Nuclear is big news for Australia. For the coming election, the federal Opposition party – the Liberal-National Coalition, has as its major, indeed, pretty much its only policy – to establish the nuclear power industry at 7 sites across the continent. At the same time, a Liberal group has sprung up – Liberals Against Nuclear, vowing to ditch that policy.
Meanwhile the AUKUS plan (beloved of both major parties) to buy super-expensive nuclear submarines, has run into problems, and is at risk of being ditched.
Also now, on March 4th the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) announced that it is embarking on a major decommissioning project, getting into the wonderful new Era of Nuclear Decommissioning. This Era was predicted by The Ecologist, back in 2019, but only now is it reported to be getting underway.
Japan, one of the top nuclear nations, has just announced the first dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor – ‘signifying that the so-called “great era of decommissioning” has begun in earnest in Japan.’ They have another 59 to go (10 cleared for operation, 23 described as “operable”, and 26 shut-down ones).
So what indeed is the “great era of decommissioning”? What does “decommissioning” actually mean?
According to the European Union:
“It involves all activities starting from the shutdown of the facility and the removal of all nuclear material right down to the environmental restoration of the site. The whole process is complex and typically takes 20 to 30 years to complete.”
So, in Japan, they really mean business:
“… dismantling of the reactor, which began on March 17, is considered the main part of the decommissioning work.”
In Australia – not so much. It means that ANSTO, a few weeks ago, got a licence from the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), to begin Phase A, Stage 1, and is now beginning to remove peripheral equipment from the the 67-year-old Hifar nuclear reactor, now 18 years out of action. More Phases and Stages to go.
Both the Japanese and Australian news items give short shrift to that final problem – nowhere to put the radioactive remains. ANSTO’s at pains to stress how small an amount it is “be managed and stored safely onsite at Lucas Heights”. The Japanese article concludes:
“While Japan has entered an era of decommissioning, decommissioning plans continue to be postponed due to the lack of a finalized waste disposal site.”
The World Nuclear Association goes into much detail on the decommissioning of 700 nuclear reactors, but only a few of these have been completely dismantled, and still no way of permanently disposing of their radioactive remains.
Meanwhile the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the governments of the most powerful nations are all complacently touting the need for new nuclear reactors. Australian authorities, keen to stress Australia’s nuclear know-how, are joining in this happy disregard of the importance of dangerous radioactive trash.
That famous old Australian character “blind Freddy” would immediately know that this is an unreasonable and immoral attitude.
The “era of nuclear decommissioning” is not really underway at all. If it were happening, there’d be no more hype about new nuclear. I fear that the sad reality is that the men in charge realise that nuclear decommissioning is just too expensive, too fraught with problems “best to just leave it alone, until we are comfortably superannuated out, or dead.”
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
Good for Japan, they can see that the future isn’t nuclear.
The LNP are just clinging to something they hope will be a vote winner – it is clearly a totally stupid policy, so expensive, so dangerous. Always has been and always will. It doesn’t matter if only 1 nuclear plant has an accident – it’s one too many.
Noel, you’re a voice of reason.
Dutton* and team have been clearly inspired by the joint Atlas-Koch Heritage and Tanton Networks’ Project2025, see Stephen Miller et al. and US deportations; similar has been done in Oz, had been threatened by UK Tories on Rwanda and with Farage & Reform (another Tanton symtpom).
One of the most influential ideological sources has been Jean Raspail’s racist screed ‘Camp of the Saints’, followed by Bannon, Miller, Musk, Le Pen, Orbán et al.; published by Tanton’s TSCP described by SPLC as:
‘The Social Contract Press (TSCP) routinely publishes race-baiting articles penned by white nationalists. The press is a program of U.S. Inc, the foundation created by John Tanton, the racist founder and principal ideologue of the modern nativist movement. TSCP puts an academic veneer of legitimacy over what are essentially racist arguments about the inferiority of today’s immigrants.’
*Coincidentally when Dutton was Minister of Home Affairs the ABF Terror Unit applied for the same ‘Camp of the Saints’ to be reclassified from ‘Mature’ to ‘Unrestricted’ during Covid in 2021?
Is it electoral tactics or ideology?
Chrome Dome Dutton is the only known puppet completely controlled by the squirrel grip of the puppeteer Big Vag,leading local enthusiast of the Tangerine Terror.Everything he utters is put in his fish-like gob by his handlers.Never had an original thought in his mediocre existence.How could one resist voting for him?
Dropped my comment on wrong thread, meant to be Dutton & deportations