THE COALITION’S NUCLEAR SCHEME is high risk, zero reward – that’s the clear takeaway from the interim findings of the federal inquiry into nuclear power generation in Australia. The committee’s interim report confirms that nuclear energy is not a viable option to meet Australia’s energy needs or climate commitments.
The Climate Council, which appeared at the inquiry, said the inquiry’s interim findings confirm what experts have long warned: nuclear reactors are too risky for Australia. Australians need action now to cut climate pollution and secure our energy future, not a nuclear fantasy that locks us into higher costs, worsening unnatural disasters, and decades of delay.
Amanda McKenzie, Climate Council CEO, said: “The climate crisis is here, now. Australians are already facing more unnatural disasters – record-breaking floods, deadly heatwaves and bushfires, and declining rainfall. In the 15 years that we would be waiting for a single watt of nuclear energy to enter the grid, our climate pollution would soar.
“Every coal-fired power station in Australia will be closed before a single nuclear reactor could be built. Already, 40% of our national grid is powered by renewables, and experts have shown that we can power our economy 24/7 with renewables backed by storage and peaking generation, and we can do it well before a single nuclear reactor is online.
“Delaying action to slash climate pollution has real consequences. The catastrophic conditions that led to the Black Summer bushfires will become the average without sustained, urgent action.
“Nuclear reactors in the 2040s is a delay tactic. The consequence is 2 billion tonnes more climate pollution endangering our kids’ future.”
Greg Bourne, Climate Councillor and energy expert, said: “The numbers don’t lie. Nuclear reactors are wildly expensive and painfully slow. The UK’s flagship nuclear project is 14 years late and facing a $60 billion cost blowout. Australians can’t afford to waste tens of billions of dollars on a major energy project that delivers too little, too late.
“There’s an explosion of misinformation and political spin, but here’s the simple truth: not a single investor is lining up to build nuclear reactors in Australia. Meanwhile, investment in renewable power is surging ahead. In 2024, investment in batteries soared, with new energy storage commitments nearly matching new generation. A total of 4 gigawatts of storage was committed, equivalent to the output of around 2,000 wind turbines. Globally, ten times as much money is flowing into renewable power as into nuclear reactors.”
“Renewable power is already delivering – cutting climate pollution, creating jobs, and keeping the lights on. Australia is at 40% renewables and on track for 82% renewable power in only five years. That will slash pollution and provide the energy security we need.”
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
By Isidoros Karderinis ATHENS, Greece: Two years have passed since the tragic day of the…
An unsettling feeling settles in the pit of my stomach - something is amiss, alarmingly…
By Wilkinson Kayne To my fellow progressive folk, Hardly a day goes by without being…
Monash University Media Release ‘Manfluencer’ Andrew Tate and brother Tristan, who are both facing human…
Guantánamo Bay has been a fiendish experiment in US law for decades. The fiendishness lies…
Disclaimer: I want to see Labor returned after the forthcoming election. If it is a…
View Comments
Not only is nuclear power too slow, Dutton hasn’t even considered what the hell we are going to do with all the dangerous NUCLEAR WASTE that nuclear power produces that remains RADIOACTIVE for thousands of years! Where is he going to dump it? Somewhere in the remote Outback where many members of our aboriginal community live? No other country in the world in their right mind would take on the disaster of disposing toxic, life-threatening nuclear waste that will endanger the lives of humans and all forms of bird and animal life and, inevitably, become a MAJOR problem for our descendants throughout the future! As usual, Dutton NEVER thinks ahead, is as short-sighted as Mr Magoo, lacking even the most miniscule levels of compassion, commonsense or discernment which means he is a TOTALLY UNSUITABLE candidate to become the LNP’s NEXT Crime Minister of Australia!
@ Kathryn
Yes, and even if we did have a safe way and place to put the waste, how would we get it there.
Maralinga has been suggested as a potential depository. Despite whether it is suitable or not, it is 3,000km from Callide, one of the proposed reactor sites.
Does Dutton really believe that transporting waste that sort of distance is appropriate? That's even if we ignore the state laws that would have to be repealed to allow such transport to happen.
fusion reactors must be a good aim for the world's power?
wam,
Australia already has one: It's called P Duddy...oh, wait...that's a confusion reactor.
By presuming that our Federal government has signed for its nuclear waste storage, post its delivery for storage somewhere in Australia. (see this nation's AUKUS Agreement's one and two.)
Most recently, the amount of Nuclear waste currently held in the USA of its "classed as expired spent nuclear rods and its plutonium 238" in its volume, is stated to be in the realm of 90,000 tonnes. (In 2017 it was estimated to be 80,000 tonnes.)
Let it be hoped that our nation has not signed any agreement, or any other document, specific to accepting the delivery of US nuclear waste.
One must understand that the US would try on any form of an agreement to gain some sort of acceptance of their deadly nuclear waste by our fickle Federal government, by its continuing genuflection to appease our deadly military alliance, firstly one must be enabled to read through the elaborate and confounding AUKUS Alliance Agreement.
Hopefully it would be recognized as an act of treason by the USA against the nation of Australia?
Please read the full content of the link held below.
https://crownschool.uchicago.edu/student-life/advocates-forum/our-silent-zombie-commercial-nuclear-waste-storage-united-states