What “Peter Dutton says … ” is hardly worth listening to

Peter Dutton’s been a loud voice as Opposition Leader and his statements get plenty of airtime – especially in a media landscape that leans heavily on his soundbites. (They’re easy to spot: articles that kick off with “Peter Dutton says …”) Let’s pick apart some of his recent big claims, check them against the facts, and see if there’s fear-mongering or exaggeration at play. I’ll focus on a few key areas he’s been vocal about since the 2022 election – immigration, national security, and economic policy – since those are his go-to wedges.

Immigration

He’s been relentless about “border chaos” under Labor, such as his February 2025 claim that Albanese’s government let in “300,000 migrants” in 2024 alone, implying it is swamping Australia with outsiders – often with a not-so-subtle jab at non-Western arrivals. The number’s close – net migration hit 296,000 – but context matters. That spike is a post-COVID catch-up after years of near-zero inflows; it is not a free-for-all. Dutton’s phrasing, though, skips that and paints it as an invasion, echoing his “African gang violence” line from 2018 that turned Melbourne’s tiny Sudanese crime stats (1% of offenders) into a national panic. Critics, like the Human Rights Law Centre, called it textbook racial scaremongering – zero in on a group, amplify fear, ignore scale. No data shows these migrants are crashing the system; in fact, Treasury says they’re filling labour gaps in aged care and construction. Yet Dutton’s “protect our way of life” vibe hints at a cultural threat, a code that is hard to miss.

Dutton’s been hammering a narrative of crisis and government weakness. In late 2024, he seized on a High Court ruling releasing detainees, claiming Labor’s response was a “disgrace” and that “rapists and murderers” were loose, pushing for mass deportations of dual nationals via a referendum. The fear angle’s clear – paint Australia as overrun by dangerous foreigners. Reality check: the ruling affected 149 people, many long-term residents, and most weren’t convicted of violent crimes – some were visa overstays or minor offenders. The kicker’s his March 2025 deportation referendum pitch – aimed at dual nationals, often from Middle Eastern or African backgrounds. It is not random; it is a pattern. Back in 2016, he said letting Lebanese Muslim refugees in the 1970s was a “mistake” – a comment resurfacing now as proof he’s comfy singling out groups. It is a classic amplify-and-alarm move – take a specific issue, blow it up, and sidestep the nuance.

National Security

On national security he’s leaned into China hard. A week ago he slammed Albanese’s “limp-wristed” response to a Chinese naval task force circling Australia, calling it a “contemptuous” show of force. Sure, the ships were real – spotted off Western Australia – but they stayed in international waters, a legal flex not a violation. ASIO and Defence say there’s no imminent military threat – China’s playing geopolitics, not prepping an assault. Experts such as Michael Shoebridge of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute noted its routine posturing, not an invasion prelude. Dutton’s rhetoric ramps it to Defcon 1, implying imminent threat without evidence of intent or capability crossing that line. Fear? Check. Substantiation? Thin.

Nonetheless, he tied it to Beijing’s aggression and Labor’s weakness, suggesting Australia’s at risk of being overrun if we don’t toughen up. Dutton’s rhetoric conjures a siege mentality, and his past digs at Chinese-Australian “spies” (the 2018 push to ban Huawei) have fueled profiling fears among Asian communities. Research has found 39% of Chinese-Australians felt targeted by political rhetoric in 2024 – Dutton’s not alone in this, but his volume’s loud. However, misstep here, like an overblown threat that fizzles, and he’s got egg on his face.

The Economy

Dutton keeps pushing a “Labor’s killing small business” line. In January he touted a $20,000 tax deduction for business lunches to reward hardworking staff, but tied it to optics of struggling local clubs – then got caught at a billionaire’s fundraiser during a Brisbane cyclone prep. The claim’s rooted in real pain – 29,000 businesses did collapse under Labor by early 2025 – but ABS data shows insolvencies were trending up pre-2022 under the Coalition too, tied to global post-COVID shocks, not just Labor policy. It is less fear-mongering here, more selective framing – highlighting pain, dodging context.

On the economy he’s got less ammo than he thinks. His “Labor’s cost-of-living crisis” line hits home – but his fixes, such as that $20,000 business lunch deduction, feel gimmicky. If Labor’s tax cuts and childcare subsidies start biting (15% fee drops are live), and he’s caught hobnobbing with billionaires again during a flood or fire, the “out of touch” tag could stick. And the media loves a hypocrisy scandal.

Summary

Duttons approach thrives on instinct over evidence. Whether it is migrants “flooding” the country, China “circling” like sharks, detainees “terrorising” suburbs, or Labor wrecking the economy he picks a hot-button fear and starts swinging – details be damned. He doesn’t need to explain; outlets like News Corp (think The Australian) run it straight, with editorials nodding along about “sovereignty” or “Aussie values.”

This media’s compliance is key. Australia’s press is concentrated – Murdoch’s empire owns 59% of metro readership – and it’s got a history of backing conservatives. Dutton’s a gift for them: punchy, polarising, clicks guaranteed. It is not hard to see why we are inundated with a repetitious “Peter Dutton says…”. Fear sells, and he’s a one-man fear factory. Racism’s the undercurrent – Lebanese “mistakes,” African “gangs,” Middle Eastern “criminals” – but he doesn’t need to say “race” outright. The compliant press fills the gaps, letting dog-whistles hum without calling them out. It is a machine: he shoots, they reload.

Between now and May, he’s got rope to hang himself. If he keeps blasting and missing, he will only limp into election day.

Until then I’ll be interpreting the boring “Peter Dutton says” articles for what they really are: “Peter Dutton says he’ll scare you.”

 

Dear reader, we need your support

Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.

One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.

With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.

Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969