Categories: AIM Extra

Does government consultation actually work?

RMIT University Media Release

A review panel examining the use of puberty blockers in gender affirming care in Queensland has been criticised for its lack of specialty expertise. So, are committees, consultations and inquiries just a matter of course – or do they serve a meaningful purpose? An RMIT expert explains.

Dr Kathryn Daley, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies says:

“The premise of consultation is that there are people who have expert views that will strengthen the quality of decisions being made.

“When this happens without appropriate experts, not only are decisions less informed, but the process of consultation is undermined.

“When there aren’t suitable experts on a committee or involved with consultation, we see a corruption of the process, which further undermines the public perception of how decisions are being made.

“Claiming that there is a working group sometimes offers politicians an opportunity to escape questioning. Any outcomes from the working group are often so far into the future that the politician escapes accountability.

“It’s quite clear that there is a campaign to prohibit the use of puberty blockers in Queensland and the composition of the review panel appears to be about creating evidence from ‘experts’ who support that agenda. When processes appear to be contrived, this erodes public trust on all political decision making.

“The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child – to which Australia is a signatory – stipulates that young people have a right to participate and be included in decisions that are being made that affect them. Yet here we are, witnessing a group of people forming decisions without the people being affected by those decisions having a seat at the table.”

Dr Kathryn Daley is Associate Director of Social Equity Research Centre and a senior lecturer at RMIT. Her work is focused on improving the wellbeing of people living on the margins, particularly children and young people.

 

Dear reader, we need your support

Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.

One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.

With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.

Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

 

AIMN Editorial

Recent Posts

Monash expert: Israel launches missile strike on Iran

Monash University Media Release Israel has launched missile strikes on Iran, including attacks on nuclear…

46 minutes ago

The United States Has Crossed the Threshold

For nearly a decade, the United States has teetered on the edge of democratic backsliding,…

6 hours ago

The Morality of Small Means: Sanctioning Israel’s Ministers

They really ought to be doing more. But in the scheme of things, the sanctioning…

10 hours ago

The 375 billion dollar blunder

It’s just my opinion, but… When then-Prime Minister Scott Morrison secretly negotiated the AUKUS pact…

18 hours ago

The source of life or the source of wealth?

The first person who, having enclosed a plot of land, took it into his head…

20 hours ago

Human Rights?

The term “genocide” emerged in 1945, crafted to encapsulate the deliberate and systematic extermination of…

23 hours ago