Image from WION Facebook page
On 26 April 1986, the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine exploded, spewing uncontrolled radiation across Europe and beyond.
Chernobyl caused massive human, environmental and economic impacts. The ongoing clean-up is set to continue for another four decades, with parts of the exclusion zone likely to remain uninhabitable for many hundreds of years.
Against the shadow of Chernobyl, Peter Dutton’s proposal to build nuclear power plants at seven sites around the country could put up to 200,000 Australians in direct danger.
Advocacy group Don’t Nuke the Climate has produced an online resource based on real world data from the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan. This detail has been transposed to Australia to help people understand the extent of nuclear contamination from a potential reactor accident.
The maps at www.nuclearplume.au show how far radioactive fallout from a Fukushima-sized accident would spread under different wind conditions from the seven sites identified for nuclear reactor by the federal Coalition. They highlight how a nuclear accident at one of the proposed reactor sites would affect nearby communities, including schools and hospitals.
Don’t Nuke the Climate is sharing this research to assist with evidence-based decision making that reduces nuclear risks and prioritises environmental responsibility and a safe future ahead of the coming federal election.
Dave Sweeney – Nuclear analyst, Australian Conservation Foundation says:
‘Australia should heed the lessons of Chernobyl and Fukushima and keep the door shut on domestic nuclear power. Nuclear isn’t just dangerous, it’s an irresponsible distraction from real climate action that makes no economic or environmental sense in Australia.’
‘Instead of the threat of radiation blowing in the wind we should be using the wind to generate clean electricity. Australia’s energy future is renewable, not radioactive.’
Dr Jim Green – Nuclear campaigner, Friends of the Earth Australia says:
‘Emergency Leaders for Climate Action recently warned that nuclear reactors would introduce significant and unnecessary risk to Australian communities and emergency responders, including firefighters already stretched by escalating climate fuelled disasters.’
‘The Coalitions nuclear push is risky and reckless. It is a high cost, high risk thought bubble, not a credible national energy policy.’
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
I'm thinking that the nuclear lobby loves the ALP even more than it loves the…
From The Australian’s newsletter: Breaking News Border Force collects illegal arrivals landed on remote northern…
By Denis Hay Description Teal Independents are restoring democracy and integrity in Australia. Learn how…
Greenpeace Media Release Greenpeace Australia Pacific has slammed Donald Trump’s support of deep sea mining…
By Walt Zlotow Some dare not call it genocide Folks following the ongoing Israeli genocide…
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton: "Sir Humphrey, please, take a seat. We must engage in a…
View Comments
Despite the Albanese's criticism of the lack of detail in Dutton's nuclear proposal both Labor and the Coalition are all-in for the purchase of 8 nuclear powered submarines. Where is the detail for the disposal of submarine based nuclear waste? It is locked up in Canberra - deliberately unavailable to the electorate for fear of voter back-lash when we find out how it is proposed to collect, transport and bury this toxic stuff. Worse still is Dutton's proposal to scatter nuclear powered generators in each state where no doubt it will be up to each state to "solve" this problem according to its' resources.