By Denis Hay
Environmental accountability. Discover actionable steps to hold politicians accountable for biodiversity loss and ecological destruction. Learn how Australia can lead sustainably.
Biodiversity, the rich variety of life on Earth, is threatened like never before. Iconic images – a stranded polar bear, a deforested Amazon, bleached coral reefs – paint a grim picture. Yet, another alarming contributor is hiding in plain sight: industrial agriculture, fuelled by political and corporate interests.
This article explores how politicians and powerful entities drive environmental destruction and provides actionable solutions for holding them accountable.
Biodiversity encompasses the interconnected web of life – ecosystem diversity, species diversity, and genetic diversity. Ecosystem diversity refers to the variety of habitats that support life, from forests and wetlands to oceans and grasslands.
Species diversity highlights the importance of supporting many animals, plants, and microorganisms.
Genetic diversity ensures resilience within species, allowing them to adapt to changing conditions.
For example, pollinators like bees are vital for food security, fertilising crops that feed billions. Without biodiversity, ecosystems lose their stability, and humanity faces heightened food insecurity risks and climate vulnerability.
According to the World Wildlife Fund, wildlife populations have declined by 73% in just 50 years. Industrial agriculture is a significant contributor, driven by converting diverse ecosystems into monoculture farms, prioritising high-yield crops over ecological health.
Deforestation for soy plantations, palm oil, and livestock feed is destroying habitats at an unprecedented rate. Additionally, chemical pesticides and fertilisers heavily pollute waterways, killing aquatic life and reducing soil fertility.
These trends propel us toward a sixth mass extinction, threatening wildlife and the resource’s humanity depends on for survival.
Modern farming prioritises mass production over sustainability. Monocultures dominate agricultural landscapes, focusing on growing a single crop type, such as corn, wheat, or soy.
This approach reduces genetic diversity, leaving crops vulnerable to pests and diseases, needing heavy chemical use. Soil degradation is another consequence, as the overapplication of synthetic fertilisers depletes organic matter and beneficial microorganisms, turning fertile land into barren deserts.
Furthermore, pesticides harm non-target species, including pollinators essential for crop reproduction. These destructive practices thrive under political subsidies, incentivising large-scale industrial farming while ignoring environmental costs.
Governments worldwide subsidise harmful industries, including fossil fuels and industrial agriculture, rather than invest in regenerative practices. Policies often prioritise short-term economic growth over long-term ecological stability.
For instance, trade agreements and intellectual property laws enable corporations to patent genetically modified seeds, reducing farmers’ autonomy. This patent system forces farmers to buy expensive seeds annually, pushing them into debt and fostering dependence on multinational corporations.
Meanwhile, public funds are funnelled into subsidies for chemical-intensive farming, worsening environmental degradation. Agribusiness’s political lobbying further entrenches this cycle, making reform difficult.
• Regulation: Introduce stricter laws to prevent deforestation and habitat destruction.
• Oversight: Set up independent environmental monitoring bodies with enforcement powers.
• Transparency: Mandate disclosure of corporate activities affecting biodiversity.
• Food Sovereignty: Promote local farming and agroecology, which embrace Indigenous practices and biodiversity.
• Community-Led Conservation: Empower local groups to manage natural resources sustainably.
• Citizens’ Assemblies: Involve communities in shaping environmental policies.
• Political Accountability: Enforce penalties for political leaders who support environmentally destructive policies.
Agroecology emphasises diverse farming systems that mimic natural ecosystems. This method involves intercropping, agroforestry, and crop rotation to restore ecological balance.
For example, planting legumes alongside grains replenishes soil nitrogen, reducing the need for synthetic fertilisers. Composting organic matter enhances soil health, while integrated pest management reduces reliance on chemical pesticides.
Regenerative agriculture builds on these principles by sequestering carbon in the soil, mitigating climate change while increasing crop yields. By prioritising soil health, biodiversity, and natural cycles, these approaches offer a sustainable alternative to industrial farming.
Local food systems reduce dependence on global supply chains, cutting emissions and improving resilience against disruptions. Farmers markets and community-supported agriculture (CSA) models connect consumers directly with local producers, ensuring fresh, diverse, and nutritious food.
Urban farming initiatives, such as rooftop gardens and hydroponics, efficiently use limited space, promoting food security in densely populated areas. By valuing regional agricultural knowledge and seasonal production, local systems support biodiversity and reduce the environmental footprint of food transportation.
• Support Organisations: Join movements like Navdanya or Via Campesina that advocate for sustainable agriculture.
• Raise Awareness: Use social media to highlight biodiversity loss and corporate overreach.
• Avoid foods grown with harmful chemicals or imported through exploitative systems.
• Support ethical brands and local farmers committed to sustainable practices.
• Elect leaders who prioritise environmental sustainability.
• Demand reforms in political financing to reduce corporate influence.
Citizens can pursue class actions against politicians and corporations responsible for environmental destruction. These lawsuits can hold entities accountable for violating environmental laws or contributing to climate change.
For example, successful cases in other countries have compelled governments to take more decisive climate action or penalise corporations for pollution. While challenging, class actions in Australia are feasible with proper legal representation and grassroots support. Such actions can set precedents and strongly message leaders and businesses that environmental negligence will not go unpunished.
Environmental destruction is not inevitable. We can protect biodiversity and ensure a sustainable future by holding politicians and corporations accountable, enforcing stricter environmental laws, and adopting regenerative agricultural practices. Citizens, too, have a critical role in driving change through advocacy, informed choices, and voting for sustainable policies.
Biodiversity ensures ecosystem stability, supports food security, and provides critical resources such as medicine. Diverse ecosystems are more resilient to changes and disruptions, safeguarding human and environmental health.
Industrial agriculture prioritises monocultures, depletes soil health, and uses chemical fertilisers and pesticides that destroy habitats and harm non-target species like pollinators and aquatic life.
Food sovereignty is the right of people to access nutritious and culturally appropriate food produced sustainably. It prioritises local farming and biodiversity, reducing dependency on harmful industrial agriculture systems.
• Support local and sustainable farming practices.
• Reduce consumption of products linked to deforestation and habitat destruction.
• Advocate for stricter environmental policies and vote for leaders who prioritise sustainability.
Demand transparency, enforce penalties for harmful policies, support grassroots movements, and use your vote to elect environmentally conscious leaders.
What actions will you take to hold leaders accountable for protecting biodiversity? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
If you found this article insightful, explore political reform and Australia’s monetary sovereignty on Social Justice Australia.
Share this article with your community to help drive the conversation toward a more just and equal society.
Click on our “Reader Feedback” menu. Please let us know how our content has inspired you. Submit your testimonial and help shape the conversation today! Additionally, leave a comment about this article below.
Social Justice Australia is committed to delivering independent, in-depth analysis of critical issues affecting Australians. Unlike corporate-backed media, we rely on our readers to sustain this platform.
If you find value in our content, consider making a small donation to help cover the costs of hosting, maintenance, and continued research. No matter how small, every contribution makes a real difference in keeping this site accessible and ad-free.
💡 Your support helps:
✅ Keep this website running without corporate influence
✅ Fund research and publishing of articles that challenge the status quo
✅ Expand awareness of policies that affect everyday Australians
💰 A one-time or monthly donation ensures Social Justice Australia stays a strong, independent voice.
Thank you for being part of this movement for change. Your support is truly appreciated!
There’s a biodiversity crisis and our food system is driving it
How to build resilience to #bushfires with regenerative agriculture:
More Regenerative Agriculture:
An Introduction to Regenerative Agriculture
This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia.
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
Know your candidates: An objective guide Here’s an overview of key candidates for the 2025…
There have been times when the tactics of the Liberal Party in this election campaign…
By Callen Sorensen Karklis Planning for the 2032 Brisbane Olympics is actively progressing, involving collaboration…
It's a tale of two launches, each with its distinct flavour. One exudes a sense…
Recent rumours have sparked intense debate about the conditions attached to potential U.S.-UK trade negotiations,…
Australians should remember, as the election approaches, that Tim Wilson was shortlisted in 2015 for…
View Comments
Disagree as in one's opinion this a symptom of fossil fuel influence over generations, including greenwashing, faux science, PR and greenwashing, since the '60s; a far right libertarian trap and long game....
Not the seed, but the '70s Club of Rome was central (Big Oil knew they were heating the atmosphere), hosted by Rockefellers/Exxon, sponsored by Agnelli/Fiat and Porsche/VW to promote (at best) social science communication constructs as hard science; based on debunked Meadows' 'limits to growth'.
The latter included or led to Gaia, Daly's steady state economy, 'degrowth', Rockefeller Foundation's 'resilience', Ehrlich's 'The Population Bomb' etc.; it's now Tanton Network linked to SusPopAus and 'demographic research' of TAPRI which inform RW MSM (for a proxy white Australia policy).
In the US, Tanton Network shares donors with fossil fuel Koch Network, social-Darwinism, Project2025 and desired outcome for authoritarian autarky.... like 1930s US, Italy and Germany, Franco's Spain (inc Opus Dei), Pinochet's Chile or now Millei's Argentina?