By Denis Hay
Australia’s defence strategy. Australia faces a pivotal choice: continue escalating military spending or embrace a peace-first strategy. Discover how investing in peace can redefine national security.
In the heart of Brisbane, an 83-year-old social justice advocate reflects on Australia’s shifting landscape. The nation’s priorities have shifted from an era when public services thrived to one dominated by neoliberal policies. As Australia stands at the precipice of another crucial decision after the 2025 election, the question arises: Should we continue down the path of militarisation or pivot towards peace?
Following World War II, Australia maintained a modest defence budget, prioritising regional stability and internal development. However, recent decades have seen a surge in military expenditures. The 2024-25 budget gave approximately $55.7 billion to defence, with projections reaching $100 billion by 2033-34. This escalation reflects a shift towards a more aggressive defence posture, influenced by global alliances and perceived threats.
While bolstering defence capabilities is often justified by national security concerns, it’s essential to consider the opportunity costs:
• Economic Trade-offs: Funds for military projects, such as the estimated $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal, could be invested in healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
• Social Implications: An increased military focus can lead to the erosion of civil liberties and the normalisation of surveillance.
• Environmental Impact: Military activities contribute to environmental degradation, from land use for training to the carbon footprint of operations.
The AUKUS pact, involving Australia, the UK, and the US, aims to enhance security through shared military technology and nuclear-powered submarines. While proponents argue it strengthens defence, critics highlight potential pitfalls:
• Sovereignty Concerns: Dependence on foreign technology and training may compromise Australia’s autonomy.
• Escalation Risks: Aligning closely with US military strategies could entangle Australia in conflicts unrelated to its national interests.
Redirecting focus from militarisation to peace building offers numerous benefits:
• Diplomatic Engagement: Strengthening ties with neighbouring countries through diplomacy can enhance regional stability.
• Economic Development: Investing in social programs can address root causes of insecurity, such as poverty and inequality.
• Global Reputation: Positioning Australia as a peace-promoting nation can elevate its standing on the international stage.
• Costa Rica: In 1949, Costa Rica abolished its military, redirecting funds to education and healthcare. This decision has contributed to its reputation as one of Latin America’s most stable and peaceful countries.
• Finland: Maintaining a policy of neutrality during the Cold War, Finland, historically known for its neutrality, became a NATO member in 2023. However, for decades, it served as a powerful example of how smaller nations can prioritise diplomacy and avoid entanglement in great power conflicts.
Australia’s control over its currency offers unique opportunities:
• Monetary Flexibility: The government can distribute funds to peace-building initiatives without the constraints faced by countries without sovereign currencies.
• Economic Stimulus: Investing in domestic programs can stimulate the economy, create jobs, and promote growth.
Embracing a peace-first approach can reshape Australia’s national identity:
• Cultural Shift: Promoting values of cooperation and diplomacy over aggression.
• Youth Engagement: Inspiring younger generations to value and pursue careers in diplomacy, social work, and international development.
1. Conduct a Comprehensive Defence Review: Assess current military expenditures and their alignment with national interests.
2. Increase Funding for Diplomacy: Strengthen the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to enhance diplomatic efforts.
3. Promote Regional Cooperation: Engage in multilateral initiatives focusing on peace and development in the Asia-Pacific region.
4. Invest in Social Programs: Address domestic issues that can lead to insecurity, such as unemployment and lack of education.
Public participation is crucial in steering national priorities:
• Advocacy: Citizens can lobby for policies prioritising peace and social welfare.
• Education: Raising awareness about the benefits of a peace-oriented approach can shift public opinion.
• Community Initiatives: Grassroots movements can implement local programs promoting social cohesion and conflict resolution.
Q: Isn’t military spending essential for national security?
A: While defence is essential, overemphasising military solutions can neglect other critical security aspects, such as economic stability and social cohesion.
Q: How can Australia ensure safety without a strong military?
A: By investing in diplomacy, regional partnerships, and addressing domestic issues that can lead to insecurity, Australia can support safety without excessive militarisation.
Q: Is redirecting funds from Australia’s defence strategy to social programs economically practical?
A: Yes. Australia’s monetary sovereignty allows for flexible resource allocation to areas that promote long-term stability and growth.
Australia’s defence strategy stands at a pivotal juncture. The choices made today will shape the nation’s future. By prioritising peace, diplomacy, and social investment, Australia can redefine its role on the global stage and ensure a secure, prosperous future for all its citizens.
What do you believe about Australia’s defence strategy? Will it truly keep Australia safe through military alliances and weapons, or diplomacy, regional cooperation, and investment in our people?
Albanese’s Embracing the Real Thing
If you found this article insightful, explore more on political reform and Australia’s monetary sovereignty at Social Justice Australia.
Share this article with your community to help drive the conversation toward a more just and equal society.
Click on our “Reader Feedback”. Please let us know how our content has inspired you. Submit your testimonial and help shape the conversation today!
Curious what others think? Please read what our readers are saying on our Reader Testimonials page.
Additionally, leave a comment about this article below.
If you value our work, please leave a quick Google Review here and help others discover us.
Social Justice Australia is committed to delivering independent, in-depth analysis of critical issues affecting Australians. Unlike corporate-backed media, we rely on our readers to sustain this platform.
If you find value in our content, consider making a small donation to help cover the costs of hosting, maintenance, and continued research. No matter how small, every contribution makes a real difference in keeping this site accessible and ad-free.
💡 Your support helps:
✅ Keep this website running without corporate influence
✅ Fund research and publishing of articles that challenge the status quo
✅ Expand awareness of policies that affect everyday Australians
💰 A one-time or monthly donation ensures Social Justice Australia stays a strong, independent voice.
If you believe in the power of independent voices to inform and inspire change, please consider supporting Social Justice Australia today. Even a small contribution helps us stay independent and continue delivering high-quality analysis on the issues that matter most.
I am deeply grateful for your support and for standing with us in this vital movement for truth and justice.
Thank you for being part of this movement for change. Your support is truly appreciated!
If you value our work, please leave a quick Google Review here and help others discover us.
This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
By James Moore There are four madmen presently threatening the safety of every human…
Michael Springer’s debut novel, The Flower Bed, is an ambitious and emotionally charged thriller that…
Monash University Media Release The US has joined the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran,…
Here’s a deep-dive, forensic-style analysis that contextualises Trump’s most recent claims, the intelligence community’s contradictions,…
By Walt Zlotow Director of Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard sure caved quickly ahead of Trump’s…
⚖️ 1. Conflating Criticism of Israel with Antisemitism Criticising Israel’s military and political actions -…
View Comments
Albanese could start by getting rid of Marles, the single biggest handicap in the government.
It won't happen , because "factions".
And Defence is a gigantic bucket of corrupt and incompetent shit,fully owned subsidiary of the MIC.
Yeah, what Harry said.