
In the annals of absurdity, 2025 has already secured its place as the year the United States declared economic war on… checks notes … coral atolls, penguin colonies, and the ghost of Alexander Hamilton’s pet parrot. Under the banner of “America First, Second, and Third – Everyone Else Gets a Bill,” the Trump administration unveiled its pièce de résistance: tariffs on every landmass outside U.S. jurisdiction, including uninhabited islands. (Take that, Tuvalu! Your 11,000 citizens and three fishing boats shall rue the day!) But while the optics of taxing seagulls and coconut crabs might seem like a satirical fever dream, the real magic trick was how this policy became the greatest wealth transfer since Robin Hood – except in reverse, and with more hairspray.
The Tariff Tantrum: A Masterclass in Distraction
Let’s dissect the genius. By imposing tariffs on every foreign entity – excluding Russia but including rocks that occasionally breach the ocean’s surface – the administration created a smokescreen thicker than a Mar-a-Lago steak well-done. Critics howled about economic illiteracy, but they missed the point. The goal wasn’t to win trade; it was to weaponise chaos. When you’re busy calculating tariffs on the Isle of Rockall (population: zero), you’re not asking who’s shorting the S&P 500.
The Stock Market Rollercoaster: From ‘Yikes’ to ‘YOLO’
Enter the stock market’s “double dip” (not the fun chip kind). Two historic crashes vaporised retirement funds, turning 401(k)s into 201(k)s. Cue panic, headlines about “the end of capitalism,” and viral videos of financial advisors sobbing into their avocado toast. But then – poof! – Trump “froze” the tariffs (a move as permanent as his tan), and markets roared back like a SpaceX rocket fueled by insider knowledge.
Coincidence? Please. This is the administration that turned “truth is stranger than fiction” into a business model. If you think the timing of those crashes and recoveries wasn’t… fortuitous… for certain well-connected individuals, I’ve got a classified Mar-a-Lago membership to sell you.
What Do You Call It? A Glossary of Euphemisms
The question posed is simple: what’s the term for a government engaging in trillion-dollar insider trading? Let’s consult the lexicon of modern kleptocracy:
- “State-Sponsored Financial Performance Art”: When economic policy is less about strategy and more about creating volatility that friends can monetise.
- “Patriotic Profit Maximisation”: Because nothing says “love of country” like liquidating Grandma’s pension to buy the dip.
- “The Mar-a-Lago Put”: A speculative bet that the government will blow up the economy, then reverse course just in time for your hedge fund to rebound.
Historians might point to the Teapot Dome scandal or the 2008 bank bailouts as precedents, but this is different. This isn’t mere corruption – it’s corruption with flair. Why settle for boring old insider trading when you can strap the entire global economy to a rollercoaster and charge admission?
The Satirical Safety Net
To avoid lawsuits (hello, Truth Social legal team!), let’s be clear: this essay is obviously a work of fiction. Any resemblance to real events is purely coincidental. Pure. Luck.
Conclusion: Capitalism’s Greatest Magic Trick
In the end, the real marvel isn’t that an administration could orchestrate such a heist – it’s that half the country would applaud it as “disruptive genius.” The lesson? When you can’t beat the market, break the market, then buy it at a discount. As the Founding Fathers surely intended.
So raise a glass to 2025: the year the invisible hand of the market gave us all the middle finger – and someone offshore made a killing betting on it.
Epilogue: For legal reasons, the author would like to note that seagulls have not yet been consulted on tariff compliance. They’re holding out for a better deal.
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
Bernie Sanders:
https://x.com/Acyn/status/1910140344437788710
The US President has prima facie manipulated financial markets and allowed some who followed his Truth Social posts to achieve personal gains by what could be considered selective insider information i.e. suggesting on Truth Social that it may be a good time to buy before announcing the 90 day wait period ?
Back in July 2024, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6–3 decision that presidents have absolute immunity for acts committed as president within their core constitutional purview and at least presumptive immunity for official acts within the outer perimeter of their official responsibility.
They also said that the President has no immunity for unofficial acts : the question is, having imposed tariffs and said that they were irremovable and seen financial markets crash as a result, has he then committed an unofficial and potentially criminal act by then granting a ninety day wait period encouraging a market bounce benefitting some of his followers on Truth Social ?
I have been saying since the issue of tariffs was first raised that Chump is purposely manipulating the markets for financial gain for himself and his rich sycophants. I was going to say mates…………but he has no mates and it does not matter who you are he will dump you like a bag of poo and set you on fire the minute he no longer needs you.
And let us not forget that DOGE already has its claws into the FTC and DOJ.
The wheels, axles, and paint have fallen off and the metal is grinding away on what’s left of the little red sanity wagon.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/11/state-department-anti-christian-bias