Categories: AIM Extra

Gender Stunts in Space: Blue Origin’s Female Celebrity Envoys

Indulgent, vain and profligate, the all-female venture into space on the self-piloted New Shepard (NS-31) operated by Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin was space capitalism and celebrity shallowness on full show, masquerading as profound, moving and useful.  

The crew consisted of bioastronautics research scientist and civil rights activist Amanda Nguyen, CBS Mornings co-host Gayle King, pop entertainer Katy Perry, film producer Kerianne Flynn, former NASA scientist and entrepreneur Aisha Bowe and Lauren Sánchez, fiancée of Jeff Bezos. The journey took 11 minutes and reached the Kármán line at approximately 96 kilometres above the earth.

Blue Origin had advertised the enterprise as an incentive to draw girls to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). It also shamelessly played on the background of some of the crew, with Nguyen promoted as “the first Vietnamese and south-east Asian female astronaut” whose presence would “highlight science as a tool for peace” and also project a potent “symbol of reconciliation between the US and Vietnam.”

Phil Joyce, Senior Vice President of New Shepard, thought it a “privilege to witness this crew of trailblazers depart the capsule today.” Each woman was “a storyteller” who would “use their voices – individually and together – to channel their life-changing experience today into creating lasting impact that will inspire people across our planet for generations.”

What was more accurately on show were celebrity space marketers on an expensive jaunt, showing us all that women can play the space capitalism game as well, albeit as the suborbital version of a catwalk or fashion show. Far from pushing some variant of feminism in the frontier of space, with scientific rewards for girls the world over, we got the eclipsing, if not a wholesale junking, of female astronauts and their monumental expertise.

It hardly compared, at any stretch or by any quantum of measure, with the achievement of Russian cosmonaut, Valentina Tereshkova, who piloted a Vostok 6 into earth’s orbit lasting 70 hours over six decades prior. To have Sánchez claiming to be “so proud of this crew”, tears cued for effect, gave the impression that they had shown technical expertise and skill when neither was required. It was far better to have deep pockets fronting the appropriate deposit, along with the necessary safe return, over which they had virtually no control over.

Dr Kai-Uwe Schrogl, special advisor for political affairs at the European Space Agency, offered a necessarily cold corrective. “A celebrity isn’t an envoy of humankind – they go into space for their own reasons,” he told BBC News. “These flights are significant and exciting, but I think maybe they can also be a source of frustration for space scientists.” How silly of those scientists, who regard space flight as an extension of “science, knowledge and the interests of humanity.”

The Guardian was also awake to the motivations of the Bezos project. “The pseudo progressiveness of this celebrity space mission, coupled with Bezos’s conduct in his other businesses, should mean we are under no illusion what purpose these flights serve.” With Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic and Elon Musk’s SpaceX, the space tourism market, marked by its bratty oligarchs, is becoming competitive. In an effort to corner the market, attractive gimmicks are in high demand.  

The cringingly superficial nature of the exercise was evident in various comments on the fashion aspect of the suits worn by the crew. Here was branding, and the sort that could be taken to space. As Sánchez stated: “Usually, you know, these suits are made for a man. Then they get tailored to fit a woman. I think the suits are elegant, but they also bring a little spice to space.” Blue Origin had capitalised on NASA’s own failings in 2019, which saw the abandoning of an all-female spacewalk for lacking appropriately fitting spacesuits.

On their return, the female cast performed their contractual undertakings to bore the press with deadly clichés and meaningless observations, reducing space travel to an exercise for the trivial. “Earth looked so quiet,” remarked Sánchez. “It was quiet, but really alive.” King, after getting on her knees to kiss the earth, merely wanted “to have a moment with the ground, just appreciate the ground for just a second.” (Surely she has had longer than that.) Perry, on her return after singing What a Wonderful World during the trip, overflowed with inanities. She felt “super connected to life”, as well as being “so connected to love.”

On the ground were other celebrities, delighted to offer their cliché-clotted thoughts. “I didn’t realise how emotional it would be, it’s hard to explain,” reflected Khloé Kardashian. “I have all this adrenaline and I’m just standing here.” From a family of celebrities that merely exist as celebrities and nothing else, she had some advice: “Dream big, wish for the stars – and one day, you could maybe be amongst them.”

Amanda Hess, reflecting on the mission in The New York Times, tried to put her finger on what it all meant. “The message is that a little girl can grow up to be whatever she wishes: a rocket scientist or a pop star, a television journalist or a billionaire’s fiancée who is empowered to pursue her various ambitions and whims in the face of tremendous costs.” Just not an astronaut.

 

Dear reader, we need your support

Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.

One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.

With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.

Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

 

 

Dr Binoy Kampmark

Dr Binoy Kampmark is a senior lecturer in the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University. He was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, University of Cambridge. He is a contributing editor to CounterPunch and can be followed on Twitter at @bkampmark.

View Comments

  • What is the difference between a house of ill fame and this rocket of vain dames? Vanityloaded vomitous vacuous vulturing, when humanity needs to fight and win over pollution, degradation, plagues, poxes, misery.., not wangwobbling waste and futility.

  • Thank goodness, someone has seen through the spin! Good on you, Binoy Kampmark, for elegantly skewering all this drivel about glamourous multicultural celebrities in glamourous suits doing the feminist thing for space travel. I don't mind these celebrities pushing their own interest in this way - each is just doing her job- which is "being a celebrity".
    But the techbillionaires are behind this, the space, the nuclear, the technocratic apostles of STEM are pursuing their desperate goal, of persuading women that high-tech is a feminist glory - while quietly downgrading the "soft sciences", like biology and ecology, and for heaven's sake let's forget the humanities studies, like history and sociology.
    Another reality is that women are more susceptible to cancer and other diseases caused by ionising radiation, than men are. Much research goes into the question of the effects of space radiation. Scientific papers all conclude that "more research needs to be done" - with the implied message being "no conclusive evidence of increased risk to women - so all is OK"
    Meanwhile NASA's policy is still "NASA follows radiation exposure recommendations established by the National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements. The exposure limits for women are about 20 percent lower compared to men "largely due to additional cancer risk for woman from breast, ovarian, and uterine cancers" . Sounds like while there are health risks for male astronauts, the risks for women are greater.

  • Cringeworthy. Cringe at this heap of tat. What's next with this vacuous bunch of empty headed people? "Married in Space", "Love at First Flight"? Good grief!

  • Thank goodness these women are OK and nothing untoward occurred during take-off or landing. Had there been a tragic accident, the men behind this stunt could have been criminally liable.

  • Why did they not select girls from poor schools who are busting their guts to achieve an education as worthy of taking the trip in low orbit space?
    That might make a difference for women.

Recent Posts

Peter Dutton’s Playbook: Say One Thing, Do Another

Peter Dutton has faced accusations of hypocrisy, particularly in light of his recent actions involving…

1 hour ago

Who Controls Our Money? The Truth Behind Bank Debt

By Denis Hay   Description Who controls our money? Discover how private banks create debt-based…

6 hours ago

Flexible and Sly: Indonesian Defence Policy, Russia and Australian Anxiety

Island states tend to be anxious political entities. Encircled by water, seemingly defended by natural…

8 hours ago

A Duty of Care

By John Steley An event is in the planning, to be held over several days…

9 hours ago

Poll Position to Political Peril: The Unraveling of Peter Dutton’s Campaign

In late 2024, Peter Dutton was riding high, with polls signaling a potential prime ministerial…

13 hours ago

Sudan crisis marks grim anniversary as Plan International condemns civilian and aid worker deaths

Plan International Australia Media Release Dozens of people have been killed in Zamzam camp in…

1 day ago