into voting for him.

    Trump sees enemies. But more than enemies, Trump sees victims. Trump’s ‘transactional’ is more a form of gaslighting. It is like he beats up his counterpart and then offers the benefit of not being beaten up so they then fall into line and do what he wants. The best way to get advantages is to be cooperative and make friends who are happy to do things for you and with you, not to be competitive and make enemies and victims who begrudgingly do things for you who will eventually treat you like Julius Ceasar and stab you so many times you don’t survive.

    While Trump is busy dismantling anything Joe Biden did or accomplished, the one thing he has said he will retain is AUKUS. Why is that? Because Australia has been played for a sucker sending billions of dollars US way with no guarantee of any delivery, or even that submarines will be an appropriate technology in a future conflict. Like Hitler built Autobahns to move troops quickly — solution, just bomb them. Rommel built defences along the French coast against an anticipated Allied invasion. That was not much use, just a waste of money.

    Yet, Trump recognises a good sucker deal when he sees one, so of course AUKUS is not dismantled.

    Perhaps it is the difference between socialism and capitalism. Socialism (I’m talking about the ideal, or perhaps my perception of the ideal) is being cooperative. At best capitalism is transactional and there is trust in forming contracts. People fulfil their part of the bargain. But at worst, capitalism is about raw competition and making sure you get the upper hand over other parties. This bad form of capitalism breeds crooks, conmen, and those who everyone hates, scammers. The USA also seems to form more cults and followers of conspiracy theories than any other country.

    The US needs to be very careful about what is happening and producing global festering resentments.

    We can be non-transactional in a good sense — that is we do things for others, not expecting a return, or we can break our contracts and just take advantage of others in a weak state. It seems that Trump puts others into a weak state to take advantage and close his ‘Art of the Deal’. Has anyone read that to understand how he works?

    In the last weeks, Trump has tried his tactic on Canada and Mexico (and China), threatening them with the beating of tariffs, then seemingly getting capitulation on illegal drug control, which it seems Canada and Mexico already had in place with Biden.

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mexico-troops-border-biden/

    That is another of this kind of tactic — position yourself to take credit for the work of others, but make sure others are placed to take the blame when things go wrong, even when it is your fault.

    Trump keeps the beating and threat of tariffs in the air. He is also threatening Panama. And as for his latest threat to rid Gaza of its ‘troublesome’ inhabitants, the Palestinians, he has teamed up with Netanyahu as a similar bully. And that is not being anti-Semitic, otherwise I also know a lot of anti-Semitic Semites, who must hate themselves!

    Donald Trump is treacherous to deal with. He has shown himself to be an abuser at all levels of life, from his ‘pussy-grabbing’ boasts, to business deals, to political machinations. Trust is an important element in dealing with people and Donald Trump cannot be trusted, either because he has no intention of keeping a bargain, or in hair-brained schemes that just won’t work.

    What do you think? Is Trump just being transactional? Or is he rather being an abuser who gaslights his victims?

  • Ian, regarding Trump as transactional, he has demonstrated time after time that he is not trustworthy in making his deals. You reference that he gets others to do his work, claims the work of others as his own and blames others when things go wrong.
    That is hardly transactional, that is being untrustworthy.

    Eleven bankruptcies I think, where business deals have soured and others have lost money, but he comes up smelling like roses.

    Untrustworthy.

    Interesting that you cite 'The art of the deal'. Peter Dutton loves that book, wants to emulate Trump.
    Does that make him untrustworthy too?

  • @Ian Joyner:

    Wonderful comment worthy of a main article, thank you.

    You've nailed Dutton per the art of the syllogism!

  • I reckon there would be instant peace in the Middle East if all Israelis were "encouraged" to move out of Palestine. I propose carving out a part of the USA for their exclusive "Chosen" use. Florida seems about right to me.

  • On a side note: You can always rely on Rupert to swim to the bottom of the slime pit in pursuit of "news". You can imagine the outcry and frothing at the mouth from Der Spud and the Clown Crew if this repulsive act had succeeded.

    https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/deliberate-orchestrated-incident-daily-telegraph-caught-up-in-stunt-gone-wrong-20250212-p5lbli.html

    https://nybreaking.com/daily-telegraph-sydney-cafe-jewish-man-htmlns_mchannelrssns_campaign1490ito1490/

Recent Posts

What will it take?

By Lachlan McKenzie In today’s world, it is increasingly evident that a small minority of…

10 hours ago

How the SmartCard Continues the Failures of the Indue Card

By Denis Hay  Description The SmartCard replaced the Indue Card, but has anything changed? Discover…

12 hours ago

Second Endings: Terminating ‘Neighbours’ (Again)

Soppy, soapy and interminable, the Australian series Neighbours, the staple for millions of British (and…

14 hours ago

The art of living in interesting times

Sometimes I can’t keep up. The treadmill feels like it is moving too fast. At…

14 hours ago

Conveniently forgotten and ignored: the 8 years war in Ukraine up to 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYKetrodpoY There's uproar in the Western media, about Donald Trump wanting to negotiate with Putin,…

17 hours ago

What part will Murdoch play in the upcoming election?

This is not just a matter of curiosity, but a call to action. It’s about…

1 day ago