Monash experts: Medicare and other Australian government sites hacked by OpenAI agent

Screenshot from YouTube video uploaded by WFTV Channel 9

Monash University Media Release 

Monash University cybersecurity experts comment on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s revelation that an OpenAI agent accessed Medicare data and other Australian government websites earlier this year.

Professor Yang Xiang, Department of Software Systems and Cybersecurity, in the Faculty of Information Technology says:

“An OpenAI agent’s unauthorised access to Australia’s Medicare statistics portal in June is a serious warning about the risks of agentic AI. 

“This kind of intrusion and access actioned by an AI agent is significantly different from a scenario where a human hacker orchestrates a cyberattack. An AI agent has the capability of trying to ‘unlock’ a virtual ‘locked door’ numerous times in a short period and potentially breaking in. 

“There is currently no evidence that personal information was accessed, but the breach still matters. A legitimate task does not justify unauthorised actions. An AI agent must treat a locked door as a limit to respect, not a puzzle to solve. 

“The delayed response also shows how far our defences have to go. Agent behaviour can be difficult to monitor and audit at scale. Protecting public systems will require better detection of AI agent activity, tighter limits on what agents can access, and faster incident reporting. 

“Agentic AI can be enormously useful, but it must be used responsibly. That is why trustworthy AI is no longer optional.”

Professor Nigel Phair, also of Department of Software Systems and Cybersecurity, in the Faculty of Information Technology says:

“As reported, the use of an OpenAI agent to gain access to a number of Australian government information websites is concerning. 

“While we have been told there has been no access to personally identifiable information, it appears sensitive information has been accessed. We need to understand how this happened, who directed the AI agent to undertake such access, and why.

“Organisations need to rapidly understand how malicious actors will use AI to gain unauthorised access to computer systems and applications, and double-down on their efforts to discover vulnerabilities and patch them accordingly.”

 

Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN

Dear Reader,

Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless independent voice – holding power to account and delivering journalism that matters.

Running this site isn’t cheap. Rising costs mean we need your support now more than ever. Every donation, big or small, keeps our servers running, our writers working, and our stories free for everyone.

Donate here:

PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below

Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund for hosting and future improvements.

Thank you for standing with us. We couldn’t do this without you.

With gratitude,

The AIMN Team

3 Comments

  1. So what exactly is an OpenAI agent? Is it somebody privately and surreptitiously using Open AI for their own purpose or is it an entity within OpenAI that is acting independently of an authorised OpenAI operator? If it is the latter then is OpenAI capable of sentience?

  2. What information was or wasn’t exposed isn’t even the point. It isn’t even the fact that Albanese sat on this Medicare data breach that makes me furious. It is the fact that he didn’t think it worth bothering to call a press conference and announce it to the people that it matters to; us. The ones that pay his salary and perks as a civil servant. No, he decided to hold onto it and use it to promote his own views on AI and laws around it whilst overseas. While I don’t disagree that there needs to urgently be more stringency we are not a demostrable ‘example.’ When were we going to be told? At every turn he puts his his foot in it lately.
    What’s more amazing is how little media coverage this has getting as if it’s not an important issue or a problem which just underlines his attitude that it wasn’t a big deal. That is in no way good enough.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*