Image from the University of New South Wales
Here’s an overview of key candidates for the 2025 Australian Federal Victorian Senate election, their party affiliations, policy priorities, and likely voting stances on major issues:
Key Positions: Libertarian-aligned; advocates free markets, free speech reform (e.g., repealing parts of the Racial Discrimination Act), and a hardline stance against China’s human rights abuses.
Voting Likelihood: For fossil fuel subsidies, against climate regulation, and supportive of national security measures.
Key Positions: Moderate faction; focuses on financial deregulation, cryptocurrency flexibility, and women’s economic security. Supports voluntary assisted dying.
Voting Likelihood: For business tax cuts, against expanded superannuation regulation.
Key Positions: Small-business advocate and former Baptist preacher; emphasises “community values” and conservative economic policies.
Voting Likelihood: Likely to align with Coalition’s anti-union and pro-privatisation agenda.
Background: Former Liberal Party president; lost preselection to Hoppitt due to factional disputes. Historically supports rural infrastructure and conservative social policies.
Key Positions: Focuses on multicultural engagement (particularly Ukrainian-Australian issues) and mental health initiatives.
Key Positions: Likely prioritises rural/regional infrastructure, agriculture subsidies, and opposing renewable energy transitions in farming areas.
Key Positions: Legalising recreational cannabis, drug law reform, and harm reduction policies.
Voting Likelihood: For drug decriminalisation, against punitive drug laws.
Key Positions: Opposing live animal exports, banning factory farming, and expanding animal rights legislation.
Voting Likelihood: Against agricultural subsidies tied to animal industries.
Key Positions: Advocacy for Indigenous sovereignty, treaty negotiations, and increased funding for First Nations communities (specific policies not detailed in search results).
Key Positions: Anti-corruption reforms, multiculturalism, and social equity. Likely aligns with centrist populism.
Key Positions: Environmental sustainability (Planet Rescue), whistleblower protections, and tech innovation. Likely supports renewable energy and transparency laws
Key Positions: Clive Palmer-linked party; anti-establishment rhetoric, privatisation, and opposition to net-zero policies.
Voting Likelihood: Against climate action, for fossil fuel subsidies.
Key Positions: Expanding Medicare, TAFE funding, and moderate climate policies (supports renewables but approved fossil fuel projects).
Voting Likelihood: For progressive tax reforms, against radical wealth redistribution.
Key Positions: Social conservatism; opposes abortion, euthanasia, and LGBTQ+ rights. Supports “traditional family values”.
Key Positions: Anti-immigration, anti-renewables, and anti-“woke” policies. Supports coal/gas expansion.
Key Positions: Wealth redistribution, nationalising energy/resources, and rent freezes.
Voting Likelihood: For corporate tax hikes, against military spending.
Key Positions: Banning new coal/gas projects, free dental/mental healthcare, and 1 million public homes.
Voting Likelihood: Against fossil fuel subsidies, for climate justice.
Key Positions: Pro-gun rights (repealing the National Firearms Agreement), expanding public land access for hunting, and opposing environmental park expansions.
David Van (Independent): Ex-Liberal; opposes allegations of misconduct. Likely aligns with conservative fiscal policies
Others (Heena Cheung, Susantha Abeysinghe, etc.): Insufficient data, but generally issue-focused or single-policy independents.
Climate Action: Greens > Victorian Socialists > Labor > Liberals/Nationals against.
Economic Policy: Liberals/Nationals (austerity) vs. Labor/Greens (welfare expansion).
Social Issues: Family First/One Nation (conservative) vs. Greens/Socialists (progressive).
For full candidate lists and policies, consult the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) website or party websites.
Here’s an overview of the candidates for the (randomly chosen) federal seat of Scullin, their affiliations, key policy positions, and likely stances on critical issues:
Party Background: Clive Palmer’s right-wing party, formed via a merger with the Australian Federation Party. Focuses on anti-establishment rhetoric, privatisation, and opposition to climate policies.
Key Beliefs/Proposals:
Likely supports deregulation and privatisation (e.g., opposing public healthcare/education funding).
Anti-net-zero emissions, aligned with Palmer’s fossil fuel interests.
May oppose immigration reforms and multicultural policies.
Voting Likelihood:
Against climate action, public services expansion, or anti-corruption bodies.
For tax cuts for corporations and fossil fuel subsidies.
Party Background: Socially conservative, Christian-aligned party emphasising “traditional family values”.
Key Beliefs/Proposals:
Opposes progressive social policies (e.g., LGBTQ+ rights, euthanasia).
Supports religious freedoms and anti-abortion measures.
Likely prioritises “family welfare” over systemic economic reforms.
Voting Likelihood:
Against drug law reform, gender-affirming care, or secular education.
For policies reinforcing conservative social norms.
Party Background: Anti-capitalist, socialist party advocating wealth redistribution and public ownership.
Key Beliefs/Proposals:
Tax ultra-wealthy and corporations to fund public housing, healthcare, and education.
Nationalise energy/resources, cancel fossil fuel projects.
Combat far-right politics and systemic inequality.
Voting Likelihood:
For rent freezes, Medicare expansion, and climate action.
Against corporate tax cuts, privatisation, or military spending.
Party Background: Far-right, nationalist party known for anti-immigration and anti-“woke” rhetoric.
Key Beliefs/Proposals:
Stricter immigration controls and reduced multicultural funding.
Opposition to climate policies and renewable energy transitions.
Anti-lockdown/vaccine mandates (historical PHON positions).
Voting Likelihood:
Against refugee rights, Indigenous Voice, or net-zero targets.
For reducing foreign aid and expanding coal/gas projects.
Rohit Taggar – Liberal Party
Andrew Giles – Australian Labor Party
Against ‘radical’ climate action and wealth taxes.
Ursula van Bree – Gerard Rennick People First
Progressive Voters: Loki Sangarya (Greens) or Omar Hassan (Socialists) align with climate action and wealth redistribution.
Centrist Voters: Andrew Giles (Labor) offers moderate reforms but compromises on fossil fuels.
Conservative Voters: Rohit Taggar (Liberal) or Arthur Tsoutsoulis (PHON) support business-first policies.
Anti-Establishment Voters: Adriana Buccianti (ToP) or Ursula van Bree (Rennick) cater to far-right populism.
For detailed policies, consult party websites or candidate statements.
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
Forward: The Unknowable Divine Across millennia, humanity has painted the divine in countless hues: vengeful…
I’d begun the voyage at three-thirty the prior night. After driving four hundred kilometres to…
By Denis Hay Federal Election 2025: Be an Informed and Strategic Voter 🗓 Election Date:…
A silly insult! I hear your cry. Yes, as the Oxford Dictionary defines a "halfwit"…
There have been times when the tactics of the Liberal Party in this election campaign…
By Callen Sorensen Karklis Planning for the 2032 Brisbane Olympics is actively progressing, involving collaboration…