Oh, how the tables have turned or more accurately, how they’ve been ‘violently yeeted’ into oncoming traffic. After years of clutching their pearls over the mere suggestion of cutting Australia’s fuel excise, Peter Dutton and the Liberal-National Party (LNP) have suddenly discovered the virtues of slashing the tax. But wait … only if you vote for them in May 2025, of course! Cue the confetti cannons filled with crushed credibility. Let’s unpack this dazzling display of political acrobatics, where principles are optional and election cycles are the real puppet masters.
Rewind to 2022–2024, when the Coalition’s favourite bedtime story was ‘The Tragedy of the Fuel Excise Cut’. Dutton sermonised that reducing the excise (then 48.8 cents per litre) would “blow a hole in the budget,” doom infrastructure projects, and summon the Four Horsemen of Inflation. Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor even tearfully warned that cutting the tax would leave Australia’s roads “crumbling like a gluten-free muffin.”
Fast-forward to March 2025: Surprise, surprise! Dutton and the LNP have unveiled a brand-new policy to cut the fuel excise, just weeks before the federal election. Suddenly, the same tax they once called “reckless” and “economically irresponsible” is now a “cost-of-living rescue package for struggling Aussies.” The budget black hole? Poof – gone! Inflationary risks? A mere myth! It’s almost as if their previous arguments were … checks notes … complete nonsense.
Let’s savor the audacity. In 2023, Dutton declared, “You can’t sacrifice long-term infrastructure for short-term political wins.” Cut to 2025: “We’re sacrificing long-term infrastructure for short-term political wins – vote for us!” The LNP’s newfound enthusiasm for fuel excise cuts isn’t just a flip-flop; it’s a full Cirque du Soleil routine.
And let’s not forget their earlier pearl-clutching over inflation. In 2023, Dutton insisted cutting the excise would be “pouring fuel on the fire” of inflation. Now? Apparently, it’s a “targeted measure to ease pressures.” Who could’ve predicted that inflation only exists when Labor suggests the same policy?
The LNP’s 2025 policy announcement is a masterstroke in selective amnesia. Remember when they lambasted Labor’s temporary 2022 excise cut as a “Band-Aid solution”? Now, Dutton’s plan is… drumroll … a temporary excise cut! The only difference? It’s stamped with an LNP logo and comes with a side of hollow promises to “review” it after the election. Spoiler alert: That review will likely involve a paper shredder.
Let’s call this what it is: a shameless, transparent, glitter-covered bid to buy votes. After years of opposing fuel excise relief – even as households struggled – the LNP has suddenly found Jesus (or at least a focus group telling them Jesus wants cheaper petrol). Dutton’s moral high ground? Bulldozed to make room for a billboard that reads, “Screw consistency – here’s 20 cents off a litre!”
Peter Dutton and the LNP’s fuel excise saga isn’t just hypocritical – it’s a slapstick comedy of errors. They’ve spent years weaponising economic jargon to oppose relief for ordinary Australians, only to morph into Santa Claus with a jerry can when an election looms.
The message is clear: When the LNP says a policy is “bad,” what they really mean is “bad for us, right now.” Voters should ask: If the fuel excise cut was “economic vandalism” in 2023, what changed? (Hint: their poll numbers.)
So, as Dutton revs his engines toward May 2025, remember this gem from his 2023 playbook: “Permanent cuts without a plan to replace revenue are economic vandalism.” Unless, of course, the vandalism comes with a ballot box payoff. How convenient.
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
By James Moore "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.…
Just in case you haven't heard, there's an election coming up on May 3rd. And,…
This article by Bert Hetebry from our old site is one for the keeper. A…
In the tumult of a raging battle, beneath the echoing cries, Where shadows merge with…
I've only just discovered "Mums for Nuclear" - and they sound just so lovely. They…
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s budget reply speech told us everything we need to know about…
View Comments
There is a very interesting article in The Conversation on this topic - posted today.
https://theconversation.com/we-calculated-how-much-duttons-excise-cut-would-save-you-on-fuel-and-few-will-save-as-much-as-promised-253214
Unfortunately, such glib statements mask glib fossil fuel & 'cost of living crisis' talking points that can be attractive to voters who are car dependent and self interested.
Ticks several boxes for RW MSM and influencers to run with it in the election campaign, targeting low info 'persuadables' and the p*ssed off....
Why didn't the Spuds head explode (think Scanners head burst scene in Scanners) from the over abundance of brain farts in his rant tonight?
Where does one start with the lies and obfuscation put around in Dutton’s budget reply? The man who led the campaign against the Voice and has overseen some of the most cruel treatment of people in Australia starts with “Australia is a compassionate country”. That is just being patronising.
So many lies. His energy costing, completely rubbery figures “independently costed” he says. We had nine years of Liberal incompetence on energy. He wants to go back from cheap renewables to gas and 20-years-off nuclear. Lies.
https://cleanenergycouncil.org.au/news-resources/analysis-of-frontier-economics-report-economics-nuclear-power
His cuts to petrol excise only lasts for one year. Does that actually help much?
He talked about scare campaigns and then uses exactly those scare tactics saying our nation is less safe under Labor. His examples start with how Chinese boats entered our waters — well the middle of the Pacific are NOT our waters and Labor certainly had something to say about it.
“We will nurture pride and unity in our country” says the man who led the most divisive campaign in Australia’s history.
So much apple pie of things easy to say, but hard to do. All sounds good, but quicksand underneath.
“Get our country back on track says the man whose previous governments derailed it in the first place.
Knowing what Dutton is like, I found his whole budget reply most disingenuous. No more than that, Dutton is just a bare-faced (bald-headed) liar.
Peter Dutton's election budget speech from 10:30 in this video:
https://iview.abc.net.au/video/CH1302V023S00
Democracy at work indeed!
Darn it, didn't realise that I'd put a space between over and abundance until it was too late to correct it. Can I go home now?
LNP reality is blinkers and black painted glasses.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/dutton-has-pledged-a-fuel-price-cut-experts-query-its-effectiveness-20250327-p5lmyc.html
P Duddy's new anthem (at least in a universe where he's...gag...nice):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7uyKYeGPdE
A desperate 'thought bubble' that has nothing to do with economics or cost-of-living, just over-blown 'smelly' junk that might appeal to LNP's fossil-fueler backers, and mercilessly suck in urban fringe car drivers.
More BS compassion and propaganda from Spud, Anxious Taylor and the Duttonate.