Two Out of Three Judges Endorse Chaos: Incoherent Policies and Misinformation Win Leader’s Debate

Snarky Critique: The Dutton Debacle – A Masterclass in Recycled Ideas and Unlearned Lessons

Let’s face it: Peter Dutton’s performance in the third leaders’ debate was less a policy showcase and more a nostalgia tour of Coalition failures, garnished with a side of “trust me, I’ve got a plan (but I won’t tell you what it is).” While he narrowly “won” the debate according to Channel Nine’s panel – a verdict as reliable as a weather forecast in Melbourne – the real takeaway is that Dutton’s policies are as half-baked as a soggy meat pie. Let’s dissect why his vision for Australia is less “sliding doors moment” and more “falling down the stairs.”

Nuclear Energy: The $120 Billion Pipe Dream

Dutton’s nuclear energy pitch is the political equivalent of buying a lottery ticket to pay off your mortgage. He insists nuclear is the “efficient” solution to Australia’s energy woes, despite the minor hiccup that it’s currently illegal and would cost taxpayers a cool $120 billion. When pressed on how he’d fund this radioactive daydream, Dutton waffled about “mature debates” and accused Albanese of fearmongering. Meanwhile, actual energy experts – and, you know, investors – are nowhere to be seen. As Albanese quipped: “If nuclear stacked up, there’d be a queue of people saying, ‘we think this is a good idea’.” Spoiler: The queue starts and ends with Dutton’s ego.

And let’s not forget the Coalition’s track record on energy. Remember the 22 failed energy policies under the previous Liberal government? Dutton’s nuclear fantasy is just the latest sequel in a franchise nobody asked for.

Housing Policy: Raiding Super to Inflate Prices (Again)

Dutton’s solution to the housing crisis? Let first-home buyers raid their superannuation – a policy so original, it’s been rejected by economists and his own party members in the past. Albanese rightly called this a “short-term fix,” but let’s be real: it’s a no-term fix. Allowing young Australians to drain their retirement savings to bid up housing prices further is like using a Band-Aid to fix a broken leg. Meanwhile, Labor’s 5% deposit scheme at least targets supply – a concept Dutton sidestepped like a pothole on election night.

But hey, Dutton’s son might use this policy! That’s the Coalition’s version of peer-reviewed research.

Economic “Management”: Secret Cuts and Trumpian Delusions

Dutton’s economic plan is a Choose Your Own Adventure book where every page says, “Cut services, but don’t tell anyone.” He vowed to reduce debt but deferred specifics, invoking the ghost of John Howard like a séance gone wrong. Remember the 2014 budget? Of course you do – the one that slashed health and education funding, a legacy Dutton now dismisses as “Labor scare campaigns”.

Then there’s his “I alone can fix it” approach to Trump’s tariffs. Dutton claimed he’d secure exemptions by offering… checks notes… more critical minerals? Albanese aptly labeled this “complete nonsense,” given that no global leader – not even NATO allies – has wrangled an exemption from Trump’s trade wars. But why let facts interfere with a good soundbite?

Climate Policy: “I’m Not a Scientist” (But I Play One on TV)

Dutton’s climate strategy is a masterclass in cognitive dissonance. He supports net zero but can’t say if climate change is worsening because “I’m not a scientist”. This from the man who once joked about Pacific islands sinking – a comment that aged like milk in the sun. Meanwhile, his gas-heavy “transition” plan is less a bridge to renewables and more a plank into the ocean.

Albanese, no climate warrior himself, at least acknowledged the “entry fee to credibility in our region” is taking climate seriously. Dutton’s fee? A shrug and a gas permit.

Healthcare: Medicare Cuts and Bulk-Billing Bluster

Dutton’s Medicare record is a horror movie sequel nobody wanted. As health minister, he tried to introduce co-payments – a policy so unpopular it was buried faster than a time capsule. Now, he accuses Labor of “scare campaigns” while Albanese waves a Medicare card like a talisman.

When Albanese vowed to stake his prime ministership on bulk-billing rates, Dutton retorted with personal attacks – a classic move when your policy cupboard is bare. Let’s not forget the Coalition’s 2014 budget, which ripped $80 billion from health and education. Dutton’s defence? “Hospital funding went up by 16%!” Sure, Peter – if you ignore inflation, demographics, and basic arithmetic.

Conclusion: Dutton’s Déjà Vu Disaster

Dutton’s campaign is a greatest-hits album of bad ideas: nuclear pipe dreams, super raids, and secret cuts, all wrapped in a “trust me, I’m not Albanese” bow. His refusal to learn from past failures – be it the 2014 budget or his own climate gaffes – shows a leader more interested in reheating leftovers than cooking up solutions.

Australia deserves better than a leader whose vision for the future is a throwback to the worst of the Abbott era. As Dutton himself might say: “Kindness isn’t weakness” but neither is competence, Peter.

 

See also:

The Great Debate Debacle: A Masterclass in Political Kabuki (As Reviewed by People Who Definitely Know What ‘Winning’ Looks Like)

Dutton’s Nuclear Meltdown: A Debate Debacle That Proves He’s Unfit for the Lodge

 

Dear reader, we need your support

Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.

One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.

With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.

Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969