Categories: AIM Extra

Oxfam Australia reacts to the Electoral Reform Bill

Oxfam Australia Media Release

Oxfam Australia is deeply concerned that the Electoral Reform Bill will restrict the ability of charities, including Oxfam, to advocate on critical issues during election campaigns.

Of major concern for charities is a provision that prevents the use of untied or general donations for use on electoral advocacy. Under the bill, which passed the Senate last night, charities would only be able to incur electoral expenditure using donations received specifically for that purpose.

Lyn Morgain, Oxfam Australia’s Chief Executive, emphasised the importance of allowing charities to remain fully engaged in democratic processes, particularly during elections.

“The recently passed Electoral Reform Bill imposes strict limitations on charitable organisations like Oxfam, preventing them from using their funds to voice opinions on important policy matters or offer unbiased information and policy analysis during election campaigns,” she said.

“Australian charities play a vital role in our democracy, providing independent policy analysis, educating voters, and pushing for reforms that benefit communities. We offer a unique, non-partisan voice in election debates, bound by law to prioritise the public interest over political alignment.

“We call on lawmakers to ensure that charities can use all their income for electoral advocacy, with transparent disclosure and appropriate limits on donations, in line with public expectations.”

 

Dear reader, we need your support

Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.

One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.

With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.

Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

 

AIMN Editorial

View Comments

  • Whenever the duopoly come together to vote for an issue, one can be sure it is bad news for Australia.

  • Anthony Whealy KC, Chair of the Centre for Public Integrity and a respected lawyer and former Supreme Court Judge has stated that this legislation, hastily rushed through the Senate last night, has potentially some Constitutional inconsistencies that the High Court may need to look at.

    He's worth listening to.

Recent Posts

What will it take?

By Lachlan McKenzie In today’s world, it is increasingly evident that a small minority of…

11 hours ago

How the SmartCard Continues the Failures of the Indue Card

By Denis Hay  Description The SmartCard replaced the Indue Card, but has anything changed? Discover…

13 hours ago

Second Endings: Terminating ‘Neighbours’ (Again)

Soppy, soapy and interminable, the Australian series Neighbours, the staple for millions of British (and…

14 hours ago

The art of living in interesting times

Sometimes I can’t keep up. The treadmill feels like it is moving too fast. At…

15 hours ago

Conveniently forgotten and ignored: the 8 years war in Ukraine up to 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYKetrodpoY There's uproar in the Western media, about Donald Trump wanting to negotiate with Putin,…

18 hours ago

What part will Murdoch play in the upcoming election?

This is not just a matter of curiosity, but a call to action. It’s about…

1 day ago