So much of the history of the Jews and the Jewish diaspora is tied to the rebellion of the Jews against the Roman occupation culminating in the expulsion of them and the destruction of the temple in 70CE, and a further rebellion and expulsion around 160CE.
The Zionist claims to Israel/Palestine rest in large part on the understanding that all the Jews in the Holy Land were expelled, but as stated in his books ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’ (2009) and ‘The Invention of the Land of Israel’ (2012), Shlomo Sand clearly states that was not the case, the rationale he uses is that Israel was a population of farmers and fishermen, and the Romans, being an occupying force with an army to feed needed the agrarian population to farm and to fish and to raise animals for meat to feed the occupying forces. The religious leaders were the trouble makers, objecting to the lands being occupied, claiming their right as God given, and hence were expelled and the most visible structures of their religion destroyed.
According to Sand, who is a respected historian, the diaspora was of the intelligensia, of the religious leaders, and as they were expelled, took with them their scriptures and moved into what is now Europe and North Africa and proselytised their religion, seeking converts and promising to return at some later time… Next year in Jerusalem.
For various reasons, Jews have been set apart from the mainstream of the places they have lived, forming seperate communities close to their synagogues, tied together, if you will, through religion and culture. The impression formed is one of a semi-closed, cultural enclave within cities and suburban areas, adding to the culture of the cities but somehow not quite being settled within it. The sense is that Jewish-ness is a strong identity, a homogenous society. Attempts have been made to find specific Jewish identity markers, whether it be through DNA, eugenics or other historically used differentiations, but there has been no defining characteristic found, in fact Jewishness is as broad as any other marker of human identities, whether it be definitively Middle Eastern or Arabic, North African, East European, or West European. No distinctive marker has been identified.
The expulsion from Jerusalem in 70CE and subsequent emigrations created a diaspora which spread throughout the Mediterranean and Eurasian region which blended in in all human characteristics except religion, which especially in Christian Europe, caused some problems.
The Jewish religion uses circumcision as a defining element. Boys are circumcised on their eighth day, marking them for life. Christians were baptised in a church setting and their baptism recorded by the clerics who also kept the records of the population, births were not recorded, but baptisms were, and so Jews were not officially registered as being born and so had no legal definition of their existence. That created problems, since without proving that a person actually existed in a legal sense, they could not purchase land and in essentially agrarian settings were unable to earn an income, or to be a permanent resident. This is so well portrayed in the play Fiddler on the Roof, where a pogrom is forcing the Jews out of Ukraine early in the twentieth century.
Many of the people displaced by those pogroms settled in Poland which had become a safe haven, and at the start of WWII had the largest Jewish population in Europe, hence the largest concentration camps of the holocaust were in or bordering on Poland.
In 1917, the Balfour Declaration given to Lord Rothschild, ceded the yet to be proclaimed British protectorate of Palestine to Zionists, to Jews, not as a magnanimous gift, but a means for Britain to refuse to accept Jews wanting to settle in Britain. As Shlomo Sands points out, Balfour could well have suggested that Jews settle in his homeland of Scotland, but no, as a politician, Balfour saw the problems that Jews brought with them, their ‘seperate-ness’, their business acumen which portrayed them as greedy, money hungry, a reputation, ill-earned, which had grown through the long history of discrimination throughout Europe. So ‘giving’ Palestine to the Jews solved several problems, essentially shoving them aside as the Zionist claims to Eretz Israel, the land promised to Abraham and his descendants, grew.
But what happened to those Jews who were not expelled in the expulsion of 70CE and subsequent emigrations?
In The Times of Israel, 15 March, there is a report headlined “Could 1,600-year-old Galilee synagogue rewrite history of Jewish life under the Romans?”
In brief, the report writes about the carbon dating of an ancient synagogue which was erected in the fourth or early fifth century CE, so Judaism was practiced well after the expulsion of 70CE. The article goes on about the cultural significance, that the synagogue was used throughout history, it was apparently restored in the 14th century, and there is evidence of Judaism being practiced until very recent times in the region.
The article does not cover what that really means for the population of Palestine between 70CE and the current day. There is the supposition that Jewish life and Judaism continued through the ages.
Could it be that the people being persecuted, whose lands are being stolen, who have farmed and grazed on that land for generations are actually Jews who have survived through those two thousand years, and have as strong not stronger, claim to the land as do the Zionists who claim it through their ‘historical’ links to Abraham? What if there were a scientific test to prove the link back to Abraham, if some element of his DNA could be found, and there by draw a direct lineage back to the time of the Biblical book of Genesis?
There is a further matter which warrants a close look at, and that is the immigration and emigration of Jewish people during the times of the Russian pogroms of the 1907 till 1917 and the destinations they chose as they faces expulsion and the emigration from post holocaust Europe.
Quoting Shlomo Sand:
“(W)hen Jewish groups were expelled from their places of residence during acts of religious persecution, they did not seek refuge in their sacred land but made every effort to relocate to other, more hospitable locations.” (The Invention of the Land Of Israel, page 20), but then, in the following paragraph, “In fact it was the United Sates’ refusal, between the ant-immigration legislation of 1924 and the year 1948, to accept victims of European Judeophobic persecution that enabled decision makers to channel somewhat more significant numbers of Jews toward the Middle East.”
In other words, Jews were not made welcome in places they would rather have migrated to.
Sand concludes that section with:
“… the Jews were not forcibly exiled from the land of Judea in the first century CE, and they did not ‘return’ to twentieth-century Palestine, and subsequently to Israel, of their own free will.”
That leads to another important question. Where would Jews prefer to live if not in Eretz Israel?
In a population of about 10 million living in Israel/Palestine, there are about 7.7 million Jews, but in recent years according to a report in today’s Guardian, there are “about 630,000 Jewish people born in Israel… now living elsewhere in the world”, additionally about 330,000 “Israel-connected” living elsewhere in the world, making about 10% of the Jewish population, have emigrated from Israel/Palestine, making their new homes in the very European countries their parents and grand parents left to find refuge in Eretz Israel.
While most choose to settle in the USA, thevnumber settling in Germany, infamous for the holocaust of 1939-1944, is around 24,000, but others communities have settled in Bulgaria, Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands and Denmark.
The factors driving the emigration, according to the Guardian, include political polarisation, the high cost of living, the impact of wars in Gaza and Lebanon and security concerns.
All this reflection points to the way the Israeli/Palestinian situation has been manipulated. The history of, and I so like this term, Judeophobia, (as distinct from anti-semitism) as used by Shlomo Sand, the fear and marginalisation of Jews through history, has been sold to us, legitimising the ethnic cleansing of Israel of Palestinians who may well be the real Israelis, with an uninterrupted lineage to the land of Eretz Israel, or Palestine, West Bank and Golan Heights (Samaria and Galilee).
As mentioned in an earlier article, the term anti-semitism directed at Israelis, is actually wrong. The definition of semite people is far broader than a term to define Jews or Israelis. It refers to the descendants of Noah’s son Shem. The term Judeo defines those adhering to the Judaic faith, Judeophobia is as significant as Islamophobia describing the rise in fear and hatred of Muslims.
Also by Bert Hetebry: What is Zionism and what is Christian Zionism?
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
Meanwhile, Netanyahu and the extremist Zionists continue their murderous rampage,killing all those terrorist babies, children and women.I think we all know how this is going to end.
Indeed we do, unfortunately Harry.
Trumpian paradise in Gaza is looking more and more likely while Palestinians are meted the same treatment as first peoples in any post colonial nation…. dispossessed, sidelined, hoping they will soon die out.
“Attempts have been made to find specific Jewish identity markers, whether it be through DNA, eugenics or other……………..”.
The Israel experiment has revealed that there has to be a willingness to use force to steal land, houses, and anything else that appeals.
A lack of normal compassion while they ethnically cleans stolen land, and an ability to exterminate the first nations people without conscience.
The world takes note of the actions, and can pick up lies in media coverage.
If Jews living in Israel feel they are surrounded by enemies, it follows that jews around the world will feel the same way, and there is no way they can claim being victims, and require special consideration.
They have sown criminal behavior, and will reap the rewards appropriate to their actions, and keeping on the move will be the only solution.
You can be pro- or anti- anything, but truth is clear, thieves and murderers are getting away with extreme crime and there should be ultimate punishment after lawful process. By 1948, the Palestinians were robbed, cheated, by British, USA conniving and all the rest, especially in Europe who wanted to see the jews gone, forever, from sight. But no long term problem was solved at all, just transferred, and criminality surges again, and again. Zionism, from the 1880’s aimed to GET, GRAB, SETTLE, and any logic can see the path, going back past the Balfour declaration, of murder and theft.
Of no immediate comfort to the millions of Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Jordanians, Iranians, Yemeni and others suffering from the bloodthirstiness and brutality of the Israeli military machine and its psychopathic masters, but there will be a reckoning eventually.
Cosmic laws exist; reciprocity exists, laws of return, recurrence & reincarnation exist, as do laws of karma and dharma. Man’s actions cannot, and have never been able to, escape the reality of these cosmic laws. It is only the ignorance of the poor intellectual animal mistakenly called Man that continues to allow these inhumane atrocities to persist, but, undeniably, there will be reckonings for all concerned.
Very few of the lands and peoples that were recognised 2000 years ago still remain the same today. The Jews are claiming to be the First People in the area which is ridiculous. If we are to believe the Bible, there were many wars fought over the land where the Jews settled, which indicates they were not the first, or the only people there.
Around the globe the first people have been overrun by others. Australian Aborigines, American “Indians”, Ainu in Japan, Laplanders, strive to maintain some rights and culture. The sons of Abraham invaded Canaan with their own belief that God had Chosen them and displaced and colonised those who had been there before.
Why do the promises of an ancient book mean anything at all in the modern context? Even the post World War II rewriting of lines on maps have been revisited time and again. They have not been imbued with sacred meaning.
It appears that the main reason is to have a “western” bulwark in the Middle East, ie, geopolitical convenience, bolstered by some powerful religious beliefs. Israel only exists because it has been willed into being by the West. It may find out one day that the West has lost interest.
Watched a one minute video that gave an insight into Zelensky and Putin, claiming both are part of a cult, the Charbad Lubavych. The narrator described the ‘war’ in terms of white genocide. That would explain why a certain ‘religious’ group in both countries is not ‘recruited’ to fight. Seems some tens of thousands of Zoinysts in Ukraine are too busy buying up distressed real estate to fight, coincidence?
This has relevance for Aussies, beware of propaganda that we should help a cult.
Meatgrinder, War in Ukraine War, ‘Operation Whites to the Fronts to Die’
https://old.bitchute.com/video/XVyH7J0YTemD/
The rest of the Dustin Nemos channel looks like junk.
How best to describe and understand the intent of the language of UN 242?
UNSC 242 shares about as much with EU neutrality and desires to restore peace in the Middle East, as EU’s refusal to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in UN 242, a denial of reality, akin to pretending a nuclear Israel doesn’t exist. It infantilizes Israeli sovereignty and keeps Europe locked in a colonial-era mindset, where they think they still get to decide Middle East borders.
A diplomatic game of denial — but only one side is expected to play fair. Israel’s policy of ambiguity regarding its nuclear capability — widely understood but never officially acknowledged — mirrors the West’s refusal to acknowledge Israel’s de facto victory and the political outcomes of 1967, especially regarding Jerusalem. Just as Israel says, “We won’t confirm or deny,” so too do Britain and France say, “We won’t accept what happened, even though we all know it did.”
The omission of Jerusalem’s status from 242 is glaring. Britain and France deliberately avoided affirming Israel’s sovereignty over East Jerusalem, even after the 1967 unification of the city — again signaling a non-neutral tilt against Israeli political and historical claims.
The Infamous “Withdrawal from Territories” Clause. UN 242 calls for Israel to withdraw from “territories occupied in the recent conflict,” not “all the territories.” The ambiguity was intentional, and different powers have since interpreted it differently — Britain and France used this to pressure Israel diplomatically, without actually ensuring peace from the Arab side.
Britain had exited Palestine in 1948 with a deep sense of resentment toward the Zionist movement. France, after the Algerian War, pivoted toward Arab states and saw the Middle East as a strategic chessboard to regain relevance. The resolution was shaped by Lord Caradon (UK) and French diplomats, whose countries had long-standing ties to Arab regimes, especially after the loss of colonial holdings. Supporting Arab causes post-decolonization became a way to maintain influence.
UN Resolution 242, drafted largely by Britain and France, was never a neutral document. It was a political compromise crafted in the shadow of their imperial interests, Cold War alignments, and long-standing pro-Arab policy biases — not an impartial framework for peace.
Happy Pesach
Torah first and formost – not a belief system. Ya want to believe in God(s) become either Xtian or Muslim. Kosher – Jewish. Halal – Muslim. The latter worships other Gods. Arabs/Muslims eat treif camel flesh. Just as Xtians eat pork. Both sets of Goyim worship other Gods.
Pesach, almost precisely one month after Purim. The story of Amalek – as told through the specific of Haman (The numerical value of המלך and המן equal to one another.) – the story of the ערב רב who came out of Egyptian bondage. This so called mixed multitude – they had no fear of heaven. Assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment – and defines ערב רב – assimilated and intermarried Jews.
Kashrut compares to a sofer writing a sefer Torah. Both this and that require fear of heaven. The Torah defines faith as: the righteous pursuit of judicial justice. Justice the Torah defines as: the obligation of lateral common law courtroom justices to compensate the damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B. Ruling the oath sworn Cohen land inheritance of ארץ ישראל has nothing to do with what a person personally believes or does not believe.
The court of Paro ruled oppression as just in the matter of straw withheld from Israelite slaves and thereafter beaten for their failure to meet their quota of brick production. Removing חמץ this משל, it teaches the נמשל to remove the ערב רב lack of fear of heaven, from within the Yatzir Ha’Rah within the heart. Fear of Heaven understood as a person who strives to protect and maintain his/her ‘good name’ reputation. Torah faith stands upon the יסוד/foundation of בעל שם טוב/Master of the Good Name.
And it’s all working out so well.Israel has doomed itself.
To all Zionists, Happy Pesach. Zionism stands upon 1917 Balfour Declaration. All Arab/Israeli Wars, including the Oct 7th Abomination War, stem from the absolute Arab and Muslim rejection of the Balfour Declaration. Britain the first major world power, followed by a 2/3rds UN GA majority in 1947, which recognized Jewish equal rights to self determination in the Middle East.
All Arab country UN members rejected the British UN GA 181 Resolution. Arabs lost their multiple wars to throw the Jews into the Sea. The term Nakba, first coined after the defeat of 5 Arab Armies to throw the Jews into the Sea in 1948. Later UN GA Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism – promotes the Arab strategy of international War against the Jews. Morality propaganda the key strategy of Arab Peoples War political rhetoric.
Torah first and formost – not a belief system. Ya want to believe in God(s) become either Xtian or Muslim. Kosher – Jewish. Halal – Muslim. The latter worships other Gods. Arabs/Muslims eat treif camel flesh. Just as Xtians eat pork. Both sets of Goyim worship other Gods.
Pesach, almost precisely one month after Purim. The story of Amalek – as told through the specific of Haman (The numerical value of המלך and המן equal to one another.) – the story of the ערב רב who came out of Egyptian bondage. This so called mixed multitude – they had no fear of heaven. Assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment – and defines ערב רב – assimilated and intermarried Jews.
Kashrut compares to a sofer writing a sefer Torah. Both this and that require fear of heaven. The Torah defines faith as: the righteous pursuit of judicial justice. Justice the Torah defines as: the obligation of lateral common law courtroom justices to compensate the damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B. Ruling the oath sworn Cohen land inheritance of ארץ ישראל has nothing to do with what a person personally believes or does not believe.
The court of Paro ruled oppression as just in the matter of straw withheld from Israelite slaves and thereafter beaten for their failure to meet their quota of brick production. Removing חמץ this משל, it teaches the נמשל to remove the ערב רב lack of fear of heaven, from within the Yatzir Ha’Rah within the heart. Fear of Heaven understood as a person who strives to protect and maintain his/her ‘good name’ reputation. Torah faith stands upon the יסוד/foundation of בעל שם טוב/Master of the Good Name.
Carman,
“Watched a one minute video that gave an insight into Zelensky and Putin, claiming both are part of a cult, the Charbad Lubavych.” One whole minute! This, um, video wan’t on tiktok by any chance, you know the platform for the brain dead and attention spans of three goldfish by any chance?
Pesach in only a couple of days! Let us remove the חמץ which assimilated and intermarried Jews daily consume. The Torah refers to such tuma Jews as the cursed ערב רב/mixed multitudes. Why cursed? Because assimilation to alien Goyim cultures and customs goes hand in glove with intermarriage with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
The WordPress blog: The Bible Through the Seasons, Confrontation with Compassion: Pastor Nick quotes James 5: 14-16 as if this religious jargon qualifies as holy scripture. The mussar Book of Avot teaches “Ein Am Ha’aretz chassid” — because chassidut requires halachic literacy and precision. James represents not just a theological fork, but an entirely unauthorized avodah.
The chosen Cohen people must do avodat HaShem, like for example obeying the commandment not to work on shabbat. The wisdom required most essentially entails making a distinction between guard Shabbat (שמור) and remember it (זכור). Without discernment, without halachic categories rooted in the middot revealed to Moshe after the Eigel, you can’t access avodat HaShem. You get a foreign fire—like Nadav and Avihu. Or worse, a foreign god.
Without the Oral Torah, impossible to differentiate between shabbat and yom tov, clean and tamei, kosher korban and pig fat. Muslims consume camel flesh and milk together. Xtians despise Torah mitzvot declaring its utterly impossible for man to keep “the law”. The Apostle Paul introduced the substitute theology of ‘Original Sin’ defeatism. This alien foreign theology corrupted the Central Torah theme of blessing/curse – life in the cohen eternal land inheritance/judicial oppression in exile as exemplified by the court of Par’o which justified beating Hebrew slaves after Par’o withheld the necessary straw required to make those bricks.
All generations of Israel have the Torah faith obligation to pursue righteous judicial justice which makes fair compensation of damages which Part A inflicts upon Party B, within the borders of the chosen Cohen homelands. Obviously no Goy can keep “the law” when they lack the skills to discern between TNaCH & Talmudic common law from Greek and Roman statute law. The church fathers, their avoda zarah did not concern themselves with justice as the definition of Torah faith. Their avoda zarah simply glossed over this key Torah concept like as did the Apostle Paul’s ‘Original Sin’ jellied over the key Torah theme of g’lut/exile. Jews in g’lut, just as in Egypt, they lacked the means to impose fair judicial justice among the Jewish people.
Xtian theology substitutes ritual precision with emotional or communal acts—which might feel “spiritual” but remain, nonetheless, completely disconnected from Sinai. In doing so, they’ve invented a new avodah with a new god—not HaShem of the Torah, but a concept filtered through Greek philosophy and Roman structure.
Torah avodah isn’t about feelings, confession, or community healing—it’s a halachic precision-bound path based on brit, oath, and revealed middot. Without Oral Torah, the brit alliance impossible to even articulate. So what’s going on in James, not just a misfire—it’s a completely unauthorized system, one devoid of the chosen Cohen structure. Hence the new testament declares that Goyim can not only become ”grafted” into the chosen Cohen people, but Jews can convert and become Xtians! This Av tuma avoda zarah utterly devoid of halachic shemirah, and outside the brit framework of Sinai/Horev.
James is writing within a Second Temple–era Jewish-Christian hybrid theology, influenced by:
Early Messianic communities Possibly Hellenistic ethical ideas (Stoicism, communal virtue): A shift from Temple-based service which fundamentally requires שם ומלכות, to internalized, communal spirituality, which does not remotely resemble cutting a Torah brit by means of swearing a Torah oath which dedicates Oral Torah middot revealed to Moshe Rabbeinu 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf. The church denies the existence of the Oral Torah.
Hence, the idea of: “Confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed”…while it sounds “kosher”, in point of fact – utterly treif Av tuma avoda zarah. It completely misses the point – required halachic structure; like the observance of shabbat requires making the distinction between forbidden work from forbidden work ie מלאכה from עבודה. A Torah oath brit required in the chosen Cohen format known as “avodat HaShem”, requires the wisdom which discerns the k’vanna of שם ומלכות. Therefore these new testament verses worship some other unknown god(s).
Xtianity despises the revelation of Torah common law. It consequently simply glosses over and utterly perverts the meaning and intent of the Torah. Without Oral Torah, you can’t know how to make these critical distinctions, like what separates saying Tehillim from tefillah. Xtian avoda zarah glosses over these subtle nuances with the broad brush – prayer white wash. This second example adds to the previous example wherein Shabbat observance absolutely requires making the fundamental differentiation between מלאכה from עבודה. Lack of wisdom compares to the precedent of Avot which teaches that an Am Ha’aretz cannot be an Chassid. Without Oral Torah, the brit can’t even be articulated. So what’s going on in James, not just a misfire—it’s a completely unauthorized system, one devoid of the Cohen structure, devoid of halachic shemirah, and outside the brit framework of Sinai/Horev.
Without Oral Torah, a person has no tools to distinguish between: Saying a mizmor of Tehillim as a form of praise, vs.Tefillah, which requires: Shem u’Malchut (divine name and kingship); Zman (halachic time constraints); K’vanna (intention within halachic form which links to a life & death crisis crunch of faith); Sometimes a minyan or other communal structure, because a person can swear a Torah oath also with a minyan, based upon the precedent of the 10 spies in the days of Moshe.
This distinction, subtle to the untrained eye, yet it’s halachically massive. Tehillim quite beautiful and sacred to the Jewish people, but it’s not a substitute for Tefillah—and to equate the two (as Christianity always does) utterly blurs the kedushah-bound categories that Oral Torah establishes and preserves. A person who can see only with one eye – exempt from making the aliyah to Jerusalem on the Chag. Tefillah a matter of the dedication of tohor middot which define the depth of defined tohor middot which breath and live within Yatzir Ha’Tov spirit within the heart. JeZeus, by stark contrast, taught his disciples that their ”father” dwelled in Heaven!
In the Torah, HaShem never refers to the people as having a private, paternalistic relationship separate from brit obligations. Tefillah directly bound by the Akadat Yitzak cords of the oath brit alliance: ‘HaShem save my future born seed from Shoah and I dedicate their souls as a korban to keep and remember your commandments’. Hence a ‘burnt offering’ as the Goyim love to translate refers to a Shoah dedication! A claim to “Father in Heaven” that lacks Torah obedience, and denies Torah She’B’al Peh, does invoke Avinu She’bashamayim/Shekinah that lives within the Yatzir Tov of the chosen Cohen hearts—rather this av tuma avoda zara invokes a strange foreign concept deity god, detached from Sinai.
Xtianity erases distinctions. Torah She’B’al Peh creates, protects, and preserves distinctions. Torah avoda functions only within those boundaries which the Oral Torah defines. Without these distinctions, you don’t have Torah—you have a projection of human emotion dressed in biblical language.
GL, imagine that, someone offers an insider’s insight in one minute.
What is the world coming to? 🙂
I see the religious machine is back again.
There is a mosckerr here scribbling endless boring complex superstition rubbish and it sickens to read this utterly uncivilised stream of utter fiction and fraud. There is no abrahamic god and nobody has seen one, ever. No DNA exists, no photo, fingerprint, FBI or CIA file, no nothing. Based on this, there is no sustainable believable superstition, no chosen race, no promised land, no righteousness and triumphal supremacist vanity, and there should be no murder, theft, claims, crimes as a result.
Another example of Gospel revisionist history which substitute the gospel for the T’NaCH narrative as primary: Luke 19:41-42
The noun peace does not correctly translate the verb shalom. Shalom stands upon the foundation of trust. Peace reflects ancient Greek philosophical rhetoric; where undefined key terms which require the listeners fuzzy logic to define these essential undefined terms, like shalom, upon which all later ideas thereafter hang upon. Herein defines the classic use of Greek rhetoric by which a person controls and directs the masses. The City of David represents the rule of fair and righteous Judicial common law justice. It has absolutely nothing what so ever to do with the revisionist history of the imaginary physical history of Jesus the imaginary myth man.
“Shalom” carries far more than the modern Western notion of “peace.” In Hebrew, shalom implies completeness, wholeness, harmony, security, and a just, equitable social order rooted in mutual trust; deeply tied to emunah (faith/trust) and mishpat (justice).
By contrast, the Greek eirēnē—translated into English as “peace”—more passive, & static, whereas shalom utterly dynamic. And when the Gospel of Luke (originally written in Greek) uses eirēnē, translators have historically rendered it as “peace” in English, which utterly obscures the Hebrew mindset behind Jesus’ (the Son of God character’s) lament over Jerusalem.
Greek rhetoric originally employed as a tool for crowd control. Rhetoric sophistry, and later Stoicism or Platonism, deeply shaped and influenced early Christian theology. These systems often pivot on undefined abstractions—”Logos”, “Peace”, “Salvation”, etc.—easily manipulated by rhetoric design, without grounding in lived experience or legal precedent (as Hebrew law absolutely demands).
Revisionist history and the mythologizing of Son of God Jesus. This aligns with the view that the Gospels understood as a allegorical political theology, where the imaginary mythical character of Son of God “Jesus” represents, not a literal historical figure but a narrative device or archetype for deeper sociopolitical critique—especially of Roman occupation and corrupt legal systems.
So if we read Luke 19:42 not as a personal lament by a mythological Son of God Jesus, but rather as a legal or prophetic indictment of Jerusalem’s Torah leadship and their collective failure to uphold mishpat (justice) and trust-based shalom, the entire tone and meaning of the text radically shifts, the Torah becomes demoted in priority – cast under the shadow of the Son of God narrative. Torah, in point of fact, and not the gospel rhetoric narrative, less about emotion and more about the oath brit alliance, the prophetic mussar which rebukes the leaders of the chosen Cohen nation for their failure, sworn at Sinai, their conscious corruption which pursues opportunistic political power over the righteousness of enforced judicial justice.
Shalom functions as a legal-communal framework, rather than merely a trick of rhetoric where mood or emotion dominates the direction taken by the blind mob masses. It reflects a system of relationships rooted in fidelity to the oath brit alliance and reciprocal trust (emunah). In that sense, shalom simply not something felt, but something upheld—a real social order built on mishpat (justice) and righteousness (tzedek), as found in the Torah and enforced by judges (shofetim) and prophets (nevi’im).
When shalom becomes translated into Greek as eirēnē, the foundational juridical content gets lost in abstraction. Eirēnē leans more toward inner tranquility or absence of conflict—passive, internal, de-prioritized obligations to pursue fair compensation to those who suffer damages. Peace reflects a word that fits into a philosophical or imperial religious context, not a oath brit alliance by and through which the Torah defines the term brit; a Sinai commitment לשמה. Greek thought, expressed in the new testament purposely neutralizes\whitwashes the legal and relational substance of Hebrew term Shalom, by absorbing Shalom into idealized peace categories. This Greek rhetoric technique then detached the gospels from historical accountability.
Greek rhetorical systems—especially sophistry and later Platonic-Christian syntheses—weaponize undefined key term peace. Such critical abstractions create semantic fog, where critical abstract terms, their most essential intent meanings. floats above the replaced Hebrew verbs with meaningless noun names. Where the writers of gospel narrative, those in power, both edits and controls this moral gospel narrative through subtle re-defined definitions. “Salvation,” “grace,” “faith,” and even “God” become perverted into malleable terms rather than precise sworn oaths which has a defined intent throughout the generations. The sworn oaths get totally whitewashed from the original T’NaCH prophetic mussar.
This Greek rhetorical shift, makes room for imperial theology, where obedience to Rome’s version of peace (Pax Romana), rebranded as the kosher spiritual obedience, and where Jerusalem’s failure isn’t legal but theological. This new testament justification for Jerusalem’s destruction consequent to the Jewish revolt in 66CE totally and completely ignores the prophetic mussar of the NaCH which warned of the destruction and exile of Judah by both the g’lut exiles caused by the Assyrian and Babylonian empires within the mussar of the T’NaCH itself.
Return the Gospel narrative to its roots of Hebrew common law jurisprudence, strip away the Greco-Roman mythologizing that turned the gospel narrative into its own separate religion, into an abstract religion of personal piety and internal peace. This new testament socio-legal drama, with its son of God figure lamenting the collapse of Jerusalem over its failure to recognize the Son of God true messiah. This gospel narrative replaces the oath sworn dedication to pursue justice within the borders of the chosen Cohen oath brit lands, replaced by a foreign idea of a passive messiah who brings peace to the Goyim people incorporated as part of the chosen Cohen people. This narrative totally ignores the teshuva made by HaShem where on Yom Kippur HaShem annulled the vow to make of Moshe’s seed the chosen Cohen poeple. Neither Babylon nor Rome destroyed Jerusalem. The failure of the chosen oath alliance brit, directly comparable to the sin of the Golden Calf, where the chosen Cohen people fail to obey the terms of the Sinai oath alliance, herein defines the basis for the destruction of Jerusalem and the g’lut exile of the Jewish people by the Assyrian, Babylonian and Roman empires. The Egyptian exile unto slavery caused by the betrayal and sale of Yosef by his jealous brothers.
WOW.
I think MOSCKERR and my nemesis should meet.
It would give the rest of us respite from the anger of religious fundamentalism and the hatred it incites
How John 13:34 perverts and justifies homosexuality
Intermarriage with the specific of Canaanites – equally applies to all Goyim who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. I bring the Book of Ezra as proof. Many early Church Fathers used John 13:34 to claim a super-sessionist “new law”, replacing the Torah’s commandments with a simplified ethic of love. Yet ironically, the very idea of loving one’s neighbor—and even one’s enemy. An utter perversion of the oath brit alliance among the chosen Cohen people who accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Ezra 9–10, post-exile, shows the seriousness of intermarriage with foreign women—because it represents a breach of kedushah and brit, meaning: spiritual allegiance and oath brit fidelity. The Church Fathers (e.g., Justin Martyr, Origen, Chrysostom) weaponized verses like John 13:34 to argue that a new “spiritual” law of love had replaced the “old legalistic” Torah—especially the halakhic boundaries that safeguarded Jewish identity and fidelity to the brit.
Jesus introduced, according to these vile animals, “Love is enough!” A Greek ideal—abstract, universal, de-politicized—divorced from the concrete legal-communal, replaced with a substitutional theology. Love, defined by Torah, defined through the Torah precedent of marriage requires that a man love his wife by acquiring title to her world to come souls. Meaning the children, the product of this union. The custom of the wife taking the “title” name of her husband, a custom practiced to this day. Based upon the precedent of the brit cut between the pieces whereby Avram, who had no children, cut a brit over the future born first born chosen Cohen generations. This concept of the chosen Cohen people understands the intent of the prohibition to marry with Goyim who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
Xtian super-sessionist theology gutted the concept of brit, which it replaced with “covenant”: Shalom became personal inner peace, rather than an oath alliance to pursue fair justice – compensation of damages inflicted by Party A to Party B among our chosen Cohen people within the borders of the oath sworn promised land.
The Xtian pervert theologians corrupted emunah unto belief in Jesus as the son of God and belief in God as a triune mystery of Monotheism. The Torah defines emunah as the righteous pursuit of justice among our oath brit peoples. The Xtian pervert theologians corrupted ‘ahavah’ unto generic love, rather than the Torah brit-bound hesed, based upon the oath brit foundation precedent of the oath which Avram cut between the pieces to therein establish for all generations the chosen Cohen people.
The Xtian pervert theologians, they knew absolutely nothing of Torah common law which stands upon the foundation of Torah precedents – both positive and negative commandments.
In doing so, the Church replaced the Torah’s vision of a holy Cohen people bound to legal, ethical, and national allegiance לשמה; with a mystical, universalized ethic that fundamentally and absolutely denies the enduring chosen-ness of Israel and the centrality of Sinai. John 13:34, obliterated the Torah common law faith to pursue justice among and between the chosen Cohen people who accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai; replaced by the Goyim “darkness” – people who reject this oath light unto the nations, like as do Arab states reject Zionism today.
The Xtian theologian perverts abhor the oath-bound brit alliance which forever discerns between emotional short term vows, from consciously making the choice to remember, from generation to generation, the oaths sworn by the Avot; whereby they cut the Torah brit, which permanently established the oath brit Cohen people. Hence the mitzva precedent of the captured woman through war. Whereby the Torah commands that she cut off all her hair and par her nails etc for no less than one month before the Israeli permitted to marry her! Why? Torah marriage cuts an oath brit alliance between man and wife; not an emotional vow which a man can easily annul, based upon the Torah precedent which permits the Father or Husband to annul the vows made by either young daughters or wives, upon first hearing their utterance!
,
John 13:34, not just evil theology, it perverts marriage unto the metaphor, its language permits homosexuality. The chosen Am segulah (treasured nation) refers directly to the Sinai first-born Cohen people. The church fathers reject to this day, the revelation of both the written Torah Constitutional law and the Oral Torah common judicial courtroom law!
These Xtian theologian perverts preferred power. Hence they slept in the same bed with the Government monarchs which ruled Xtian lands. The American and French Revolutions separated Church from State and cast these Xtian whores unto the dogs to sleep with. All agricultural based economies require slave labor, a known fact of history. This has absolutely nothing to do with the bankrupt theology of the church great whore of Babylon, which post victory of the American Civil War, its reactionary opportunism now denounces slavery as evil. All church cathedrals built through feudal slave labor.
When categories established by Torah law—male/female, Israel/goy, slave/free—eviscerated, when new testament replacement theology – which abhors Torah common law – its specific Torah abominations such as homosexuality and men and women confusion of genders and clothes. Galatians 3:28 doesn’t just dissolve the legal structure of the Torah, but opens the door to ideological chaos—Same-sex marriage (“There is no male and female”); Gender fluidity and trans ideology; Erasure of Jewish national identity (e.g. no “Jew or Greek”); Social anarchy in place of legal status (no “slave or free”). In many liberal Xtian and post-Xtian circles, Galatians 3:28 has become the banner verse for LGBTQ+ inclusion, often cited directly to undermine Torah prohibitions in Leviticus 18 and 20. Paul’s statement simply interpreted as supporting the idea that: All categories are now irrelevant in Christ.
Paul’s doctrine, and the super-sessionist theology it spawned, does not merely disagree with Torah—it declares war on Torah categories. Shalom perverted into inner peace, not the righteous pursuit of judicial justice which strives to make fair restitution of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B. His replacement theology abhors the post Golden Calf – Day of Atonement – where HaShem first revealed the revelation of the Oral Torah – which the church rejects. Galatians 3:28 simply not just heresy—but rather this Av tumah theological root begets modern moral collapse.
It dismantles the sacred distinctions that uphold holiness, family, justice, and national brit identity. It replaces Torah law with a boundaryless mysticism that justifies everything from homosexuality to gender nihilism to the erasure of Jewish nationhood.
This verse is often cited to support a universalist theology—that all human beings are one, created by God, and therefore equal and interchangeable. Viewed in the context of Paul’s theology, especially in Acts and Galatians, this verse becomes part of a larger Pauline strategy to undermine: Israel’s distinct chosen Cohen oath brit status, the chosen-ness of the Jewish people. The Torah’s territorial inheritance laws, and the culture and customs established by halaka, and the idea that only within the borders of the Promised lands to Jews possess the wisdom to keep and remember the oaths sworn by the Avot לשמה, from generation to generation.
Paul’s replacement theology perverts the oath brit alliance to that of a temporary vow, which his perverted theology attempts to annul through the new testament. The Torah establishes the vision that the nations inherit distinct national cultural and customs inheritances. Distinct languages, lands and destinies (Genesis 10-11). The essential concept of Israel’s national identity as a people relies upon and defined by the promised lands which Arab nationalism absolutely rejects. Deuteronomy 32:8 (LXX): “When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God.” Deuteronomy 7:6: “You are a people holy to Hashem… a chosen people from all the peoples on the face of the earth.” Paul’s replacement theology, like Arab hatred of Zionism which bases itself upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration wherein first Britain and later 2\3rd of all UN member states recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination within the borders of a distinct Middle Eastern nation.
His replacement theology abomination of shared human origin which collapses national distinctions cultures and customs, like modern Arab racist nationalism rejects Jewish national sanctity. Paul’s Acts 17:26 (universal origin) with Galatians 3:28 (category collapse) replacement theology destroys the chosen Cohen people of Israel; dissolves the laws of inheritance and land; undermines the Oral Torah halakhic requirements concerning intermarriage with Goyim and promotes modern Wokeism that emphasize awareness of social injustices and systemic inequalities, particularly related to race and identity. It is often viewed critically by some as being overly doctrinaire or insincere in its approach to social issues. Acts 17:26 is the philosophical foundation for Christian universalism.
It sounds innocent—but in Pauline context, it’s a soft prelude to the hard abolition of Israel’s unique brit. It paves the way for the erasure of identity, the rejection of Oral Torah Talmudic common law judicial lateral courts.
Paul’s 1 Corinthians 7:39 (KJV): Formula: “Only in the Lord” — Coded Super-sessionist Halakhah? Paul doesn’t outright reject the binding nature of marriage—but it’s loaded with subtle replacement theology logic. Torah marriage flatly not just a temporary transitional vow–but rather an oath brit, contractual alliance with family generations and national implications. Governed by halakhic precedent, rooted in Exodus 22, Deuteronomy 24, and the Oral Torah. Validated by witnesses, contract (ketubah), and understood as part of a nation’s framework of kedushah and inheritance. Paul substitutes this with a subjective spiritual criterion: his “Only in the Lord.”, directly implies – Marry a fellow believer in Christ. It’s not about cutting an oath brit alliance—rather replaced by a shared belief in Xtian faith that declares Jesus as God. This “Only in the Lord” phrase, exist as the key super-sessionist pivot of Pauling propaganda. It nullifies the Torah -brit based marital framework model, replaces halakhic structure with doctrinal allegiance to the church abomination. And renders Torah marital law as obsolete for “believers”.
It detaches marriage from the promised land, nation, and halackhic authority. Sets the foundation for spiritual intermarriage theology – a direct violation of Torah common law; leading to full Goyim-Xtian identity formation apart from Israel. If one can marry “in the Lord”, then one need not marry “in the nation”. If faith in the belief of Jesus as God replaces Israel as the chosen Cohen nation, then the new covenant has replaced the oath brit cut between the pieces with Avram.
Paul’s “Only in the Lord” is not a neutral phrase. It functions as a Trojan horse for an entire redefinition of marriage: no longer a national covenant rooted in generational Torah obligations, but a private, spiritualized union under Church doctrine.
Xtianity, especially in its Pauline and post-Constantinian forms, intentionally dissolves ethnic, legal, and national distinctions. This is central to its theology. Galatians 3:28 – “There is neither Jew nor Greek… male and female… all are one in Christ.” This replacement theology erased halakhic distinctions, promotes spiritual unity over ethnic/national differences. Recasts marriage as a personal vow like sacrament, which replaces the oath sworn to remember dedication which any and all brit alliances fundamentally requires.
Liberal Protestant thoughts concerning marriage emphasize: romantic love and personal choice; Xtian values of inclusivity; detachment from ancestry, tribe, nation, or land. The Torah oath NOT vow, brit relationship cut between man and wife binds Jews to Torah Constitutional Law, tohorat ha’beit requirements for the woman to visit a mikveh prior to sexual activity; and the standards of keeping tohor & tuma distinctions like kosher foods etc. A man commits that he will educate his future born children in the oath brit faith – not to worship other Gods through intermarriage and assimilation which embraces Goyim cultures and customs.
Xtianity’s doctrine of spiritual unity and its deconstruction of Torah-based national distinctions directly laid the groundwork for both the theological legitimation and cultural normalization of interracial marriage. It treats distinctions—whether between Israel and the nations, or male and female—as obstacles to spiritual truth, not as sacred boundaries tied to divine law and oath brit consciously remembered dedications passed down from generation to generations just as DNA. From Augustine to modern liberal Protestants, modern issues like Wokeism and identity dissolution directly consequential to the Pauline doctrines of utter abomination.
Mosckerr, write until you expire. Superstition ruins, kills, depraves, corrupts, stupidifies, maddens, cheats, perverts. There is no god, no promised land, no chosen race, no excuse for murder, theft, crime. All this is lying shit. All this fraud, fiction, fantasy, festering filth must END, for us all.
If you are a criminal terrorist then writing stupid may persuade some that you are simply deranged and mentally retarded.
It hides the main game which romps on with thieving and genocide.
4th Day of the Omer, the dedication to remove the חמץ of Av tuma avoda zarah from within the tuma Yatzir Ha’Ra within our hearts. How new testament Paul’s – Hebrews 9: 6-12 duplicates the Sin of the Golden Calf
HaShem is not a man that He should lie (Numbers 23:19). The brit is not a metaphor. It is an oath-bound alliance, sealed with the Nefesh soul contained within living blood, upheld by divine t’shuva, and renewed in every korban offered by the sons of Aaron. To cancel that brit amounts to the denial of the character of HaShem Himself; to replace Moshe Rabbeinu with a foreign mediator, ultimately defines the Sin of the Golden Calf and Hebrews 9: 6-10 which repeats the sin of the Calf—not just in deed, but in theology.
Hebrews 9:6–10, traditionally read in Xtian theology as a critique of the korbanot system—framing it as ineffective, obsolete, and merely symbolic. In this interpretation, the daily offerings and Yom Kippur rituals, reduced to shadows, paving the way for a universalized, spiritual priesthood centered on Christ. This reading not only distorts the purpose of korbanot—it severs them from the oath brit framework that defines Israel’s unique Chosen Cohen identity. The Pauline religious rhetoric restricts korbanot relegated to making a barbeque unto Heaven.
The Pauline frameworks of guilt and substitution (e.g., Hebrews 9:12: “not by the blood of goats and calves, but by His own blood…”). This substitute theology expressed in Hebrews ignores HaShem’s own t’shuva which defines the k’vanna of every Yom Kippur. Paul’s Av tuma religious rhetoric replaced his Original Sin guilt and repentance thesis of the fall of Adam, which requires the Jesus resurrection from the dead to atone for the guilt of the Original Sin made by Adam. Yom Kippur testifies to the oath brit faithfulness of HaShem together with His chosen Cohen People. HaShem not a Man that he should lie. The Pauline Hebrews 9:10 seeks to superimpose a Church Christ-centered priesthood – effectively canceling Israel’s oath brit Cohen status established at the brit cut between the pieces; where Christ replaces Israel as the holy Moshiach.
The Golden Calf originally reflects this av tuma theme of substitute theology, wherein the ערב רב of Israel demanded to make the Golden Calf a visible mediator to replace Moshe. Both the sin of the Golden Calf and Hebrews 9:6-10 seek to install an abstract, foreign model of nearness. Thus Hebrews 9 attempts to repackage the Divine Cohen services which eternally dedicate the Cohen House of Moshiach into the image of this new replacement foreign God Jesus mediator.
Torah brit faith, simply not metaphor as the book of Hebrews pretends. Rather this oath-bound alliance, sealed with the nefesh—the soul contained within the living blood collected from the cut throat of a korban animal whose beating heart pumps this living blood, thrown upon the altar. Israel swears an oath which requires שם ומלכות\blowing the Divine Spirit Name from within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart together with a dedicated Oral Torah Horev revelation middah/attribute, designated and sanctified to adjust how a Jew socially interacts with his people in the future—upheld not by guilt or appeasement, but by the Divine t’shuva of loyalty itself, as expressed every Yom Kippur; every Shabbat Jews remember the tohor time oriented commandment which forever distinguishes the difference between מלאכה from עבודה.
This Shabbat rededication of the righteous pursuit of justice, as expressed through every korban dedicated, herein serves as the foundation of the mitzva of Moshiach, by the sons of Aaron whom Moshe originally anointed with oil. Just as the sons of Aaron anoint all korbanot dedicated upon the altar with oil. This anointing dedication through oil, it affirms the consecrated role of Am Yisrael as HaShem’s chosen Cohen nation, the Moshiach in all generations. To annul this oath brit utterly profanes the halachot of Shevuot. Such av tuma behavior simply denies the very character of the Chosen Cohen nation and its avodat HaShem through all generations as the anointed Moshiach. To replace Moshe Rabbeinu—the appointed lawgiver and oath brit mediator—with a foreign figure – not a kosher innovation. Rather it exposes the tuma of repeating the sin of the Golden Calf, not just in deed but in theology.
Sigh, moskerr (real or otherwise) is just another religious fanatic and easily ignored.
I’m all for free speech… up to a certain limit, a limbo bar if you will, below which certain elements of ‘free speech’ simply become intolerable. The poster, mosckerr, seems to be a bot, a glyph spouting AI generated nonsense. Does The AIMN tolerate this rubbish, or is there a natural limit to its tolerance?
Wow. I see your point.
I might put a stop to it.
Roswell,
After reading “I see your point.” all I can think of is Hooligan’s Island
Richie:
I see your point.
Eddie:
Why? Have my trousers fallen down? No, they’re up! I can see they’re up! Oh, I see your point!
Richie:
Why? Have my trousers fallen down? No, they’re up! I can see they’re up! Oh, I see your point!
Eddie:
Why? Have my trousers fallen down? No, they’re up! I can see they’re up! Oh, I see your point!
Richie:
Why? Have my trousers fallen down?
Eddie:
Help! Rich! We’re stuck in a sort of nob gag Bermuda Triangle!
Richie:
Quick! Change routine! Change routine!
I also agree with Canguro about mosckserr.