The Department of the House of Representatives Media Release
The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics has released the final report for its reviews of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) annual reports of 2021, 2022 and 2023.
The Committee’s Chair, Dr Daniel Mulino MP, said that the report covered key issues examined by the Committee during the 47th Parliament.
Dr Mulino noted that ASIC had been subject to extensive parliamentary scrutiny over the past three years, including by other committees. ‘Similar to our colleagues on the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, the House Economics Committee asked extensive questions about ASIC’s enforcement approach,’ he said. ‘Members also probed how ASIC measures and reports on its performance, and whether it is meeting the expectations of both government and the community in fulfilling its role.’
Dr Mulino said that although the Committee acknowledged the challenges ASIC faces in triaging thousands of complaints and tip-offs annually, the Committee expects ASIC to continue its efforts to better communicate with the many Australians who reach out for help.
He said the report also discusses ASIC actions under new intervention powers granted after the Hayne Royal Commission, including step-in powers to block poorly targeted financial products. ‘The Committee was pleased to see early signs of success from ASIC’s use of the new powers, and we encourage ASIC to continue using these new tools judiciously to prevent and take action against wrongdoing,’ Dr Mulino said.
Dr Mulino said the Committee had been particularly concerned by ASIC’s reports of widespread misleading practices in the insurance industry, and urged ASIC to remain vigilant on this issue. ‘Alleged insurer misconduct was also a major theme in the Committee’s recent review of insurers’ responses to 2022 major flood claims,’ he said, ‘where we recommended significantly expanding ASIC’s data-collecting powers for the insurance industry. We were pleased to hear through these annual report reviews that ASIC supports those recommendations.’
The report also addresses ASIC’s recent work on other issues and industries, including corporate cyber security obligations, greenwashing and the ASX’s troubled CHESS settlement system upgrade.
See also: SMEs: The Forgotten Economic Force That Could Decide the Election
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
A very dry statement. Meaningless to most readers who are interested in the performance and efficacy of ASIC as a vital service to the Oz public (people and corporations). Where are the KPI’s, and what are the results and progress on restructure?
Off the back of a history of under-funding, and massive increase in duties prescribed by various govts, what is its current standing / expectations, and likewise for the future going forward.
Given the massive increase in international and transnational organized crime and avoidance of law, it appears that ASIC has been hamstrung, and there are crossover issues remaining with ATO, ACCC, APRA and AUSTRAC, and possibly with other intelligence and law agencies. What are the govt expectations and developments in these areas?
These are surely headline matters affecting the Oz economy.