Categories: AIM Extra

Oxfam Australia reacts to the Electoral Reform Bill

Oxfam Australia Media Release

Oxfam Australia is deeply concerned that the Electoral Reform Bill will restrict the ability of charities, including Oxfam, to advocate on critical issues during election campaigns.

Of major concern for charities is a provision that prevents the use of untied or general donations for use on electoral advocacy. Under the bill, which passed the Senate last night, charities would only be able to incur electoral expenditure using donations received specifically for that purpose.

Lyn Morgain, Oxfam Australia’s Chief Executive, emphasised the importance of allowing charities to remain fully engaged in democratic processes, particularly during elections.

“The recently passed Electoral Reform Bill imposes strict limitations on charitable organisations like Oxfam, preventing them from using their funds to voice opinions on important policy matters or offer unbiased information and policy analysis during election campaigns,” she said.

“Australian charities play a vital role in our democracy, providing independent policy analysis, educating voters, and pushing for reforms that benefit communities. We offer a unique, non-partisan voice in election debates, bound by law to prioritise the public interest over political alignment.

“We call on lawmakers to ensure that charities can use all their income for electoral advocacy, with transparent disclosure and appropriate limits on donations, in line with public expectations.”

 

Dear reader, we need your support

Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.

One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.

With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.

Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

 

AIMN Editorial

View Comments

  • Whenever the duopoly come together to vote for an issue, one can be sure it is bad news for Australia.

  • Anthony Whealy KC, Chair of the Centre for Public Integrity and a respected lawyer and former Supreme Court Judge has stated that this legislation, hastily rushed through the Senate last night, has potentially some Constitutional inconsistencies that the High Court may need to look at.

    He's worth listening to.

Recent Posts

If God exists, they defy definition & Paradoxes throughout time

Forward: The Unknowable Divine Across millennia, humanity has painted the divine in countless hues: vengeful…

8 hours ago

On the Armidale Road

I’d begun the voyage at three-thirty the prior night. After driving four hundred kilometres to…

12 hours ago

Federal Election 2025: Be an Informed and Strategic Voter

By Denis Hay Federal Election 2025: Be an Informed and Strategic Voter 🗓 Election Date:…

12 hours ago

Is Elon Musk a halfwit?

A silly insult! I hear your cry. Yes, as the Oxford Dictionary defines a "halfwit"…

13 hours ago

Struggling to find an objective guide on who your candidates are? Hopefully this list helps (Victorian edition)

Know your candidates: An objective guide Here’s an overview of key candidates for the 2025…

18 hours ago

Putting The Negative Into Negative Gearing…

There have been times when the tactics of the Liberal Party in this election campaign…

20 hours ago