Image from Sky News Australia
Community Housing Industry Association Media Release
New research from Redbridge for the Community Housing Industry Association (CHIA) and PowerHousing Australia (PHA) shows an expansion of low cost rental housing will be a vote changing political issue at the upcoming federal election.
A poll of more than 1,500 people across 24 of the most contestable electorates in late January shows 73% of voters say housing affordability will be important in influencing their vote.
The research shows 84% believe ensuring Australians have safe and stable housing is a fundamental government responsibility, and 76% agree more social housing is needed.
It comes as advocates unite in Canberra to persuade parliamentarians to build on existing initiatives and lift their ambition on community housing.
“Housing is at the eye of the cost-of-living storm. In this election, we know increasing community housing is the best solution to this crippling problem and it has overwhelming public support,” CHIA CEO Wendy Hayhurst said.
“Fewer than four per cent of Australian homes are social or affordable. To fix our broken housing system it needs to be more like one-in-ten.
“This research not only confirms voters want more action on affordable housing, but that there are alarming levels of housing stress. In these key electorates, one in three people lack confidence they can afford their housing costs over the next year. These findings should send a strong message to all political leaders.”
According to the findings, 28% of renters and mortgage holders spend over half their income on housing. The data also shows housing stress is worse outside the inner city postcodes, with 31% of people saying they are struggling in outer suburban areas, and 29% in the regions, compared with 24% in the inner cities.
“We understand the intense cost of living crisis people are experiencing, and we know the cost of housing is a major stressor. The current federal government is making some inroads into easing the strain on housing, such as increasing stock through the Housing Australia Future Fund, but more work is needed,” PHA CEO Michelle Gegenhuber said.
“This research shows there is bipartisan support for a fairer housing system in Australia, with polling showing two thirds of voters back minimum affordable housing requirements in new developments.”
“We are asking for a commitment that puts a significant dent in the current rates of housing stress and homelessness. Australia needs one in 10 homes for social and affordable housing, and quadrupling the Housing Australia Future Fund. A different future for Australian housing is achievable with the right action.”
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
What a scary thought: “How does 12 years of Donald Trump as US President sound?…
By Lachlan McKenzie In today’s world, it is increasingly evident that a small minority of…
By Denis Hay Description The SmartCard replaced the Indue Card, but has anything changed? Discover…
Soppy, soapy and interminable, the Australian series Neighbours, the staple for millions of British (and…
Sometimes I can’t keep up. The treadmill feels like it is moving too fast. At…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYKetrodpoY There's uproar in the Western media, about Donald Trump wanting to negotiate with Putin,…
View Comments
So the much-maligned Greens were right all along? Hmmmm.
I don't believe increasing the rental assistance will solve anything. Like anything government subsidised the vendor/landlord/child care/nursing home/first home buyers/etc will just increase their charges to soak up the increase. One answer is rent control as successfully practiced in many European countries where people often rent the same premises their entire adult life. Another is a return to well-funded state housing commissions which used to work well until the governments started selling the houses/flats to investors ie the "Sirius Building" in The Rocks.
As for home ownership we all know one big step is the elimination of negative gearing and the capital gains tax concessions.
I can't see any government state or federal having the fortitude to do anything serious about home ownership and the rental market.